Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The Trump Presidency – 2016 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=92014)

RainMaker 07-16-2018 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3211658)
I'm guessing that the US has some pretty good work behind the scenes too, but I'd rather just know it's there and not hear about it in a world court or in Newsweek.


I doubt it's as good as this. They got the ruling party in this country to lick their boots.

mckerney 07-16-2018 12:52 PM



AENeuman 07-16-2018 01:01 PM

1 Attachment(s)
i kept thinking of this scene through the whole press conference

Attachment 6979

Thomkal 07-16-2018 01:10 PM

Germany's foreign secretary after the summit: "We can no longer completely rely on the White House"

whomario 07-16-2018 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3211711)
Germany's foreign secretary after the summit: "We can no longer completely rely on the White House"


The language used is no coincidence, because in that same interview he was also emphasizing the similarity in interests and the good relations between Germany/Europe and "the US" since WW2, while explicitly stating (and not for the first time) that one can't rely on "the White House". Not the first time there has been made a distinction like that from politicians over here.

The general impression i am getting is that basically Germany and the EU as a whole will pretty much wait this shitshow out and is fine treading water rather than make any decision based on making Trump happy. And in the meantime they will work on contingency plans/policies in case the crazy person gets another term.

JPhillips 07-16-2018 02:03 PM

This woman was very close to the NRA.

Quote:

A criminal complaint was unsealed today in the District of Columbia charging a Russian national with conspiracy to act as an agent of the Russian Federation within the United States without prior notification to the Attorney General.

The announcement was made by Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jessie K. Liu, and Nancy McNamara, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office.

Mariia Butina, 29, a Russian citizen residing in Washington D.C., was arrested on July 15, 2018, in Washington, D.C., and made her initial appearance this afternoon before Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. She was ordered held pending a hearing set for July 18, 2018.

According to the affidavit in support of the complaint, from as early as 2015 and continuing through at least February 2017, Butina worked at the direction of a high-level official in the Russian government who was previously a member of the legislature of the Russian Federation and later became a top official at the Russian Central Bank. This Russian official was sanctioned by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control in April 2018.

The court filings detail the Russian official’s and Butina’s efforts for Butina to act as an agent of Russia inside the United States by developing relationships with U.S. persons and infiltrating organizations having influence in American politics, for the purpose of advancing the interests of the Russian Federation. The filings also describe certain actions taken by Butina to further this effort during multiple visits from Russia and, later, when she entered and resided in the United States on a student visa. The filings allege that she undertook her activities without officially disclosing the fact that she was acting as an agent of Russian government, as required by law.

Lathum 07-16-2018 02:06 PM

Gonna get a head start on this, I'm bad at learning new languages.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07D9DY6WP...=9909182750601

JPhillips 07-16-2018 02:16 PM

I'm not a lawyer, so I may be misreading things, but this affidavit is Holy Shit bonkers.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-re...80766/download

bronconick 07-16-2018 02:20 PM

Tom Winter‏Verified account @Tom_Winter









BREAKING / NBC News: DOJ announces the arrest of Russian National Mariia Butina, age 29, for "infiltrating organizations having influence in American politics, for the purpose of advancing the interests of the Russian Federation." She was arrested yesterday.


She was one that was reaching out to the NRA

Thomkal 07-16-2018 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3211717)
I'm not a lawyer, so I may be misreading things, but this affidavit is Holy Shit bonkers.

Access Denied



I'm not either, but I'd say its pretty damning. Can't wait until they reveal who "US person 1 and 2" are.

JPhillips 07-16-2018 02:54 PM



It's worse than the worst case scenario. The Russians were using a GOP operative to establish backchannel communication between the Russians and GOP leaders through the NRA.

Makes all the Kushner/Flynn backchannel stuff during the transition more interesting, too.

mckerney 07-16-2018 03:01 PM



corbes 07-16-2018 03:11 PM

Kaitlan Collins on Twitter: "STATEMENT FROM DAN COATS: "The role of the Intelligence Community is to provide the best information and fact-based assessments possible for the President and policymakers. We have been clear in our assessments of Russian meddling in the 2016 election..."… https://t.co/rLT3plm8g5"

Edward64 07-16-2018 03:14 PM

2020 can't get here soon enough.

Thomkal 07-16-2018 03:26 PM

Judge in Manafort's case postponed a meeting on change of venue until next Mon morning. possible flipping?

Thomkal 07-16-2018 03:36 PM

Guess I was right about things moving quickly about Trump/Russia :)

Thomkal 07-16-2018 03:45 PM

And now a video from 2015 Freedom Fest where Trump was asked a question about US/Russia relations. And the woman asking? Maria Butina


Trump answers question on Russia at FreedomFest 2015 - YouTube

kingfc22 07-16-2018 04:05 PM

Give it 24 hours and Trump will do something even more absurd and go on multiple twitter rants which the media will then follow and this will all blow over.

If it ain't broke don't fix it.

RainMaker 07-16-2018 04:07 PM

Where's Cam? He's got some explaining to do.

JPhillips 07-16-2018 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingfc22 (Post 3211732)
Give it 24 hours and Trump will do something even more absurd and go on multiple twitter rants which the media will then follow and this will all blow over.

If it ain't broke don't fix it.


Trump's problem is that Mueller doesn't care about any of that.

JPhillips 07-16-2018 04:40 PM

There's going to be a lot of these. That's the arrested spy with her Russian minder.


AlexB 07-16-2018 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3211642)
A glimpse into why Republicans have been throwing a fit over Sacha Baron Cohen's new show.

https://www.esquire.com/entertainmen...merica-review/


First episode was just on over here: first half was not great:

First section was Bernie Sanders basically being professional and not calling him a twat. Wasn’t funny either.

Second section was an old Republican couple being grossed out by, well pretty gross/stupid conversation, but being polite and not throwing him out. Again, not funny at all.

Third section was an artist being up her own arse - no surprise there, or much humour

I nearly quit TBH because it was neither thought provoking or funny, but the last section saved it. I won’t ruin it, but it was far more clever in concept, preparation, delivery, and in the scope of both numbers and importance of the people involved (assuming they were who the captions said they were)

Even if you are generally behind the people being ridiculed, you can’t be happy about some of the idiotic things they agree to in conversation, and agree to say/promote while doing a promo to camera. Again all this assumes they are who they are captioned to be, otherwise the joke’s on me!

Either perservere through the first three sections, or just skip to the last bit as that is definitely worth watching.

digamma 07-16-2018 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3211733)
Where's Cam? He's got some explaining to do.



You'll find him on twitter preaching the good word about how background checks don't work and awarding a "good guy" of the day. You can guess what the good guy is packing!

RainMaker 07-16-2018 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digamma (Post 3211738)
You'll find him on twitter preaching the good word about how background checks don't work and awarding a "good guy" of the day. You can guess what the good guy is packing!


At least we know who's paying his bills. What a true patriot! :lol:

RainMaker 07-16-2018 05:29 PM

This should surprise no one.



Thomkal 07-16-2018 06:03 PM

Not shocking in the least that it was Rohrabacker.

Atocep 07-16-2018 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexB (Post 3211737)
First episode was just on over here: first half was not great:

First section was Bernie Sanders basically being professional and not calling him a twat. Wasn’t funny either.

Second section was an old Republican couple being grossed out by, well pretty gross/stupid conversation, but being polite and not throwing him out. Again, not funny at all.

Third section was an artist being up her own arse - no surprise there, or much humour

I nearly quit TBH because it was neither thought provoking or funny, but the last section saved it. I won’t ruin it, but it was far more clever in concept, preparation, delivery, and in the scope of both numbers and importance of the people involved (assuming they were who the captions said they were)

Even if you are generally behind the people being ridiculed, you can’t be happy about some of the idiotic things they agree to in conversation, and agree to say/promote while doing a promo to camera. Again all this assumes they are who they are captioned to be, otherwise the joke’s on me!

Either perservere through the first three sections, or just skip to the last bit as that is definitely worth watching.



Just finished watching it and, overall, I agree. The last segment is 100% must watch. It's seriously depressing to see people ok with what they were pitching. I'm guessing clips or quotes from this are going to end up in campaign ads soon.

Thomkal 07-16-2018 06:22 PM

what was the last segment?

digamma 07-16-2018 07:06 PM

Kinderguardians

Radii 07-16-2018 07:56 PM

https://www.rollingstone.com/tv/tv-r...review-698440/

I'm a Sepinwall fanboy, but I think this take on the show, and our country, is really good.

Quote:

There’s a moment featuring Gun Owners of America director Larry Pratt where Erran jokes, “It’s not rape if it’s your wife.” Pratt cackles, shakes Erran’s hand, and says, “That probably won’t be in the video we send to the Hill.” At another time, this might be startling. Now it’s just one more sick punchline in an era when so many recent allegations of sexual assault are met with indifference at best, victim-blaming at worst. Pratt won’t feel any repercussions for that, any more than any of Cohen’s other targets will, because everyone has already chosen sides and the people on their side won’t care.


Quote:

In promos for upcoming episodes, a smiling Dick Cheney signs a “waterboard kit.” The former Vice President’s pro-torture stance isn’t exactly something a master con man has to bamboozle him into admitting; the man is on record about it. Cohen’s playing Gotcha! with people who have already confessed to far worse, over and over again.



I'm interested to see what current sitting congressmen did, sure. But, as a concept and a show? Meh.

Thomkal 07-16-2018 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3211720)
I'm not either, but I'd say its pretty damning. Can't wait until they reveal who "US person 1 and 2" are.



US Person 1 appears to be GOP Consultant Paul Erickson:


Maria Butina, Russian gun-rights advocate who sought to build ties with NRA, charged with acting as a covert Russian agent - The Washington Post

Izulde 07-16-2018 10:29 PM

I think the moment when Trump said it's the US's fault that Russian-American relations are poor is the one that will ultimately bring him down.

First time I've been shocked by something he's said. Like, I literally gaped at the screen like a damn goldfish.

When even Joseph McCarthy is rolling over in his grave, anyone who supports him after this has crossed the Rubicon into idolatry with Trump as golden calf.

Sure enough, I've seen a few Tea Party Republican voters (not politicians AFAIK) declaring that they're now breaking with Trump.

NobodyHere 07-16-2018 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Izulde (Post 3211774)
Sure enough, I've seen a few Tea Party Republican voters (not politicians AFAIK) declaring that they're now breaking with Trump.


They'll turn on Rush Limbaugh tomorrow who'll spin the issues in such a fashion that the liberal media is to blame and then they'll be happy angry Republicans again.

PilotMan 07-16-2018 10:48 PM

I do feel like this does move him into a new metric.

Atocep 07-16-2018 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3211754)
what was the last segment?


Larry Pratt, Trent Lott, Dana Rohrabacher, Joe Walsh, and Joe Walsh recorded a promo that supported teaching kindgergarten classroom students how to defend themselves with "pistols, rifles, semi-automatics, and a rudimentary knowledge of mortars".

AENeuman 07-17-2018 01:06 AM

I guess this could be a poll.

But is it really possible this is blackmail? I’ve always assumed Russia was doing what a foe would do and just struck gold when the guy they helped would rather deny than admit his win was not all him.

Groundhog 07-17-2018 01:19 AM

Reading through Twitter on my phone this morning I had to actually watch the Trump-Putin video to see if it was just a case of Trump being trump causing the usual "impeach him" outrage or if it was next level. But yeah...
Whole thing felt like the final big payoff for Putin - make Trump look like a weak buffoon on the world stage and shatter all remaining confidence in the US internationally in the most demeaning way possible. Must be some particular spicy pee videos Putin and co. have in their archives.

Groundhog 07-17-2018 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AENeuman (Post 3211781)
I guess this could be a poll.

But is it really possible this is blackmail? I’ve always assumed Russia was doing what a foe would do and just struck gold when the guy they helped would rather deny than admit his win was not all him.


I've joked about it ever since the pee video rumours, but is there any doubt at this stage? Only question I think is what it is - either something personal on Trump, or the threat of personal financial ruin. Even the election rigging wouldn't be enough on its own to explain that performance IMO.

corbes 07-17-2018 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AENeuman (Post 3211781)
But is it really possible this is blackmail?


What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?

Neon_Chaos 07-17-2018 04:11 AM

Wow. Trump just sold out the USA.

No wonder our government is pivoting towards a closer relationship with China.

Even this bumpkin from the Philippines can see it. What a twat.

Edward64 07-17-2018 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhog (Post 3211783)
I've joked about it ever since the pee video rumours, but is there any doubt at this stage? Only question I think is what it is - either something personal on Trump, or the threat of personal financial ruin. Even the election rigging wouldn't be enough on its own to explain that performance IMO.


Corbes article above alluded to Russian financial support or embarrassing pictures.

His business(es) has had financial support from Russia interests for a while now. I also think the specter of his election being tarnished/illegitimate because of Russian interference weighs on him. So easily believe these key reasons of how he reacts to Russia.

The embarrassing pictures is probably the most dubious. If it was peeing, it would be damaging (is there a lot of evidence for this for is it from one source?) and he would probably claim it was doctored. If it was him having regular sex, I doubt he would care that much.

Regardless of the three factors, I still struggle with why he is doing this. If he was beholden to Russia, you would think he would find less visible and less combative ways of "complying" and not tarnish (more) his Presidency in the history books.

bronconick 07-17-2018 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhog (Post 3211783)
I've joked about it ever since the pee video rumours, but is there any doubt at this stage? Only question I think is what it is - either something personal on Trump, or the threat of personal financial ruin. Even the election rigging wouldn't be enough on its own to explain that performance IMO.



Could be as simple as money laundering for the Russian mob.

bronconick 07-17-2018 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3211793)

Regardless of the three factors, I still struggle with why he is doing this. If he was beholden to Russia, you would think he would find less visible and less combative ways of "complying" and not tarnish (more) his Presidency in the history books.





Because he's not that smart and is too stubborn to take advice from people who know better who could couch things like politicians always did.

Edward64 07-17-2018 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronconick (Post 3211794)
Could be as simple as money laundering for the Russian mob.


I read somewhere that Mueller probably has Trump's tax returns. Never done money laundering but I would think there would be evidence for that in his/company's tax returns.

digamma 07-17-2018 10:01 AM

Maybe I'm naive, but isn't it the point of money laundering that it doesn't show up in your taxes?

***yes, I know you could have some holes in things or absurdly high interest amounts that don't match your income or whatever, but the point is, if you're money laundering, you're probably not going to report it on your taxes. What the taxes can show is who you're paying interest to, where your reported income is coming from, etc.

JPhillips 07-17-2018 10:11 AM

I don't think Trump was having his money cleaned. If, as his own sons have stated, he was selling a lot of condos in cash to Russians, those LLCs could be traced back to individuals and the sources of the money figured out.

But I'd bet there are problems for Trump extending well beyond that in his financial records.

mckerney 07-17-2018 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corbes (Post 3211786)
Right-wing media seemed a bit shocked yesterday, but already have recovered and moved on to covering and denouncing the "liberal overreaction" to yesterday's event while pushing articles declaring the summit to be a success. In case you were thinking that this might somehow be a turning point.


Apparently the only other option was for Trump to declare an all out war on Russia that would have already killed is after the nukes were fired, so it's hard to argue that Trump didn't do a great job.

JPhillips 07-17-2018 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corbes (Post 3211786)
Right-wing media seemed a bit shocked yesterday, but already have recovered and moved on to covering and denouncing the "liberal overreaction" to yesterday's event while pushing articles declaring the summit to be a success. In case you were thinking that this might somehow be a turning point.


And GOP electeds are getting in on the act.



whomario 07-17-2018 12:23 PM

NowThis on Twitter: "Trump's thoughts on Brexit is like a college student trying to pull off a presentation on a book they didn't read… "

If he didn't have such power, he'd be soooo amusing. I mean, why couldn't you have a system where there is one person with the power and then one is a figure-head, he'd be so perfectly amusing to watch in such a role with high visibility but limited power :(

PilotMan 07-17-2018 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whomario (Post 3211831)
NowThis on Twitter: "Trump's thoughts on Brexit is like a college student trying to pull off a presentation on a book they didn't read… "

If he didn't have such power, he'd be soooo amusing. I mean, why couldn't you have a system where there is one person with the power and then one is a figure-head, he'd be so perfectly amusing to watch in such a role with high visibility but limited power :(


King Donald the First. He'd love that.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.