Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Werewolf Games (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Werewolf XLV - ROME! (Game over, post 3425) (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=58090)

Poli 04-12-2007 08:20 PM

Dang it. Poor Schmidty. :(

I fear someone is trying to try and make me look bad.

Poli 04-12-2007 08:20 PM

WOW. Don't tell me one again.

Abe Sargent 04-12-2007 08:21 PM

Barkeep?

st.cronin 04-12-2007 08:21 PM

The following Senators are now the Consuls of Rome:

Hoopus Guyus
Narcizus Lispus

The new Tribune of the Plebs is:
Antus Meisterus

The best lawyer in Rome is:
Ardentus Enthusiastus

And the second best lawyer in Rome is:
Neonus Chaosus


updated financial standings coming

saldana 04-12-2007 08:21 PM

well....that was possibly the most confusing game i have ever played...good luck Rome.

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 08:21 PM

This is a bad joke, right? One again?

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana (Post 1441136)
well....that was possibly the most confusing game i have ever played...good luck Rome.


You didn't play Path's game, right? Just checking ...

Poli 04-12-2007 08:23 PM

ITC was loyal to the Senate, fellas. :(

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 08:23 PM

So clearly we didn't lock up the 2nd killer - frustrating results.

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441137)
This is a bad joke, right? One again?



WOW.

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:25 PM

Barkeep?

Autumn 04-12-2007 08:26 PM

You have got to be kidding me.

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:26 PM

After all the shit he gave me last night when I tried my hardest to do the right thing?!?! And he doesn't get an arrest in?

Holy cow.

Antmeister 04-12-2007 08:27 PM

Ummmmm.....what just happened?

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:28 PM

Well...... There is a possible explanation.

Poli 04-12-2007 08:28 PM

I guess there's little question left about barkeep.

st.cronin 04-12-2007 08:28 PM

The richest men in Rome are:

Abeus Anxietus
Dodeus Erchickus
Kayus Whitus

These men are known to be extremely wealthy:

Coffeeus Yakus Warlordus
Ironus Headus
Passus Caglius
Pathus Twelvus
Peregrineus Barbarus

These men are known to be moderately wealthy:

Barkeepus Valerius Fortynineus
Autumnus Leavus
Antus Meisterus
Chiefus Rumus
Narcizus Lispus
Lonestarus Girlus

The following (remaining) Senators are of normal wealth for the Senatorial class:

Ardentus Enthusiastus
Daddyus Torgous
Grammus Atticus
Hoopus Guyus
Mustangus Sallus
Neonus Chaosus
Tyrus Ithus

Autumn 04-12-2007 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1441132)
Dang it. Poor Schmidty. :(

I fear someone is trying to try and make me look bad.


It seems to be working :-(

I'd like to hear about who won services and how they used them, right away. We obviously lost hte killer, and we at least missed with the bodyguards.

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:30 PM

Ironhead - did you have the sex slaves sent to you today? Or was that yesterday?

Ironhead 04-12-2007 08:30 PM

As suggested in the tread I bid on and won the services of Balbus Senna. I need a reality check here - I don't know if I am reading too much into the wording on his ability. I can use him to convince someone of the righteousness of my beliefs.

It is the word convince that kind of makes me pause. If both villagers and wolves have access to this service does that mean that whether people are good or bad they could still convince someone they are good? I know that might sound like I am a wolf and afraid to use it, but again - if I were a wolf I wouldn't even bring this up in the open.

Peregrine 04-12-2007 08:31 PM

Okay, can we arrest Barkeep today? Once maybe, in some kind of fluke, but twice, when he knew in advance who Kwhit was arresting, that's treason.

st.cronin 04-12-2007 08:32 PM

Persons selling their services in the Forum

Gallus Clarus, ex-legionnaire
Titus Ludius, ex-legionnaire
Durus Pimpus, dealer in sexual slaves
Animus Sentus, person rumored to be affiliated with the Priesthood
Furius Lucius, former warlord of Gaul, enslaved and now freed
Lexus Postus, owner of many horses
Blakus Fortunatus, owner of many horses

and of course,
Ardentus Enthusiastus
Neonus Chaosus


primer
Today you must vote on the guilt or innocence of Lonestarus Girlus. Today's deadline is 9am Saturday Morning, Eastern Time Zone.

Antmeister 04-12-2007 08:34 PM

Ok....the results just blew my mind. I don't know what to think anymore.

Autumn 04-12-2007 08:35 PM

I will put out there that I did not win any service and so did not use one yesterday. I am hoping someone loyal was able to win and use something remotely useful. Because I think we are up s*** creek, to use an ancient Roman expression.

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:35 PM

I repeat: Ironhead, when did you have the sex slaves sent to you?

Ironhead 04-12-2007 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441160)
I repeat: Ironhead, when did you have the sex slaves sent to you?


Woah, woah - chill out there buddy. You posted the question right when I was posting. Antsy about something?

Dodgerchick won the services of the sex slaves on Day 2 and sent them to me on Day 3.

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 08:42 PM

This is rediculous, we should not have one person again today.

st.cronin 04-12-2007 08:43 PM

One last note: I do not have the list of suits that will be heard on day V ready yet. I will put that up in the morning. Apologies for the inconvenience.

Poli 04-12-2007 08:45 PM

Still hoping to hear about who I should send the message to. I really don't know who to ask or what.

Autumn 04-12-2007 08:45 PM

It seems an outrageously stupid way for BArkeepus to act if he is a traitor. But unless the sex slaves can prevent an arrest, I don't know what else to think.

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 08:46 PM

So, is the consensus that Barkeepus did not jail someon? I think both Consuls listed Loneus Starus Girlus. Khus Whitus, you said that you voted to jail her and I saw the giant case announcement.

Barkeepus, what is the word? Why did you not jail anyone?

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ironhead (Post 1441154)
As suggested in the tread I bid on and won the services of Balbus Senna. I need a reality check here - I don't know if I am reading too much into the wording on his ability. I can use him to convince someone of the righteousness of my beliefs.

It is the word convince that kind of makes me pause. If both villagers and wolves have access to this service does that mean that whether people are good or bad they could still convince someone they are good? I know that might sound like I am a wolf and afraid to use it, but again - if I were a wolf I wouldn't even bring this up in the open.


I've got some insight into this, as I was visited by Balbus - Schmidty sent him to me. However, until he posted in the thread I had no idea that it was Schmidty who sent Balbus to me. And it sounded like Schmidty expected me to think that Balbus would clear Schmidty, not look at me which is what I figured was going on when I got the PM. So that was kind of weird from where I sat.

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441173)
It seems an outrageously stupid way for BArkeepus to act if he is a traitor. But unless the sex slaves can prevent an arrest, I don't know what else to think.


The sex slaves are role blockers, right?

Did anyone send the sex slaves to Barkeepus. Dodgerus Chickus didn't you say you had the sex slaves?

Autumn 04-12-2007 08:48 PM

I'm not sure, AE. Given the spot you've been in, I'd want you to use it to make your loyalty obvious. My assumption has been that people have used it to forward hte PM with their role to people to prove thier role? Is that right? If so, perhaps you could do so to Kayus Whitus, who is the only one of us I think who has been supposedly scanned. I'm not sure what other use it has unless you have some info you dno't want to share publicly.

Peregrine 04-12-2007 08:48 PM

Remember that earlier Barkeep posted his list of candidates and at that time I specifically told him that Kwhit was already arresting Lonestargirl, and he responded. There's no way he didn't know that.

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ironhead (Post 1441163)
Woah, woah - chill out there buddy. You posted the question right when I was posting. Antsy about something?

Dodgerchick won the services of the sex slaves on Day 2 and sent them to me on Day 3.



Wasn't being combative (although it probably did sound that way). Just wanted it to be seen. That's all.

Antmeister 04-12-2007 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1441164)
This is rediculous, we should not have one person again today.


How come when I complained about this, I was being paranoid and suspicious and now all of the sudden it becomes frickin clear. This one person vote has been bothering me for a while.

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 08:49 PM

I'm very interested to hear who got the attorneys at this point.

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441180)
Remember that earlier Barkeep posted his list of candidates and at that time I specifically told him that Kwhit was already arresting Lonestargirl, and he responded. There's no way he didn't know that.


Yep. That and my HUGE post about it.

I actually posted it twice. Once in normal size - the other a bit larger.

Poli 04-12-2007 08:51 PM

I assume Neon Chaos will also vouch for ITC.

Peregrine 04-12-2007 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441188)
Yep. That and my HUGE post about it.

I actually posted it twice. Once in normal size - the other a bit larger.


Right, but after my post he claimed he had missed your incredibly large post.

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antmeister (Post 1441182)
How come when I complained about this, I was being paranoid and suspicious and now all of the sudden it becomes frickin clear. This one person vote has been bothering me for a while.


I still think it would be a totally stupid move for a Tarq consul to make. That's why I'm pursuing the possibility that he was sex-slave-ified.

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441190)
Right, but after my post he claimed he had missed your incredibly large post.


Yeah. I know. That worried me at the time.

Ironhead 04-12-2007 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441176)
I've got some insight into this, as I was visited by Balbus - Schmidty sent him to me. However, until he posted in the thread I had no idea that it was Schmidty who sent Balbus to me. And it sounded like Schmidty expected me to think that Balbus would clear Schmidty, not look at me which is what I figured was going on when I got the PM. So that was kind of weird from where I sat.


Wait - wasn't that when Schmidty said he was an idiot for revealing something he shouldn't have? Are we sure Schmidty actually won the service? I am going to be gone for the next 50 - 60 minutes but I can check when I get back.

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antmeister (Post 1441182)
How come when I complained about this, I was being paranoid and suspicious and now all of the sudden it becomes frickin clear. This one person vote has been bothering me for a while.


I completely agree and I think we should post fake votes for jailing. I proposed that in the tombstone game and it didn't fly there. I don't get it, why not vote and hold the Consuls accountable if they don't follow through?

I know Peregrine and I think Autumn also agree with this theory. Is anyone else willing to caste unofficial votes for jailing to give the consuls the will of the senate?

KWhit 04-12-2007 08:54 PM

So Ironhead had the sex slaves sent to him on day 3? Meaning they were back in play today, right? So someone could have sent them to BK????

Can anyone vouch for them? Who won them yesterday?

Antmeister 04-12-2007 08:54 PM

Ok....I am really confused right now. What does the sex slaves do exactly? Does that mean you can' t post for a day or simply mean you can't use any action for a day?

Peregrine 04-12-2007 08:55 PM

If the sex slaves can stop a Consul from arresting someone then we are really screwed. I mean, I'm pretty sure there's no way we can win anyway, but that would really clinch it.

Antmeister 04-12-2007 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1441194)
I completely agree and I think we should post fake votes for jailing. I proposed that in the tombstone game and it didn't fly there. I don't get it, why not vote and hold the Consuls accountable if they don't follow through?

I know Peregrine and I think Autumn also agree with this theory. Is anyone else willing to caste unofficial votes for jailing to give the consuls the will of the senate?


What do you mean by fake votes? How does that work?

Peregrine 04-12-2007 09:00 PM

He's saying that we should cast unofficial votes on who we want to arrest, then expect the consuls to arrest them. This would give us some control back, which we sorely need, as I feel the traitors are manipulating everything, and control at least a good few of the services and roles.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.