Hmm, okay, now I am really curious to see what Autumn says. Thanks, DT, I see what you mean.

Well, if we're going to hash it out in here I'll let it be known that the request A) had something to do with my ability and B) was not worded that DT was requesting that I do that. It was a way to confirm some info to pass to DT.

Hmm, that is pretty damning if it was multiple people. I'm putting my vote back.

Vote Autumn

@9:52 - "A"

No, no word. Of course, I have only actually talked with one person. I think everyone figures (correctly for the most part) that I ain't around to chat anyway.

DT, out of curiosity, was the info he wanted just the name of the person or was it full role info?

@henry - that is INCORRECT

he says it was role, and they both said that too

Ok, I'm leaving my vote where it is now unless something really changes.

By role I mean role, as in character. That is all I asked for and all I got.

Right. Repeat votes from that post.

nfg & king - did he just want your names, or did he want info about your roles?

Just name.

Damn, just read through that mass of posts, I didn't think I was going to miss that much action. Curious.

hmmm

I'll wait to hear further info before throwing out a vote, as no more are necessary at the moment.

that's much less incriminatory then i expected given the traditional definition of role...i must ponder. for now

UNVOTE AUTUMN

Geez. What was I, chopped liver? I didn't get a message.

Seriously, I'm getting lonely and paranoid over here.

I have no idea how many votes are on me right now, but let's please avoid an insta-lynch, at least until DT digests the info from me. I'm not a terribly important villager but you would be kicking yourselves in the ass if you managed to lynch two villagers in three hours. Let's save the gangpiles for scanned wolves.

nfg & king - is this correct?:

I'm sure that nfg and now king PMed you asking if you had told me to ask them about their roles. Clearly you didn't.

I also didn't state that you did. I told both of them that if they told me their role I could confirm that with you.

I only get four, guys, sorry, and DT got two of them. I think I can safely say I won't be trying that particular information gathering tactic again lol

lol...the terminology still doesn't make any sense to me. What's repeated?

I'll assume you mean that these are the guys who voted for known villagers.

I explained both of my votes at the time, but I can regurgitate. I basically admitted on Day One I didn't have time to do more than scan the thread, and I had to go, so it had to be a quick vote. I felt that ntn was targeted for essentially metagame reasons, and I knew PB was on a cross-country trip and that might have been hampering his participation. So I went with a third party candidate, KWhit. My vote was #2 on him at the time, I believe. Almopst immediately after, DT came out and supported that vote and then voted for him himself, which led to a landslide--after I was already out of the thread and gone. I was as surprised as anyone to return and find my vote candidate actually got the lynch, when he was some 5-6 votes behind the leaders at the time.

Today's vote was pure self-preservation. I know I'm not bad, so my lynch is bad. Ergo, vote for the leader (especially since I was leaving again for a while).

Chief - did you get a PM from autumn?

As of 1171:

Autumn: PB (1116, 9:31 pm) EF(1124 9:38) ISiddiqui (1127 9:40) nfg (1132 9:42 pm) Danny (1157 9:58 pm)

Autumn, can you verify that you asked Danny the same thing. If not, then this post sticks out as suspicious to me.


My trust level in nfg has dipped a little since it seems as if he is the one that started this whole mess.

Yes, that's what I mean. I meant the list of people from the post above mine that had replicated the first two days of lynch voting, and the 5 people in those two votes that voted for the known villagers both days. Sorry for confusion.

You have 5 votes right now, so we aren't in an instant kill situation. I guess I could un-vote again, but it's kind of like I am doing the...

You put your Autumn vote in, you put your Autumn vote out, you put your Autumn vote in and you post it all about, you do the vote for Autumn and you send DT a PM, that's what it's all about!

Unvote Autumn

I did not PM Danny at all.

unvote Autumn

Jack, what are you doing to us?

building a CoT

Huh? Autumn has not sent me a PM. I was asking DT is Autumn requested role or name info as that makes a big difference as I could see a villager wanting to know the names of people (as it would pertain to abilities we already know such as Clap's), but I think a circumstance in which a villager would be requesting full role info is unlikely.

EF - did you get a PM from autumn?

No.

exactly.

may just be a terminology mixup honestly.

thanks Chief.

Oh for crying out loud... :D

I think we need to go bck and look at day one and two votes and see what we can learn. We haven't been doing too well basing things off PM's.

Right now I am going to step away from this and fire up an IL-2 to shoot down some Nazis. Maybe one of them will talk. ;)

did you get a PM from autumn?

Nope

lol okay

I had wanted to go through the vote history but I think I've spent too much time in the thread already this evening. I'll be here doing some work though.

you're ok in my book autumn

I find it too much of a coincidence that you would know the actual request asked (which was PM back your name and that is all) without receiving it from Autumn. That is why I asked Autumn to confirm or deny if a PM was sent to you.

When I sent a PM to DT, I did not divulge what was asked of me.

DT - what type of wording did nfg use when alerting you of his PM from Autumn.

I didn't know the request asked, that's why I asked DT. It was an important piece of information that needed clarifying

well that was an interesting couple hours of posts to catch up on. I hope whatever the heck happened through all that was a help to you DT. I'm off to bed now.

I told DT what was asked of me and that Autumn came representing him. The words used were "I have the ability to confirm roles. If you send me your role I can confirm it and send that information to DT. I am doing this so we can help DT build a circle of trust. It was not exactly said that DT authorized this but it was heavily implied...

Quotes are circle of trust....

after rather....
Non-editing sucks....