Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Obama versus McCain (versus the rest) (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=65622)

Galaxy 09-03-2008 03:13 PM

Good points.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 03:16 PM

um, Senator McCain, who do you think would win in a fight, Randy Couture or Brock Lesnar and Ill take your answer sitting down...thanks. Go Rebels!

sachmo71 09-03-2008 03:16 PM


molson 09-03-2008 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 1823308)
Uhhh, there is a town hall.


They can call it whatever they want, but there's still a moderator, and I'm sure the questions are still pre-screened by the candidates.

Arles 09-03-2008 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823281)
that's so disingenuous again. He was honest, he said debate and a debate they'll have times 3.

I think that's the perfect word for Obama's statements. He does this in August:

Quote:

Democratic candidate Barack Obama on Saturday backed away from rival John McCain's challenge for a series of joint appearances, agreeing only to the standard three debates in the fall.

In May, when a McCain adviser proposed a series of pre-convention appearances at town hall meetings, Obama said, "I think that's a great idea." In summer stumping on the campaign trail, McCain has often noted that Obama had not followed through and joined him in any events.

ABC News: Obama Backs Away From McCain's Debate Challenge

Then, at his convention, he calls out McCain for a debate after rejecting McCain's attempt at a debate (which he earlier agreed with):
Quote:

If John McCain wants to have a debate about who has the temperament, and judgment, to serve as the next Commander-in-Chief, that's a debate I'm ready to have.
I'd say disingenuous pretty much sums up Obama's "challenge" to McCain for a debate on the above items.

GrantDawg 09-03-2008 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachmo71 (Post 1823359)


That, my friend, is awesome!

JPhillips 09-03-2008 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by molson (Post 1823364)
They can call it whatever they want, but there's still a moderator, and I'm sure the questions are still pre-screened by the candidates.


And you're wrong:

Quote:

The participants in the town meeting will pose their questions to the candidates after reviewing their questions with the moderator for the sole purpose of avoiding duplication.

There has to be some sort of moderator even in a town hall. Who calls on questioners? Who enforces time limits? Who gives an introduction? Brokaw may do more than that, I don't know, but you can't have a debate without some sort of moderation.

DaddyTorgo 09-03-2008 03:37 PM

Was just conversing with a coworker who brought up a great point - she said she was watching an interview with Luke Russert last week and they were talking about polling numbers, and he pointed out that traditional polling #'s (which are tied to landlines) don't accurately reflect the electorate because of the large % of the population under 30 who no longer have a landline at all, and the fact that a majority of that group are left-leaning. My coworker then said that Luke said that they did a seperate survey of cellphone users and Obama had like a 20pt lead on McCain.

Now I'm not suggesting that that 20pt lead is accurate (it seems way too huge to me), but simply raising the point and guessing that the truth lies somewhere in the middle, that perhaps Obama's lead is somewhat more secure than the raw polls give him credit for.

JPhillips 09-03-2008 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arles (Post 1823366)
I think that's the perfect word for Obama's statements. He does this in August:



ABC News: Obama Backs Away From McCain's Debate Challenge

Then, at his convention, he calls out McCain for a debate after rejecting McCain's attempt at a debate (which he earlier agreed with):

I'd say disingenuous pretty much sums up Obama's "challenge" to McCain for a debate on the above items.


You do realize there are multiple definitions for "debate"? In context it seems clear Obama was calling for:

Quote:

A discussion involving opposing points; an argument.

While a town hall would be:

Quote:

A formal contest of argumentation in which two opposing teams defend and attack a given proposition.

JPhillips 09-03-2008 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1823375)
Was just conversing with a coworker who brought up a great point - she said she was watching an interview with Luke Russert last week and they were talking about polling numbers, and he pointed out that traditional polling #'s (which are tied to landlines) don't accurately reflect the electorate because of the large % of the population under 30 who no longer have a landline at all, and the fact that a majority of that group are left-leaning. My coworker then said that Luke said that they did a seperate survey of cellphone users and Obama had like a 20pt lead on McCain.

Now I'm not suggesting that that 20pt lead is accurate (it seems way too huge to me), but simply raising the point and guessing that the truth lies somewhere in the middle, that perhaps Obama's lead is somewhat more secure than the raw polls give him credit for.


I haven't seen that. One of the big polling outfits, I think Gallup, studied this and found a less than three point difference in a pure cell phone sample. They also stated that accounting for cell phone users was a part of their overall methodology and hence their polling numbers.

DaddyTorgo 09-03-2008 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 1823381)
I haven't seen that. One of the big polling outfits, I think Gallup, studied this and found a less than three point difference in a pure cell phone sample. They also stated that accounting for cell phone users was a part of their overall methodology and hence their polling numbers.


fair enough - like i said - it wasn't an interview I saw or anything - it was total hearsay on my part to post that. just something i wondered if people had taken into account.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 03:44 PM

C'mon Arles, that's strategy. Youve gotta be able to look at things neutrally sometime right?

ISiddiqui 09-03-2008 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823295)
...or a duel.


Why exactly do you think Palin's on the ticket? :D

DaddyTorgo 09-03-2008 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cafferty's latest blog on cnn.com

The Associated Press reports a private lawyer has been authorized to spend $95,000 dollars of state money to defend Palin in the trooper ethics probe


.

Arles 09-03-2008 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823387)
C'mon Arles, that's strategy.

Hey, I think it's real smart for Obama. But, to call out McCain for a debate on these issues right after declining his challenge to have more debates is akin to yelling at someone and taunting him while quietly asking your friends to hold you back.

Quote:

Youve gotta be able to look at things neutrally sometime right?
You've pegged me. I have no ability to look at things neutrally. Maybe one day I'll be able to separate the politics from everything and be as unbiased as you are. Well, it gives me something to strive for atleast.

flere-imsaho 09-03-2008 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFL Cat (Post 1823226)
Plus, he does have the military record, and unlike Kerry, he never came back from Vietnam bad mouthing his fellow soldiers...plus, who in their right mind would try to Swift Boat a POW?


Yeah, that would be like someone accusing a triple-amputee Bronze and Silver Star Vietnam Vet of a lack of patriotism in campaign ads featuring images of the Vet superimposed with images of Osama bin Laden & Saddam Hussein. Crazy talk!

molson 09-03-2008 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1823420)
.


So you're upset that the State is defending the govenor in a legal matter?

And you want higher taxes?? (snicker).

States outsource legal maters all the time, when there's a conflict, or if its otherwise more efficient. Otherwise she'd be defended by the Attorney General's Office (which would also use State money)

JPhillips 09-03-2008 04:28 PM

For the love of God Obama wasn't calling for any formal debate. He was talking about a discussion or argument.

As for Palin's lawyer, that's not a big deal. A governor has to be able to have legal counsel and having a limited budget from the state is reasonable. The fact that he's both the governor's attorney and Palin's family attorney could be a bit of a conflict, however.

DaddyTorgo 09-03-2008 04:38 PM

Hey i didn't say i was upset - just hadn't heard that yet and so was posting it over here. Besides, Alaska has plenty of $$ - not worried about that.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arles (Post 1823424)
Hey, I think it's real smart for Obama. But, to call out McCain for a debate on these issues right after declining his challenge to have more debates is akin to yelling at someone and taunting him while quietly asking your friends to hold you back.


You've pegged me. I have no ability to look at things neutrally. Maybe one day I'll be able to separate the politics from everything and be as unbiased as you are. Well, it gives me something to strive for atleast.


you said it.

Arles, theyre having a debate and if you trust the rules as stated than it's closer to what you desire than youre willing to admit so you can staunchly stand in your corner. I however will continue to look at things as fairly as possible. As an example, I have no problam with a government attorney defending the governor on Alaskan tax dollars, until I hear otherwise that's what that attorney is supposed to do. Wow, Arles, can you believe it? Ability to see things from a neutral standpoint. When you stop the spin perhaps you'll be able to too.

Galaxy 09-03-2008 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823387)
C'mon Arles, that's strategy. Youve gotta be able to look at things neutrally sometime right?


Who here (including myself) looks things at neutrally? We are all bias. Politics and no bias do not mix. Never have, never will.

Galaxy 09-03-2008 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warhammer (Post 1819079)
First, America needs to rediscover personal responsibility. You are responsible for maintaining your home. You are responsible for managing your money. You are responsible for how you react to the world around you. Etc., etc.

Second, we need to re-establish family values. Where I am from, most of the people that are from single family homes wind up in bad situations. (Just for the record, this is something that is not a government issue, it is a societal issue) We need to figure out some way to encourage people to have a stable home environment for their children. We have to restore ethical values (I am a big believer in some universal truths).

Third, we need to realize in this country that not everyone is cut out for college and encourage people to go to trade schools. We also need to improve our trade schools because many of the people that I have run across from the schools down here were not worth crap. I'm talking about machinists who couldn't read a ruler or tape measure type of stuff.

Finally, we need to revamp our public school system. It is absolute crap. I was lucky enough to have a wonderful kindergarten teacher for my son. Unfortunately, what happens in first grade? They put many of the smart kids in a class with a second year teacher. Bless her heart she is nice. But she does not yet know how to challenge students. The result is that my child is not getting the most out of his education. He can do better, but he is not challenged at all. Compared to last year when his teacher repeatedly challenged him to write and sing songs. The result is that he is used to performing in front of his peers, his hand writing is excellent for his age, and he has a great creative side as far as making up music. (But he doesn't want to be a rock star because then he would have to smoke)

Another thing regarding education is make ethics and civics classes mandatory. Additionally, we need to show kids why they need to develop skills.

But, all that said, we still need trash collectors, janitors, etc. We need to make unskilled labor more profitable so that people will work in those jobs rather than sit on their ass, which I see all too often about a mile from where I live.


An old post, but I like this.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy (Post 1823458)
Who here (including myself) looks things at neutrally? We are all bias. Politics and no bias do not mix. Never have, never will.


Well Ill refer you back to my DT supported list of things I want and I think most everyone can agree that that is a pretty good starting bloc.

Jas_lov 09-03-2008 05:29 PM

New state polls are out and they look good for Obama:

Iowa: Obama 55 McCain 40
Minnesota: Obama 53 McCain 41
Ohio: Obama 47 McCain 45

Arles 09-03-2008 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823450)
Arles, theyre having a debate and if you trust the rules as stated than it's closer to what you desire than youre willing to admit so you can staunchly stand in your corner.

I'm not really sure what you are saying here, but my point was the picture of it all. Declining debates (that Obama agreed to in principle earlier) and then stating you want more discussion with your opponent and calling him out seems little disingenuous to me.

Quote:

I however will continue to look at things as fairly as possible.
You keep playing this game of acting like you are completely impartial when you've been nothing of the sort in this thread. Neither have I or pretty much any other poster, but we aren't sticking our nose up at everyone else when they argue their point of view. If you think you are being completely impartial, there's obviously nothing I can say to change that in your mind. So, we'll just leave it to the readers of this thread to decide if this image you've made of yourself in your own mind is accurate.

Quote:

As an example, I have no problam with a government attorney defending the governor on Alaskan tax dollars, until I hear otherwise that's what that attorney is supposed to do.
How gracious of you. I think most on the left feel this way. What's interesting is that even when you try and be impartial, you still need to throw out a qualifier when taking the McCain/Palin side.

I'm biased, most in this thread are biased. I could puff smoke up your butt to show how impartial I am and state how I think Obama was correct in situation Y or the press was unfair to him in situation Z (there are many examples of both), but I choose not to insult everyone's intelligence who's reading.

Quote:

Wow, Arles, can you believe it? Ability to see things from a neutral standpoint. When you stop the spin perhaps you'll be able to too.
You just keep telling yourself that. There are two types of people in this thread: those that acknowledge their bias and those lying to themselves. I'll leave it to you to decide which camp you want to belong to. No skin off my back either way.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 05:35 PM

by no means do I mean to denegrade anyone else's view or attempt to make anyone think like me unless I can convince someone that the facts are overwhelming and they change their opinion of their own volition. Ive stated clearly and concisely to you that things should be allowed to run their course, that the questions from both sides are legitimate, that the lying shouldnt be allowed on either side, that family issues should remain private if thats what the family wants, etc. So at what point is that a biased view and Im sure you want those things too, right? I will call a spade a spade and my view is my own but I do think when I have an opinion, that it is my opinion, until it's changed by more info to justify a flip or a flop. Edit to add: Now if I can change your opinion with info. or through debate than great but at least I will attempt to base it on truthyness and honesty in stuff i post.

In regards to puffing smoke and being able to show when person A is right about X and person B wrong about X and then be vice versa is an ok thing to be. I do not think anyone in this thread HAS TO follow the straight line in support of or against their player...if anything that's the problem with this country.

And the commentary about the attorney is vanilla as it can be, I wasnt trying to be gracious but continue to participate in this thread and that current issue. I have no idea the rules that a government attorney is supposed to follow so as far as I know theyre playing by them. Until someone tells me or shows me that something isnt above board why shouldnt it go through and she be able to use him/her?

Hit the reset button, one time and re-read what I said without a slant, JimGA is able to do this IMO. It's not a biased jab or anything....Im not a lawyer nor work for the government.

can I still buy your next game?

Jas_lov 09-03-2008 05:41 PM

I don't think those inside the Republican Party are too happy about the Palin pick even though they say so on the air. Mike Murphy and Peggy Noonan are caught discussing Palin off air:

YouTube - Noonan and Murphy on Palin

Noonan said this today in her WSJ article today: "She is a real and present danger to the American left, and to the Obama candidacy. She could become a transformative political presence. So they are going to have to kill her, and kill her quick." And then in the clip she says "It's over." Are conservatives really as happy with Palin as they claim to be?

ace1914 09-03-2008 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy (Post 1823461)
An old post, but I like this.


Looks like the last part of Obama's acceptance speech....

Warhammer, do you do speech writing?

Arles 09-03-2008 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jas_lov (Post 1823513)
I don't think those inside the Republican Party are too happy about the Palin pick even though they say so on the air. Mike Murphy and Peggy Noonan are caught discussing Palin off air:

YouTube - Noonan and Murphy on Palin

Noonan said this today in her WSJ article today: "She is a real and present danger to the American left, and to the Obama candidacy. She could become a transformative political presence. So they are going to have to kill her, and kill her quick." And then in the clip she says "It's over." Are conservatives really as happy with Palin as they claim to be?

As I said in the other thread, I really don't see a difference in the next four years regardless of who's president (again, given I am not motivated to vote on social issues). So, before the Palin pick, I wasn't really all that interested in the election. After the Palin pick, I see more of a reason to vote for McCain as I like her. Not sure what that means, but the pick has certainly got me more interested in the election.

ace1914 09-03-2008 06:11 PM

Good or bad, here comes your next Palin/Obama comparison.


Palin's Church May Have Shaped Controversial Worldview

Flasch186 09-03-2008 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ace1914 (Post 1823567)
Good or bad, here comes your next Palin/Obama comparison.


Palin's Church May Have Shaped Controversial Worldview


I dont think her quoted statement is good or bad although I'd like to see religion kept out of politics. Granted, I didnt watch the video but she should stand by her beliefs so I have no problem with the quote. Better to know someone than not when having to cast a ballot for or against.


/graciousness

Flasch186 09-03-2008 06:35 PM

Well now it seems a couple of the talking heads got caught on an open mike and were expressing their true (because the cameras were off) feelings on the Palin selection:

Noonan, Murphy trash Palin on hot mic: 'It's over' - Yahoo! News

Arles, Im not painting it one way or the other.

Alan T 09-03-2008 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 (Post 1823600)
Her quote is fine, it's more this one (if confirmed) that would be interesting:



That is nothing worse than the emails I get forwarded by my mother-in-law and what alot of the ultra-religious-right pretty much believe. There are extremest of all kinds, and I try to stay away from all of them (both the left and the right) when I can.

Mizzou B-ball fan 09-03-2008 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jas_lov (Post 1823486)
New state polls are out and they look good for Obama:

Iowa: Obama 55 McCain 40
Minnesota: Obama 53 McCain 41
Ohio: Obama 47 McCain 45


That Ohio poll is far from good for Obama. He got a 6-8 point boost in nationwide polls overall, but only a 2 point boost in Ohio. We'll have to wait to see what it shows after the RNC convention to see if it evens out (Ohio was a dead heat before the conventions).

Flasch186 09-03-2008 06:46 PM

now they count?

Noop 09-03-2008 06:56 PM


Noop 09-03-2008 06:57 PM

I submit with no comment.

Alan T 09-03-2008 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 1823648)
I submit with no comment.


I am shocked that an underaged teenager is drinking. Shocked

Noop 09-03-2008 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1823653)
I am shocked that an underaged teenager is drinking. Shocked


Family values.

Noop 09-03-2008 07:04 PM


Flasch186 09-03-2008 07:05 PM

yeah, no biggie to me....now if she were preggo at the time it'd be completely different :)

Noop 09-03-2008 07:05 PM


Noop 09-03-2008 07:07 PM

No biggie? Being 16 it is conceivable that she might have a drivers license and car.

Just Saying.

astrosfan64 09-03-2008 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arles (Post 1823490)


You keep playing this game of acting like you are completely impartial when you've been nothing of the sort in this thread. Neither have I or pretty much any other poster, but we aren't sticking our nose up at everyone else when they argue their point of view. If you think you are being completely impartial, there's obviously nothing I can say to change that in your mind. So, we'll just leave it to the readers of this thread to decide if this image you've made of yourself in your own mind is accurate.






I can say that both you and flasch are FAR from being impartial, but at least arles admits it. I would like to state that I am only partial to logic.

My journey on this election.


I wanted Rudy for Republican and President

I wanted Obama for Democrat over Hillary

I wanted Obama for the president

I heard Obama having to think on his feet (and I realized he sounds just like George Bush) Great Speaker unlike George, but sounds even worse then George if you catch him unprepared on a topic.

I saw Obama go back on some key points that made me think he wasn't the "agent of change he claimed to be" (turning down campaign reform e.g. public funds) (turning down the town hall style of debates)

I decided to go with McCain

McCain is going to pick Joe Liberman ( I'm really excited that he is crossing party lines and picking his choice)

They announce Palin

I read about Palin's history and stances and hear how McCain really wanted Liberman but they talked him out of it.

I throw up on myself

I'm back to Obama - he would really have to screw up for me to change at this point. If he does get that bad, I would just throw in the towel and go back vote independent.

Alan T 09-03-2008 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 1823664)
No biggie? Being 16 it is conceivable that she might have a drivers license and car.

Just Saying.



If people want to argue that it is not a good idea to have a VP in office that believes in ultra-conservative right wing religious views, then I'll 100% agree with them. If you're wanting to talk about pictures of underaged drinking, I can point you to facebook or myspace where you can find all kinds of example of this I am sure.

Noop 09-03-2008 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1823667)
If people want to argue that it is not a good idea to have a VP in office that believes in ultra-conservative right wing religious views, then I'll 100% agree with them. If you're wanting to talk about pictures of underaged drinking, I can point you to facebook or myspace where you can find all kinds of example of this I am sure.


To my knowledge none of those kid's parent is potentially one heartbeat away from being president of the United States of America. If she can not keep her house in order, how can she potentially run a country.

SirFozzie 09-03-2008 07:16 PM

Real Clear Politics just released snippets of tonight's speech by Palin:

On her experience as a public servant:

"I had the privilege of living most of my life in a small town. I was just your average hockey mom, and signed up for the PTA because I wanted to make my kids' public education better. When I ran for city council, I didn't need focus groups and voter profiles because I knew those voters, and knew their families, too. Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown. And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves. I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a 'community organizer,' except that you have actual responsibilities."

On why she is going to Washington, D.C.:

"I'm not a member of the permanent political establishment. And I've learned quickly, these past few days, that if you're not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone. But here's a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I'm not going to Washington to seek their good opinion - I'm going to Washington to serve the people of this country."

On energy policies that the McCain-Palin administration will implement:

"Our opponents say, again and again, that drilling will not solve all of America's energy problems - as if we all didn't know that already. But the fact that drilling won't solve every problem is no excuse to do nothing at all. Starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we're going to lay more pipelines...build more nuclear plants...create jobs with clean coal...and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal, and other alternative sources. We need American energy resources, brought to you by American ingenuity, and produced by American workers."

On John McCain:

"Here's how I look at the choice Americans face in this election. In politics, there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers. And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change.

VPI97 09-03-2008 07:17 PM

Is it just me or does the girl in those pictures look nothing like Bristol Palin?

Just sayin...

Noop 09-03-2008 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VPI97 (Post 1823677)
Is it just me or does the girl in those pictures look nothing like Bristol Palin?

Just sayin...


I have read that and that's why I removed the other photos, according to the site I got the photo's from these two photos are indeed her.

Not 100% sure though.

ace1914 09-03-2008 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VPI97 (Post 1823677)
Is it just me or does the girl in those pictures look nothing like Bristol Palin?

Just sayin...


Stunt double.

Noop 09-03-2008 07:22 PM

Is it possible for her to be dropped by McCain? No doubt if he were to do that his campaign would be dead in the water.

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 1823684)
Is it possible for her to be dropped by McCain? No doubt if he were to do that his campaign would be dead in the water.


He won't. She's his ride or die chick. He's either gonna hit an evangelical home run or he's gonna strike out big. Either way, they're gonna ride this horse to the end of the road.

Jas_lov 09-03-2008 07:30 PM

There's no way he drops her. We haven't even seen her speak yet and she might do really well tonight. Unless that affair thing turns out to be true there's nothing that would make McCain drop her. The Democrats would jump all over McCain's biggest decision as a presidential nominee being a complete disaster and he'd be finished.

sabotai 09-03-2008 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirFozzie (Post 1823674)
Real Clear Politics just released snippets of tonight's speech by Palin:


Sounds like a really defensive speech. And it looks really hackish and cliche (what speech doesn't, though?).

Noop 09-03-2008 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jas_lov (Post 1823698)
There's no way he drops her. We haven't even seen her speak yet and she might do really well tonight. Unless that affair thing turns out to be true there's nothing that would make McCain drop her. The Democrats would jump all over McCain's biggest decision as a presidential nominee being a complete disaster and he'd be finished.


What affair thing?

SirFozzie 09-03-2008 07:38 PM

Ouch. I just read up on troopergate on Wikipedia. You have to take it with a whole shaker full of salt, but it looks well referenced, and some of the quotes (from the judge in the divorce case, for example) if true.. just wow. This is the person the Republicans want to be one heartbeat from the presidency? I have to question not only her judgement, but McCain's judgement for selecting her.

Alaska Public Safety Commissioner dismissal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Noop 09-03-2008 07:41 PM

Jebus Thrist if this stuff is true then McCain may need to drop her.

Jas_lov 09-03-2008 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 1823707)
What affair thing?


LOL! It's just a rumor and I think it's in the National Enquirer so that's how little credibility it has. I read somewhere that the McCain campaign is threatening a lawsuit against them. If it were true though, it would finish them.

Noop 09-03-2008 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jas_lov (Post 1823714)
LOL! It's just a rumor and I think it's in the National Enquirer so that's how little credibility it has. I read somewhere that the McCain campaign is threatening a lawsuit against them. If it were true though, it would finish them.


Man she is getting it on all fronts...no pun intended.

Galaxy 09-03-2008 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 1823673)
To my knowledge none of those kid's parent is potentially one heartbeat away from being president of the United States of America. If she can not keep her house in order, how can she potentially run a country.



So you want place a tracker on her kid (s)? Did you drink when you we're 16? Bill Clinton seemed to damaged his family when he was President, but he managed to keep the country running smoothly.

Noop 09-03-2008 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy (Post 1823727)
So you want place a tracker on her kid (s)? Did you drink when you we're 16? Bill Clinton seemed to damaged his family when he was President, but he managed to keep the country running smoothly.


No I didn't because I was at the time, an athlete and as such did no succumb to those vices.

JonInMiddleGA 09-03-2008 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy (Post 1823727)
So you want place a tracker on her kid (s)?


If that's what it takes to avoid having her kid be a teenage drunk that gets knocked up? You're damned skippy.

At this point, all that's missing seems to be a picture of her & the family hanging out around their trailer park working on the car up on blocks in the front yard next to the pink flamingos.

edit to add -- If you take the politics out of it & just look at the details, Palin seems lot more like a candidate to be on Springer than running for public office. And more & more I'm starting to believe she's far more qualified for the former than the latter.

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 08:30 PM

Obama to Appear on Fox on Thursday Night - The Caucus Blog - NYTimes.com

Flasch186 09-03-2008 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 1823730)
And more & more I'm starting to believe she's far more qualified for the former than the latter.


Well I feel like JimGA and I are becoming more in agreement and I dont feel the need to admit to partisanship since Im striving to look at things at face value but any person can see things as they choose in regards to my stance and statements and anyone else's. I truly do not feel she's qualified for the position, especially compared to those that McCain couldve chosen and some on the right agree with that sentiment. Remember, Arles and I agreed that the "Real" scandal (Troopergate) should be allowed to run it's course so that we can get to the truth...The rest of the issues become opinion and valuations regarding 'experience, knowledge, traits, etc.' so there isn't much that is partisan in the real meat of things. When the spin comes it becomes evident and clear. I stated in Alaska that Troppergate was a big deal (I was there at the time), I said it should be allowed to be investigated, and the truth should be allowed to come out....How does Arles feel about Troopergate? 'nothing to see here, move along...' but I argue "We dont know yet and we should be allowed to find out the truth." where is the partisanship?

ISiddiqui 09-03-2008 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 1823761)


Part of me sees this as a dick move. When Obama was speaking, all McCain did was release an ad congratulating Obama. Obama is planning to steal some thunder from McCain by appearing on a (most likely) very hyped interview with O'Reilly? Bad form... should have been on Friday.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 08:49 PM

Firoina's talking, "McCain will achieve a balanced budget by 2013..." Isnt that a long time? I dont know realistically but it seems long.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 1823776)
Part of me sees this as a dick move. When Obama was speaking, all McCain did was release an ad congratulating Obama. Obama is planning to steal some thunder from McCain by appearing on a (most likely) very hyped interview with O'Reilly? Bad form... should have been on Friday.



agreed, bad form and bad quid pro quo vs. how the RNC treated his convention. Not a good move but will people recognize it as so outside of us who pay attention to such things?

ISiddiqui 09-03-2008 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823780)
Firoina's talking, "McCain will achieve a balanced budget by 2013..." Isnt that a long time? I dont know realistically but it seems long.


Well, I think it was just a we'll be balanced by the end of McCain's 1st term... and that doesn't preclude hitting that a bit earlier.

JonInMiddleGA 09-03-2008 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823785)
agreed, bad form and bad quid pro quo vs. how the RNC treated his convention. Not a good move but will people recognize it as so outside of us who pay attention to such things?


Eh, both sides are attempting to play to (what they perceive as) their own advantage. If Obama figures he'll get more mileage from the interview than from doing a reciprocal ad or nothing at all, then I've got no problem with it. McCain was just looking for an edge, Obama is entitled to the same AFAIC.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 08:58 PM

but cant you balance a budget quicker, I mean Im not talking running a surplus or eating into the deficit but I guess i just thought it would be faster than that but I guess I never thought about how long it would take before.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 1823798)
Eh, both sides are attempting to play to (what they perceive as) their own advantage. If Obama figures he'll get more mileage from the interview than from doing a reciprocal ad or nothing at all, then I've got no problem with it. McCain was just looking for an edge, Obama is entitled to the same AFAIC.



But it's different John, An ad is expected and almost gets ignored....Obama going on Fox News (a known critic of his) during the RNC convention is attractive and stealing of 'their' moment. During the DNC convention all I saw the Republicans do was after night commentary and Larry King....and it was never McCain out there. This is different and IMO poor form.

ISiddiqui 09-03-2008 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823799)
but cant you balance a budget quicker, I mean Im not talking running a surplus or eating into the deficit but I guess i just thought it would be faster than that but I guess I never thought about how long it would take before.


It didn't preclude balancing the budget quicker ;).

Remember, the Clinton Administration passed his budget bill to deal with the debt in 1993 (his first year in office) and the budget didn't get balanced until Clinton's 2nd term.

DaddyTorgo 09-03-2008 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823803)
But it's different John, An ad is expected and almost gets ignored....Obama going on Fox News (a known critic of his) during the RNC convention is attractive and stealing of 'their' moment. During the DNC convention all I saw the Republicans do was after night commentary and Larry King....and it was never McCain out there. This is different and IMO poor form.


isn't part (most) of the blame on Fox News too though? for asking him on that night?

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 09:20 PM

At best, he escapes with his teeth in the same place. They'll bust him up really good and it'll be like Saddleback. Another way to embolden the right wing base. But far better than say, a reciprocal ad. Not that I think it's out of the realm of crazy for him to consider doing it.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 09:20 PM

no...theyre job is to get ratings. I wonder if they;ll get pressured to drop him though. If they did, though, he'd probably just go on somewhere else. I dont think it's playing fair....and Fox should just keep him if he's just going to go on somewhere else.

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 09:25 PM

Can't wait to hear what Mitt has to say. Wonder how many total delegates Ron Paul will have at the end of the night.

Jas_lov 09-03-2008 09:25 PM

One thing is for sure, Palin can't do any worse than Romney who lost me with his sun rising in the west opening.

JonInMiddleGA 09-03-2008 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823803)
But it's different John, An ad is expected and almost gets ignored....Obama going on Fox News (a known critic of his) during the RNC convention is attractive and stealing of 'their' moment. ... This is different and IMO poor form.


I think it's pretty brilliant to tell you the truth, and I'd bet that Obama's camp offered it as a one-night-only opportunity to Fox News.

If you ain't cheatin' you ain't tryin', you know that by now ;)

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 09:28 PM

"Stubborn kind of integrity that we need in a President."

Auspicious start, Huck.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 09:29 PM

Looks like Huckabee's going with the 'the media is all against us' vein....

We'll see if it works.

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 09:30 PM

I still don't see how the GOP thinks that talking change is gonna sell folks.

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 09:34 PM

Huck is comin' hard. It's gonna be a barn burner tonight. Can't wait to see the papers in the mornin'.

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 09:36 PM

I will say, I learned something tonight. I had no idea John McCain was a brave man who served in Vietnam and was a POW. They ought to cover that more and boost up that narrative.

DaddyTorgo 09-03-2008 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 1823848)
I will say, I learned something tonight. I had no idea John McCain was a brave man who served in Vietnam and was a POW. They ought to cover that more and boost up that narrative.


mmhmm

because you know...clearly that alone makes him fit to be president

path12 09-03-2008 09:42 PM

Did I really see Romney railing against the Eastern elitists? Seriously?

Flasch186 09-03-2008 09:44 PM

Palin wants quick state board ruling in trooper probe - CNN.com

some movement on Troopergate.

DaddyTorgo 09-03-2008 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by path12 (Post 1823855)
Did I really see Romney railing against the Eastern elitists? Seriously?



:lol:

SirFozzie 09-03-2008 09:47 PM

No, that's more like trying to short-circuit it by handing it off to another group.

Palin wants investigation yanked from Legislature: Gov. Sarah Palin | adn.com

The Legislature plans to go forward with its investigation, said Sen. Hollis French, an Anchorage Democrat and former state prosecutor who is project director for the case.

That investigation isn't just examining potential abuse of power by the governor, but also others in her administration, French said.

"We're going to proceed. If they want to proceed, that's perfectly within their right but it doesn't diminish our right to do so," he said.

The Legislature's special counsel Steve Branchflower so far has not been able to depose either Palin or her husband, Todd. Van Flein indicated the governor likely will not agree to a deposition unless lawmakers turn the matter over the Personnel Board.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 09:48 PM

I said movement so you didnt have to say "no" as it is movement. Stinks that she and her husband wont cooperate with investigation by being deposed, if that's true.

Radii 09-03-2008 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823799)
but cant you balance a budget quicker, I mean Im not talking running a surplus or eating into the deficit but I guess i just thought it would be faster than that but I guess I never thought about how long it would take before.



Referenced at factcheck.org:

Quote:

According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, "without substantial cuts in government spending" Obama’s plan – and McCain's, too – "would substantially increase the national debt over the next ten years."

There is a link to the Tax Policy Center's report, apparently my IP range is banned from that site :(

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/Uploa...es_summary.pdf


factcheck.org mentions multiple times that both candidate's are expected to increase the national debt by trillions based on plans laid out so far when discussing commercials where they've attacked each others tax plans.

SirFozzie 09-03-2008 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823868)
I said movement so you didnt have to say "no" as it is movement. Stinks that she and her husband wont cooperate with investigation by being deposed, if that's true.


The only movement it is is a bowel movement. She's learned from the Bushes well.

Flasch186 09-03-2008 09:52 PM

well that just sucks, about the budgets and their deficits on both sides.

Jas_lov 09-03-2008 09:56 PM

Who cares about budgets and deficits, they made Levi shave his head! Bristol and Levi do look like a happy couple and Cindy McCain looks good in puke green.

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jas_lov (Post 1823888)
Who cares about budgets and deficits, they made Levi shave his head! Bristol and Levi do look like a happy couple and Cindy McCain looks good in puke green.


Seriously. Imagine the text messages he's getting from his hockey buddies? Yeesh.

Galaxy 09-03-2008 09:59 PM

How many sisters does Sarah have?

Flasch186 09-03-2008 10:11 PM

Rudy's giving a good speech, he's really good at it. He seems to connect with the audience.

How does 'reducing gov't. strengthen the $'?

Galaxy 09-03-2008 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823907)
Rudy's giving a good speech, he's really good at it. He seems to connect with the audience.


It's a good speech. He's always has been a strong speaker.

DaddyTorgo 09-03-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1823907)
Rudy's giving a good speech, he's really good at it. He seems to connect with the audience.


noun + verb + 9/11 right? rinse and repeat

Flasch186 09-03-2008 10:17 PM

ouch, did he just say the word "islamic" offends terrorists? Maybe I heard it wrong. Im not sure I even understand the point but I wonder what he meant.

Young Drachma 09-03-2008 10:17 PM

Rudy saves America!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.