Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Official 2008-2009 MLB Offseason Thread (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=68674)

Mr. Sparkle 11-17-2008 03:17 PM

Anybody but Pujos for NL MVP would have been a travesty.

hxxp://hotstove.mlblogs.com/archives/2008/11/reds_lose_affeldt_to_giants.html

Giants sign Jeremy Affeldt to a 2 year deal worth a reported $8 million.

SackAttack 11-17-2008 03:40 PM

Manny finishing 3rd in the voting actually sounds about right to me. He didn't deserve to win the award outright based on just two months, but he had such a dramatic impact on his new team that he did deserve to at least be part of the conversation.

Crapshoot 11-17-2008 03:44 PM

No way. Manny was amazing, but finished 13th in the league in VORP amongst hitters (again, a hell of an achievement in 1/3 of the season)- I think its fine to place him in your top 10, but the idea that he should be in the top 3 is ridiculous.

Its amazing - so far the association of nitwits known as the BBWAA hasn't fucked up an award - I have faith that they will give Morneau the MVP and continue on with their standard precedent however. :D

BishopMVP 11-17-2008 05:42 PM

Well, he did finish 4th if that's any consolation... and I'd say Brad Lidge getting 2 first-place votes (but no Cy Young votes?) is the bigger joke. Or maybe Jose Valverde and Stephen Drew getting any votes.

In potential trade news, the Red Sox are discussing dealing Julio Lugo to anyone that will take him Detroit for.... Dontrelle Willis? (Or maybe Nate Robertson.) The classic "devil you don't know" case I suppose. Although I did love this quote from another board
Quote:

I'm actually surprised so many people support the idea of trading Lugo for Willis/Robertson. Lugo is athletic, versatile, a good baserunner, and has relatively decent on-base skills. At this point, he's basically Alex Cora, except he's athletic, versatile, a good baserunner, and has relatively decent on-base skills.
:D

Buccaneer 11-17-2008 05:56 PM

I was thinking of something while going through m son's TSN issue. I have heard about Brad Lidge's amazing season and how he came back from devastation that took years to overcome. WTF? I had to look it up to make sure. He lost Game 5 of the 2005 NLCS, yet he had 3 saves in that series and his team ended up winning Game 6 and the ML Pennant. So he lost a game in closing situation - big deal, that happens to every closer out there. It was not like it cost his team a 1) playoff spot, 2) pennant or 3) world series. So why have they been making a big deal about what happened 3 years, when it wasn't that big of a deal to begin with?

Hammer755 11-17-2008 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buccaneer (Post 1889012)
I was thinking of something while going through m son's TSN issue. I have heard about Brad Lidge's amazing season and how he came back from devastation that took years to overcome. WTF? I had to look it up to make sure. He lost Game 5 of the 2005 NLCS, yet he had 3 saves in that series and his team ended up winning Game 6 and the ML Pennant. So he lost a game in closing situation - big deal, that happens to every closer out there. It was not like it cost his team a 1) playoff spot, 2) pennant or 3) world series. So why have they been making a big deal about what happened 3 years, when it wasn't that big of a deal to begin with?


Lidge was essentially unable to close games for the Astros after that. There was a repeated cycle of Lidge being ineffective as a closer and being demoted to the setup role where he would flourish and once again be given the closer's job. Rinse & repeat.

RedKingGold 11-17-2008 08:52 PM

I think the rumor goes that Lidge lost confidence in his curveball after the Pujols bomb and just threw fastballs. Hitters were able to get his timing down and shelled him several times. Phil Garner then messed Lidge up more by demoting/promoting him from the closer role.

After getting traded to the Phillies, Lidge done got his knee injured early in spring training. Lidge then developed that devestating slider, primarily to take pressure off of his knee while rehabbing and in his first early season performances.

Once that leg healed up, he was still able to get high speed on that fastball. However, developing that slider is what made him so effective this year.

Hammer755 11-17-2008 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedKingGold (Post 1889149)
I think the rumor goes that Lidge lost confidence in his curveball after the Pujols bomb and just threw fastballs. Hitters were able to get his timing down and shelled him several times. Phil Garner then messed Lidge up more by demoting/promoting him from the closer role.

After getting traded to the Phillies, Lidge done got his knee injured early in spring training. Lidge then developed that devestating slider, primarily to take pressure off of his knee while rehabbing and in his first early season performances.

Once that leg healed up, he was still able to get high speed on that fastball. However, developing that slider is what made him so effective this year.


Nah, he's always had the wicked slider (he struck out 157 batters in 95 IP in 2004 largely because of it), but he did have trouble locating it in 2006. His Hit, BB and HR rates all increased significantly in 06.

There are two trains of thought locally regarding Lidge - one that it was a mental thing after the Pujols bomb in the 05 playoffs, but I think that the more logical conclusion was that he had some minor injuries over the past couple of seasons that limited his effectiveness.

Buccaneer 11-17-2008 10:04 PM

That's the part I don't get - why would Pujols blast effect him that much? It didn't cost them anything, except playing one extra game? Was he really young at the time?

adubroff 11-17-2008 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buccaneer (Post 1889248)
That's the part I don't get - why would Pujols blast effect him that much? It didn't cost them anything, except playing one extra game? Was he really young at the time?


He also lost two games in the World Series.

stevew 11-18-2008 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buccaneer (Post 1889248)
That's the part I don't get - why would Pujols blast effect him that much? It didn't cost them anything, except playing one extra game? Was he really young at the time?


I dunno, stuff like that can fuck a guy up real bad.

Is the wiki entry on Donnie Moore actually true? I didn't realize he shot himself after attempting to murder his wife. I thought it was just due to depression in some part due to the Hendu homer.

Chief Rum 11-18-2008 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 1889352)
I dunno, stuff like that can fuck a guy up real bad.

Is the wiki entry on Donnie Moore actually true? I didn't realize he shot himself after attempting to murder his wife. I thought it was just due to depression in some part due to the Hendu homer.


Yes, it's true. Moore had a lot of problems. It's also quite true, though, to say that his precipitous fall started with the swing of Dave Henderson's bat. It's a tragic story. :(

Neuqua 11-18-2008 01:12 PM

Cubs re-sign Dempster to a 4 year/$52 mllion dollar deal. Reasonable price. I'm happy.

Ronnie Dobbs2 11-18-2008 01:13 PM

One writer voted K-Rod for MVP.

BBWAA: 2008 AL Most Valuable Player

Fighter of Foo 11-18-2008 01:45 PM

Put a warning on the link! NSFE

stevew 11-18-2008 02:22 PM

Scrappy hitter 4 MVP!

miked 11-18-2008 02:27 PM

He's got heart.

ISiddiqui 11-18-2008 04:24 PM

Wow. What a stunningly bad pick. And I thought Morneau's award was a crappy pick.

Big Fo 11-18-2008 04:34 PM

Not the best year for AL sluggers really. They should have kept the award and saved it for a later year when two guys put up monster numbers.

ISiddiqui 11-18-2008 04:38 PM

Yeah, but if they wanted to give it to a Red Sox, Youk was far superior of a choice. Personally, I'd think it wasn't a great pick if it was Youkilis, but I'd be ok with it.

Ronnie Dobbs2 11-18-2008 04:40 PM

Siddiqui - Two questions

1. Are you surprised? I had figured this was locked up since the end of the regular season.

2. If this pick is so egregious, who was egregiously passed over?

Atocep 11-18-2008 04:59 PM

Pedroia isn't a terrible pick. He was 3rd in the AL in VORP and 1st among position players in WARP. I can live with it since I was worried K-Rod would somehow end up walking away with the award.

If they truly wanted to give the award to the Most Valuable player, though, it would have been Mauer or Cliff Lee. The Twins didn't make the postseason, though, which means Mauer's season carried zero value. Cliff Lee was a pitcher on a .500 team, which means he wasn't even a real baseball player.

ISiddiqui 11-18-2008 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 (Post 1889766)
Siddiqui - Two questions

1. Are you surprised? I had figured this was locked up since the end of the regular season.

2. If this pick is so egregious, who was egregiously passed over?


I'm absolutely shocked. I think Pedroia really isn't as deserving as Quentin, A-Rod, or Mauer.

Ronnie Dobbs2 11-18-2008 05:39 PM

You must not have read a lot of articles about it, then. From what I was reading, most thought it was Pedroia's to lose.

Quentin was done the moment he lost his season to a self-inflicted injury. A-Rod's going to have a tough time winning when his stats took a huge step back and his team missed the playoffs. Mauer is more debatable, but certainly not leaps and bounds ahead of Pedroia.

I do not think that Pedroia was the best player in the AL this year, but the writers have decided that that's not necessarily what the award is about.

BishopMVP 11-18-2008 07:34 PM

Objectively, I would have gone Mauer, Youkilis, Pedroia, 15 guys, Morneau. Subjectively I love it. Especially for having defended him against quotes like
Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith Law
Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith Law near the end of last season
He's clearly better than I thought, but I don't think he's anywhere near this good. It's a bad swing, and he has very little power.


samifan24 11-18-2008 08:31 PM

There's a reason why Keith Law hasn't been picked up by any Major League team since he was let go by Toronto.

molson 11-18-2008 08:37 PM

I love it when people on message boards think they're scouts.

I think any of the top 3 would have been a good choice. Youkalis "feels" the most valuable to, but Mauer and Pedroia should get bonus points for the positions they play.

Ronnie Dobbs2 11-19-2008 09:04 AM

Fantasy Baseball, Football, Basketball and Hockey - news, projections, cheatsheets, depth charts, draft guide - Rotoworld.com

Coco Crisp traded to the Royals for Ramon Ramirez. Any KC folk have a scouting report?

Mizzou B-ball fan 11-19-2008 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 (Post 1890152)
Fantasy Baseball, Football, Basketball and Hockey - news, projections, cheatsheets, depth charts, draft guide - Rotoworld.com

Coco Crisp traded to the Royals for Ramon Ramirez. Any KC folk have a scouting report?


We picked Ramirez up off the scrap heap after an injury the previous season. He ended up being a very good pitcher for the Royals. 2.64 ERA with a 31/70 BB/SO in 71 innings. Hate to see him go, but the Royals have a lot of depth in the bullpen.

Ronnie Dobbs2 11-19-2008 09:10 AM

So who goes next, Teahan or Dejesus?

Mizzou B-ball fan 11-19-2008 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 (Post 1890156)
So who goes next, Teahan or Dejesus?


I think it's definitely Teahan. He's roughly the same player as Crisp (Teahan has a few more homers, Crisp has better defense). Teahan's definitely expendable at this point. I think they'll be asking a pretty high price for DeJesus.

Mizzou B-ball fan 11-19-2008 09:40 AM

FYI......rumor around KC is that a trade involving Teahan and Felix Pie is being discussed between the Cubs and Royals.

MikeVic 11-19-2008 09:56 AM

I heard on the radio that the Yankees are going to offer a big contract to Burnett, and that the Jays are going after Milton Bradley.

sterlingice 11-19-2008 11:36 AM

That's the question. I think someone on RoyalsReview had this one pegged perfect. Just like the Jacobs deal, it looks good viewed in a vacuum- take a reliever, the most inconsistent position, and trade for a position player with some useful attributes. However, again, like Jacobs- Crisp has as many flaws as he has strengths so maybe it's just a wash.

But what has become quite evident is that this is a prelude to a larger move which is a shame because I think Teahen has value as a super-sub at all 4 corner positions and DeJesus is my favorite Royal, and one of the few "professional" hitters on the team who actually knows how to take a walk, work the count, and hit for a little pop.

For the Red Sox fans out there- Ramirez was a great reliever for us last year and will be a good addition to the pen. He's a little homer prone but otherwise, pitches well. Look out for injuries as the reason we got him for a song was because he had arm issues. But, he's young, under club control for quite a while, and someone you can trust in the back of the bullpen.

As a side note, I'm sure the fans will grill these trades next year when the bullpen isn't great like it was last year. However, that's more a product of it being an inherently volatile position to begin with.

SI

sterlingice 11-19-2008 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1890177)
FYI......rumor around KC is that a trade involving Teahan and Felix Pie is being discussed between the Cubs and Royals.


Seems like that has to be off the table now.

I'd still like this as part of a "master plan" to trade DDJ, one other major piece or Teahen, and a prospect or two for someone big and it's been lined up for a while now. If it's suddenly Feb 1 and these guys are still on the team and Moore has to sell them for pennies on the dollar, then this failed.

SI

McSweeny 11-19-2008 12:04 PM

i don't really think you can call Ramirez homer prone when he only allowed two homeruns in 71 innings last year

sterlingice 11-19-2008 12:07 PM

He did have 7 in his previous 80 innings, tho. I guess that's still not too bad of a ratio

SI

Logan 11-19-2008 12:33 PM

What kind of package would KC be looking for by giving up DeJesus that would actually benefit them?

sterlingice 11-19-2008 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1890293)
What kind of package would KC be looking for by giving up DeJesus that would actually benefit them?


I can only think that Moore is looking to package him with others to get a bigger piece. We seem to be stockpiling replacement to somewhat useful players so we can kick out a couple for something bigger. So, no, all the talk of 3 B and C-level prospects don't get it done for DDJ. I think it's going to be DDJ+ for something not DDJ broken down for parts. Otherwise, why go through all this to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic?

SI

Logan 11-19-2008 01:51 PM

For your sake, I sure hope that's the plan. Trading him for younger guys would be tough to watch.

BishopMVP 11-19-2008 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1890250)
That's the question. I think someone on RoyalsReview had this one pegged perfect. Just like the Jacobs deal, it looks good viewed in a vacuum- take a reliever, the most inconsistent position, and trade for a position player with some useful attributes. However, again, like Jacobs- Crisp has as many flaws as he has strengths so maybe it's just a wash.

Ehhh... it might make less sense because Crisp is only under club control for 2? years and won't be below-market after this one, but he's a much better player than Mike Jacobs. Above-average defensive CF'er with a .780 OPS last year when he was "struggling". Royals CF's were in the .640 range.

The numbers I've seen on Ramirez say 6 hr's in 51 IP at Coors and 3 in 155 elsewhere. Obviously, he's an injury-prone reliever, so this could end up looking foolish a couple months into the season (hello Gagne), but he seems like the best available reliever for the price.

I also really dislike the idea of moving Masterson to the rotation after this - his stuff doesn't play up as well in the rotation and he'd be league-average there, but he has the type of arm (easy delivery, power sinker) that can go 2-3 innings when needed and pitch back to back days to be an uber-reliever. Of course, it depends now on if Bowden/Buchholz/Masterson are traded for a catcher.

sterlingice 11-20-2008 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BishopMVP (Post 1890506)
Ehhh... it might make less sense because Crisp is only under club control for 2? years and won't be below-market after this one, but he's a much better player than Mike Jacobs. Above-average defensive CF'er with a .780 OPS last year when he was "struggling". Royals CF's were in the .640 range.


Huh? What should have been the Royals main CF last year was DeJesus and he was at .818. However, I admit they had this fascination with trying to get Gathright and his .583 into the lineup every day and thusly bumping DeJesus to left where he's not nearly as valuable.

SI

Dr. Sak 11-20-2008 12:40 PM

Chase Utley will be out 3 to 5 months (from now) with hip surgery.

RedKingGold 11-20-2008 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 1890867)
Chase Utley will be out 3 to 5 months (from now) with hip surgery.


Yeah, just saw that. Supposedly, he had hip issues since early in the second half of the season which caused his numbers to drop off. I'm no scout, but watching his at bats at the post season, his swing did seem a little tighter than usual when compared to at-bats in April/May.

It's a significant blow, but I think it's an extended spring training this year due to the World Baseball Classic. So, hopefully, he'll have a lot of time to rehab before spring training and should only miss a month or so of the regular season.

Pedro Feliz also had back surgery today. He's expected to be out 8-12 weeks.

Lastly, the Phillies sent outfielder Greg Golson to the Texas Rangers for John Mayberry. I know that Golson was roughly a 3-star prospect (out of 5) who had really good speed. The only thing I can find for the reasoning is that Mayberry has more power.

Any Rangers fans or other people who know about Mayberry have anything to add?

Fighter of Foo 11-21-2008 08:33 AM

Mayberry is a talented corner OF who fails at hitting breaking stuff. Definitely needs more time in the minors even though he's getting old for a prospect. Mayberry was on the Rangers 40-man roster while I'm guessing Golson was not. Rangers (and everyone else) are sorting out their roster in preparation for the Rule 5 draft.

RedKingGold 11-21-2008 09:31 AM

I think Golson was on the 40-man roster, actually. I know he was called up last year and went 0-for-6.

Also, the Phils added a few guys to their 40-man roster, including their best pitching prospect Carlos Carrasco. Although he's got a lot to prove in spring training, the Phillies rotation will be fantastic next year if we re-sign Moyer and Carrasco is ready to go as the #4 or #5.

As far as replacing Utley during the early part of the season, I'd think that Bruntlett/Jason Donald will platoon the position until Chase is ready to come back.

BishopMVP 11-21-2008 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1890805)
Huh? What should have been the Royals main CF last year was DeJesus and he was at .818. However, I admit they had this fascination with trying to get Gathright and his .583 into the lineup every day and thusly bumping DeJesus to left where he's not nearly as valuable.

SI

I mean, I completely agree Dejesus is a competent CF'er and he should have been playing there last year, which is why I had to check B-R and make sure Gammons didn't mess that number up. But if they weren't willing to put Dejesus in CF this year, and already said they'd go with him in LF and a prospect in CF next year, why would I count him as the primary CF? And it's pretty undeniable Coco is a better hitter than the Joey Gathright etc. pupu-platter the Royals used/were planning on using.

Karlifornia 11-21-2008 05:17 PM

Giants are gonna throw an offer to Sabathia....rumor has it as 6 years for 120 mil

DeToxRox 11-21-2008 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karlifornia (Post 1891629)
Giants are gonna throw an offer to Sabathia....rumor has it as 6 years for 120 mil


I assume this is in the hope that CC gets up to 350 lbs once he gets his money and eats Barry Zito.

DeToxRox 11-21-2008 05:33 PM

Dola ..

Does anyone actually forsee Sabathia not getting even fatter then he already is once he gets paid?

Dude is a great pitcher, but he isn't exactly a workout warrior, which scares me when he is about to get around 130 + mil.

Buccaneer 11-22-2008 09:26 PM

Is there a betting site (inTrade?) that offers up odds on being selected to the baseball HOF?

watravaler 11-23-2008 04:11 AM

White Sox sign another Cuban stud for $10 million...

Dayán Viciedo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Love it! Only 19, but I wouldn't be suprised to see him starting at 3B come spring. Put up monster numbers at 16yrs old, shocked that the Yankees/Sox didn't out-bid the Sox here...

sterlingice 11-23-2008 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watravaler (Post 1892299)
White Sox sign another Cuban stud for $10 million...

Dayán Viciedo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Love it! Only 19, but I wouldn't be suprised to see him starting at 3B come spring. Put up monster numbers at 16yrs old, shocked that the Yankees/Sox didn't out-bid the Sox here...


Dumb question: if he is under contract for only 5 years- why sign that deal if he's only 19 and under club control until his age 24 year? Didn't you just sign up to be his farm team and maybe get two years, absolute best case scenario, of good MLB service?

SI

Chief Rum 11-23-2008 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1892457)
Dumb question: if he is under contract for only 5 years- why sign that deal if he's only 19 and under club control until his age 24 year? Didn't you just sign up to be his farm team and maybe get two years, absolute best case scenario, of good MLB service?

SI


No, they signed him for much longer than that. At the very least, it is the five years, and then his final arbitration year in his sixth year, and that's if he makes the big club this coming season and stays there for his whole contract.

At least if I understand it right. He is like any Dominican or Venezuelan free agent kid right now, but because he has a much more expanded resume as a Cuban national player, he can command a much bigger contract on the open market. But that doesn't mean he's exempt from CBA rules stating you can't become a free agent until you have six years of MLB service time. If the scenario you put out happens, he does three years in the minors (at a high price, he's still paid his contract), then he finishes that contract with two years in the bigs, and the White Sox still control his rights for four more years, or as long as they continue to offer him arbitration.

My only reservation on whether that's the case is to wonder what the situation is with older Japanese players. Take Dice-K for instance. When his deal runs out, do the Sox still have a couple years of "control" over him?

Chief Rum 11-23-2008 03:48 PM

I don't know how it affects Dice-K, BTW, but I do know that we have moved past the original terms of the Angels' deal with Kendry Morales, but he is still under club control (and I am really rooting for him to make the team and have a regular spot this year).

Buccaneer 11-23-2008 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1892457)
Dumb question: if he is under contract for only 5 years- why sign that deal if he's only 19 and under club control until his age 24 year? Didn't you just sign up to be his farm team and maybe get two years, absolute best case scenario, of good MLB service?

SI


I think "if he's only 19" is the operative phrase.

sterlingice 11-23-2008 06:42 PM

Point well taken

SI

Bad-example 11-24-2008 02:38 PM

Egdar Renteria to Giants: 18M for 2 years.

Costs them a draft pick, but not too much of a risk.

Ronnie Dobbs2 11-24-2008 02:42 PM

And it gets them younger!

Atocep 11-24-2008 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad-example (Post 1893320)
Egdar Renteria to Giants: 18M for 2 years.

Costs them a draft pick, but not too much of a risk.


Giving up a draft pick and committing $18 million to a declining SS who hit .270/.317/.382 last season may not be a risk, but its completely indefensible. Of course, this is brought to you by the same GM that thought Vizquel had another year left in him...

Fighter of Foo 11-24-2008 03:01 PM

Why the fuck wouldn't the Giants wait and see if Detroit at least offered arbitration before signing the deal? That's incredibly stupid.

At least since they sucked it's only a 2nd round pick (someone please correct if that's wrong).

Atocep 11-24-2008 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fighter of Foo (Post 1893335)
Why the fuck wouldn't the Giants wait and see if Detroit at least offered arbitration before signing the deal? That's incredibly stupid.

At least since they sucked it's only a 2nd round pick (someone please correct if that's wrong).


You can't risk letting a key piece of your potential championship team sign someplace else.

Bad-example 11-24-2008 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 1893330)
Giving up a draft pick and committing $18 million to a declining SS who hit .270/.317/.382 last season may not be a risk, but its completely indefensible. Of course, this is brought to you by the same GM that thought Vizquel had another year left in him...


Ok, I am not thrilled by the move, but it is only 2 years and the contract isn't a huge burden. Last time he returned to the NL his numbers improved. Not too crazy to think he can rebound again, at least to some degree.

MrBug708 11-24-2008 04:52 PM

Why didnt the Giants go harder after Furcal?

Bad-example 11-24-2008 05:02 PM

Rotoworld changed their tune:

Rafael Furcal's agent, Paul Kinzer, said he is still talking to the Giants and doesn't believe the team has a deal with Edgar Renteria.
"Unless the Giants did it in the last 10 minutes, which I don't think they did, they weren't close," Kinzer told the San Francisco Chronicle. The Giants have denied that a Renteria deal is done.

JPhillips 11-24-2008 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad-example (Post 1893320)
Egdar Renteria to Giants: 18M for 2 years.

Costs them a draft pick, but not too much of a risk.


Thank God Jocketty didn't strike first.

Mizzou B-ball fan 11-26-2008 07:43 AM

Didn't see this mentioned. Cubs and Royals are reportedly close to working out a trade. Teahan would go to the Cubs and 2B Fontenot and SP/RP Marshall would go to the Royals.

Teahen deal could be in works | royals.com: News

Coffee Warlord 11-26-2008 08:27 AM

No thank you. We have enough low-power outfielders, thank you. And I like Fontenot.

Mizzou B-ball fan 11-26-2008 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord (Post 1894142)
No thank you. We have enough low-power outfielders, thank you. And I like Fontenot.


I think Teahan would benefit greatly from a move to the cozier ballpark. He's know in KC for always hitting the ball 5 feet short of the fences in Kauffman Stadium. He'd probably see a pretty good boost in HR production in Wrigley.

lungs 11-26-2008 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1892484)
My only reservation on whether that's the case is to wonder what the situation is with older Japanese players. Take Dice-K for instance. When his deal runs out, do the Sox still have a couple years of "control" over him?


Japanese players have it put into their contract that they are exempt from going through arbitration and thus are not bound by the service time requirements everybody else is.

So when Daisuke's contract is up, he is a free agent.

sterlingice 11-26-2008 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1894134)
Didn't see this mentioned. Cubs and Royals are reportedly close to working out a trade. Teahan would go to the Cubs and 2B Fontenot and SP/RP Marshall would go to the Royals.

Teahen deal could be in works | royals.com: News


Yeah, that's been debunked pretty much everywhere as it doesn't make much sense for the Cubs. Maybe Fontenot or Marshall, but definitely not both and it really still doesn't make a ton of sense for the Cubs.

SI

Bad-example 12-02-2008 09:15 PM

Thought this was interesting. Adjustable ticket prices based upon demand. I wonder if it is something that could catch on. Any other clubs doing something like this? Hard to see someone deciding to go to the game because tickets might be 2 bucks cheaper.

ESPN - San Francisco Giants' ticket prices to change by the day

Quote:

SAN FRANCISCO -- Next season, San Francisco Giants fans buying single-game tickets for an April game against Milwaukee might pay half as much as they would for a weekend game with the rival Los Angeles Dodgers later in the year.

The club is trying something new with ticket sales in a few tough-to-sell upper-deck outfield sections of its waterfront ballpark for 2009: cost based on demand.

The walk-up sales price for up to about 2,000 seats could even go up or down on game day. The change would be minimal, say somewhere between 25 cents and $2.

Team president Larry Baer calls it "dynamic pricing" and figures it might just become the way of the future for professional sports franchises. The Giants have partnered with a software company that will make it possible to quickly change the ticket prices based on the popularity of a given game -- not to mention weather, a possible milestone or a player from a visiting team who brings extra interest.

"We're going to experiment with this a little bit in a few sections of the park," Baer said. "What this really is, is the ticket business is changing dramatically and quickly. There's a chance we might wake up 10 years from now and tickets will be priced according to demand, like the airlines."

Baer said, for example, fans might spend $25 to see the Giants host a team like the Dodgers in August or perhaps even the always-popular Chicago Cubs in September, but might only charge $8 for the same seats in April when the Brewers come to the Bay Area.

The team plans to accept feedback from the fan base on how the process is working before determining whether to go forward with the same or a similar approach in 2010. The Giants -- minus the hype surrounding Barry Bonds and the All-Star Game they hosted in 2007 -- failed to reach 3 million in home attendance last season for the first time at their 9-year-old waterfront ballpark. It certainly didn't help the team played so poorly at home.

"We're talking hundreds of seats, not thousands of seats," Baer said. "We'll see how it works and how the fans like it. This would be a first. We have innovative people in our ticket office."

Baer vowed after the 2008 season ended not to increase ticket prices, especially considering the economic challenges. He said for the most part the team's prices will be flat for next year. Four or five categories will be stay the same, while two or three will go down and one section has gone up slightly.

For 2009 individual ticket sales, 50 percent of prices were reduced, 38 percent remained the same and 12 percent were increased. Of season tickets, 55 percent were either reduced or stayed the same and the other 45 percent had what Baer called "minor contractual increases." One section is up $2, he said.

Still, someone who shows up expecting to pay $10 to see a game could wind up spending a little bit more -- or less. The Giants also have worked on promotions that drop the ticket price based on the number of strikeouts a starting pitcher records or even deals at the concession stands.

"In sports, entertainment and theater, some tickets are on demand," Baer said. "This might be the way of the future."

Logan 12-02-2008 10:47 PM

The Mets have been doing something similar for a few years. There's platinum games (Yankees, Braves, Phillies, etc), gold, and silver (the random, uninteresting interleague teams, Brewers of old, etc), and they're all priced differently. I'm sure other teams have also done something like this.

It doesn't seem like what the Giants are doing special in this case would matter much.

ISiddiqui 12-02-2008 10:51 PM

Hell, even the Tampa Rays have this sort of arrangement (Yankees, Red Sox, and Cubs [when they have them] games cost more)

Chief Rum 12-02-2008 10:59 PM

Angels do this, too, for Yankees, Red Sox and Dodgers games at least. They may do it for some AL West opponents, too, and if the Cubs are on the schedule.

Big Fo 12-03-2008 07:27 AM

The Braves have slightly improved their sorry rotation by trading for the mediocre Javier Vazquez.

Quote:

In exchange for Vazquez and relief pitcher Boone Logan, according to a report in the Atlanta Journal-Constituion, the Braves will send four young players to the White Sox: catcher Tyler Flowers, third baseman Jon Gilmore, pitcher Santos Rodriguez and infielder Brent Lillibridge. Lillibridge is a player White Sox GM Ken Williams has been after for awhile.

SportsIllustrated.com

Bad-example 12-03-2008 10:30 AM

Quote:

The walk-up sales price for up to about 2,000 seats could even go up or down on game day. The change would be minimal, say somewhere between 25 cents and $2.

This seems like the unique part of the plan. Different prices based on opponent or day of the week is one thing, but prices fluctuating on game day is something I never heard of before.

Logan 12-03-2008 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad-example (Post 1897450)
This seems like the unique part of the plan. Different prices based on opponent or day of the week is one thing, but prices fluctuating on game day is something I never heard of before.


Yes it's unique but it's also pointless. Who is going to decide that now they will go see a Giants - Rockies game in the Upper Deck in September because a ticket only costs $15.50 instead of $16.25?

I'm willing to wager that the extra sales that come straight from this won't even cover the expense incurred to change the prices on a day to day basis from a resources standpoint.

SirFozzie 12-03-2008 01:45 PM

Nice, the Sawx sign MVP Dustin Pedroia to a 6 year, $40.5 Million deal. It works for both sides, Pedroia gives up two free agent years, and instead gets paid better over his one remaining minimum salary year, and his three arbitration years. Win-Win for all sides.

JonInMiddleGA 12-03-2008 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Fo (Post 1897350)
The Braves have slightly improved their sorry rotation by trading for the mediocre Javier Vazquez.


And gave up way too much to do so, specifically Flowers.

First an attempt to re-sign Mike Hampton, now this. I'm starting to think Frank Wren is not the right man for the job.

DaddyTorgo 12-03-2008 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirFozzie (Post 1897581)
Nice, the Sawx sign MVP Dustin Pedroia to a 6 year, $40.5 Million deal. It works for both sides, Pedroia gives up two free agent years, and instead gets paid better over his one remaining minimum salary year, and his three arbitration years. Win-Win for all sides.


WOOF WOOF!!! LONG LIVE THE LIL DAWG!!!!

watravaler 12-03-2008 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 1897591)
And gave up way too much to do so, specifically Flowers.

First an attempt to re-sign Mike Hampton, now this. I'm starting to think Frank Wren is not the right man for the job.


Agreed, JV only has value as #4/#5, as his confidence/mental issues make him all but worthless come playoff time. But he will give you 150 strong innings from April to July. When the games get "big", quite frankly, Vazquez shits in his pants.

Big Fo 12-03-2008 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 1897591)
And gave up way too much to do so, specifically Flowers.

First an attempt to re-sign Mike Hampton, now this. I'm starting to think Frank Wren is not the right man for the job.

Yeah I'm not too knowledgeable when it comes to the Braves minor leaguers but I do recall reading in a few places that Flowers was the only potentially good catcher in the whole minor league system.

I was about to say "well maybe Boone Logan helps make the deal look better" but I just looked up his career statistics.

JonInMiddleGA 12-03-2008 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watravaler (Post 1897655)
But he will give you 150 strong innings from April to July.


Which I'm guessing is what the Braves are looking for, as they wait/hope/pray for Hudson to return.

That part of the deal I don't have a problem with, but IMO they gave up way too much for what appears to be at best a stop gap measure.

molson 12-03-2008 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirFozzie (Post 1897581)
Nice, the Sawx sign MVP Dustin Pedroia to a 6 year, $40.5 Million deal. It works for both sides, Pedroia gives up two free agent years, and instead gets paid better over his one remaining minimum salary year, and his three arbitration years. Win-Win for all sides.


It Seems to good to be true for the Sox to lock him up until age 31 at pretty much what the Pirates pay Jack Wilson. And great security for Pedroia. I wonder why we don't more deals like this.

sterlingice 12-04-2008 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by molson (Post 1897834)
It Seems to good to be true for the Sox to lock him up until age 31 at pretty much what the Pirates pay Jack Wilson. And great security for Pedroia. I wonder why we don't more deals like this.


The players union doesn't like these sorts of deals since it typically buys out a couple of prime years so they put a lot of pressure on young players to not accept them

SI

RedKingGold 12-04-2008 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1898016)
The players agents don't like these sorts of deals since it typically buys out a couple of prime years so they put a lot of pressure on young players to not accept them

SI


Fixed. ;)

Fighter of Foo 12-04-2008 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Fo (Post 1897685)
Yeah I'm not too knowledgeable when it comes to the Braves minor leaguers but I do recall reading in a few places that Flowers was the only potentially good catcher in the whole minor league system.

I was about to say "well maybe Boone Logan helps make the deal look better" but I just looked up his career statistics.


Yeah I don't like the deal either, but it's because Vazquez is league average and probably inevitably overpaid, not that Flowers is some super prospect. He's Salty II IMHO and it's not like McCann's going anywhere.

Mr. Sparkle 12-04-2008 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad-example (Post 1893320)
Egdar Renteria to Giants: 18M for 2 years.

Costs them a draft pick, but not too much of a risk.


Deal is now official, and since Detroit didn't end up offering arbitration, no draft pick was lost. Also inked Bobby Howry to a 1 year/2.75m deal. Really like the Howry deal, don't mind the Renteria one. A 2 year contract isn't much of a commitment, and it's not like he's blocking anyone. Burriss can compete for 2nd with Fransden and Velez. I expect some bounce back from Renteria this year as well.

It will be interesting to see if they really do go hard after Sabathia.

johnnyshaka 12-04-2008 01:55 PM

Rentaria now locked up in SF mean that Furcal signs in OAK shortly??

Bad-example 12-04-2008 03:35 PM

Put a big hitting corner outfielder on the Giants and you have to start taking them seriously in that weak division. I like the Affeldt and Howry signings and Renteria as a placeholder for 2 years without crazy dollars is ok by me.

JonInMiddleGA 12-05-2008 03:31 PM

It's time but it still makes me sad
ESPN - Greg Maddux to announce retirement Monday

Greg Maddux is all done.

The four-time Cy Young winner will announce his retirement Monday at the baseball winter meetings in Las Vegas.

Maddux turns 43 in April. He is eighth on the career wins list with 355, and went 8-13 last season with the San Diego Padres and Los Angeles Dodgers.

The announcement about his retirement came Friday from the office of his agent, Scott Boras.

Big Fo 12-05-2008 04:34 PM

My all-time favorite player and the best pitcher of his generation. Fuck Clemens, Johnson, and Martinez.

Ronnie Dobbs2 12-05-2008 04:42 PM

I know we tend to put guys on pedestals when they retire, but that's just wrong. And Maddux was one of my favorites growing up in Chicago.

And that isn't even bringing in the fact that he had his own strike zone to help him along.

JonInMiddleGA 12-05-2008 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 (Post 1899089)
I know we tend to put guys on pedestals when they retire, but that's just wrong.


I did that with Maddux long before today. Simply the greatest pitcher within my memory (I missed actually seeing Koufax), and quite possibly the best ever.

Big Fo 12-05-2008 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 (Post 1899089)
And that isn't even bringing in the fact that he had his own strike zone to help him along.


You're probably right, Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz were the only three pitchers in MLB history to ever get a borderline strike call.

lungs 12-05-2008 05:20 PM

My hat is off to Greg Maddux.

I wonder if he'll get into coaching like his brother?

ISiddiqui 12-05-2008 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 (Post 1899089)
I know we tend to put guys on pedestals when they retire, but that's just wrong. And Maddux was one of my favorites growing up in Chicago.


QFT

Maddux was definitely great, but I think Clemens and Martinez are definitely better (albeit for different reasons, Clemens for longevity at a very high level [higher ERA+ and winning % than Maddux while pitching a similar number of games], Martinez for the greatest peak pitching seasons in MLB history [97-03 has never and it is hard to imagine it will ever be touched in terms of brilliance])

Ronnie Dobbs2 12-05-2008 05:35 PM

Maddux had the best career of anyone this generation. Clemens and Martinez were better pitchers.

JonInMiddleGA 12-05-2008 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lungs (Post 1899109)
I wonder if he'll get into coaching like his brother?


My guess would be no, just doesn't seem like it would suit him. I could see him doing the spring training visit like ala Koufax at some point though.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.