Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   It's BACK! The 2005-2006 NHL Season (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=40969)

Pyser 11-03-2005 03:29 AM

ok, ive been watching the devils all season, i guess ill weigh in now.

-the gomez-gionta-brylin line is AWESOME to watch. they set the tone for this team, which is weird, because it used to be madden's D line that set the tone. how times have changed.

-the D we signed to replace stevens/niedermeyer just dont work. in the old league, malakhov and mcgillis would fit in with the devils D perfectly. but as of right now, one of these guys HAS to go. they just dont cut it, and they cost way too much.

-hey, mogilny. SHOOT THE FUCKING PUCK. guy looks to pass way too much.

-been pretty happy with clemmensen as he's filled in for brodeur. broduer, by the way, is not nearly as effective with the weakened D and the no-touching outside the trapezoid. the league really screwed him on that rule.

-we cant play D. the old, tried-and-true devils D (rub the forward out on the way to the boards) is illegal now, and the team is flat out struggling. and its basically the lumbering defensemens fault. when sean brown (sean brown!) is your 2nd best defensemen, somethings wrong. and this is with colin white injured (great, another big, immobile D-man). better bring up hale and get some legs on D, and quick.


the devils will be lucky to snag the 5th spot in the playoffs...though i still expect them to make it. but this isnt the team i grew up loving.

that said, i fully expect them to adapt, and fairly quickly. the forwards are in place...it's just a matter of straightening the D out. the problem is very clear: mcgillis, malakhov, matvichuck, white...too many old-style d-men.

Honolulu_Blue 11-03-2005 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbor
Ya know....i'm gonna get skewered for saying this...but....does'nt the game just seem too much like pond hockey now...there is no animosity in the games,no toughness...i'm not talking about fighting,but i'd like to see a little more roughness.


At first it seemed like the new rules created more speed and more open ice and led to some bigger hits. This was good. This, however, has seemed to have faded and I agree, there does seem to be a lack of animosity out there. There are minor flare ups every now and then, but they are few and far between...

Fidatelo 11-03-2005 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPI-Fan
Also, a sign that things are a little out of control IMO:

In the past, even early on the crackdowns, I could pretty much always see exactly what it was that was called. Now (and this was magnified in the Isles/Philly game I went to), it seems like around 30-50% of penalties I have NO clue what they were for until they show the replay. Some refs seem to be out there just looking for anything to call.


The thing is, that tells me that they are getting it right! As a fan, you should not be able to see 100% of the actual penalties on the ice. You are 100 or more feet removed from the surface of a game being played at high speeds and you think you should be able to act as defacto referee?

The fact is, refs are calling penalties exactly how they should be. A little tug with a stick or a glove, regardless of the effect it has on the play or the player, is a penalty. Yes, there is currently a ridiculous parade to the box most nights. It takes more than a month to erase a decade worth of bad habits. Coaches have spent 10+ years teaching guys to use their sticks and hands to slow opponents. It's basically instinct with a lot of guys at this point. So even if they stick their stick out, and realise quickly what they're doing and pull it away... tweet! And I think that's good.

In time they'll figure it out, or the coaches will find other guys who will, and the games will flow properly. It is November 3rd... we haven't even been watching for a month yet! 1 month! I know this is the Internet generation and whatnot, but good gravy everyone needs to take a chill pill and let this thing take it's course.

On the other hand, this could also be a great big example of "be careful what you wish for". Perhaps a majority of fans liked the old style more than they thought they did.

JonInMiddleGA 11-03-2005 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo
Perhaps a majority of fans liked the old style more than they thought they did.


Some of us knew that the whole time & called out the current farce for what it is from the get-go.

Joe Canadian 11-03-2005 09:25 AM

hxxp://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=141753&hubname=

This is an amazing story, seems Jacques Demers spent all his 15 years in the NHL without the ability to read or write. The English version of his book hits stores in early 2006, and I'll be picking it up for sure.

Hurst2112 11-03-2005 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Canadian
hxxp://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=141753&hubname=

This is an amazing story, seems Jacques Demers spent all his 15 years in the NHL without the ability to read or write. The English version of his book hits stores in early 2006, and I'll be picking it up for sure.


Is the book just a bunch of pictures?

Honolulu_Blue 11-03-2005 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Canadian
hxxp://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=141753&hubname=

This is an amazing story, seems Jacques Demers spent all his 15 years in the NHL without the ability to read or write. The English version of his book hits stores in early 2006, and I'll be picking it up for sure.


That is amazing. Wow. To get that far without being able to read or write? Unbelievable. I love Jacques Demers. Always will. He was the coach of the Wings back when I first really started watching hockey ('87-'88). I loved that Wings team: Probert, Kocur, Gallant, Yzerman, Burr, Barr, PETR KLIMA!, Adam Oates, Chabot, Snepsts, Bridgeman, Zombo, Norwood, Chiasson, Hanlon and Stefan in net... Just loved that team. They even had this back up goalie, Sam St. Laurent who still wore one of those old-time Jason-style goalie masks. That was a fun era for the Wings.

Draft Dodger 11-03-2005 10:13 AM

yeah, saw the Demers story last night and was in disbelief.

just amazing that an adult can succeed in ANY job without being able to read or write

Joe Canadian 11-03-2005 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hurst2112
Is the book just a bunch of pictures?


No, a Montreal newspaper columnist helped him write the book... the same guy also helps him with his weekly column.

JonInMiddleGA 11-03-2005 11:08 AM

I saw the Demers story yesterday too, and thought it was great stuff.

bbor 11-03-2005 11:41 AM

Perhaps Klima spelled his name Peter....but Demers was unable to spell and it turned into Petr?:D

gstelmack 11-03-2005 11:59 AM

I went to the Hurricanes / Bruins game here in Raleigh last week. That's my first game under the new rules, and I'll chime in on the "I love the new style of play" side of things. Less thuggery, more skating, skill, and flow to the game. Plus the game only took about 2.5 hours to watch including most of an overtime period, which sure seemed shorter than the games I used to go to.

A big thumbs up from me on the new NHL.

Wolfpack 11-03-2005 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gstelmack
I went to the Hurricanes / Bruins game here in Raleigh last week. That's my first game under the new rules, and I'll chime in on the "I love the new style of play" side of things. Less thuggery, more skating, skill, and flow to the game. Plus the game only took about 2.5 hours to watch including most of an overtime period, which sure seemed shorter than the games I used to go to.

A big thumbs up from me on the new NHL.


Of course, you'd say that because Carolina's 8-2-1 under the new rules. ;)

Cards4ever 11-03-2005 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo
I think fan overreaction to too many penalties is what causes the game to continually slide back to crap within weeks of every "crackdown". I find it eternally frustrating that media and fans alike spend the entire off-season bemoaning the terrible state of the game, then 3 weeks into the season start whining about all of the penalties.

What people need to understand is that there has to be a transition period, and it's not overnight. A coach who is losing games because his team is in the box 12 times a night will not tolerate it over the length of a season. Unfortunately, it never comes to that because crackdowns are abolished by December.



I think part of the problem is, people don't have a problem with the penalties, until they start getting called on their team.

As far as people wanting the old game back? NO THANK YOU! Hockey is not about the clutch and grab, it's about the skate shoot and score.

sterlingice 11-03-2005 01:41 PM

Yeah, I'm with Cards4ever. I'll take a whole year of crappily officiated penalty-play filled hockey if it got rid of the clutching and obstruction and everything. That said, very few people are willing to go for that. It's exactly what he said: everyone's happy as long as it's not their team. Have some patience, yeesh.

SI

Cards4ever 11-03-2005 10:32 PM

For those of you who like to "slum" it, here are a list of players to watch this fall for next years draft.

http://centralscouting.nhl.com/CSMenu.nsf/0/29046f7701bfae6385256af7004ffb41/$FILE/2005%20Players%20to%20Watch.pdf

sterlingice 11-04-2005 12:07 AM

Ah, so you mean something Blues and Blackhawks fans can agree on ;)

SI

Cards4ever 11-04-2005 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice
Ah, so you mean something Blues and Blackhawks fans can agree on ;)

SI


Hmmm, not sure if that was directed at me or not. I'm not a Blues fan, I'm a Minnesota Gopher fan! I watch the NHL mainly to watch players with Minnesota connections. I go to a lot of HS games and College games and I was told that was "slumming" it, so, that was my reference. :)

sterlingice 11-04-2005 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cards4ever
Hmmm, not sure if that was directed at me or not. I'm not a Blues fan, I'm a Minnesota Gopher fan! I watch the NHL mainly to watch players with Minnesota connections. I go to a lot of HS games and College games and I was told that was "slumming" it, so, that was my reference. :)


Nah, that was actually me trying to make some peace with the Blues fans as, well, both of our teams suck this year :(

SI

Draft Dodger 11-04-2005 03:44 PM

I like this Avs team more and more as the season goes along.

btw, I wrote up a little team-by-team report for the first month of the season. Western Conference only. (Eastern will be next month)

http://www.smart-guys-sports.com/?p=32

sterlingice 11-04-2005 04:04 PM

For anyone who hasn't read his writeup, it's good stuff.

SI

st.cronin 11-04-2005 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyser
ok, ive been watching the devils all season, i guess ill weigh in now.

-the gomez-gionta-brylin line is AWESOME to watch. they set the tone for this team, which is weird, because it used to be madden's D line that set the tone. how times have changed.

-the D we signed to replace stevens/niedermeyer just dont work. in the old league, malakhov and mcgillis would fit in with the devils D perfectly. but as of right now, one of these guys HAS to go. they just dont cut it, and they cost way too much.

-hey, mogilny. SHOOT THE FUCKING PUCK. guy looks to pass way too much.

-been pretty happy with clemmensen as he's filled in for brodeur. broduer, by the way, is not nearly as effective with the weakened D and the no-touching outside the trapezoid. the league really screwed him on that rule.

-we cant play D. the old, tried-and-true devils D (rub the forward out on the way to the boards) is illegal now, and the team is flat out struggling. and its basically the lumbering defensemens fault. when sean brown (sean brown!) is your 2nd best defensemen, somethings wrong. and this is with colin white injured (great, another big, immobile D-man). better bring up hale and get some legs on D, and quick.


the devils will be lucky to snag the 5th spot in the playoffs...though i still expect them to make it. but this isnt the team i grew up loving.

that said, i fully expect them to adapt, and fairly quickly. the forwards are in place...it's just a matter of straightening the D out. the problem is very clear: mcgillis, malakhov, matvichuck, white...too many old-style d-men.


Parise?

TazFTW 11-04-2005 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
I like this Avs team more and more as the season goes along.

btw, I wrote up a little team-by-team report for the first month of the season. Western Conference only. (Eastern will be next month)

http://www.smart-guys-sports.com/?p=32



Welp, Columbus no longer has their good as Nash is injured again.

Honolulu_Blue 11-04-2005 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
I like this Avs team more and more as the season goes along.

btw, I wrote up a little team-by-team report for the first month of the season. Western Conference only. (Eastern will be next month)

http://www.smart-guys-sports.com/?p=32


Good stuff, Double D!

Pyser 11-04-2005 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
Parise?



hes shown some promise...but he hasnt clicked with any linemates yet.

robinson had him playing with mogilny and gomez at the start of the year....then parise moved to a mogilny-kozlov line....and then yesterday against the rangers he was with pandolfo and someone else, whom i forget. mightve been a kid who was just called up.

so basically, he's been everywhere but on madden's line (the top checking line). truthfully, he hasnt stood out much. but he seems scrappy, has gotten some time with the pp unit, and should fit right in for years. just hasnt clicked with anyone yet, i guess.

st.cronin 11-04-2005 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyser
hes shown some promise...but he hasnt clicked with any linemates yet.

robinson had him playing with mogilny and gomez at the start of the year....then parise moved to a mogilny-kozlov line....and then yesterday against the rangers he was with pandolfo and someone else, whom i forget. mightve been a kid who was just called up.

so basically, he's been everywhere but on madden's line (the top checking line). truthfully, he hasnt stood out much. but he seems scrappy, has gotten some time with the pp unit, and should fit right in for years. just hasnt clicked with anyone yet, i guess.


I saw a lot of him at NoDak. He's a very unique player, and I think you're lucky to have him. I expect him to be quite good, maybe something like Holik in his good years.

Draft Dodger 11-04-2005 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TazFTW
Welp, Columbus no longer has their good as Nash is injured again.


yeah, saw that.

sachmo71 11-04-2005 09:16 PM

Sorry, Chicago. :(

RPI-Fan 11-04-2005 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyser
hes shown some promise...but he hasnt clicked with any linemates yet.

robinson had him playing with mogilny and gomez at the start of the year....then parise moved to a mogilny-kozlov line....and then yesterday against the rangers he was with pandolfo and someone else, whom i forget. mightve been a kid who was just called up.

so basically, he's been everywhere but on madden's line (the top checking line). truthfully, he hasnt stood out much. but he seems scrappy, has gotten some time with the pp unit, and should fit right in for years. just hasnt clicked with anyone yet, i guess.


Everyone that was raking Milbury over the coals for taking Nilson just ahead of Parise a couple years ago isn't looking quite so smart right now...

Draft Dodger 11-04-2005 09:49 PM

Milbury still sucks donkey balls

Joe Canadian 11-04-2005 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPI-Fan
Everyone that was raking Milbury over the coals for taking Nilson just ahead of Parise a couple years ago isn't looking quite so smart right now...


Any sucess the Islanders have is completly by accident, it is by no means an indication of Milbury's hockey knowledge.

Honolulu_Blue 11-04-2005 09:51 PM

The Blues just lost 7-2 to the Oilers (who are playing exceptionally well right now).

The Blackhawks are currently losing 8-1 to the Stars.

The Norris Division, or whatever the hell it's called nowadays (Central?), is crap. It's almost like the NFC North of the NHL.

Honolulu_Blue 11-04-2005 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
Milbury still sucks donkey balls


Yes. He is a horrible GM this Milbury.

RPI-Fan 11-04-2005 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
Yes. He is a horrible GM this Milbury.


I'm not saying he's a good GM... but taking Nilson was a smart pick and those Parise-lovers should have realized the Devils would be getting someone who could contribute early, but never be more than an energy player and decent penalty killer.

Joe Canadian 11-04-2005 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPI-Fan
I'm not saying he's a good GM... but taking Nilson was a smart pick and those Parise-lovers should have realized the Devils would be getting someone who could contribute early, but never be more than an energy player and decent penalty killer.


But Milbury made the pick by accident... :)

DeToxRox 11-05-2005 12:22 AM

Ovechkins goal in the shooutout tonight .. Hot damn.

Also .. Thrashers and Caps with some drama. Could be fun to watch play out.

And the hit in the Caps/Sabs game. Damn.

Fun night of NHL action.

Cards4ever 11-05-2005 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
I saw a lot of him at NoDak. He's a very unique player, and I think you're lucky to have him. I expect him to be quite good, maybe something like Holik in his good years.


Made a lot of trips to Grand Forks huh? Or is the Fighting Sioux Network available in Madison?

sterlingice 11-05-2005 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachmo71
Sorry, Chicago. :(


Yeah, that was a real oof last night. :(

SI

Karim 11-05-2005 04:53 PM

It seems the Flames will try and win the 'old way' in the 'new' NHL. They've played well the past few games by virtue of solid defensive play, limiting scoring chances against, good penalty killing and timely goaltending. This is the only way the team can win because there is just a limited amount of offence. The team is actually showing that it can be extremely physical while not taking penalties which is vital. And of course, any team that wants to drop the gloves will play into the Flames' style. It's rubbing off on the new acquisitions with Amonte, McCarty and Ritchie all fighting in the past few games.

Tonight will be a good test against Vancouver.

sachmo71 11-06-2005 12:20 AM

Stars get a nice shootout win in Colorado tonight!

Donnie Baker 11-06-2005 02:28 AM

Haven't got into watching it closely yet, that season off affected my patterns. How has 'Sid the Kid' been doing? (that is such an annoying nickname)

Draft Dodger 11-06-2005 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachmo71
Stars get a nice shootout win in Colorado tonight!


would have loved to watch that, but the NHL apparantly decided to blackout certain games to certain people. I called up DirecTV and made life a tad uncomfortable to a rep and then her supervisor, but they couldn't really give me any acceptable answer. I'm pretty pissed off to have the game just blacked out seemingly at random by the leage, and have asked to have someone at DTV contact me with some answers (wont be holding my breath on that).

it's only one game, but I'm rather furious at the way NHL is fucking around customers. neither Dallas or Colorado is close to me, so it's not a local blackout, and local blackouts are the only blackouts I'm supposed to have on Center Ice

EDIT: I suspected was that it was just a technical glitch on the part of DTV and they were just giving me a load of bull. Well, I just happened to be browsing through my Now Playing list, and the game MAGICALLY became unblacked out to me not long after I called. Still annoyed, because I missed all but the 3rd period, and even more so because since I didn't think I had it recorded, I checked on the score...I can't watch a game where I know what happens.

RPI-Fan 11-06-2005 09:56 AM

Quote:

Still annoyed, because I missed all but the 3rd period, and even more so because since I didn't think I had it recorded, I checked on the score...I can't watch a game where I know what happens.

Hah, I'm the exact same way.

Draft Dodger 11-07-2005 08:15 PM

a bit of a head scratcher from the Bruins. They trade Andy Hilbert to the Blackhawks for a 5th rounder. Now, granted, the B's don't really have a need for a forward right now, but Hilbert is a former 2nd round pick, is 24, and has been solid in the AHL (79 points last years).

Just seems like they gave him up too cheap.

Karim 11-08-2005 12:01 AM

Back-to-back wins against the Canucks, making it four in a row for the Flames. Awesome game again tonight. Phaneuf was first star with a goal (game winner) and two assists. He won't win the Calder playing our west with Sid the Kid and Ovenchicken in the east but he's playing well enough to be nominated. Of course, it's really early.

Draft Dodger 11-08-2005 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karim
Back-to-back wins against the Canucks, making it four in a row for the Flames. Awesome game again tonight. Phaneuf was first star with a goal (game winner) and two assists. He won't win the Calder playing our west with Sid the Kid and Ovenchicken in the east but he's playing well enough to be nominated. Of course, it's really early.


Phaneuf rocks. I'd watch more Flames games just to watch him work.

sachmo71 11-08-2005 06:00 AM

Shutout for Turco against the hated and feared Oil tonight, and it was well earned. The forwards tried to leave him out to dry a few times tonight, but he wouldn't have any of that.

In the odd trades department...

Quote:

WASHINGTON (CP) - The Toronto Maple Leafs have traded tough guy Nathan Perrott to the Dallas Stars for a conditional draft pick in 2006.

The Maple Leafs, who lost 5-4 to the Capitals in Washington on Sunday, made the move to create room on their roster.

"I wanted to be a Toronto Maple Leaf," Perrott told Leafs TV. "But I'm going to go there, do my best and work hard."

The Maple Leafs will receive a fifth-round draft pick from Dallas if Perrott plays more than half of the Stars' remaining games. Otherwise, the Leafs will get a sixth-round selection.

Perrott, who had no points in three games this season, was the odd man out in Toronto. The emergence of rookie Kyle Wellwood and return of Mariusz Czerkawski from injury meant the Leafs had to demote someone to the AHL's Toronto Marlies or make a move.





In Dallas, Perrott will have to work his way into the team's lineup.

"Nathan comes in as one of our 23rd (skater) and we look forward to the grit he will add to our lineup," Stars GM Doug Armstrong said in a release. "We like his ability to skate and the pressure he can provide on the forecheck."

In 66 career games with Toronto and Nashville, Perrott has two goals, four assists and 197 penalty minutes.

The Maple Leafs acquired him in a 2002 trade with the Predators.

"He's been everything we had hoped for," Leafs coach Pat Quinn said. "He works his hardest. This is an opportunity for him.

"We hope he has some good luck."


So we had a goon (I forgot his damn name!), but they let him go in the offseason. We have Erskine, but he's such a defensive liability that they don't want to carry him as the 7th D-man on the roster. I guess there isn't anyone in the minors who can fill this role, so we get Perrott? For a 5th? (maybe 6th). Sheesh.

Johnny, are you around? Can you tell me something good about this guy? I hear he can't skate, he can't shoot, and he makes bad decisions. Can he fight well?

Johnny93g 11-08-2005 08:24 AM

Well, i liked Perrott better then Belak...lol...thats not saying much though.
Perrot gives a good effort, but thats about it.....He can forecheck, and throw a few hits, but again, not effectivly enough to be a regular...Its pretty much a steal for Toronto here. It will be a 6th rounder, as i dont see Perrot getting in anyone's lineup for more then half their games. He's exactly what the coach said, he's the 23rd man on the roster

edit: his fighting never stood out to me....he was last in the hierarchy or fighters for toronto. I couldnt even tell you if we won or lost most of his fights.

Joe Canadian 11-08-2005 11:04 AM

I watched Perrott pretty regularly in his 90+ games down here with the Baby Leafs... I'll echo Johnny's remarks that he's not a regular NHLer. He is however a very hard worker so if that's something Dallas needs then they got what they needed... I think he's worth a 6th Rd pick... 5th Rd not so much.

bbor 11-08-2005 11:41 AM

Perrot fell out of favor in Toronto last week after the Sens game.In the game against Ottawa Domi had his ass handed to him in a fight,Perrot was playing that game and did'nt fight all night.Perrot is there to add toughness to the team,in this game he showed he may not be willing to do that anymore thus making him useless.

Draft Dodger 11-08-2005 12:34 PM

let's see if this works


st.cronin 11-08-2005 07:39 PM

Who was that Philly goalie who gave up the shot from center ice in the playoffs a few years ago?

st.cronin 11-08-2005 09:04 PM

dola

I think my last post jinxed CuJo.

bbor 11-08-2005 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
Who was that Philly goalie who gave up the shot from center ice in the playoffs a few years ago?


Ninymakki(Sp?) Let one in from center a few weeks ago for the Flyers.

DeToxRox 11-08-2005 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
Who was that Philly goalie who gave up the shot from center ice in the playoffs a few years ago?


Dan Cloutier vs the Wings in 02?

Karim 11-09-2005 03:51 AM

Here's an 'article' (it's Fox) that suggests members of the UofM Gophers team have been involved in underage drinking. The players in question include Flames first round pick Kris Chucko, future first overall pick Phil Kessell, Jeff Frazee and Evan Kaufmann.

Up here the drinking age is 18 so many of us were laughing this off but I'm also hearing that the NCAA takes this very seriously and that many of these players could be in serious trouble. In Chucko's case, it could go so far as him losing his eligibility and him having to play in the WHL for Brandon.

For those in the know, how serious is this?

http://www.kmsp.com/news/investigato...ry.asp?1650014

Honolulu_Blue 11-09-2005 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeToxRoxDVHStyle
Dan Cloutier vs the Wings in 02?


Chris Osgood vs the Blues in 98?

Joe Canadian 11-09-2005 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karim
Here's an 'article' (it's Fox) that suggests members of the UofM Gophers team have been involved in underage drinking. The players in question include Flames first round pick Kris Chucko, future first overall pick Phil Kessell, Jeff Frazee and Evan Kaufmann.

Up here the drinking age is 18 so many of us were laughing this off but I'm also hearing that the NCAA takes this very seriously and that many of these players could be in serious trouble. In Chucko's case, it could go so far as him losing his eligibility and him having to play in the WHL for Brandon.

For those in the know, how serious is this?

http://www.kmsp.com/news/investigato...ry.asp?1650014


Seriously, there must be something more important these ass hats could be investigating...

Ksyrup 11-09-2005 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
Chris Osgood vs the Blues in 98?


Was it that long ago? Or, did he do it more than once? He's also the one who prematurely started celebrating a playoff win and watched a puck fly past him and off a post, isn't he?

Ksyrup 11-09-2005 07:18 AM

I happened to catch the last 5 minutes of the Nasville/Edmonton game last night. It was 1-1 with under 2 minutes left, and it ended 3-2. That was pretty cool. I don't think I ever saw that happen in years past.

sachmo71 11-09-2005 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
Chris Osgood vs the Blues in 98?



Osgood also gave one up to Jamie Langenbrunner in 99.

Tekneek 11-09-2005 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup
Was it that long ago? Or, did he do it more than once? He's also the one who prematurely started celebrating a playoff win and watched a puck fly past him and off a post, isn't he?


That sounds like a series between the Wings and Sharks.

sachmo71 11-09-2005 09:04 AM

Actually, it happened to Osgood twice in the 98-99 season. Al MacInnis scored from center ice in the second round, and Jamie Langenbrunner did it in the as well.

Honolulu_Blue 11-09-2005 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tekneek
That sounds like a series between the Wings and Sharks.


Osgood wasn't celebrating when that happened. The game was tied. He just left the net to play the puck and couldn't get back in time before it went in. It was horrible. That series was probably the most painful sporting event(s) that I have ever suffered through. I was crushed. I actually banned myself from hockey for a while. (Note: the ban lasted until January '95, but only because of the strike. I ended up going to a pre-season Wings' game).

Honolulu_Blue 11-09-2005 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachmo71
Actually, it happened to Osgood twice in the 98-99 season. Al MacInnis scored from center ice in the second round, and Jamie Langenbrunner did it in the as well.


That was '97-'98, no? And even with all that nonsense, we still won the Cup! :D

I remember the MacInnis goal vividly. It was my first year of law school. I was in the midst of a "24 hour take-home" exam for Con Law. Basically, you pick up the exam from the library and have 24 hours to finish it. I picked it up around noon, worked diligently until around 7:30. Then I decided to work on the exam, while having the game on in the background. It wasn't working at all, so I figured I had made enough progress so I would watch the game and then go back to the exam. I went to a friend's house to watch it. With a minute to go, I stood up and put my coat on. I didn't want to waste any time chatting or lingering around post-game. A few second's later MacInnis scores.

The game didn't end until the second overtime on a nice goal by Shanahan. I think the Blues almost won it, but their best chance hit the cross-bar. I didn't get home until after midnight. Luckily I was pretty pumped up by the win, so I finished the exam.

I was still seriously displeased.

Honolulu_Blue 11-09-2005 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup
Was it that long ago? Or, did he do it more than once? He's also the one who prematurely started celebrating a playoff win and watched a puck fly past him and off a post, isn't he?


That was Vernon, I think. Hrmm... That happened against the Blackhawks in the '95 playoffs. A terrifying moment for sure.

It was a Sunday afternoon game, I think. During the game I ate some promotional "Batman" hamburger from McDonald's. It was pretty tasty.

Ksyrup 11-09-2005 09:45 AM

You remember eating a promotional hamburger from McDonald's during a hockey game 10 years ago. I feel ashamed for being such a casual hockey fan. I'm not sure I can return to this thread in good conscience.

sachmo71 11-09-2005 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
That was '97-'98, no? And even with all that nonsense, we still won the Cup! :D

I remember the MacInnis goal vividly. It was my first year of law school. I was in the midst of a "24 hour take-home" exam for Con Law. Basically, you pick up the exam from the library and have 24 hours to finish it. I picked it up around noon, worked diligently until around 7:30. Then I decided to work on the exam, while having the game on in the background. It wasn't working at all, so I figured I had made enough progress so I would watch the game and then go back to the exam. I went to a friend's house to watch it. With a minute to go, I stood up and put my coat on. I didn't want to waste any time chatting or lingering around post-game. A few second's later MacInnis scores.

The game didn't end until the second overtime on a nice goal by Shanahan. I think the Blues almost won it, but their best chance hit the cross-bar. I didn't get home until after midnight. Luckily I was pretty pumped up by the win, so I finished the exam.

I was still seriously displeased.



Yes, it was. That was also the year Belfour tried to chop one of the Wings agitators (I believe it was Lapointe) in half with his goalie stick from the crotch up. OWCH!

Draft Dodger 11-09-2005 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
That series was probably the most painful sporting event(s) that I have ever suffered through. I was crushed.


there's painful and then there's Roy's Statue of Liberty But He Doesn't Have The Puck.

Honolulu_Blue 11-09-2005 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachmo71
Yes, it was. That was also the year Belfour tried to chop one of the Wings agitators (I believe it was Lapointe) in half with his goalie stick from the crotch up. OWCH!


Indeed! Poor Marty. I loved the guy when he was with the Wings, but he sort of became the poster child for excessive spending after Boston gave him the $5.5 million a year. You can't blame a fella for taking the money, but the Bruins insane to give it to him. He's a great character guy, but he's really a third line type of player, strong, physical, and will chip in up to 20 goals in a very good year.

The greatest Martin LaPointe moment was his goal in game 6 of the '97 Western Conference Finals. It was a beauty of a slap shot from above the circles that disintegrated Patrick Roy's catching glove and went into the net. Looking back, I think that series is probably my favorite Wings playoff series ever, even with that stinker of a game 5.

Honolulu_Blue 11-09-2005 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
there's painful and then there's Roy's Statue of Liberty But He Doesn't Have The Puck.


Good times... Good times... ;)

sachmo71 11-09-2005 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
Good times... Good times... ;)



He was such a tool.


Good, but a dick.

Draft Dodger 11-09-2005 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachmo71
He was such a tool.


Good, but a dick.


I have no argument for that.
but, at least when he retired...he stayed retired.

Honolulu_Blue 11-09-2005 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachmo71
He was such a tool.


Good, but a dick.


Yes. I think, at the moment, he is cearly my most hated sports figure of all time. He was a great goalie, amazing, but I hated him nonetheless. Claude Lemieux comes in as a close second. After that, things get fuzzy...

bbor 11-09-2005 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
Yes. I think, at the moment, he is cearly my most hated sports figure of all time. He was a great goalie, amazing, but I hated him nonetheless. Petr Klima comes in as a close second. After that, things get fuzzy...


Fixed that for ya.

:eek: :eek: :eek:



:D

Honolulu_Blue 11-09-2005 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbor
Fixed that for ya.

:eek: :eek: :eek:



:D


You're an evil, evil man, bbor!

Kilma rules. The exciting moves, the great hair, that super-cool helmet... A young H_B even got a little teary-eyed when he was traded to Edmonton for Jimmy "*&*$ing" Carson. I think they traded Klima, Joe Murphy, Adam Graves, and Jeff Sharples to Edmonton for Carson, Kevin McClelland, and a mid-round draft pick. A horrible trade. Just horrible.

Speaking of hate, I did hate Jimmy Carson. Even when he was a member of the Wings I hated him. That's a rare thing. I can only think of a handful of Wings I've actually hated while playing for the team: Carson, Joe Murphy, Marc Potvin, Jim Cummins, to name a few. I didn't even hate Tim Cheveldae, despite his complete suckitude. I actually kinda liked the guy, especially when he wore his "lucky" yellow suit before a big game.

Honolulu_Blue 11-09-2005 11:19 AM

Since I am bored and have already taken a trip or two down Red Wings Memory Lane... I think the Wings' 1989 draft class has to be the best draft ever for the organization and, perhaps, one of the best draft classes in the history of the NHL. This draft was the cornerstone for the Wings 3 Cups.

1989
11 C Mike Sillinger
32 D Bob Boughner
53 D Nicklas Lidstrom
74 C Sergei Fedorov
95 C Shawn McCosh
116 R Dallas Drake
137 D Scott Zygulski
158 D Andy Suhy
179 Bob Jones
200 D Greg Bignell
204 L Rick Judson
221 D Vladimir Konstantinov
242 R Joe Frederick
246 G Jason Glickman


Granted, not all of these guys are household names and the first round pick didn't exactly blow the doors off the NHL, but it's an amazing draft class. Sillinger and Boughner are solid NHL players. They have bounced around the league a lot, but even now, 16 years later, they starting in the NHL. Same goes for Dallas Drake, current captain of the Blues.

The gems of the draft are obviously Fedorov, Lidstrom, and Konstantinov. For a while there Fedorov was the best player in the NHL. Well, for one year at least. Even after that he was always dangerous and an amazing talent, though he's starting to fade away out there in Anaheim. Lidstrom is, well, Lidstrom. Multiple Norris Trophies. Probably in the top 10-15 defensemen of all time. I still think there was no better defensemen in the leauge than Konstantinov in 96-97. He could do it all, hit, skate, pass, shoot, you name it. He was as complete a defensemen as one would want before his untimely accident. But for that, I think he, and not Lidstrom, would have been the one taking home the Norris year after year.

Just taking a quick look back at some drafts...

Edmonton's '79 (Kevin Lowe, Mark Messier, and Glen Anderson) and '80 (Coffey, Kurri, and Moog) drafts were pretty outstanding, especially when you consider the number of players drafted.

I also love the Wings '83 draft which saw Steve Yzerman, Bob Probert, Joe Kocur, Petr Kima!, and Stu Grimson get drafted into the league. Great times ahead for all!

Draft Dodger 11-09-2005 11:39 AM

you can have Boughner back

sachmo71 11-09-2005 11:52 AM

no doubt about it...that was an insane draft.

sterlingice 11-09-2005 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karim
Here's an 'article' (it's Fox) that suggests members of the UofM Gophers team have been involved in underage drinking. The players in question include Flames first round pick Kris Chucko, future first overall pick Phil Kessell, Jeff Frazee and Evan Kaufmann.

Up here the drinking age is 18 so many of us were laughing this off but I'm also hearing that the NCAA takes this very seriously and that many of these players could be in serious trouble. In Chucko's case, it could go so far as him losing his eligibility and him having to play in the WHL for Brandon.

For those in the know, how serious is this?

http://www.kmsp.com/news/investigato...ry.asp?1650014


Wait, wait? So you're saying there's underage drinking at college? No way!

SI

Draft Dodger 11-09-2005 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
Granted, not all of these guys are household names and the first round pick didn't exactly blow the doors off the NHL, but it's an amazing draft class. Sillinger and Boughner are solid NHL players. They have bounced around the league a lot, but even now, 16 years later, they starting in the NHL. Same goes for Dallas Drake, current captain of the Blues.


not saying it wasn't a bad draft. but it WAS a pretty deep class: Sundin (sniff), Guerin, Stu Barnes, Holik and Kozlig were also first rounders, and guys like Foote, Travis Green, Paul Laus (!), Brisebois, Greg Johnson, Dafoe, Draper (Winnipeg), Klatt and Reichel were also drafted. and then there was that OTHER 6th round pick, just ahead of Dallas Drake. Some Pavel Bure guy.

just to throw it out there, the year before, Colorado..er, Quebec, drafted Leschyshen, Fiset, Kamensky, Gusarov and Lapointe. Not a bad draft. Then again, they also took Wade Belak in the first round if 1994, so I guess they cancel each other out.

Wolfpack 11-09-2005 09:50 PM

w00t! Canes down Buffalo 5-3 and set franchise record with eighth straight win! They didn't come from behind, but they still had to work for it as the Sabres were peppering the goal all game and Gerber had to stand on his head a lot to keep a lot of the shots out. Empty-netter late sealed it, though.

Karim 11-10-2005 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice
Wait, wait? So you're saying there's underage drinking at college? No way!


My question is how big of deal is it to the NCAA? A couple of people have indicated to me that the UofM could face sanctions and players could lose eligibility. Is that a likely response by NCAA authorities?

Cards4ever 11-10-2005 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karim
Here's an 'article' (it's Fox) that suggests members of the UofM Gophers team have been involved in underage drinking. The players in question include Flames first round pick Kris Chucko, future first overall pick Phil Kessell, Jeff Frazee and Evan Kaufmann.

Up here the drinking age is 18 so many of us were laughing this off but I'm also hearing that the NCAA takes this very seriously and that many of these players could be in serious trouble. In Chucko's case, it could go so far as him losing his eligibility and him having to play in the WHL for Brandon.

For those in the know, how serious is this?

http://www.kmsp.com/news/investigato...ry.asp?1650014



The drinking is probably going to result in some 1 game suspensions for the players. The bigger issue is, it looks like they were allowed in free on Karaoke night when there is supposed to be a $3 Cover Charge. It also looks like they were given free drinks, also a NCAA violation.

Being a Gopher fan, I know, hear, and understand the point of view of "underage drinking, shocking", but these guys are going to pay the price for that choice. Like or not they are pretty popular figures on campus and around town and they just can't blend in like a normal college student. Lots of Frats and the like to drink at, hopefully they use those sources next time.

kcchief19 11-10-2005 09:50 AM

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...s/13127100.htm

I'm officially on the Kansas City Penguines bandwagon. I just need to get me a sweater so I can watch them play in our new building, eh.

Honolulu_Blue 11-10-2005 09:15 PM

Wow. An absolute beauty of a goal by Crosby in the shoot-out against Montreal. He was Pittsburgh's third shooter and the shootout score was 0-0. He scores. Pens win. A classic goal for his first game against his favorite team growing up. The excitement building up that goal and the fans' reaction is definitive proof that the shoot-out is the way to end a tie in the regular season. It was electriftying. The alternative? A long, dull walk to the parking lot. The debate has ended, kids.

'Nuff said.

Booj 11-10-2005 09:18 PM

Yeah that was a crazy goal... I knew he was going to score, too.

I'll take a point after being down 2-0 after the 1st period...

I just wish Ottawa would lose games at some point this season....

Honolulu_Blue 11-10-2005 09:22 PM

Wow. The Avs are up 3-0 against Vancouver. They scored 3 goals in the first seven minutes and before the Canucks even had a shot on goal...

sterlingice 11-10-2005 09:26 PM

Yay! Hawks win the crapfest in St Louis. And I actually got it on tv here (Fox Sports Midwest coverage for the Blues). The only nights I get the Hawks and Rockets on tv, they're both on at the same time :(

SI

Draft Dodger 11-10-2005 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
Wow. The Avs are up 3-0 against Vancouver. They scored 3 goals in the first seven minutes and before the Canucks even had a shot on goal...


aw fuck.
I'm thinking...15 minutes in and no one cares about the Avs anyway. there wont be a spoiler there. oops (no biggy, really, but I ain't coming back. besides, the Avs play like crap when they have the lead).

fwiw, their last game (vs SJ), they had a 2-0 lead 3 minutes in, again before allowing a shot. they ended up getting outshot 18-8 in that period!

bye.

Honolulu_Blue 11-10-2005 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
aw fuck.
I'm thinking...15 minutes in and no one cares about the Avs anyway. there wont be a spoiler there. oops (no biggy, really, but I ain't coming back. besides, the Avs play like crap when they have the lead).

fwiw, their last game (vs SJ), they had a 2-0 lead 3 minutes in, again before allowing a shot. they ended up getting outshot 18-8 in that period!

bye.


Gah!

DD, I'm so sorry. I should've thought to put spoiler warnings on that post. Damnit! Will do so in the future.

Draft Dodger 11-10-2005 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
Gah!

DD, I'm so sorry. I should've thought to put spoiler warnings on that post. Damnit! Will do so in the future.


no you shouldn't have. it was totally my fault.

why am I still here?

Draft Dodger 11-11-2005 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
besides, the Avs play like crap when they have the lead).


can I call 'em or what?

Honolulu_Blue 11-11-2005 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
can I call 'em or what?


They won 5-3. They were fine, though they did sit back a bit and let Vancouver take it to 'em. Still, it's hard not at times with a 4 goal lead.

Draft Dodger 11-11-2005 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
They won 5-3. They were fine, though they did sit back a bit and let Vancouver take it to 'em. Still, it's hard not at times with a 4 goal lead.


true. but they looked as awful in the 2nd period as they looked good in the first. and they start to coast like that EVERY time they get a lead. I'm sure I sound like a Toronto fan, complaining about a win, but I really do wish they'd cut that the fuck out.

love to watch the team though. they are doing way better than I expected.

Maple Leafs 11-11-2005 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
I'm sure I sound like a Toronto fan, complaining about a win...

Wait, I thought we held parades when we won. Which is it again?

Draft Dodger 11-11-2005 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs
Wait, I thought we held parades when we won. Which is it again?


that definitely didn't come from me.

er...did it?

Honolulu_Blue 11-11-2005 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs
Wait, I thought we held parades when we won. Which is it again?



Parades. Definitely parades.


Maple Leafs 11-11-2005 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
that definitely didn't come from me.

No, it was someone else. Probably one of those puppy-kicking Red Wing fans. But both points of view are pretty common, and I'm always kind of amused by the stereotypes of Leaf fans that seem to contradict each other.

On the one hand, we complain about everything. On the other hand, we do cartwheels over even the smallest victory.

On the one hand, we brutally turn on our players and tear them apart. On the other hand, we think all our players walk on water.

On the one hand, we delude ourselves into thinking we're going to win the Cup every year. On the other hand, we're so damn pessimistic and depressing to be around.

On the one hand, we're fickle morons for hopping on and off the bandwagon over every little development. On the other hand, we're hopeless idiots for being the only fans in the league that sell out the building every night no matter how well the team does.

On the one hand, our team never wins the Stanley Cup. On the other hand... um, actually, forget that one.

Still, couldn't all the Leaf-haters get together and at least get on message?

Draft Dodger 11-11-2005 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs
Still, couldn't all the Leaf-haters get together and at least get on message?


can we all just say Darcy Tucker is a pansy, and leave it at that?
oh wait, we ALL agree that Wade Belak sucks, right?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.