Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1439881)

Does anyone have a vote count?

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1439878)

me?

what have I done that's suspicious?

wow...maybe everyone in my RL is right and i'm "off" lately *shrug*

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1439861)

KWhit, it doesn't prove he is innocent. But it does suggest he is telling the truth.

I believe Bullet is more motivated to stay in the game with a role he enjoys - Doc Holliday in Tombstone is one example of this. For whatever reason, he is not inclined to help people who want to lynch him even if that means the game ends earlier for him.

If Bullet was a Tarq and had hired a role that allowed him to do a kill then he would have to speculate about claiming a role. Yet he selected one that had risk associated with it - he had to have the right name (50% shot) since AE had not revealed the name of his hire.

It doesn't clear him. But it creates enough doubt for me that I want to avoid jumping on the pile of votes already on him. And I'm getting my vote out rather than abstaining.

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord (Post 1439885)

You're acting a lot like you did the last time I played with you, when we were both wolves.

Simply put, if bullet turns out to be a traitor, I STRONGLY suspect you are too.

Originally Posted by saldana (Post 1439887)

hoops, normally i dont question your reasoning much, as it is usually sound and logical, but in this case, you are missing something rather significant....bullet's disclosure actually proves he is isnt being honest...he alleged that he had signicantly important information, and now he claims he hired an ex-legionairre....if that is what his big information is, why the exaggeration? why not just say that to begin with, as it was essentially worthless? why any deception at all? why not just say that he was just vanilla and that killing him would be a mistake instead of now making an issue about the veracity of his statement?

if nothing else, i dont trust him at this point...my vote stays.

Originally Posted by Antmeister (Post 1439898)

Gentlemen there has been much activity occuring in the Senate and I am perplexed. I am going to sue the following people who bumped me in the halls.
Antus Meisterus sues Saldanus Lathumus
Antus Meisterus sues Schmidtyus Schmidtyus

And with some evidence mounting agaist him, I vote:
Execute Bulletus Spongeus

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord (Post 1439895)

Hey AE? Drop your lawsuits on me. I like my money, mmkay?

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1439907)

You never apologized.:p

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1439912)

And I'm still suing you. Seems fair.

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord (Post 1439915)

No taking money from a Senator loyal to Republic, you money grubber!

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1439849)

Here is how I see the info of the last 30 minutes:

1. Bullet said he hired Titus Ludius (post #915)
2. Titus is an ex-legionnaire (post #4)
3. Ardent, who had hired an ex-legionnaire, and says it was Gallus Clarus (#925)
4. Ironhead says he has hired a role on Day 2 that has the ability to kill (post #919)

So, Bullet would have had to guess a role from Day 1 that is not contested, then guess the right name (50% shot), and not reveal a role that had a chance to launch the night kill?

VOTE FREE BULLETUS SPONGEUS

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1439933)

I did my part. I sent him one asking if he wanted some crack.