Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   My Ridiculously Inept Congresscommie (Who Now Faces Arrest!) (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=48386)

wade moore 03-31-2006 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
I agree, but I'm still not sure what the 'strike' was or if she even knew it was a police officer.

I was just pointing out that you can't say she is a 'barking loon' or whatever for saying her race was a factor, she may be wrong or right.


Again, I think you're missing a certain "history" with her. I don't know THAT much about her, but I know enough to know that she is...... i'll be PC even.... "eccentric" compared to her peers....

You have to keep in mind that these guys from GA probably think having to explain the intricate details of this is like being questioned by someone when you say "Carrot Top is NOT funny" to provide details.

johneh 03-31-2006 08:55 PM

Well our Governor has already plead guilty to breaking the law & he is still in office with a 14% approval rating (lower than Nixon's when he resigned)

JeeberD 03-31-2006 08:58 PM

Haven't I read in this thread that she slapped him on the cheek and that he told her three times to stop before he tried to restrain her?

st.cronin 04-01-2006 12:51 AM

I don't think it matters what her history was. Labeling as racism actions which are what law enforcement is supposed to be doing is pretty far out. It needs some sort of support.

GrantDawg 04-03-2006 02:30 PM

Capitol police ask for arrest warrant for McKinney
Black leaders say McKinney victim of racial profiling

By BOB KEMPER, S.A. REID
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 04/03/06 WASHINGTON — Capitol Hill police on Monday asked a federal prosecutor to approve an arrest warrant for Rep. Cynthia McKinney for her role in a scuffle with a police officer last week, the prosecutor's office confirmed.
Capitol Police had no immediate comment so it's not yet known whether the intent is to file felony or misdemeanor assault charges against McKinney, a DeKalb County Democrat.
Coz Carson, a spokesman for McKinney, said the requested warrant should be dismissed if "this is a prosecutor who's not a politician."
"Any prosecutor with any sense can look at this thing and understand that it's something that should be blown out of proportion any further," Carson said.
The office of the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Kenneth Wainstein, must approve the request by Capitol Hill police before police can go to a judge to ask for an arrest warrant.
Officials familiar with the process have said a warrant can be obtained within a day, though that doesn't mean a warrant against McKinney would be.
McKinney was stopped by a Capitol Hill police officer last Wednesday as she tried to go around a security checkpoint in a House office building. Members of Congress are allowed to go around the ubiquitous checkpoints, but the police officer failed to recognize McKinney as a member of Congress and tried to stop her.
After calling to McKinney to stop, the officer touched her shoulder or arm. That prompted McKinney to spin around and the strike the officer, though there are conflicting reports as to whether she slapped him, punched him in the chest or struck him with a cell phone.
McKinney was not wearing a special lapel pin given to members of Congress to make them easier to identify. She also has changed her hairstyle since her official House portrait, the picture police would check to identify her.
Also Monday, black preachers, elected officials and activists in Atlanta cited McKinney's recent run-in with Capitol police as an example of racial profiling and called what happened to her disrespectful.
Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, along with members of the Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, announced their continued support for the sixth-term congresswoman at a morning meeting.
Supporters say the incident has been blown out of proportion and politicized. Her treatment, they added, was excessive and shows that black elected officials aren't immune to problems of double standards and racial profiling other African-Americans face.
"Racial profiling is a well thought out and planned attack on black political leaders," state Rep. Alberta Abdul-Salaam said Monday. "It's going from the gold dome down to the White House. It's happening and it's wrong."
McKinney was in attendance at the morning meeting and said she was grateful for the support. She would not comment on the incident, but instead focused on the work her office is doing on behalf of her 4th District constituents.
"You can rest assured I'm doing the work that you sent me to Washington to do," McKinney said. "Nothing is going to keep me away from my responsibility."

GrantDawg 04-03-2006 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
Again, I think you're missing a certain "history" with her. I don't know THAT much about her, but I know enough to know that she is...... i'll be PC even.... "eccentric" compared to her peers....

You have to keep in mind that these guys from GA probably think having to explain the intricate details of this is like being questioned by someone when you say "Carrot Top is NOT funny" to provide details.


That is a spot-on analogy. That may be the best analogy I've ever seen on this board. 5-stars!

wade moore 04-03-2006 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
That is a spot-on analogy. That may be the best analogy I've ever seen on this board. 5-stars!


:D

Crapshoot 04-04-2006 10:06 PM

Did anyone see Jon Stewart's response ?

"I believe in judging people not on the colors of their skin, but on their character. And you are batshit insane. "

Ben E Lou 04-04-2006 10:19 PM

House Democrats are now starting to distance themselves from her. One article I saw said the Pelosi and Cynthia are no longer on speaking terms. Even the AJC wrote an anti-Cynthia editorial today:

Quote:

OUR OPINION
McKinney's arrogance crosses line

Published on: 04/04/06 In her embarrassing confrontation with the U.S. Capitol Police, U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney has demonstrated that while she may have changed her trademark hairstyle, her personal style remains as offensive as ever.
McKinney has been sharply criticized — and deservedly so — for allegedly striking a Capitol police officer who stopped her from going around a security checkpoint, a perk allowed members of Congress.
According to police accounts, the officer asked McKinney three times to halt before putting his hand out to restrain her. That's when Capitol Hill police — who asked a federal prosecutor Monday to approve an arrest warrant for McKinney — say the outraged congresswoman hit the officer.
The officer apparently failed to recognize the DeKalb Democrat, who was not wearing a special lapel pin given to the 435 House members to help police identify them. In addition, McKinney sports a new hairdo.
A smarter, less arrogant politician would have smiled at the officer who stopped her, extended a hand and explained: "I'm Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney from the great state of Georgia, and I appreciate your diligence in keeping the Capitol safe. Next time, I hope you'll recognize me." She would have had a pal for life.
But why make friends when you can make headlines? Two days after the scuffle, McKinney faced TV cameras and stayed true to form, charging the officer with racism.
"The whole incident was instigated by the inappropriate touching and stopping of me — a female, black congresswoman," she said.
McKinney's haughty position — that every Capitol employee ought to know her by sight and that she should never have to endure checkpoints like the riffraff — evinces the arrogance and ego that voters expect from elected officials. It may be inconvenient for self-important people such as McKinney to stop and show their IDs, but it's essential in these scary times of terrorist bombings and anthrax attacks.
In 1998, two Capitol officers were killed by a mentally ill man who opened fire at the main tourist entrance to the Capitol.
In the past, McKinney has complained that she's mistaken for the "hired help" in Washington. In the next election, DeKalb residents can help clear up that confusion by putting an end to McKinney's employment with them.

Crapshoot 04-04-2006 10:41 PM

Isn't the AJC the paper that has Cal "good ol " Thomas as one of its writers ? I think the article is fine, but is there something about the AJC's politics I'm unaware of (genuine question) ?

GrantDawg 04-04-2006 11:06 PM

This one shocked me:

This is a big deal? Sure shouldn't be

Published on: 04/05/06
There is a lot of bad news in black America.
After a decade of rising affluence, poverty (among blacks and whites) is on the upswing. Marriage is out of fashion, but diabetes, hypertension and heart failure are not. We die sooner than whites. And black men remain disproportionately shut out of the mainstream — unemployed, on drugs, in prison.

MOST POPULAR STORIES
EMAIL THIS
PRINT THIS
MOST POPULAR
CYNTHIA TUCKER
MY OPINION


E-mail Tucker Recent columns:

So if black activists and political leaders are looking for matters crying out for redress or reform or fairness, I could give them a list. Cynthia McKinney's complaints would not be on it.
If you're going to call a press conference and muster such prominent supporters as Harry Belafonte and Danny Glover, you ought to be sure the issue is important enough to command national attention. You should save that sort of clarion call for the most serious matters — renewing the Voting Rights Act or raising the minimum wage so that more black men can support their children. The precious spotlight of national news coverage should not be wasted on a spoiled and demanding congresswoman who thinks she's the Soul Queen of Capitol Hill.
Nor should the Abrams tank of political warfare — the charge of "racism" — be rolled out to fight every minor battle. Racism is a shadow of its former self, but it lives yet. You see it in the high rates of harsh discipline meted out to black boys in public schools. You can also see it in the disproportionate numbers of black men sent to prison for crimes they didn't commit.
Certainly, the legacy of racism is alive and well. You can see it in the self-destructive behavior of so many young black men — the internecine violence, the distorted self-esteem, the worship of thug culture. You can see the legacy of racism in the enduring rates of poverty and poor health among black citizens.
But McKinney's trumped-up charge of racism merely cheapens the term, so that it's less effective when it's needed to discuss genuine discrimination.
Immediately after the episode, McKinney — uncharacteristically, to be sure — issued a statement of regret, saying, "I know that Capitol Hill Police are securing our safety, and I appreciate the work that they do." But within hours, her stance had changed as she rallied supporters to her side to defend her against the depredations of a racist white police state.
(Now, I can understand McKinney's frustration over the fact that she is often unrecognized. I share that frustration. More times than I can count, I've been mistaken for McKinney, criticized for things she said or given advice about my braids. In fact, while McKinney wore braids until recently, I haven't worn them since sixth grade. Still, I've never slapped or slugged anyone who confused me with her. But if this keeps up, that could change.)
Last month, The New York Times ran a front-page story outlining the dire social and economic prospects for young black men. According to a number of recent academic studies, black men, despite the obvious successes of a few, are falling further and further behind, locked in place as a permanent underclass. "Especially in the country's inner cities, the studies show, finishing high school is the exception, legal work is scarcer than ever and prison is almost routine, with incarceration rates climbing for blacks even as urban crime rates have declined," the article said.
I waited for somebody to call a press conference. I waited for Jesse and Al to take to the streets demanding public policies that would bring black men into the mainstream. I looked for responses from the usual suspects — the NAACP, the Urban League and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. I heard nothing.
But a misunderstanding between a second-rate member of Congress and a Capitol Hill police officer has apparently become a full-blown crisis. So maybe I'm wrong about all of this. Perhaps I just need to adjust my perspective.
Perhaps the fact that one-third of young black men have police records is not a problem. Maybe the fact that 70 percent of black children are born outside the bonds of marriage is no big deal, and a 72 percent unemployment rate among black male high school drop-outs in their 20s does not signal a crisis. Maybe the serious decline in the marriage rate among black adults does not suggest the demise of a community.
No, indeed. The biggest problem facing black America involves a white cop who wouldn't give a black woman her props.
Cynthia Tucker is the editorial page editor. Her column appears Wednesdays and Sundays.

BYU 14 04-05-2006 12:17 AM

Shocking maybe, but definitely spot on.

Glengoyne 04-05-2006 12:59 AM

Pinging Mr. Giggles

MrBigglesworth 04-05-2006 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glengoyne
Pinging Mr. Giggles

For what?

Ben E Lou 04-05-2006 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crapshoot
Isn't the AJC the paper that has Cal "good ol " Thomas as one of its writers ? I think the article is fine, but is there something about the AJC's politics I'm unaware of (genuine question) ?

It has a somewhat-balanced set of columns. However, the Editorial Board (which is responsible for that article) is decidedly left-leaning. The Editorial Board is also responsible for the AJC's political candidate endorsement, and those endorsements are heavily tilted toward the Democratic Party. It sounds like some former allies are trying to distance themselves from Cynthia now...

Honolulu_Blue 04-05-2006 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Immediately after the episode, McKinney — uncharacteristically, to be sure — issued a statement of regret, saying, "I know that Capitol Hill Police are securing our safety, and I appreciate the work that they do."


This is the proper response. This is what someone who is not a "barking loon" says in such a situation. End of.

Shepp 04-05-2006 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
It has a somewhat-balanced set of columns. However, the Editorial Board (which is responsible for that article) is decidedly left-leaning. The Editorial Board is also responsible for the AJC's political candidate endorsement, and those endorsements are heavily tilted toward the Democratic Party. It sounds like some former allies are trying to distance themselves from Cynthia now...



That is a very conservative assessment of the AJC:D

Glengoyne 04-05-2006 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
For what?


Just wondering if you thought that Jon Stewart or Cynthia Tucker were jumping to unsupported conclusions.

Ben E Lou 04-05-2006 02:04 PM

Soledad vs. Cynthia this morning.

Ben E Lou 04-05-2006 02:12 PM

Dang. I had heard snippets of it, but just watched it all the way through. They both got pretty pissy there at the end. Soledad sounded like she was ready for a straight-up catfight, especially the way she delivered the last line of the interview.

Honolulu_Blue 04-05-2006 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Dang. I had heard snippets of it, but just watched it all the way through. They both got pretty pissy there at the end. Soledad sounded like she was ready for a straight-up catfight, especially the way she delivered the last line of the interview.


Perhaps a Soledad vs. Cynthia could be the undercard to the Rosie O'Donnel vs. Naomi Campbell bout...

st.cronin 04-05-2006 02:17 PM

'much ado about a hairdo'???

st.cronin 04-05-2006 02:23 PM

'we're not the ones who turned this into a criminal matter' hahahahaha

st.cronin 04-05-2006 02:26 PM

'we don't know what happened' hahahahaha

st.cronin 04-05-2006 02:29 PM

I don't think that woman has a brain in her head.

WVUFAN 04-05-2006 02:30 PM

I applaude Soledad for this interview. Love the straight-shooting style.

JediKooter 04-05-2006 02:32 PM

The more I read about this lady, the more and more I believe she is just not in touch with reality. She can only blame herself for the situation. She forgot the pin, not the police officer. I wonder if a hispanic member of Congress did what she did and got roughed up a little bit, would Cynthia come running crying racism? I'm thinking....no.

st.cronin 04-05-2006 02:36 PM

Where did she get that lawyer? He's awful.

Celeval 04-05-2006 02:49 PM

Wpw. I love how she sat back and just didn't even answer the question(s).

I'm somewhat surprised that the race card is being played with the older, white, male lawyer, though.

Ben E Lou 04-05-2006 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celeval
I'm somewhat surprised that the race card is being played with the older, white, male lawyer, though.

Kevin, you lived in DeKalb County. Why are you surprised??? :p

st.cronin 04-05-2006 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celeval
Wpw. I love how she sat back and just didn't even answer the question(s).

I'm somewhat surprised that the race card is being played with the older, white, male lawyer, though.


Yeah, that's what struck me as odd. She could have easily found a black female lawyer who was just as incoherent as that guy.

Celeval 04-05-2006 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celeval
Wpw. I love how she sat back and just didn't even answer the question(s).

I'm somewhat surprised that the race card is being played with the older, white, male lawyer, though.


Anyone else think that about 30s in, the other lawyer who phoned in was like: "Oh, shit, I've got to get in there..."

Celeval 04-05-2006 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Kevin, you lived in DeKalb County. Why are you surprised??? :p


:-D

Solecismic 04-05-2006 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthia Tucker
You see it in the high rates of harsh discipline meted out to black boys in public schools. You can also see it in the disproportionate numbers of black men sent to prison for crimes they didn't commit.
Certainly, the legacy of racism is alive and well. You can see it in the self-destructive behavior of so many young black men — the internecine violence, the distorted self-esteem, the worship of thug culture.


I agree with her calling McKinney to task for invoking the race card. McKinney ultimately hurts real victims of racism, who will face more trouble finding someone willing to pay attention. But I see a lot of problematic messages here.

Why is it only a shame when the violence is internecine (against other black people)? Why did she have to qualify that particular noun? How does she know who was sent to prison for crimes they didn't commit? Does the FBI keep statistics?

If young black men have such distorted self-esteem, and such worship of thug culture, then why isn't it surprising that they are more often disciplined in the schools?

I think Tucker is contributing to the same problem as McKinney. She wants different standards applied based on race. In each case, the harm to the cause is similar. McKinney trivializes racism in the workplace. And Tucker trivializes inner-city crime rates.

Tucker may be more dangerous. She's obviously more intelligent than McKinney, who is easy to dismiss as a nutjob. And her message encourages the black community to protect and excuse its violent element. Nothing keeps inner-city black people from getting what they need to succeed more than the violence that surrounds them.

I would hope that a strong, intelligent, black voice in the community wouldn't sell out her own people like that. But by following the tried-and-true politically correct line of her pals "Jesse and Al" (no last names necessary), she gains street cred. Which she seems to prefer to actually doing something to help the people most in need.

Crapshoot 04-05-2006 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celeval
Wpw. I love how she sat back and just didn't even answer the question(s).

I'm somewhat surprised that the race card is being played with the older, white, male lawyer, though.


Yeah, I found that to be somewhat funny. She did come across as a real piece of work though.

MrBigglesworth 04-05-2006 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glengoyne
Just wondering if you thought that Jon Stewart or Cynthia Tucker were jumping to unsupported conclusions.

I'm not so sure that you understood my point Blen. My point was that a horribly written, unfunny, baseless attack on President Bush filled with attacks that a majority of the people would call 'axiomatic' and that contained allusions to him having carnal knowledge of Condoleeza Rice would be ridiculed at best and closed at worst by the very same poster that posted this screed against McKinney.

About ten other posts of mine in this thread have said the same thing, look them up if you are still unclear.

heybrad 04-05-2006 02:55 PM

I'll need to remember if I commit a crime, that all I need to do is offer to sit down and discuss it with the other party. At that point, if they pursue criminal charges, it's no longer my problem.

Ben E Lou 04-05-2006 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Solecismic
I agree with her calling McKinney to task for invoking the race card. McKinney ultimately hurts real victims of racism, who will face more trouble finding someone willing to pay attention. But I see a lot of problematic messages here.

Why is it only a shame when the violence is internecine (against other black people)? Why did she have to qualify that particular noun? How does she know who was sent to prison for crimes they didn't commit? Does the FBI keep statistics?

If young black men have such distorted self-esteem, and such worship of thug culture, then why isn't it surprising that they are more often disciplined in the schools?

I think Tucker is contributing to the same problem as McKinney. She wants different standards applied based on race. In each case, the harm to the cause is similar. McKinney trivializes racism in the workplace. And Tucker trivializes inner-city crime rates.

Tucker may be more dangerous. She's obviously more intelligent than McKinney, who is easy to dismiss as a nutjob. And her message encourages the black community to protect and excuse its violent element. Nothing keeps inner-city black people from getting what they need to succeed more than the violence that surrounds them.

I would hope that a strong, intelligent, black voice in the community wouldn't sell out her own people like that. But by following the tried-and-true politically correct line of her pals "Jesse and Al" (no last names necessary), she gains street cred. Which she seems to prefer to actually doing something to help the people most in need.

Jim (and others):

This may be a missing piece for those who don't live in metro Atlanta: Cynthia Tucker is head of the Editorial Board at the AJC. She is quite far to the left herself, and usually marches lockstep with the party line of the liberal wing of the Democratic party, hence the "this one shocked me" from GrantDawg. The stuff you point out is very much par for the course for her. The only thing stunning or shocking about the article is that she, of ALL people, speaks out against McKinney.

That being said, that one didn't shock me. What a lot of Georgians miss about Cynthia Tucker is that she USUALLY but not ALWAYS marches lockstep with the liberal Democrat party line. If one pays careful attention to her, it is easy to see the one area in which she consistently bashes the liberal point of view in general, and the black leadership specifically: when the liberal point of view/black leadership is not doing enough, in her estimation, to help poor black people. Tucker seems to have a clear view that a (the?) primary purpose of liberalism is to help poor black people, and when the black leadership isn't doing enough to fix whatever her issue of the day is, she lashes out in her editorials against them.

It also doesn't surprise me because I would imagine that Tucker and McKinney know one another and have interacted many times. I saw it in my brief face-to-face interaction with her, and I had a conversation with my older brother today, who left with a similar impression after an encounter with McKinney: she's incredibly arrogant, aloof, and generally not a likeable person. Someone like Tucker, who doesn't need any favors from McKinney, would be more likely to take her to task, and to deliver a few pointed barbs along the way.

GrantDawg 04-05-2006 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celeval
Wpw. I love how she sat back and just didn't even answer the question(s).

I'm somewhat surprised that the race card is being played with the older, white, male lawyer, though.



I'm not completely. It is sort of the same mind set when a man hires a female attorney to defend him for rape. It is the "see, here is a WHITE man agreeing with me." Of course, she could have found an attorney that could have come across better than this guy. He is as bad as the one that was with her at her intial press conference.

Ben E Lou 04-05-2006 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Of course, she could have found an attorney that could have come across better than this guy.

Well, she hasn't exactly demonstrated the best decision-making skills.

st.cronin 04-05-2006 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Well, she hasn't exactly demonstrated the best decision-making skills.


I'm curious if there's any evidence, anywhere, that she can think by herself? Did she go to college? Has she ever had a hard job?

Ben E Lou 04-05-2006 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
I'm curious if there's any evidence, anywhere, that she can think by herself? Did she go to college? Has she ever had a hard job?

From her bio...
Quote:

Born in Atlanta, Georgia on March 17, 1955, Cynthia currently lives in south DeKalb County. She earned a B.A. in International Relations from the University of Southern California in 1978 and a Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. Cynthia was accepted into Berkeley's Ph.D. program and hopes to graduate from that institution one day. In 1984, Cynthia worked as a Diplomatic Fellow at Spelman College in Atlanta. She also taught Political Science at Clark Atlanta University and later at Agnes Scott College, a women's college in Decatur, Georgia.
Jerry Clower would refer to her as someone who was educated beyond her intelligence, most likely. ;)

duckman 04-05-2006 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
'much ado about a hairdo'???


She used that same retarded line to open up her interview on FOX News this morning.

duckman 04-05-2006 05:51 PM

dola

FOX News is reporting that the case will be heard in front of a grand jury tomorrow. A staff member of Sam Farr will be called as a witness along with others.

BYU 14 04-05-2006 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Of course, she could have found an attorney that could have come across better than this guy. He is as bad as the one that was with her at her intial press conference.


I felt the same thing, usually I would say it was a wise move not having her talk much. But after hearing this guy stumble through his points, looking EXTREMELY uncomfortable along the way, I don't know what would be the lesser of two evils.

Ben E Lou 04-06-2006 11:15 AM

2 things...

1. She just apologized on the floor of the house.
2. According to a reporter in D.C., word is that she had a come-to-Jesus meetin' with John Lewis on behalf of the Congressional Black Caucus, and that the CBC members are *FURIOUS* with her right now for the way she has handled this.

BYU 14 04-06-2006 11:27 AM

Would you say she is backing down at this point?

stevew 04-06-2006 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
2 things...

1. She just apologized on the floor of the house.

Shit, she could have done that last week, and the whole mess would have blown over pretty quickly. Instead she goes on an offensive, and acts offensive.

Ben E Lou 04-06-2006 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYU 14
Would you say she is backing down at this point?

Hard to tell. Besides, if so, it may well be too little, too late. The case apparently went to a grand jury today...

Quote:

Originally Posted by CNN.com
McKinney apologizes for scuffle with officer

Grand jury to hear testimony on incident, sources say

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Rep. Cynthia McKinney apologized on the House floor Thursday for a confrontation with a Capitol Police officer last week.
"There should not have been any physical contact in this incident," McKinney said.
"I am sorry that this misunderstanding happened at all, and I regret its escalation and I apologize," she said surrounded by colleagues on the House floor.
She said she would vote for a resolution expressing support for the efforts of Capitol Police.
McKinney's apology came as a District of Columbia grand jury was to begin hearing testimony Thursday related to the confrontation, sources said Wednesday.
A decision on whether the Georgia congresswoman will be charged could come as early as next week, federal law enforcement sources said.
Senior congressional sources said that two House staff members -- Troy Phillips, an aide to Rep. Sam Farr, D-California, and Lisa Subrize, executive assistant to Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, R-Michigan -- have been subpoenaed to testify.
Police say McKinney struck a Capitol Police officer last week when the officer did not recognize her as a member of Congress and tried to stop her from entering a House office building when she did not present identification.
McKinney accuses the officer of "inappropriate touching" and racial profiling in the incident.
The Justice Department and the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, which is handling the case, refused to comment.
James Myart, an attorney representing McKinney, said he wouldn't be surprised if his client were indicted.
"Grand juries do what grand juries do," Myart said. "However, I would think that they would recognize that there simply is not enough evidence here to even bring an indictment."
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus, which has declined to comment because the facts of the case are in dispute, met Wednesday evening to discuss the incident. McKinney was in attendance.
Also Wednesday, McKinney deflected questions about the confrontation, while the Capitol Police chief said the lawmaker should have known better. (Watch McKinney deflect questions -- 10:46)
Capitol Police Chief Terrance Gainer said McKinney didn't stop at an officer's request, then turned around and hit him after he grabbed her when she passed a security checkpoint.
"Any time an officer does not know who the person is coming in the building, I direct them to stop that person. And even if you're stopped, you're not supposed to hit a police officer. It's very simple," he said. "Even the high and the haughty should be able to stop and say, 'I'm a congressman,' and then everybody moves on."
But Myart said that Gainer and other officers went to McKinney's office after the dispute and apologized for the officer's conduct. Myart also questioned why McKinney wasn't arrested on the spot for assaulting an officer, if that is in fact what happened.
Citing potential criminal charges against McKinney, another of her attorneys, Mike Raffauf, said Wednesday his client would not discuss specifics of the case.
McKinney has acknowledged that when she was stopped she was not wearing the lapel pin given to lawmakers. The lawmaker said the identification pin is irrelevant.
"It doesn't have a face or a photo ID on it, and quite frankly it can be duplicated," she said.
McKinney and her attorneys insist that Capitol Police officers should be trained to recognize all 535 members of Congress on sight.
But while Myart has said McKinney was "assaulted" and that her reaction to the officer was appropriate, Gainer argued that McKinney has turned an officer's failure to recognize her into a criminal matter.
Gainer said race was not an issue and that he has seen officers stop and question white, black and Latino members of Congress. He added that officers are given photos of new members of Congress, but with 30,000 employees in the Capitol complex and more than 9 million visitors a year, officers have "to make sure we know who is coming in the building."
Republicans have seized the opportunity to take shots at the legislator. Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, called McKinney a "racist" on Fox News Channel and House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Illinois, downplayed the Georgia lawmaker's allegation of racial profiling.
"This is not about personalities. It's not about somebody's ego. It's not about racial profiling," Hastert said. "It's trying to make this place safer and working with the people that try to make it safer."
Also, two Republican members introduced a resolution Tuesday commending the Capitol Police for their "continued courage and professionalism." (Full story)
McKinney, 51, represents Georgia's 4th Congressional District, a majority-black, Democratic district on the east side of metro Atlanta.
First elected in 1992, she was defeated in a 2002 Democratic primary but made a comeback in 2004, winning her old seat after the candidate who had defeated her two years earlier decided to run for the U.S. Senate.


Ben E Lou 04-06-2006 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew
Shit, she could have done that last week, and the whole mess would have blown over pretty quickly. Instead she goes on an offensive, and acts offensive.

Put me in the camp that believes that the apology came about due to the CBC meeting last night, and that it wasn't something she wanted to do.

Radii 04-06-2006 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Put me in the camp that believes that the apology came about due to the CBC meeting last night, and that it wasn't something she wanted to do.



My 8 year old got caught telling a lie a few weeks ago. He dug his heels in, made up a quick, and totally implausable story and denied that he'd told a lie. My wife laid into him for awhile, and let it go. I came home and laid into him for a little while, just trying to get him to see(and admit) that we had caught him totally red-handed, but he continued to stay in his own little alternate reality, and at a couple of points actually said to each of us "Ok, I admit that I lied, but I really didn't, I just don't want to talk about it any more" thinking that would somehow make everything ok.

Hearing that McKinney apologized after all of the bullshit of the last week strikes me as having only slightly more tact, and the same amount of sincerity(none) as an 8 year old in the story above.

Solecismic 04-06-2006 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radii
My 8 year old got caught telling a lie a few weeks ago. He dug his heels in, made up a quick, and totally implausable story and denied that he'd told a lie. My wife laid into him for awhile, and let it go. I came home and laid into him for a little while, just trying to get him to see(and admit) that we had caught him totally red-handed, but he continued to stay in his own little alternate reality, and at a couple of points actually said to each of us "Ok, I admit that I lied, but I really didn't, I just don't want to talk about it any more" thinking that would somehow make everything ok.

Hearing that McKinney apologized after all of the bullshit of the last week strikes me as having only slightly more tact, and the same amount of sincerity(none) as an 8 year old in the story above.


Yeah, you should have known something was up when Danny Glover came over to your house to defend him.

Radii 04-06-2006 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Solecismic
Yeah, you should have known something was up when Danny Glover came over to your house to defend him.


Glover was alright, it was Belafonte that really got to me.

Ben E Lou 04-06-2006 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McKinney's web site
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Coz Carson, Communications Director
202-225-1605, 404-803-7929 c, [email protected]

Statement on the Floor of the House of Representatives
By Rep. Cynthia A. McKinney
April 6, 2006

Thank you Mr. Speaker,
I come before this body to personally express, again, my sincere regret about the encounter with the Capitol Hill Police. I appreciate my colleagues who are standing with me, who love this institution and who love this country. There should not have been any physical contact in this incident. I have always supported law enforcement, and will be voting for H. Res. 756 expressing my gratitude and appreciation to the professionalism and dedication of the men and women of the U.S. Capitol Police. I am sorry that this misunderstanding happened at all and I regret its escalation. And I apologize.

.

Glengoyne 04-06-2006 03:54 PM

An apology isn't near as satisfying as a court date.

Unfortunately I'm guessing this is what is required to get the officer in question to drop the charges.

stevew 04-06-2006 03:58 PM

I'm guessing she will probably win re-election quite easily. When's the primary?

GrantDawg 04-07-2006 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew
I'm guessing she will probably win re-election quite easily. When's the primary?



That is guarenteed.

Bearcat729 04-07-2006 09:10 PM

For those with HBO she's on Real Time with Bill Maher this week.

Schmidty 04-07-2006 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat729
For those with HBO she's on Real Time with Bill Maher this week.



Bill Maher still has a show?????? And people watch it, AND pay for it??????

Hahahahah!!!!! Certain americans are dumb.

Schmidty 04-07-2006 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schmidty
Bill Maher still has a show?????? And people watch it, AND pay for it??????

Hahahahah!!!!! Certain americans are dumb.


That sounded harsh. My bad.

I think that Rush Limbaugh and Howard Stern suck too, so don't think I only hate on political liberals. I despise ALL one-sided morons.

MrBigglesworth 04-07-2006 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schmidty
That sounded harsh. My bad.

I think that Rush Limbaugh and Howard Stern suck too, so don't think I only hate on political liberals. I despise ALL one-sided morons.

Bill Maher is on the liberal side of a lot of issues, but is by no means one-sided. He takes a lot of stands that would be unpopular to most liberals. From the wikipedia entry:
Quote:

Maher describes himself as a libertarian and celebrates libertarian figures such as Larry Elder and P.J. O'Rourke. He favors partial privatization of social security, ending corporate welfare, and legalizing drugs, gambling, prostitution, and pornography. He supported Bob Dole in the 1996 U.S. presidential election on the basis that Dole was a war hero. [1] He has expressed disdain for many of the liberal positions regarding hate crime, sexual harassment, etc. as being "things that make women nod." (In general, his views on women and sex tend to be iconoclastic and potentially offensive.) However, Maher does support many Social Democrat stances which are in direct opposition to libertarian ideology and/or associated with modern liberalism, including government regulation of corporations, restrictions on corporate entrepreneurship, foreign aid, an internationalist foreign policy, public schooling, a ban on homeschooling, campaign finance restrictions, radical environmentalism, affirmative action, minimum wage laws, gun control, income redistribution through higher taxation and government funding for abortion.
That's the profile of someone left of center, but definitely not on the level of Rush hackery, just someone with an opinion.

BishopMVP 04-08-2006 12:38 PM

Ping: Bucc - I don't follow Bill Maher, but when you've got
Quote:

government regulation of corporations, restrictions on corporate entrepreneurship, foreign aid, an internationalist foreign policy, public schooling, a ban on homeschooling, campaign finance restrictions, radical environmentalism, affirmative action, minimum wage laws, gun control, income redistribution through higher taxation and government funding for abortion.
you're not a libertarian. Just wanting to legalize drugs/prostitution does not make you one.

st.cronin 04-08-2006 12:42 PM

a ban on homeschooling?

GrantDawg 04-08-2006 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
a ban on homeschooling?


Yup. That's a real Libertarian position, no?

Buccaneer 04-08-2006 12:46 PM

No, just the opposite, I think.

st.cronin 04-08-2006 12:50 PM

What's wrong with homeschooling? I can't imagine a left or right argument against it.

Buccaneer 04-08-2006 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
What's wrong with homeschooling? I can't imagine a left or right argument against it.


It would come from an NEA, anti-religion or pro-govt/socialistic position.

SFL Cat 04-08-2006 12:57 PM

It is evil, because it is mostly bigoted Christian zealots who do homeschooling. Don't you know, it takes a village to indoctrinate...er...teach a child.

GrantDawg 04-23-2006 02:48 PM

My in-laws have just received a bit of a shock. They just found out because of redistricting, they are now in McKinney's district! They cut a portion of Dekalb county off her area, and gave her a large portion of Rockdale County. Needless to say, they are not amused.

Glengoyne 04-23-2006 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
My in-laws have just received a bit of a shock. They just found out because of redistricting, they are now in McKinney's district! They cut a portion of Dekalb county off her area, and gave her a large portion of Rockdale County. Needless to say, they are not amused.


Ha HA!


/Nelson voice off

Ben E Lou 04-23-2006 06:37 PM

More from good ol' Cynthia, from tomorrow's AJC:

Quote:

TV station catches gaffe by McKinney
Congresswoman berates staffer as tape rolled after interview

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 04/24/06 Move over Britney Spears, Cynthia McKinney's — oops! — done it again.
The flap-plagued congresswoman, who has been in the media spotlight since she scuffled with a Capitol Hill police officer last month, was caught bad-mouthing a senior staffer Saturday.
Unfortunately for McKinney, a DeKalb County Democrat who is running for re-election in the 4th Congressional District, a TV microphone she was wearing picked up her indelicate grumbling.
"Crap!" an irritated McKinney is heard saying after ending an interview with CBS 46 in which reporter Renee Starzyk repeatedly asked about the fallout from the police dust-up. "You know what? They lied to Coz and Coz is a fool."
McKinney, apparently realizing her blunder, then returned to face the camera and tell the reporter that comments about her communications director, Coz Carson, were off the record.
But the TV stationed aired the footage Saturday and the story later was picked up by CNN.
Mike Machi, Channel 46's assistant news director, said McKinney's office was aware Starzyk would ask about the fuss in the one-on-one interview.
"Congresswoman McKinney has been in Washington for a long time and she has handled the media for most of her public life," said Machi, who was unapologetic about airing the interview outtakes. "There were lots of ways to handle this and I was absolutely surprised that she handled this situation in that fashion."
McKinney, who is expected to qualify for her U.S. House race today, could not be reached Sunday for comment. But Carson, who said he began working for the congresswoman a week before the pushing incident, seemed unbothered by the public upbraiding.
"I share her frustration with the media's insatiable appetite for controversy and unimportant issues," said Carson, a former newsman who said he has known McKinney and her family for years.
Carson said he was present for Saturday's interview, which took place during a community meeting with constituents, but declined to say what led to the rebuke.
He also demurred when asked if he had spoken to McKinney about the "fool" comment.
"I'll just say I look forward to getting back to work tomorrow," he said.
Political observer Merle Black of Emory University got a chuckle out of McKinney's latest gaffe. But he said he wasn't surprised by her behavior, even in an election year.
"All of this is consistent," Black said of the way McKinney has handled the attention, including her charges that the police incident was racially motivated. "She doesn't act the way most Congress members act."
It took an Emory University political observer to make that highlighted comment? ;)

GrantDawg 04-23-2006 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
More from good ol' Cynthia, from tomorrow's AJC:

It took an Emory University political observer to make that highlighted comment? ;)



Yeah, I saw that. The "she's crazy" moment in all that wasn't the comment (who hasn't been frustrated with someone and said something like that), but the coming back to the podium to tell them they were not allowed to "use" that. As if she has the power to tell them that. There was only one fool involved there, and it wasn't Coz.

Ben E Lou 04-23-2006 06:49 PM

Transcript of McKinney comments

Published on: 04/23/06This is the partial transcript of a question and answer session held Saturday in Chamblee with Congresswoman Cynthia Mckinney. She regularly holds such sessions in her district. This session was taped by CBS 46 news. .
&bullQuestion: has anyone asked you about your confrontation with the Capitol police officer?
Answer: Actually you, media, are the only ones who are asking about that.
&bullQuestion: I'm sure you thought about this — potentially someone might ask you about this, outside of the media, about the confrontation — what would your response be, how do you explain it to the people of DeKalb County?
Answer: Well, actually no one has asked me other than you and so... I talk to my constituents about the things that are on their minds...
&bullQuestion: Do you think the incident will affect your chances for re-election?
Answer: You're talking about the incident I'm talking about issues.
&bullQuestion: You want to talk about issues, has the confrontation made it harder for you to focus on the issues? Has it been a distraction?
Answer: You're a distraction because that seems to be all you want to talk about — but people here understand that my representation is much larger than any discreet incident
OFF CAMERA, WITH MIKE STILL ON:
•"This is crap — they lied to Coz and Coz is a fool for believin' 'em. [Referring to aide Coz Carson]
&bullAnything that is captured by your audio while I'm not seated in this chair is off the record and is not permissible to use — is that understood?

JonInMiddleGA 04-23-2006 07:22 PM

Heck, I'm still chuckling at Coz Carson being the spokesman of a Congressperson.

Then again, him & McKinney are a pretty well made match.

Celeval 04-23-2006 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
My in-laws have just received a bit of a shock. They just found out because of redistricting, they are now in McKinney's district! They cut a portion of Dekalb county off her area, and gave her a large portion of Rockdale County. Needless to say, they are not amused.


Will this help or hurt her in re-election? I'm not familiar with where the redistricting happened, so I've got no real idea of the demographics there.

GrantDawg 04-23-2006 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celeval
Will this help or hurt her in re-election? I'm not familiar with where the redistricting happened, so I've got no real idea of the demographics there.



It was a strong Republican area. It should hurt her, but you never know. Dekalb has 5 times the population of Rockdale. The Republicans did the redistricting, so you would think they wouldn't have cut the heart out a Republican base to give McKinney an easy win. The district still has that corner of Gwinnett in it as well, and it lost a part of South Dekalb.

TroyF 04-23-2006 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
Yup. I went for a period of being very fascinated with what Marx's true feelings were versus what "capital C" Communism was. It's something that has always been an interesting conversation for me (and maybe worth a thread of it's own), although it's been awhile so some of the facts are somewhat hazy to me... but quite clearly the three are very different, yet more often than not like you noted are used interchnageably....

FWIW, I'm not saying anyone in this thread does or does not understand the word, but clearly we have multiple people using different definitions, therefore.....


Part of the reason they are used interchangebly is that a Marxist society isn't really possible. It will inevitibly slip into communism or something close to it.

Marx was a smart guy. His only problem is that he had very little understanding of psychology. Especially the psychology of the masses.

It doesn't matter a lot to me when those terms are misused anyway. How many dems and far left wingers have called Bush a "Nazi"? How many times has Rush used the Femi-Nazi line?

The term nazi and communist are used in their truest forms only in classrooms and discussions of history majors. The terms now mean "communist=left wing" "nazi-right wing"

It's not worth getting bent out of shape about the terms at this point.

MrBigglesworth 06-17-2006 04:18 PM

Thread needs a re-title:
Quote:

Grand jury refuses to indict McKinney

By BOB KEMPER
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 06/16/06

WASHINGTON — A grand jury has declined to indict Rep. Cynthia McKinney of Georgia for allegedly striking a Capitol police officer in March, the federal prosecutor announced Friday.

The decision ends a case against the DeKalb County Democrat that has been rife with political and racial tensions.
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...ney.html?imw=Y

st.cronin 06-17-2006 08:21 PM

I meant to ask this earlier: Is McKinney the one who complained about hurricane names being racist? If not, who was that?

Dutch 06-17-2006 08:31 PM

And a rewording for the news article...

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
Thread needs a re-title:

Quote:

Grand jury refuses to indict McKinney

By BOB KEMPER
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 06/16/06

WASHINGTON — A grand jury has declined to indict Rep. Cynthia McKinney of Georgia for allegedly striking a Capitol police officer in March, the federal prosecutor announced Friday.

The decision ends a case against the DeKalb County Democrat that has been rife with political and racial tensions she created all by herself.

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...ney.html?imw=Y


Crapshoot 06-17-2006 08:33 PM

McKinney just comes across as a dumb, offensive idiot. How people keep re-electing her I'm not sure- what's her selling point ? Then again, there are people who vote for Tom Delay, so perhaps I expect too much.

JonInMiddleGA 06-17-2006 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
I meant to ask this earlier: Is McKinney the one who complained about hurricane names being racist? If not, who was that?


That would have been Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX)
http://www.snopes.com/racial/language/hurricane.asp

Dutch 06-17-2006 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crapshoot
McKinney just comes across as a dumb, offensive idiot. How people keep re-electing her I'm not sure- what's her selling point ? Then again, there are people who vote for Tom Delay, so perhaps I expect too much.


Just because you don't read about it in the elite media, Democrats are fucked up too, get over it.

Crapshoot 06-17-2006 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dutch
Just because you don't read about it in the elite media, Democrats are fucked up too, get over it.


Wtf ? I know you aren't the brightest bulb, but I was criticizing the "Democrat" AND the "Republican" - perhaps your comprehension needs work.

JonInMiddleGA 06-17-2006 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crapshoot
McKinney just comes across as a dumb, offensive idiot. How people keep re-electing her I'm not sure- what's her selling point ?


Have you checked out the demographics of her district?

Dutch 06-17-2006 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crapshoot
Wtf ? I know you aren't the brightest bulb, but I was criticizing the "Democrat" AND the "Republican" - perhaps your comprehension needs work.


No thanks, my point remains. If Crapshoot wants to discuss how a Republican does something wrong, it's 5 pages about how evil the Republican party is...period. If Crapwhoot wants to discuss how a Democrat does something wrong, it's one post about how bad the Republicans are as well.

MrBigglesworth 06-18-2006 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dutch
Just because you don't read about it in the elite media, Democrats are fucked up too, get over it.

'Elite media', is that the new term for the two minutes hate? It's impossible to keep up.

MrBigglesworth 06-18-2006 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA
Have you checked out the demographics of her district?

Are you saying that black people vote for dumb, offensive idiots?

JonInMiddleGA 06-18-2006 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
Are you saying that black people vote for dumb, offensive idiots?


In this particular case, the answer appears to be yes.

And, hot off the press, is today's story about McKinney's supporters welcoming her back to the district, complete with quotes about how the incident was really the fault of the police.
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...8mckinney.html

MrBigglesworth 06-18-2006 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA
In this particular case, the answer appears to be yes.

From your 'look at the demographics' comment, it appears that you believe that to be the case in more than just this particular one. Is that correct, or am I mischaracterizing your view?

TroyF 06-18-2006 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
Are you saying that black people vote for dumb, offensive idiots?



Yup. Just as white people vote for dumb, offensive idiots.

It's great you are trying to turn this into a race issue now. You seem pretty much exactly like the women you are trying to defend here. She isn't persecuted because she is black. She's ripped because she's an idiot. And sadly there are a lot of people supporting her and her agenda.

Just as it's sad white people have elected former KKK leaders into office.

But then, I know it only works one way Biggie. White Republicans are the cause of every bit of hell on the face of the planet, while race baiting dems like this psycho are just helping people out. We get it.

gstelmack 06-18-2006 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TroyF
It's great you are trying to turn this into a race issue now.


It's what MrB does. He twists and turns statements by people on the board to make it sound like the most offensive statement possible in order to keep the argument going, especially if it helps make one of the Republican / right-wing / conservative members of the board look like all the stereotypes he likes to heap on us. It's why I've stopped responding to anything he posts; it's just not worth it, and he's extremely good at word-twisting and taking things out of context.

miked 06-18-2006 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA
In this particular case, the answer appears to be yes.

And, hot off the press, is today's story about McKinney's supporters welcoming her back to the district, complete with quotes about how the incident was really the fault of the police.
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...8mckinney.html


Fuck the police.

MrBigglesworth 06-18-2006 09:42 AM

TroyF, gstelmack, what did JiMG mean when he said 'check the demographics'? I asked him twice what he meant by it, and he hasn't given an indication that that is NOT what he meant. And he is obviously denigrating some group, I'm just trying to pin down which group.

MrBigglesworth 06-18-2006 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TroyF
Yup. Just as white people vote for dumb, offensive idiots.

It's great you are trying to turn this into a race issue now. You seem pretty much exactly like the women you are trying to defend here. She isn't persecuted because she is black. She's ripped because she's an idiot. And sadly there are a lot of people supporting her and her agenda.

Just as it's sad white people have elected former KKK leaders into office.

But then, I know it only works one way Biggie. White Republicans are the cause of every bit of hell on the face of the planet, while race baiting dems like this psycho are just helping people out. We get it.

This is completely uncalled for. I haven't attacked white republicans anywhere here. I'm not the one that brought up the race issue (that would be JiMG, at least that is my reading, and all I did was ask politely if that was really what he meant). I'm also not sure how you can say for sure that race wasn't an issue with the capitol police incident: McKinney certainly doesn't look like a typical member of Congress. (I do think it's in bad taste for her to go around saying that though)

MrBigglesworth 06-18-2006 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gstelmack
It's what MrB does. He twists and turns statements by people on the board to make it sound like the most offensive statement possible in order to keep the argument going, especially if it helps make one of the Republican / right-wing / conservative members of the board look like all the stereotypes he likes to heap on us. It's why I've stopped responding to anything he posts; it's just not worth it, and he's extremely good at word-twisting and taking things out of context.

Here's my quote again:
Quote:

From your 'look at the demographics' comment, it appears that you believe that to be the case in more than just this particular one. Is that correct, or am I mischaracterizing your view?
OMG! How rude! I should be suspended indefinitely! I'm unhinged attacking the poor defenseless JiMG who probably read this and went home crying because I twisted his words so bad!

Please gstelmack, the only one giving out personal attacks is you.

GrantDawg 06-18-2006 10:12 AM

I rhink JIMGA would have been better off to say "look at the history of her district." Dekalb County is probably the best arguement against democracy that exists. It has a 100+ years history of corrupt government, starting with white, racist crooks and tranforming into black, racist crooks.

Glengoyne 06-18-2006 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
Are you saying that black people vote for dumb, offensive idiots?


Is this an admission that she's a dumb and offensive idiot?:)

Glengoyne 06-18-2006 11:17 AM

I was going to ask JIMG if they had an option to select "idiot" as a demographic description in Georgia. They could put it under the "inbred" box.

Cause Idiots are idiots completely without regard to the color of their skin. Sort of like "Stupid is as stupid does."

Dutch 06-18-2006 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glengoyne
Is this an admission that she's a dumb and offensive idiot?:)


Well played. ;)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.