|
I think similar logic that moved the votes off of Lerriuqs could be used for me as well. Doesn't look like anybody's trying to save me.. rather the opposite in fact.
I could get behind a clap vote. I tossed his name out as suspect earlier today. |
Votes as of post #2300
5 - Telle - Poli (1981), Autumn (2275), DaddyTorgo (2280), PackerFanatic (2286), Dubb (2294) 6 - Lerriuqs - saldana (2160), Abe (2189), The Jackal (2228), Martin D (2238), Lerriuqs (2248), Telle (2298) 1 - Passacaglia - claphamsa (2087) 1 - hoopsguy - Passacaglia (2190) 2 - Claphamsa - Chief Rum (2276), Hoopaguy (2291) |
UNVOTE HOOPSGUY
VOTE LERRIUQS Guess if I have to choose, I'll go lerriuqs. |
Keep in mind guys, if lerriuqs votes Telle, we have a tie.
|
why hasn't he moved off himself?
|
not a fan of a tie...considering switching
|
He's not even in the thread.
|
idk - you think he's waiting to snipe it into a tie?
|
Well, this will be interesting. If Lerriuqs dies of self vote I think we can be pretty clear that's not a wolf move. Though I suppose maybe he's the brutal and Telle's a wolf too, that's the only way that makes sense to me. Either way I can't see shuffling my vote anymore, we'll see which way it turns out and who falls where.
|
Maybe because the longer he doesn't, the more likely people are to not realize the situation.
|
DT, I'd suggest switching. But then again, I'm on lerriuqs.
|
i could pull off telle
|
I've got to run, I'll be back after deadline to see how the chips fall.
|
is that post going to get me in trouble with render?
|
Quote:
I think lerriuqs voted himself before Telle became a viable option. |
Lerriuqs had no way of knowing it would get this close to a tie when he self-voted, so I don't imagine that's the ploy.
|
but he could unvote - curious that he hasn't
|
Quote:
Ah, well if that's the case then I can't see how this helps the wolves unless it's some really crazy role. |
Quote:
That's a good point. I guess we just need to watch ourselves. |
What the hell...
UNVOTE Lerriuqs VOTE Telle |
No wait DT, it's 7-5 squirrel now -- if you make it 8-4 squirrel, we're good for no ties.
|
Tie.
|
DT, it's all you!
|
UNVOTE TELLE
VOTE LER |
UNVOTE TELLE
VOTE LERRIUQS |
No tie.
|
Yes!!
|
nice catch boys!
|
unless Telle's a wolf that is
|
Well, lost my connection for about 15 minutes and back to see - a tie?
|
Crazy
|
now we'll see just what exactly was going on there
|
Deadline
|
Quote:
I have no idea, but I want it to be known that I didn't intend to vote Lerri until he pulled the deadline bullshit he just did. |
Or not - hope that those who were around (as I had planned to be) were able to make the best of it.
|
Final Vote Results
4 - Telle - Poli (1981), Autumn (2275), PackerFanatic (2286), Lerriuqs (2320) 7 - Lerriuqs - saldana (2160), Abe (2189), The Jackal (2228), Martin D (2238), Telle (2298), Dubb (2324), DaddyTorgo (2325) 1 - Passacaglia - claphamsa (2087) 1 - hoopsguy - Passacaglia (2190) 2 - Claphamsa - Chief Rum (2276), Hoopaguy (2291) |
Quote:
I don't blame your move one bit and would have done the same thing. |
Quote:
Quote:
No offense guys, but I didn't need the lectures from you either. I had a strategy...We'll see if it works out in the long run. I wasn't frustrated in the slightest at being on the chopping block and I wouldn't have done my vote the way I did without a reason... |
well that's something we won't necessarily find out until we sort out what's up with Lerri and potentially telle if Lerri shows up good
|
Quote:
fair enough - maybe he's the duke or something guys? we haven't seen a duke yet, right? |
i'm assuming danny is doing the writeup right now so i'm waiting
|
Quote:
you really need to stop being so sensitive and calling everything a lecture when really it isn't. I can't speak for what Pass said but my comments was solely based on the game and the fact you have almost no posts. There was nothing about it even remotely close to a lecture so lighten up. |
Quote:
None taken. And none meant by me, either - we just had a run for a while where we had people vote for themselves just because they were frustrated, and it was pretty annoying, IMO -- if you had some strategy, more power to you. |
Quote:
Who's being sensitive?? You're the one who assumed I was frustrated based on my vote. |
So, who no longer needs therapy today? Is it Hoops? No! Is it Claphamsa? No! Is it Passacaglia? No!
Is it Telle! Yes! …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Her therapist bill is unpaid! The phone suddenly the therapy room phone rings, her husband Render is at the office with cash! Telle is saved! So, now who goes instead? Dubb point the finger at Lerriuqs and yell “I know Poli, so I know crazy and you sir, are not crazy!” Lerriuqs does not fight the group and willing leaves the group without the need to be escorted out. As he leaves, he smiles and says “my friends are deeply troubled and I am glad that they remain while I leave. Lerriuqs was the Sympathizer! The Sympathizer - You secretly feel a lot of sympathy for the needies and their desire to remain in therapy and will win with them. Every night, you may scan to see if a player is a needy. The night deadline is at 1am eastern time. |
I really hope there wasn't a role built into the game that required someone to self-vote
|
as long as you had strategy behind it - more power to you. think it was more that we're all still getting accustomed to your playing style so we just wanted to deter you from voting for yourself if it was just b/c you were frustrated
|
sympathizer hmm? that's cool
i wonder if we can gleam anything from his votes and his strategy today? perhaps trying to get a runaway going on himself in order to give the wolves a place to bury their votes? |
Quote:
you're being sensitive. You assumed Saldana was lecturing you and you assumed I was as well. And if you don't think self-voting doesn't reek of frustration you are a fool. If you had some other agenda that's fine, but don't get your panties in a bunch when you pull something that is looked at as a bitch move and people call you out for it. |
Nt a bad resut
|
I wonder if he scanned Telle as a wolf and was trying to save her?
|
Who does the self vote implicate? Did we have wolf as ne of those with a lot of votes?
|
Out of curiosity guys, how you set a link to a specific post within a thread as opposed to the page that it's on?
|
Quote:
I'm 100% certain he didn't :) But fact wise.. he self-voted long before the run on me. I'm not sure but I think at that point hoops was the second contender. And then he voted me right at deadline, producing a tie which we don't know how it would settle out. Doesn't sound much like trying to save me. |
click on the post number then cut and paste the link
|
But will that link to the post within the page or just to the post by itself? I want it to go the page and then adjust the browser to the post.
|
|
Thanks, but that's not what I am trying to do :)
|
Then I cant help you
|
wow. wierd
|
Won't quoting the post do that?
|
Lerri was up to something. What he was up to I don't know. Sometime tomarrow I'll go through the posts for today and see if I can figure out what he was trying to do by self voting.
|
im guessing he had a legit stratgy,... wheather or not it will make sense in a week when the game is over.... well see :)
|
Quote:
It's for page 1 of the thread, 3rd post. |
Ok figured it out
|
u figured out that EF wasnt the only wolf? good plan
|
|
I took lathum's link, but changed 'showpost' to 'showthread'
|
And why did I do that, if Danny figured it out? Good question.
|
Quote:
I was thinking this, too -- then thinking that's what he wanted us to think. Maybe he simply thought that dying would help the wolves, since he was a villager, so he might as well? Also, Telle's right that the run on her started after he voted himself. hoops, I have another q for you -- where am I on your trust list currently? |
Quote:
Because you care :) |
Quote:
Well here is the thing and I think it is pretty damning for Telle. Why not vote her to try and save himself earlier? At best he kills a villager and at worst he goes anyway? I don't get the play. |
Nice result, good to not have to worry about the sympathizer. The best thing about our lynches is even when we've hit villagers, they weren't exactly vital to us. We've got a seer with potentially 4 scans after tonight if they survive? That's gotta be some helpful info there.
|
Quote:
At the moment, neutral to mild distrust. But I'm going to see if that changes after reviewing tonight's votes. I don't think we learn much about the wolves from today since the wolves don't know the Sympathizer. So I think that Autumn's feeling that "it was too easy" to build a consensus on Lerri was exactly right. |
I really don't know what to think of Telle at this point.
|
So Lathum, when the hell is your "ability" going to help us? Because the longer nothing happens, the more suspect you look.
|
Do we have lerriuqs voting history handy? Obviously day one is irrelevant, but by day 2 or 3 he could've learned something.
|
I suppose these questions can be answered after the night deadline is processed, not trying to throw info out for wolves, simply just got back and throwing some thoughts out.
|
Will someone please listen to me and help me get out Telle?
|
At least we got rid of the sympathizer, though I have no earthly idea what to think of what "licorice" was doing.
|
Speaking of "earthly". I highly recommend watching Star Trek, even if you're watching it on your birthday alone.
|
Quote:
I watched it with my dad on his birthday, and I concur. Great movie. |
Lerriuqs counts as a wolf for win conditions, so why self-vote and risk himself? Surely he's a better loss than a real wolf, from his standpoint, but not a good loss overall. Clearly if he thought he was running against a wolf, but at the time he self-voted I think he was the clear vote getter. Perhaps he hoped it would be a sympathy ploy, or that we would buy the idea that he had a weird role, which I obviously was wondering?
Obviously at the end he was keen to maybe tie things up, but it did seem to me he was willing to risk Telle getting the ax. Let's put up a detailed voting history here. |
i'll listen to you tomorrow poli. nuff said
|
The sympathizer counts as a group member for win conditions.
|
Quote:
This was the vote when Lerriuqs self-voted. |
Quote:
Oh, thanks for clearing that up. I was thinking that then convinced myself otherwise. That makes more sense then. |
Quote:
like your one to talk. Is this your way of probing for information so you can determine if you wanna kill me tonight? I really don't like this question and I like it less in between phases. You ever think it's part of my role and I can't say more about it? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No? I was just asking a question. I know my votes on PB don't look good, but I was just asking.. I haven't voted for you or come close yet, but the longer nothing happens the more likely it was that you were lying. I still think you're probably telling the truth and are a group member, but I wouldn't put it past you to make up a role to gain trust early. No need to get offended.. |
And I even said you don't need to answer until after the NK, wtf.
|
Looking back on this game I guess I made mistakes voting for PB, and I should've trusted my gut since I never thought he was bad, but I'm a group member through and through and I want to makeup for the PB voting with finding wolves.
|
I suppose saying "when the hell" came off as hostile, didn't mean it to.
|
Stop editing your posts Jackal, you should know better.
|
Quote:
Huh? |
I don't see any edits
|
Quote:
don't act like you don't know, what did you change it back already? What a wolf move. |
Quote:
dude what the hell are you talking about |
Quote:
yeah, because he had BK change it back and unedit it. Those wolves always stick together. |
Quote:
i resent that implication, i don't care if you're joking |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.