Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   COVID-19 - Wuhan Coronavirus (a non-political thread, see pg. 36 #1778) (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=96561)

Lathum 03-23-2020 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panerd (Post 3270867)
Yes kindergarten next year. I figure we did pay them for March and totally understandable that nobody saw anything happening this quickly and would never expect a refund. Mine is for April and May which I am 99.9% certain will not happen.


In you situation I would just cancel depending on the contract in place. If April and May don't happen, and you don't need the spots next year whats the point. Maybe a couple weeks in June? Doesn't seem worth it.

spleen1015 03-23-2020 10:21 AM

'Nature is taking back Venice': wildlife returns to tourist-free city | Environment | The Guardian

Flasch186 03-23-2020 10:27 AM

The idea that the Federal Govt isn't the ONLY buyer and then distributing the PPE and such is criminal. They've literally created a desperate buyer pool for limited supplies and the American People are going to die because of it. There are so many things occurring that are just baffling and scream of incompetence that I might have to take it to the other thread. I used to think that no American would die based on the incompetence of ouur politicians yet I was proven wrong again similarly to when I thought we'd hit a bottom of our morality...wrong again.

Arles 03-23-2020 10:35 AM

We are struggling with how to handle refunds for Little League. It looks like we won't have a season (we are still holding onto a 1% chance we can have the playoffs in May/June). We charged $150 a kid, but already gave our full personalized uniforms (around $45 a kid) and played about 5 weeks of practices/games (had to pay for fields, etc). In the event we have to cancel the season, we are trying to figure out how to handle this. One board member thinks we shouldn't do anything (no refunds since they played for 1 month+). Another wants to move the season to the fall (that's a no from me as I am off this summer and don't want to be roped in another year - plus a big chunk of kids play club/other sports which makes allowances in the spring, but not the fall).

My thinking is we figure expenses (probably $45 a kid for unis, prorate the field and other expenses to this point - prob $30-35 a kid) and then give back as much as we can as a refund. My guess would be around $70-75. What do you guys think? Giving that big of a refund would make things pretty tight going into next year, but I'm not sure it is fair to not refund a family if they paid $300 for two kids to play baseball from Feb-May and they only got 5 weeks.

albionmoonlight 03-23-2020 10:36 AM

Partial refund seems like the best option.

Have parents pay for what was consumed, and they get the rest back.

JPhillips 03-23-2020 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 3270876)
The idea that the Federal Govt isn't the ONLY buyer and then distributing the PPE and such is criminal. They've literally created a desperate buyer pool for limited supplies and the American People are going to die because of it. There are so many things occurring that are just baffling and scream of incompetence that I might have to take it to the other thread. I used to think that no American would die based on the incompetence of ouur politicians yet I was proven wrong again similarly to when I thought we'd hit a bottom of our morality...wrong again.


It's worse than incompetence. We know companies have lobbied the WH not to use it and we know that states and cities are bidding up the prices in order to get what's available.

It's all about companies making more profits.

Vince, Pt. II 03-23-2020 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3270881)
Partial refund seems like the best option.

Have parents pay for what was consumed, and they get the rest back.


+1

This seems to be the most sensible option. Probably still causes outrage, because people are going to people, but yeah.

JPhillips 03-23-2020 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3270881)
Partial refund seems like the best option.

Have parents pay for what was consumed, and they get the rest back.


I basically support this. I'd be willing to be transparent on what was spent and what needs to be in place for the coming year and then give back the rest.

Arles 03-23-2020 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3270885)
I basically support this. I'd be willing to be transparent on what was spent and what needs to be in place for the coming year and then give back the rest.

Yeah, this is almost exactly what I said. We just break down how we came up with the refund calculation. As one guy said, we can't give $50,000 in refunds if we only have $30,000.

Ben E Lou 03-23-2020 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3270881)
Partial refund seems like the best option.

Have parents pay for what was consumed, and they get the rest back.

:withstupid:

Poli 03-23-2020 10:48 AM

Partial seems fair...and I'm guessing that might be what I can expect when our flag league is cancelled. Maybe with our family camp/vacation in June as well.

Ben E Lou 03-23-2020 10:48 AM

Our kids' soccer league played one game before the shutdown. They've closed until 4/1 and the last communication was that they'd try to condense the season (multiple games per weekend) into April and early May. I, uh, don't see that happening.

bob 03-23-2020 11:01 AM

Lots of organizations struggling with the idea of refunds. See airlines but another one I've heard of is concert tickets. Shows are postponed, not cancelled, with people being told once dates are rescheduled they can either keep the ticket or get a refund. But very very few shows are actually being rescheduled so money is being held hostage.

Brian Swartz 03-23-2020 11:09 AM

Surgeon General still talking about containment. And also about other needed things like people not staying at home and taking the outbreak seriously, but I just don't see how someone can look at the current situation and still be thinking containment is a viable option. I thought it was a week and a half ago, and I was probably already wrong then, but now? New York alone proves that isn't a thing.

Lathum 03-23-2020 11:19 AM

Klobuchars husband positive and in the hospital.

JPhillips 03-23-2020 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3270897)
Surgeon General still talking about containment. And also about other needed things like people not staying at home and taking the outbreak seriously, but I just don't see how someone can look at the current situation and still be thinking containment is a viable option. I thought it was a week and a half ago, and I was probably already wrong then, but now? New York alone proves that isn't a thing.


Most of the country isn't in the position of NYC. Containment in, for example, my hometown in rural Ohio is absolutely still possible.

spleen1015 03-23-2020 11:24 AM

Take this for what it is worth.

The CEO of my company is one of the CEOs that have been invited to the WH during all of this, travel & leisure industry.

It has been said that he has informed our leadership to expect a federal government stay at home order to come out before Wednesday. So, work on providing folks with the means to work from home as quickly as possible, as much as possible.

I heard this from someone outside of IT who says their VP has told them this.

So, who knows how much is true.

Brian Swartz 03-23-2020 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips
Containment in, for example, my hometown in rural Ohio is absolutely still possible.


I doubt very much it's possible in most big cities. Containment in the broader picture is gone. In certain areas such as you describe? Sure. But we've never had enough testing available for long enough to get to the point of even knowing how big the problem actually is, which means it's far worse than the number of cases tell us. Not an issue for me as I live in a rural area, but that's not most of the people in the country.

Poli 03-23-2020 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3270892)
Our kids' soccer league played one game before the shutdown. They've closed until 4/1 and the last communication was that they'd try to condense the season (multiple games per weekend) into April and early May. I, uh, don't see that happening.


Flag ball is trying something similar out here...and I mean, come on.

JPhillips 03-23-2020 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3270912)
I doubt very much it's possible in most big cities. Containment in the broader picture is gone. In certain areas such as you describe? Sure. But we've never had enough testing available for long enough to get to the point of even knowing how big the problem actually is, which means it's far worse than the number of cases tell us. Not an issue for me as I live in a rural area, but that's not most of the people in the country.


Yeah, urban areas are tough. We'll need different strategies for different areas. Unfortunately, the President and the GOP seem to be moving to a herd immunity idea that will get a lot of people killed.

Ben E Lou 03-23-2020 12:07 PM

NC schools closed through May 15th now. Many businesses closed through May 15th as well.

larrymcg421 03-23-2020 12:18 PM

I can't imagine any schools are going to re-open for this semester. Fulton County is suggesting April 13, but that seems crazy now.

Ben E Lou 03-23-2020 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3270928)
NC schools closed through May 15th now. Many businesses closed through May 15th as well.

Per same presser: "don't use day care if you don't have to, but they can remain open."

Ironhead 03-23-2020 12:23 PM

When I was talking to my wife last night I realized that she was under the impression that the purpose of social distancing was to cause the virus to die out and then regular life would resume as normal. When I explained that what is happening now is just to slow the spread of the virus and make sure we don't overwhelm the healthcare system but that we are going to be dealing with this virus in some fashion for the foreseeable future she seemed devastated. And she is someone who has taken this very seriously.

It got me thinking - what percentage of Americans right now really understand the purpose of social distancing? Do people really understand that we are "flattening the curve" and just trying to space out or stagger the number of people who get sick or are they expecting to emerge from their homes in a month or two and have the virus completely gone?

ISiddiqui 03-23-2020 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ironhead (Post 3270931)
It got me thinking - what percentage of Americans right now really understand the purpose of social distancing? Do people really understand that we are "flattening the curve" and just trying to space out or stagger the number of people who get sick or are they expecting to emerge from their homes in a month or two and have the virus completely gone?


I bet it's the latter. Most folks probably think after 4-8 weeks everything will be exactly the same. I think it's slowly dawning on folks that it's to keep the healthcare system from collapsing and we are going to be dealing with some restrictions for a while (like maybe in May or June we can go back to gatherings of 50 or less and gradually move up from there).

I do wonder if this will have a permanent change in how we greet one another. Some East Asian countries already are not that fond of 'touch' greetings - whether that's hugs or handshakes. I am curious to see if that's the direction we go into.

Brian Swartz 03-23-2020 12:38 PM

My impression is also that a lot of people don't get it. Some do, as well, but for example one guy at work was wanting us to host a pancake breakfast for people. Came from a good place, but when we explained you can't have more than five people in at a time, have to be six feet apart, he was like 'oh nobody really cares about that'.

And then you have the beach stuff and whatnot. So there's a significant number at least who really don't get it, and I think it's going to be a hard blow to them when they realize what's really happening. I increasingly feel guilty for how good I have it. Will probably be going to give blood this week as that's something that is coming under pressure and it looks like I won't be working, but I have a relative who is also my landlord and is suspending my limited rent payments indefinitely, some savings, supportive family structure, etc.

Can't stop thinking about the fact that so many don't have that, are oblivious, and aside from obviously praying I can't do a darned thing to help them.

Vegas Vic 03-23-2020 12:43 PM

I hope it was worth it, you fucking morons.

Florida college students test positive for coronavirus after going on spring break

Lathum 03-23-2020 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas Vic (Post 3270936)


The thing that really pisses me off if they won't grasp how their actions have now put other people in jeopardy.

Brian Swartz 03-23-2020 12:58 PM

Olympics postponed indefinitely, which was inevitable.

drip, drip, drip.

Ben E Lou 03-23-2020 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas Vic (Post 3270936)


Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3270939)
The thing that really pisses me off if they won't grasp how their actions have now put other people in jeopardy.

When parents send their kids to Spring Break, they're not sending their best. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. Some of them, I suppose, are good people.

sterlingice 03-23-2020 01:00 PM

I think a lot of it is also that people think they will just get mild symptoms and they'll tough through it like any disease. Only, it's pretty clear that healthy adults can get hit hard enough by this to have to go to the ER. And I think people are really in denial about that.

SI

JPhillips 03-23-2020 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3270942)
When parents send their kids to Spring Break, they're not sending their best. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. Some of them, I suppose, are good people.


lol

PilotMan 03-23-2020 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3270942)
When parents send their kids to Spring Break, they're not sending their best. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. Some of them, I suppose, are good people.



:bowdown::bowdown::bowdown:

spleen1015 03-23-2020 01:07 PM

Every thought I have about spring break goes back to MTV in the 90s. I've never made a spring break trip and I feel like the only people that do are fucking idiots.

I've never been much of a partier though.

Arles 03-23-2020 01:11 PM

I still wonder if some people had COVID-19 back in February. I know a few people close to us (including my wife) had pretty brutal cases of the flu that took them out of commission for 4-5 days in late Feb. It would be nice if we could eventually come up with a way to see if we had it or currently carry it.

RainMaker 03-23-2020 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arles (Post 3270879)
We are struggling with how to handle refunds for Little League. It looks like we won't have a season (we are still holding onto a 1% chance we can have the playoffs in May/June). We charged $150 a kid, but already gave our full personalized uniforms (around $45 a kid) and played about 5 weeks of practices/games (had to pay for fields, etc). In the event we have to cancel the season, we are trying to figure out how to handle this. One board member thinks we shouldn't do anything (no refunds since they played for 1 month+). Another wants to move the season to the fall (that's a no from me as I am off this summer and don't want to be roped in another year - plus a big chunk of kids play club/other sports which makes allowances in the spring, but not the fall).

My thinking is we figure expenses (probably $45 a kid for unis, prorate the field and other expenses to this point - prob $30-35 a kid) and then give back as much as we can as a refund. My guess would be around $70-75. What do you guys think? Giving that big of a refund would make things pretty tight going into next year, but I'm not sure it is fair to not refund a family if they paid $300 for two kids to play baseball from Feb-May and they only got 5 weeks.


I think partial refunds is fair. But I say be honest and explain everything you just said to us to them. Be clear with how you got the number.

Also maybe make a note that this is a non-profit (assuming you are) and that money will be extremely tight going into next season. That if there are any parents who don't wish to receive a refund, the money will be put toward the league moving forward. I think a lot of parents would be OK with that.

spleen1015 03-23-2020 01:15 PM

We went to Dave and Busters on Christmas Eve for a birthday party.

Of the 8 people that went, 6 of us got sick as hell with what we thought was the flu. All of the Covid symptoms. The 2 grandparents, over 65 both had it worse than the rest of us. The 21 year old and 16 year old are the 2 who didn't get sick.

I was down for 6 days, my wife down for 10.

The other 2 adults that were there swear we all got it then. I doubt it but you never know I guess.

Lathum 03-23-2020 01:19 PM

My 4th graders weekly writing assignment is

Do you prefer to stay home on the weekends or go out and do things around town. Write an essay to convince your parents to do whatever you prefer this weekend

solid troll job Ms. J. Well played.

Edward64 03-23-2020 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3270959)
My 4th graders weekly writing assignment is

Do you prefer to stay home on the weekends or go out and do things around town. Write an essay to convince your parents to do whatever you prefer this weekend

solid troll job Ms. J. Well played.


Honestly, that would piss me off. I would write an email to her and cc the vice/principal and let your/my displeasure known.

Edward64 03-23-2020 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spleen1015 (Post 3270956)
We went to Dave and Busters on Christmas Eve for a birthday party.

Of the 8 people that went, 6 of us got sick as hell with what we thought was the flu. All of the Covid symptoms. The 2 grandparents, over 65 both had it worse than the rest of us. The 21 year old and 16 year old are the 2 who didn't get sick.

I was down for 6 days, my wife down for 10.

The other 2 adults that were there swear we all got it then. I doubt it but you never know I guess.


Congrats, you are immune now. Go party !!

RainMaker 03-23-2020 01:28 PM

I imagine there will be a time where you can get tested for antibodies (maybe even now if they're using serum). If you find out you have them, that's probably a huge relief.

JPhillips 03-23-2020 01:30 PM

Utah Dem Ben McAdams hospitalized and on oxygen.

Jas_lov 03-23-2020 01:33 PM

I saw McAdams on one of the news shows a couple days ago. He's only 45 and seemed in good health. One of the myths is that it only affects old people so that's one reason the Spring Breakers think they're immune.

panerd 03-23-2020 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3270963)
Congrats, you are immune now. Go party !!


I imagine there would actually be tremendous benefit. Volunteering, being able to work if you couldnt before, etc...

bob 03-23-2020 01:41 PM

That's assuming catching it once means you can't catch it again. Not sure if that is established.

panerd 03-23-2020 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob (Post 3270972)
That's assuming catching it once means you can't catch it again. Not sure if that is established.


Agree though most of the scientests seem to think that is the case. Viral load would be a concern though I suppose like the healthy doctors who die from it.

Lathum 03-23-2020 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3270942)
When parents send their kids to Spring Break, they're not sending their best. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. Some of them, I suppose, are good people.


Hahahahaha!!!

Lathum 03-23-2020 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3270962)
Honestly, that would piss me off. I would write an email to her and cc the vice/principal and let your/my displeasure known.


My guess is it was already part of whatever they would have been doing in class and no one thought to change it. I’m sure they were under tremendous pressure to get the packets out. My son and I actually had a nice moment of levity over it, which was good because this morning he had a full on melt down.

panerd 03-23-2020 01:51 PM

Wondering out loud as a hypochondriac myself... I wonder what the hospitalization numbers would look like if this were an unknown disease. For example 3 months ago I get a bad cold and what I think is bronchitis and unknowingly lug it out at home vs now if I get diagnosed with COVID19. Negliable number or significant?

AlexB 03-23-2020 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arles (Post 3270952)
I still wonder if some people had COVID-19 back in February. I know a few people close to us (including my wife) had pretty brutal cases of the flu that took them out of commission for 4-5 days in late Feb. It would be nice if we could eventually come up with a way to see if we had it or currently carry it.


I know we’re working on an antibodies test that apparently only takes 10 minutes for a result, which will do exactly that.

Will really expand our knowledge of the number and severity of cases: if lots of people have had it and didn’t realise, that’s good news...

Brian Swartz 03-23-2020 01:56 PM

Will it really do that though? Without enough PPE to go around, how do you safely administer such a test at the volume required?

molson 03-23-2020 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexB (Post 3270978)

Will really expand our knowledge of the number and severity of cases: if lots of people have had it and didn’t realise, that’s good news...


Definitely. And it's hard to imagine that it was here in January at the latest, and didn't spread widely before we finally noticed a few weeks ago.

Though it's also been a bad regular flu season (23k dead in the U.S. thus far), which has probably complicated things. Maybe some of those deaths were COVID, I don't know how often flu is tested for in normal times, or if doctors just rely on symptoms.

Ben E Lou 03-23-2020 02:01 PM

{Can't believe I left off: "they're rapists."}

Arles 03-23-2020 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3270979)
Will it really do that though? Without enough PPE to go around, how do you safely administer such a test at the volume required?

Just test all the health personnel and let the ones who've had it do the tests :p

In all seriousness, I would guess some of these could be self-administered.

CrimsonFox 03-23-2020 02:26 PM

Welp I don't have the flu. I went in because of fever and sore and swollen glands. Basically have throat infection and red swollen infected tonsils

Was neat how they have stations set up. I was shooed out of the main waiting room and told to go into a side door straight into the office where they had a hallway of 4 chairs spread out 6 feet apart each. I sat there until they came and asked questions. THen took me in a room and did all the stuff. They DID test me for flu but sticking the long swab up my nose on both sides (yeeeeeeeeesh)

Didn't have flu., Just inflamed infected tonsils and throat

I did ask if they were even able to test for coronavirus and she said no.

So how are there all these articles of people getting tested?

Oh yeah she said that the WHO offered a bunch of testing supplies back in January and trump turned them down

CrimsonFox 03-23-2020 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3270982)
{Can't believe I left off: "they're rapists."}



Lathum 03-23-2020 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panerd (Post 3270976)
Wondering out loud as a hypochondriac myself... I wonder what the hospitalization numbers would look like if this were an unknown disease. For example 3 months ago I get a bad cold and what I think is bronchitis and unknowingly lug it out at home vs now if I get diagnosed with COVID19. Negliable number or significant?


We are hoping we had it also. a couple weeks ago took the kids and a friends kid to the movies. A few days later friends kid gets sent home with 103 fever. Around the same time we all felt very lethargic and I had a nagging headache for about 10 days, which never happens. Really hoping we had it and it just didn't hit us hard, however unlikely.

CrimsonFox 03-23-2020 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexB (Post 3270978)
I know we’re working on an antibodies test that apparently only takes 10 minutes for a result, which will do exactly that.

Will really expand our knowledge of the number and severity of cases: if lots of people have had it and didn’t realise, that’s good news...


my flu test took 10 minutes as well

ISiddiqui 03-23-2020 02:29 PM

Btw, the way you administer the Covid 19 test is basically the same as the flu test - a big long swab that goes in your nose and down your throat.

RainMaker 03-23-2020 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrimsonFox (Post 3270991)
So how are there all these articles of people getting tested?


Seems like they are only testing the worst cases. Or if you have a lot of money you can get them too.

Flasch186 03-23-2020 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arles (Post 3270952)
I still wonder if some people had COVID-19 back in February. I know a few people close to us (including my wife) had pretty brutal cases of the flu that took them out of commission for 4-5 days in late Feb. It would be nice if we could eventually come up with a way to see if we had it or currently carry it.


On our Disney cruise EO Feb my 6 yr old got sick, my dad got sick and my mom got sick the day we got off the cruise. No idea what they had but they had fevers and a mild cough each.

RainMaker 03-23-2020 02:31 PM

I think if people had it in February, we would have seen a surge in hospital much sooner.

albionmoonlight 03-23-2020 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3270998)
I think if people had it in February, we would have seen a surge in hospital much sooner.


I agree with this.

I really want to buy the whole "We've all had it for months, but we just thought it was flu/generic winter virus" thing. That would be so great. But it just does not accord with the increase in hospitalizations happening now and not then.

bhlloy 03-23-2020 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3270998)
I think if people had it in February, we would have seen a surge in hospital much sooner.


Yeah this, plus how our fatality/hospitalization numbers are following other countries models pretty closely. As little faith as I have in our health care system I find it hard to believe we have been missing double digit deaths per day. Seems like a lot of wishful thinking going around here.

AlexB 03-23-2020 02:41 PM

BBC saying Rand Paul went to the government gym, had a bunch of meetings, etc while waiting for his test results.

If that’s true... :banghead:

SirFozzie 03-23-2020 02:44 PM

for a week.

molson 03-23-2020 02:50 PM

Influential hospitalaztion rates were up this flu season, well over double some years.

Weekly U.S. Influenza Surveillance Report | CDC

Plus in a vacuum, 100 deaths a day in the U.S. wouldn't be particularly noticeable except maybe in local areas that were hit hard. If we believe the reported numbers are it - this has a LONG way to go to be as close to as bad as a bad flu season (which had 61,000 dead in 2017-2018, for example v. 400 so far with Covid.). But the medical community seems to be on the same page that one of the devastating things about this particular virus is it's ability to spread from people with no or little symptoms unchecked.

And people did test positive for it January and February, though testing was very limited. It would be an amazing coincidence if the curve of the infection rate exactly followed the U.S's ability to test, which I thought we all agreed the country was way behind on. But if that was really it, then we need to do whatever we were doing in February to keep the count so low for 6 weeks following the arrival of the virus to the U.S.

whomario 03-23-2020 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3270998)
I think if people had it in February, we would have seen a surge in hospital much sooner.


Not necessarily. Needs 'critical mass' to really spread or happen to a bunch of people who are especially prone to close contact with lots of people. Plus it needs to spread in the older population specifically to be noticeable as those are displaying severs symptoms more regularly.

Anybody thinking they had it based on symptoms should really hold their horses, there is way too much overlap. They differ in profile if you look at % of patients having Symptom A, B or C., but still lots of overlap and different patients display different symptoms.

The one thing that is close to unique is shortness of breath (while resting), once you notice that you should get help ASAP.

@lathum : Headaches (and muscle aching etc) were actually much rarer so far in Corona Cases than the flu, same for fatigue. Maybe you usually have more a common cold rather than Influenza, which is why it was unusual to you.

CU Tiger 03-23-2020 02:58 PM

The CDC data is at least encouraging. Seems to start downward trend on 3/11, which was before a lot of the more critical forced closing happened. If this trend will continue, and people will follow distancing we may avoid worst case scenarios.

Cases in U.S. | CDC

JPhillips 03-23-2020 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 3271007)
The CDC data is at least encouraging. Seems to start downward trend on 3/11, which was before a lot of the more critical forced closing happened. If this trend will continue, and people will follow distancing we may avoid worst case scenarios.

Cases in U.S. | CDC


I don't think that graph has any worth. The footnote says this:

Quote:

** Does not include cases among persons repatriated to the United States from Wuhan, China and Japan; does not include U.S.-identified cases where the date of illness onset has not yet been reported.

If you just take the number of cases and divide by the days they show case onset it should average almost 650, but their highest number is 331.

JPhillips 03-23-2020 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexB (Post 3271002)
BBC saying Rand Paul went to the government gym, had a bunch of meetings, etc while waiting for his test results.

If that’s true... :banghead:


Every time Rand does something it makes me a little more sympathetic for his neighbor.

whomario 03-23-2020 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by molson (Post 3271005)
Influential hospitalaztion rates were up this flu season, well over double some years.

Weekly U.S. Influenza Surveillance Report | CDC

Plus in a vacuum, 100 deaths a day in the U.S. wouldn't be particularly noticeable except maybe in local areas that were hit hard. If we believe the reported numbers are it - this has a LONG way to go to be as close to as bad as a bad flu season (which had 61,000 dead in 2017-2018, for example). But the medical community seems to be on the same page that one of the devastating things about this particular virus is it's ability to spread from people with no or little symptoms unchecked.

And people did test positive for it January and February, though testing was very limited. It would be an amazing coincidence if the curve of the infection rate exactly followed the U.S's ability to test, which I thought we all agreed the country was way behind on. But if that was really it, then we need to do whatever we were doing in February to keep the count so low for 6 weeks following the arrival of the virus to the U.S.


Which is btw half the number of deaths per capita than the Lombardy region has had already in about 3 weeks. 2/3 of those in the past week. Whereas a flu season is like 5 months with a 'peak' of 2 - 2.5 depending on circumstances.

US has 33 times as many inhabitants, 3500 deaths for lombardy x 33 = 115k

And without massive interference this would likely not have even been the 'peak' but merely the 'low season' to start things off. And they went from 50 deats to 250 to 600+ very suddenly.

NobodyHere 03-23-2020 03:35 PM

Well it looks like my business is exempt from the shutdown so far.

I was kind of looking forward to a two week vacation.

molson 03-23-2020 03:44 PM

Also interesting that the first reported U.S. case came 11 days before the first Italy case, and 1 day before the first South Korea case. If we weren't substantially impacted until March, than we inadvertently contained it amazingly well for a time. And maybe there are inherent advantages in the U.S. that slows the spread (more rural, fewer smokers, etc.)

CU Tiger 03-23-2020 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3271010)

If you just take the number of cases and divide by the days they show case onset it should average almost 650, but their highest number is 331.



I don't think thats how the math on this works.
The total number of all of the data here - the area under the curve - will total up to all of the cases in the country to date (minus the ones mentioned) - 4,038.
Why would it average 650? it would be 4038 / number of day data point, about 70. Which is around 58.

AlexB 03-23-2020 03:45 PM

We’re on near lockdown - we should only leave home for essential work reasons (not entirely sure what that means, but I’m guessing visiting cricket clubs to assess sites for plastic pitches doesn’t qualify!), food/medicine shopping, caring for vulnerable people, and solo exercise only

whomario 03-23-2020 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by molson (Post 3271020)
Also interesting that the first reported U.S. case came 11 days before the first Italy case, and 1 day before the first South Korea case. If we weren't substantially impacted until March, than we inadvertently contained it amazingly well for a time. And maybe there are inherent advantages in the U.S. that slows the spread (more rural, fewer smokers, etc.)


Italy is thought to have had it much earlier as well ;) (based on lab analysis etc)

It seems that with a virus like that needs critical mass before being noticeable and then a while before tested cases go up (because you have more to go on to find them or simply because more and more show up). Which is likely why Lombardy is so hard hit, because it had the most early cases and then managed to spread there wildly before the measures got in place. Whereas the rest of italy had the protective measures in place just in time before there were too many infected.
The scary thing about Italy is they had only 7000 cases march 8th and a week later they started having 400 dead a day and going up from there.

JPhillips 03-23-2020 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 3271021)
I don't think thats how the math on this works.
The total number of all of the data here - the area under the curve - will total up to all of the cases in the country to date (minus the ones mentioned) - 4,038.
Why would it average 650? it would be 4038 / number of day data point, about 70. Which is around 58.


I'm looking at the total number of US cases. That chart is missing so many cases that I don't trust that there's really a downslope to new cases over the past few days.

Ironhead 03-23-2020 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3271028)
I'm looking at the total number of US cases. That chart is missing so many cases that I don't trust that there's really a downslope to new cases over the past few days.


I guess the thing that would immediately make me not trust it is that the incubation period is said to be up to 14 days before symptoms are seen but they are only using a 1 week lag in "Illnesses that began during this time may not yet be reported" period. Seems like it should be longer.

Arles 03-23-2020 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ironhead (Post 3271031)
I guess the thing that would immediately make me not trust it is that the incubation period is said to be up to 14 days before symptoms are seen but they are only using a 1 week lag in "Illnesses that began during this time may not yet be reported" period. Seems like it should be longer.

The 14 days is a "possible" range, but most seem to be from 4-6 days. At which point the 1 week lag probably hits a vast majority of cases.

rjolley 03-23-2020 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arles (Post 3270952)
I still wonder if some people had COVID-19 back in February. I know a few people close to us (including my wife) had pretty brutal cases of the flu that took them out of commission for 4-5 days in late Feb. It would be nice if we could eventually come up with a way to see if we had it or currently carry it.


That's my wife's and my theory, and think it goes back before February.

I was down with something a few months ago. Sickest I've been in a long time. Felt like the flu. I didn't get tested or see a doctor, but I was considering urgent care at one point.

Also, the same thing went through my office. People out 3-10 days with a bug that everyone assumed was a bad strain of the flu. Heard other people were out with some bug that tests came back negative for the flu. Was that COVID-19? Who knows....

SirFozzie 03-23-2020 04:32 PM

UK joins germany in pretty much forbidding all gatherings and shutting down all non-essential industries:

Coronavirus: Strict new curbs on life in UK announced by PM - BBC News

grdawg 03-23-2020 04:44 PM

And Kemp continues to do nothing for Georgia. Shelter in place for "medically fragile". Its not like those people probably haven't already been doing that. Its going to be up to individual cities to do the it on their own. I'm sure Atlanta will be doing a shelter in place, but it needs to be all of Georgia.

MIJB#19 03-23-2020 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexB (Post 3271022)
We’re on near lockdown - we should only leave home for work, food/medicine shopping, caring for vulnerable people, and solo exercise only

Over the weekend people largely ignored the social distancing, which lead to stricter distancing restrictions, close to what you described, except that it's considered okay to walk outside with people from the same household, or with 1 other person. 3 or more will be considered a group and prohibited. Additionally, the large gatherings restrictions have been extended until June 1st. We'll have to see what changes will be made on April 6th about the grey area between small groups and large groups. It's a pity, but so be it.

Sample size and all, I fully expect the numbers (positive test, deaths, hospitalizations) to rise for at least another 2 weeks, purely based on the 14 days + 14 days math I've been using. I'm not buying the "results will be visible after 1 1/2 weeks of semi-lockdown" talk.

whomario 03-23-2020 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirFozzie (Post 3271035)
UK joins germany in pretty much forbidding all gatherings and shutting down all non-essential industries:

Coronavirus: Strict new curbs on life in UK announced by PM - BBC News


France now has people not going to work or a doctor timestamp a seperate permission slip and are then only allowed to leave the house once a day for an hour and within 1 Kilometer of their home.

What seems questionable is they did it based on high numbers today but those are partly leftover from the weekend (and tests take 1-2 days to process anyway) and since the original lockdown was put in place on the 17th it seems safe to assume a decent portion of those new cases got infected before the initial lockdown.

AlexB 03-23-2020 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIJB#19 (Post 3271040)
Over the weekend people largely ignored the social distancing, which lead to stricter distancing restrictions, close to what you described, except that it's considered okay to walk outside with people from the same household, or with 1 other person. 3 or more will be considered a group and prohibited. Additionally, the large gatherings restrictions have been extended until June 1st. We'll have to see what changes will be made on April 6th about the grey area between small groups and large groups. It's a pity, but so be it.

Sample size and all, I fully expect the numbers (positive test, deaths, hospitalizations) to rise for at least another 2 weeks, purely based on the 14 days + 14 days math I've been using. I'm not buying the "results will be visible after 1 1/2 weeks of semi-lockdown" talk.


Tis true

Flasch186 03-23-2020 05:20 PM

Welp, it's fait accompli. He's going to release the hounds come April 1 and then 30 days later at most we'll have an overwhelming wave of death and destruction throughout the country. I hope I'm wrong but it isn't going to be manageable by the hospitals and doctors and nurses.

whomario 03-23-2020 05:34 PM

Why the rise in Infections goes up so fast: and why it can get out of hand if unchecked in an easily digestible 2 minute explanation:


Randi Mayem Singer on Twitter: "Don't spread the virus. Spread this video.
https://t.co/WYQcC2RiaN"



And in Spain soldiers today found multiple dead in a retirement home when disenfecting it. The same home has had 75 cases. Since the discussion came to prisons: This is the real threat as far as deaths goes.

Mota 03-23-2020 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 3270835)
I agree with most everything here, especially with respect to the NHL shutdown being the eye-opener for the majority of Canadians. However I feel like Ontario (Toronto) and BC (Vancouver) are in a bit rougher shape than this lets on. They are large, international hubs and got hit earlier than the rest of the country and it's showing.



I do think that our nationwide response since the NHL shutdown has been pretty solid. Our province (Manitoba) feels like it's a bit slow to react comparatively, but so far it hasn't had a hugely obvious negative impact so perhaps the response has been adequate enough.


I think the next major domino to fall will be closing of provincial borders, which will be annoying if this extends into May and beyond because my cottage is on the other side of the Manitoba/Ontario border and that would otherwise be a great place to go socially distance.


I live just north of Toronto and an ambulance just took someone away 3 houses away from me. They put on the masks and plastic wraps before going in there, so it could have been COVID-19 related.

Scary as heck.

RainMaker 03-23-2020 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirFozzie (Post 3271003)
for a week.


Why does it take a week to get a result? Especially for a sitting US Senator. In China and South Korea they get these results back in a couple hours (and have for months).

Scoobz0202 03-23-2020 06:05 PM

The tone of this conference is really sad and, yea, Fauci isn't there to contradict.

Lathum 03-23-2020 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scoobz0202 (Post 3271057)
The tone of this conference is really sad and, yea, Fauci isn't there to contradict.


I can't watch them anymore

Flasch186 03-23-2020 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scoobz0202 (Post 3271057)
The tone of this conference is really sad and, yea, Fauci isn't there to contradict.


Had to get rid of the truther

Brian Swartz 03-23-2020 06:13 PM

I'm really curious, and more afraid now, of what happens next with the big shutdown orders having come from states, not from the federal government. That disconnect could be fatal - I don't believe words until they are backed up with action, but the signaling here is starting to push the panic buttons in my mind.

Edward64 03-23-2020 06:18 PM

Yeah, when I don't see Fauci there I change the channel. BS or half-truths without Fauci.

Lathum 03-23-2020 06:18 PM


Edward64 03-23-2020 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3271061)
I'm really curious, and more afraid now, of what happens next with the big shutdown orders having come from states, not from the federal government. That disconnect could be fatal - I don't believe words until they are backed up with action, but the signaling here is starting to push the panic buttons in my mind.


You think states will enact more than close all businesses except essentials, pseduo stay-at-home/PAUSE (but you can still go out and exercise just as long as you stay 6ft away)?

The next step is no going outdoor unless its for groceries, medicine?

RainMaker 03-23-2020 06:22 PM

More insider trading!


Edward64 03-23-2020 06:27 PM

A little good news for Italy. Hope the trend continues.

New coronavirus cases drop in Italy for second day | TheHill
Quote:

Italy recorded a lower day-to-day increase of coronavirus cases for the second day in a row Monday, officials said.

Italy’s Civil Protection agency documented 4,789 new cases Monday, 700 less than the 5,560 new cases reported Sunday, The Associated Press reported. But officials cautioned that it’s too early to know if the worst is behind the country that has experienced the most deaths due to the virus.

The day-to-day death count also fell to just over 600 deaths Monday compared to 651 on Sunday.

The coronavirus has hit Italy hard, overwhelming its health care system and killing 6,077 people. The country has 63,927 confirmed cases, compared to China’s 81,496.

Brian Swartz 03-23-2020 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64
You think states will enact more than close all businesses except essentials, pseduo stay-at-home/PAUSE (but you can still go out and exercise just as long as you stay 6ft away)?


I think there's not much more they can do other than try to enforce the existing orders stronger than 'please do this'. I also think the mixed messages on this, the people starting to say just open everything and let the chips fall where they may is really dangerous, because by the time it is obvious to them it was the wrong move, it'll be way too late.

It's more the lack of national unity (and I'm not just saying politically here, but at every level) that is really a huge threat to our response. The fact that after four days we can't get together on the stimulus package is emblematic. Whose fault it is/who is wrong is kind of besides the point here. As this goes forward and the pain regardless of what we do or don't do increases, continuing to fraction, blame the wrong thing, etc. seems likely to continue.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.