Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Beijing Olympics 2008 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=66861)

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BishopMVP (Post 1806226)
As if "womens" gymnastics wasn't a pedophiles dream already. Add in the comments by the announcer how he "was surfing the net about a year and a half ago and came across a video of this girl doing a routine and said what is this" and should we send Chris Hansen to the studio now or save costs by having him wait at NBC Studios in NY?

Then there was the vault attempt, where the fact the Chinese girl is 14 at most wasn't even the most objectionale part. The girl landed on her head and she only got a .1 deduction for it! She still scored a 14.something :eek: It's hard for me to take it seriously when the scoring system is so complicated the announcers don't even attempt to explain it, but shouldn't she get a 2 for the execution on that or something? She landed on her head!

Yeesh, those are some ugly uniforms for the Americans.


I agree. It's like impossible to get below an 8 on execution or something. It's like frigging penalties in football or fouls in basketball - I think there's a lot of like "reputation" involved which is lame,

sterlingice 08-10-2008 08:33 PM

My biggest objection is that it's a subtractionist's dream. Vault, uneven bars, balance beam, pommel horse, and rings- you might as well just fast forward to the dismount as that's where half the points are gained/lost, barring a fall or something.

Honestly, I think every gymnastics coach has this conversation with every 7 year old gymnast:
"How does scoring work?"
"You get a 10, and each little mistake you make, you lose X points."
"What about adding neato elements that are more difficult?"
"Why? It's not like you get extra for them"

SI

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:33 PM

wow - memmel just came off the uneven bars too

I think this us team is not going to compete for the team gold - we're reduced to rooting for nastia + shawn in the all-around

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:35 PM

heh - and nastia just fell on her back on her dismount

I think this us team is cursed

sterlingice 08-10-2008 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1806231)
I agree. It's like impossible to get below an 8 on execution or something. It's like frigging penalties in football or fouls in basketball - I think there's a lot of like "reputation" involved which is lame,


With all the big missteps the US has had, how are the Americans even in it for the team competition, particularly since everyone else gets to drop a score except us? Are the other teams kissing the mat every other participant?

SI

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1806237)
With all the big missteps the US has had, how are the Americans even in it for the team competition, particularly since everyone else gets to drop a score except us? Are the other teams kissing the mat every other participant?

SI



that's a damn good question SI. prolly because due to "reputation" the other teams are ending up with 14's for comprable exercises while we get 15's?

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:42 PM

that being said - none of these scores affect the team finals, so really they could still win it all if they just don't fuck up the same ways then. Means fewer US girls in the all-around or the individual event finals though.

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:43 PM

solid beam score for alicia on beam there

RendeR 08-10-2008 08:44 PM

Remember guys this is just the qualifiers, they still have to actually have the all around competition, this is just to get into that round and we're a shoe in to be in the top 8 teams overall.

MrBug708 08-10-2008 08:45 PM

Bah. I wish NBC would show coverate all at the same time. This thread is useless because the results are posted 3 hours before they are shown on the West Coast :(

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBug708 (Post 1806247)
Bah. I wish NBC would show coverate all at the same time. This thread is useless because the results are posted 3 hours before they are shown on the West Coast :(


are we being bad about not spoiler-izing the things that aren't live?

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RendeR (Post 1806246)
Remember guys this is just the qualifiers, they still have to actually have the all around competition, this is just to get into that round and we're a shoe in to be in the top 8 teams overall.


I think I just said that - lol

sterlingice 08-10-2008 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBug708 (Post 1806247)
Bah. I wish NBC would show coverate all at the same time. This thread is useless because the results are posted 3 hours before they are shown on the West Coast :(


Really? Sorry, didn't realize that. I figured that since the east coaster (EST) and myself in flyover territory (CST) were getting stuff at the same time that it was the same for everyone. I presume the live stuff is the same for everyone (i.e. the morning swimming stuff that they show here in the evening).

SI

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:49 PM

that girl (shawn johnson) is just...wow. flawless! and nastia's not far behind her.

RendeR 08-10-2008 08:52 PM

Even with all the mistakes they put up good numbers, tey have two absolute studs and if their third member comes through big in the team final they have every chance to win gold.

bulletsponge 08-10-2008 08:52 PM

so many cute ponytails. i wish more women would wear them

Jas_lov 08-10-2008 08:52 PM

Well at least they're in good spirits. Did you guys know that this is just prelims? The medal competitions are later in the week. Now for the real event, swimming.

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 08:54 PM

oh I knew Jas. Just didn't bode well it seemd (although of course it is wiped-clean)

MJ4H 08-10-2008 08:54 PM

calm down jas lov this was just the prelims. sheesh.

sterlingice 08-10-2008 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jas_lov (Post 1806256)
Now for the real event, swimming.


Damn straight :popcorn:

SI

RendeR 08-10-2008 09:07 PM

Real good Andrea, focus on what she's doing wrong, don;t try to sabotage her any further or anything, sheesh. Reporters are morons.

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 09:12 PM

kudos to coventry. Yay for zimbabwe!

RendeR 08-10-2008 09:13 PM

Very impressive swim. Love seeing records fall.

Jas_lov 08-10-2008 09:28 PM

Magnuson gets the silver in the 100 fly!

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 09:42 PM

wow - cute story abou this 30-whatever year old german gymnast

RendeR 08-10-2008 10:05 PM

Yeah talk about a sport where she's 'out of the age bracket'

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:09 PM

that's cute. Norway's first ever swimming medal!

sterlingice 08-10-2008 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1806326)
that's cute. Norway's first ever swimming medal!


It's tough to swim when your water is only unfrozen in July and August ;)

SI

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1806329)
It's tough to swim when your water is only unfrozen in July and August ;)

SI


hahah. Hey that's okay - their bread n butter is all the winter olympic events

sterlingice 08-10-2008 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1806330)
hahah. Hey that's okay - their bread n butter is all the winter olympic events


Yeah, when every event has some combination of Norway, Sweden, and Finland on the medal stand ;)

SI

sterlingice 08-10-2008 10:18 PM

(How can there be a sex scandal between Italy and France? By which I mean- they don't seem to care about sex in public in those countries ;) )

SI

mckerney 08-10-2008 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingnebwsu (Post 1806031)
LeBron James is the best player on the court in the world, and has been for the last 3 years.


Fix'd

ISiddiqui 08-10-2008 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1806136)
I dunno. This isn't synchronized swimming where we have people making shapes in the water. This is taking diving and making 2 people do it the same way at the same time.

SI


Very true. Synchronized diving is freaking amazing. I don't know how they do it.

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:25 PM

soooo close by katie hoff there! damn!

sterlingice 08-10-2008 10:25 PM

Here we go. Here's the big event for the night

SI

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:27 PM

this may be phelps' most difficult gold medal to get

Jas_lov 08-10-2008 10:28 PM

Must beat the French! They are shattering the world record so far!

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:29 PM

helluva catchup by phelps there in the 2nd 50...wow

sterlingice 08-10-2008 10:29 PM

Man, look at that world record line

SI

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:30 PM

I think france will take it i'd say

Jas_lov 08-10-2008 10:31 PM

GO!!!!!!!!!!! THEY DID IT!!!!!!!!!!!!

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:31 PM

OMG!!!!

WHAT A FUCKING CLOSE BY LEZAK!!!! HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!!

sterlingice 08-10-2008 10:31 PM

Oh. My. God!

SI

QuikSand 08-10-2008 10:31 PM

Okay that was pretty fucking clutch.

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:31 PM

46.06 - is that the fastest relay-split in history?

Eaglesfan27 08-10-2008 10:31 PM

WOW!!! Love that win after France talked smack.

Tigercat 08-10-2008 10:34 PM

Oh those silly, silly frenchies. Good to see the mouth was the one that lost to the greatest split in the history of swimming.

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:35 PM

and cullen jones gets a gold too - yay for that!

sterlingice 08-10-2008 10:35 PM

That was positively electric

SI

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:36 PM

phelps apparently broke the american record on the leadoff leg too

MalcPow 08-10-2008 10:36 PM

Oh man that was sweet.

sterlingice 08-10-2008 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1806297)
wow - cute story abou this 30-whatever year old german gymnast


She was at least twice, if not 3 times, as old as some of those Chinese gymnasts ;)

SI

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1806373)
She was at least twice, if not 3 times, as old as some of those Chinese gymnasts ;)

SI


haha - well played sir

SirFozzie 08-10-2008 10:55 PM

After promising to "SMASH" the dreams of Michael Phelps, and throwing away a win in the final 10 meteres of the race, there is a new international signal for choking.


sterlingice 08-10-2008 10:55 PM

I still can't get over that race. Absolutely great. I wish they would replay the last 50 meters again

SI

Tigercat 08-10-2008 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirFozzie (Post 1806390)
After promising to "SMASH" the dreams of Michael Phelps, and throwing away a win in the final 10 meteres of the race, there is a new international signal for choking.


I'm sorry, there is already an international signal for choking militarily:



ISiddiqui 08-10-2008 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirFozzie (Post 1806390)
After promising to "SMASH" the dreams of Michael Phelps, and throwing away a win in the final 10 meteres of the race, there is a new international signal for choking.



I'm not entirely sure that barely losing to the World Record in 100m split is exactly "choking".

DaddyTorgo 08-10-2008 11:00 PM

lol - wait - strangely those are the same!

NoMyths 08-10-2008 11:54 PM

What an incredible race. Glad I was able to watch it.

BishopMVP 08-10-2008 11:59 PM

So now breaking a world record isn't enough and they've progressed to shattering multiple records in one event.

New WR 400Free Relay - by 4 seconds
New 100m Free WR - set by Australian leadoff
Fastest Relay Split ever - (and i think they were saying earlier 46.6 was the previous record) Lezak had 46.06
New 100m Free AR - set by Phelps on leadoff for the hell of it

What do these people do the other 4 years? They don't peak for the World Championships or something? Or do they only bring out the cold, deep, specially made pools for the Olympics?

DaddyTorgo 08-11-2008 12:03 AM

lol @ bishop

DaddyTorgo 08-11-2008 12:03 AM

I do wish the world championships were televised and made a bigger deal out of though

clemsonfan 08-11-2008 05:11 AM

That, by far, was the greatest Olympic moment I have ever seen!

wade moore 08-11-2008 07:13 AM

Watched this race last night - incredible. Couldn't help but get excited over the last 50m or so.

Would have loved to see the guy from France interviewed.

RendeR 08-11-2008 08:30 AM

Sounds like I went to bed too early

Mizzou B-ball fan 08-11-2008 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RendeR (Post 1806515)
Sounds like I went to bed too early


We were up, but my wife wasn't paying attention to the race. I had to rewind so she could watch the thing again after she heard me screaming at the TV and jumping up and down.

RendeR 08-11-2008 08:37 AM

So the French guy saying "we're going to smash the americans" gets to have his words crammed down his throat eh?

DaddyTorgo 08-11-2008 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RendeR (Post 1806515)
Sounds like I went to bed too early


just watch it on nbcolympics.com silly.

amazing 4x100 Free relay - Phelps was neck and neck with the Frenchy (Frenchy set a WR on the first leg, Phelps set an American record), the 2nd and 3rd legs were fairly neck-and-neck although France had a slight lead, the French anchor was the WR holder in the 100 free going into the race (who had just lost his record to his teammate), and the Americans had a 32-yo anchor who was behind by like a full body-length at the turn it seemed, managed to pull back even about halfway down the back-50 and then drafted in Frenchy's wake until the last 10-15 meters where he got energy from SOMEWHERE to pull even with Frenchy and out-touch him at the wall by .08 seconds, in the process setting a WR for fastest relay-split (46.06).

Looking at my posts on the board you can see - sure seemed like the Americans were done and there was no way he was going to catch up, and then BAM...there he was, and you could see as they came into the wall that he was going to out-touch him...it was just...amazing.

The top 5 finishers all broke the WR that the US B-team had set that morning in the prelims (which was itself what...1+ seconds faster than the old record). So in the span of 24-hours the WR went down by like over 5 seconds.

Lathum 08-11-2008 09:42 AM

Awesome race. My wife and I were jumping on the bed screaming like little kids.

Vegas Vic 08-11-2008 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1806531)
The top 5 finishers all broke the WR that the US B-team had set that morning in the prelims (which was itself what...1+ seconds faster than the old record).


I think this bears repeating, just to emphasize the magnitude of this event. Two teams that broke the previous world record didn't even receive medals.

MikeVic 08-11-2008 09:53 AM

So, before the Olympics began there was some story I saw about how swimmers were wearing these outfits that helped them a lot.

I didn't watch the relay, so I don't know if everyone was wearing suits or just the lower part, but since everyone swam so fast I'll assume everyone wore those suits?

Do you think this is right? Shouldn't swimmers just wear a speedo or something? Isn't technology getting too advanced to allow full, aerodynamic suits?

cougarfreak 08-11-2008 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 1806394)
I'm not entirely sure that barely losing to the World Record in 100m split is exactly "choking".


After blowing the lead he had at the turn, I don't think there's any question the dude choked as bad as the Maginot Line did in 1940. :p

DaddyTorgo 08-11-2008 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVic (Post 1806569)
So, before the Olympics began there was some story I saw about how swimmers were wearing these outfits that helped them a lot.

I didn't watch the relay, so I don't know if everyone was wearing suits or just the lower part, but since everyone swam so fast I'll assume everyone wore those suits?

Do you think this is right? Shouldn't swimmers just wear a speedo or something? Isn't technology getting too advanced to allow full, aerodynamic suits?


nah. i mean sure it'd be nice if they all just wore regular speedos and you could compare records and numbers across eras, but the world doesn't exist in a bubble, and the public would get bored if they weren't seeing records broken (or so the argument probably goes). I'm sure there's a way to quantify the effect of the suit though and adjust the times accordingly to stack up swimmers from different eras...maybe?

besides what's the harm? at least they're not doing PED's (hopefully).

NoMyths 08-11-2008 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVic (Post 1806569)
So, before the Olympics began there was some story I saw about how swimmers were wearing these outfits that helped them a lot.

I didn't watch the relay, so I don't know if everyone was wearing suits or just the lower part, but since everyone swam so fast I'll assume everyone wore those suits?

Do you think this is right? Shouldn't swimmers just wear a speedo or something? Isn't technology getting too advanced to allow full, aerodynamic suits?


I saw a statistic that claimed the top suits cut about 2% from the times of swimmers (no idea what distance that would relate to, though). So it's certainly substantial. However, as my understanding is that anyone can choose to wear the best suits -- and all of the top companies have their own versions, it seems -- outside of sponsorship concerns, it seems like the technology is level across the playing field, much like tennis.

Alan T 08-11-2008 12:38 PM

Can some one help me figure out where to watch online? Looking through the nbcolympics.com site, all I see are video clips and not actual footage. And their entire schedule thing is completely blank.

Alan T 08-11-2008 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1806674)
Can some one help me figure out where to watch online? Looking through the nbcolympics.com site, all I see are video clips and not actual footage. And their entire schedule thing is completely blank.



Ahh finally found it, Not sure why the schedule thing is completely blank though.

sabotai 08-11-2008 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVic (Post 1806569)
So, before the Olympics began there was some story I saw about how swimmers were wearing these outfits that helped them a lot.

I didn't watch the relay, so I don't know if everyone was wearing suits or just the lower part, but since everyone swam so fast I'll assume everyone wore those suits?

Do you think this is right? Shouldn't swimmers just wear a speedo or something? Isn't technology getting too advanced to allow full, aerodynamic suits?


In every sport, people are always looking for the best equipment. NASCAR is always trying to build a faster car, tennis is always building a better racket, football is always building a better helmet and better pads. The only real difference is this jump in technology is a bit higher than most.

As long as everyone involved in the sport has access to it, I don't see the problem.

QuikSand 08-11-2008 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas Vic (Post 1806566)
I think this bears repeating, just to emphasize the magnitude of this event. Two teams that broke the previous world record didn't even receive medals.


In my view, this actually undermines the magnitude of the event. It renders it plain to see that there's a fundamental difference between the settings. From what little I know, I guess it's the suits, but whatever it is -- it's perfectly clear that there's a material difference at work here, not just incremental improvement among the athletes.

MikeVic 08-11-2008 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 1806707)
In my view, this actually undermines the magnitude of the event. It renders it plain to see that there's a fundamental difference between the settings. From what little I know, I guess it's the suits, but whatever it is -- it's perfectly clear that there's a material difference at work here, not just incremental improvement among the athletes.


Exactly. I know every sporting event will have some kind of technological aid over time, so I didn't think much about the suits... but after reading that two teams broke thee old record and weren't even top three...! That just seems really wrong.

gstelmack 08-11-2008 02:09 PM

The other big talk has been regarding the pools, and that different pool sizes (depth, width) affect the times. Plus some rules changes on strokes that make it difficult to compare eras.

Regardless, despite all the record breaking going on, it's fun to watch the judges just kind of sauntering along the deck at the same pace as the swimmers furiously paddling away...

NoMyths 08-11-2008 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 1806707)
In my view, this actually undermines the magnitude of the event. It renders it plain to see that there's a fundamental difference between the settings. From what little I know, I guess it's the suits, but whatever it is -- it's perfectly clear that there's a material difference at work here, not just incremental improvement among the athletes.


Not sure I follow. If everyone has access to the same technology, doesn't it prove that the playing field is pretty level when the winning team has to overcome four world-record performances in order to do so, and the separation between first and second in a four-man relay is .08 seconds?

Clearly the suit technology cuts down on drag and such in a significant way, but let's consider how much improvement there is. If we assume the 2% figure is accurate (and that a swimmer accidentally slowing his tempo a fraction doesn't offset the gains), then the Americans gained what, about 4 seconds? "About", of course, being a huge margin for error considering the increments of swimming time, but for rough math, there we go. Fwiw, they broke the world record by just under 4 seconds. If they swam in basic Speedos against the rest of that field (of which most, if not all, were wearing the better suits) they'd have finished 6th assuming the other times remained the same -- and still been right on the line of breaking the previous world record.

The difference between first place and last place was 4.63 seconds, an incredibly close gap considering that each team had 4 chances to lose a fraction of time here or there. My sense is that if the technology is available to every swimmer, the question becomes more about comparing new records to old ones rather than "undermining the magnitude of the event". Having watched it, it didn't matter what the final times were, really -- as spectators we witnessed a thrilling come-from-behind victory that was determined by less time than it takes for a hummingbird to flap its wings once.

MIJB#19 08-11-2008 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVic (Post 1806711)
Exactly. I know every sporting event will have some kind of technological aid over time, so I didn't think much about the suits... but after reading that two teams broke thee old record and weren't even top three...! That just seems really wrong.

Sample size, anyone? Relays are always relatively uncommon in the daily life of the swimmers, so they have much less opportunity to set times. In contrast, at the women's 4x100 the Dutch world record holders failed to break their own record, while the rest of the field was miles away.

BishopMVP 08-11-2008 04:58 PM

I have two little pleasures when watching the lesser-known events. One is trying to think if I could be good at the event - realistically I know there's no chance I could compete at the world-class level, but I used to dominate Badminton in middle school gym class, and I swear I could take some of those guys out there.

The other is imagining the best US athletes playing in these. LeBron in Team Handball is the one I was thinking about yesterday. One of the Europeans who actually plays/watches can disagree with me, but I swear he'd score 50 goals a game without trying. I don't even know exactly what the rules allow for trying to stop drives, but who out there could stop LeBron?

Galaxy 08-11-2008 05:02 PM

Off-note, but it looks like Chicago made the final list (along with Tokyo, Madrid, and Rio de Janeiro) for the 2016 Olympics.

BishopMVP 08-11-2008 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVic (Post 1806569)
So, before the Olympics began there was some story I saw about how swimmers were wearing these outfits that helped them a lot.

I didn't watch the relay, so I don't know if everyone was wearing suits or just the lower part, but since everyone swam so fast I'll assume everyone wore those suits?

Do you think this is right? Shouldn't swimmers just wear a speedo or something? Isn't technology getting too advanced to allow full, aerodynamic suits?

The thing I can't figure out is Phelps + most others weren't wearing the full body-length suits for other events. Do they only help freestyle swimmers and detract for other strokes? wbatl1, do you know anything about that?

NoMyths 08-11-2008 06:00 PM

Phelps and the top swimmers don't have to swim their fastest races to make the finals, and as such you'll see several of them either taking a lot off late in a race and such (not shaving, etc.).

Big Fo 08-11-2008 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BishopMVP (Post 1806830)
I have two little pleasures when watching the lesser-known events. One is trying to think if I could be good at the event - realistically I know there's no chance I could compete at the world-class level, but I used to dominate Badminton in middle school gym class, and I swear I could take some of those guys out there.

The other is imagining the best US athletes playing in these. LeBron in Team Handball is the one I was thinking about yesterday. One of the Europeans who actually plays/watches can disagree with me, but I swear he'd score 50 goals a game without trying. I don't even know exactly what the rules allow for trying to stop drives, but who out there could stop LeBron?


I'd like to see how good at rugby some of our football players could have been.

Buccaneer 08-11-2008 06:25 PM

According to my wife, NBC's coverage sucks badly, pretty much to the point of not bothering to tune in.

SirFozzie 08-11-2008 06:28 PM

Except for Phelps swimming, I've been avoiding NBC, and been watching a ton of MSNBC and NBCOlympics.com

MrBug708 08-11-2008 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy (Post 1806831)
Off-note, but it looks like Chicago made the final list (along with Tokyo, Madrid, and Rio de Janeiro) for the 2016 Olympics.


I was really hoping that Los Angeles would have been able to beat out Chicago

Jas_lov 08-11-2008 06:31 PM

Your wife is a liar! She's a liar! The coverage ain't bad, could be better. It shouldn't stop anyone from tuning in though as the events are top notch, especially the swimming.

mckerney 08-11-2008 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBug708 (Post 1806897)
I was really hoping that Los Angeles would have been able to beat out Chicago


If there in Chicago there will be soccer games in Minneapolis at TCF Bank Stadium, which would be fun.

SirFozzie 08-11-2008 06:56 PM

Interesting, that aerial shot of the fireworks from the Olympic Ceremonies? Computer Generated.

They DID do fireworks, it was just that they couldn't provide an aerial shot for them, due to the risk of the helicopter being damaged.

Says a lot for how far computer generated stuff has gone.

Buccaneer 08-11-2008 07:31 PM

Cyclists continue to be the stupidest atheletes on this planet.

Cyclist Moreno kicked out of Games - 2008 Olympics - SI.com

Neuqua 08-11-2008 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBug708 (Post 1806897)
I was really hoping that Los Angeles would have been able to beat out Chicago



:p

DaddyTorgo 08-11-2008 08:19 PM

I prefer more T than A, but those lil white half-mesh bikini bottoms are showing some serious A.

QuikSand 08-11-2008 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoMyths (Post 1806731)
Not sure I follow. If everyone has access to the same technology, doesn't it prove that the playing field is pretty level when the winning team has to overcome four world-record performances in order to do so, and the separation between first and second in a four-man relay is .08 seconds?

Clearly the suit technology cuts down on drag and such in a significant way, but let's consider how much improvement there is. If we assume the 2% figure is accurate (and that a swimmer accidentally slowing his tempo a fraction doesn't offset the gains), then the Americans gained what, about 4 seconds? "About", of course, being a huge margin for error considering the increments of swimming time, but for rough math, there we go. Fwiw, they broke the world record by just under 4 seconds. If they swam in basic Speedos against the rest of that field (of which most, if not all, were wearing the better suits) they'd have finished 6th assuming the other times remained the same -- and still been right on the line of breaking the previous world record.

The difference between first place and last place was 4.63 seconds, an incredibly close gap considering that each team had 4 chances to lose a fraction of time here or there. My sense is that if the technology is available to every swimmer, the question becomes more about comparing new records to old ones rather than "undermining the magnitude of the event". Having watched it, it didn't matter what the final times were, really -- as spectators we witnessed a thrilling come-from-behind victory that was determined by less time than it takes for a hummingbird to flap its wings once.


I thought I was pretty clear, but I'll try again.

The race was exhilarating. Awesome to watch, and I don't really care much about the Olympics or rooting for people who happen to be from my country. Ranks *way* there in sports events I have ever viewed. Thrilling.

I'm also not saying that it lessens the amazing outcome. Nor am I saying the playing field was not level. I was just responding to a comment above that the complete crushing of the world record made the event more momentous.

What I'm saying is just that the fact that 5 out of 8 teams beat the all-time world record time tells us all that the times of this setting are clearly not on par with those from other eras and settings. Plain and simple. So, the "amazing that they crushed the world record by so much" stuff rings hollow to me. It's clearly substantially a function of different suits, different pools, or something else besides suddenly all the top swimmers just got a *ton* better than they all were six months or four years ago.


Oh, and I'd have to quarrel with you on the hummingbird wingbeat stuff, not that I have a general problem with hyperbole or anything, it's just bad math.

bulletsponge 08-11-2008 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1806967)
I prefer more T than A, but those lil white half-mesh bikini bottoms are showing some serious A.


:eek:

thats what i consider quality programing

DaddyTorgo 08-11-2008 09:26 PM

michael phelps is just...not human. He's unbelievable. A total freak.

SirFozzie 08-11-2008 09:34 PM

can he do the spitz +1? (8 Gold medals, 8 World Records)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.