Is an inability to read the mod's posts or justify your vote in any way grounds for being labeled a crazy liberal?

Im sorry, but your lies are astounding. To even hint that one of my obvious piety and rightousness would consider pre-marital sex is down right offensive. Such beliefs you hold about sex out of wedlock will quickly find you meeting the mighty savior for your retribution liberal!!!!

Hold on right there buddy! you told me at the time a BJ didnt count as sex, but i refused because i am no harlot. shame on you

Not yet. ;)

I am just around practicing the piano. I have to be ready for church. I pray that we find these deviants and get them out of our church and out of our town.

I will ask you but once, refrain from continuing to refer to sexual activities in such vulgar mannor. Sexual activity is something only to be actively pursued by couples in wedlock, and is not for the enjoyment of ones-self. It is for the purpose of procreation, and nothing else. Your obvious attempts to seduce the god loving community for the devilish practices you have in mind will be dealt with quickly and sternly, worry not.

well since i am a lady i will not speak of this ugliness again. now if you will excuse me im off to the curch to pray i forget this unfortuante incident. good day

Almost Heaven will no longer put up with it. Yesterday you found that man doing devil things to that other man. Today you will take action. You awake refreshed and recharged with the holy anger filling your souls.

You will ferret out those deviants. Them, and anyone who stands with them, will go down. You will make sure of it!

Day One has begun. It ends at 9 pm EST Monday night.

Please remember that you may not cast a stone if a person is NOT on the liberal list. That would be assault and battery and would likely get you on the list as a felony.

The only people we can vote for are "liberals," right?

I'm a little unclear on what we're supposed to do, to be honest. Nobody is officially a "liberal" yet, so I think we don't get to vote for anybody.

Not yet it appears, which is odd...but im sure anxiety will give us someone soon

hoopsguy, were pride not a sin, I would say you have done your mother proud taking up the Lord's mighty anger with the sexually immoral deviants of this world. Best you keep that up before Pa Crew takes his belt to you. You know how he is when the fervor takes him.

well after what he said, bullet ought to be on the liberal list.

Strange game so far.

ah sorry for voting so early i missread the title and i thougth day one was over at 2am EST monday morning, and i didnt even realize that we could only vote for liberals.

so i guess UNVOTE TYRITH

Quick question - assuming that somebody does end up on the subversive liberal list today, is it imperative that we have a stoning? Or is the stoning optional?

In my own belief, if we can lynch we should...so if someone hits the block, i will be voting for the stoning.

Blade, it wasn't a strategic question, it was a question about the rules.

Im just telling you, optional or not, i will be strongly pushing for a lynch...i dont think it being optional matters...we know we can, and if we get the chance we should follow through.

hi blade!

Even if only one name ends up on the subversive list, for reasons unpublished?

So, hypothetically speaking, Anxiety comes back and adds one name to the subversive list, and doesn't explain why. You would be for stoning that person?

dola

I'm trying to figure out the benefit of that strategy.

Yes...especially then...all the wolves, and only some of the good players have secret liberal tendencies. If some mechanic reveals one of these players as liberal, i think we have a better chance of them being evil then normal. That may come back and screw me later, but thats my belief. It is gods will so to say :)

HI DT!!

And with this post I feel 99% sure that you are a wolf.

I'm dead serious, everybody. Some of you I'm sure will know what I see.

Cronin, are you on crack? Im telling you my firm belief of how we beat the wolves, and you think im one of them? Care to elaborate so i can point out your mistakes?

By the way, wrong or not you have earned some trust from me. Either you learned from mafia or are good...in the past, whenever you are evil you avoid confronting me...the fact you dont hesitate here makes me happy. Now i just need to turn you in the right direction, as going after me is not smart.

Examine your assumptions.

My assumptions are that players revealed to be liberal through game mechanics, and not something they say in thread, have a good chance of being evil. Whats wrong about that?

There's no way Anxiety makes it that easy for us, and only a wolf would WANT to jump on that kind of logic. A red-blooded God-fearing patriotic American would realize there's more to it than that.

Also, what makes you think that you will know why somebody is on the list (game mechanics vs. something said in thread)? The hypothetical I gave you was that you don't KNOW why they are on the list.

You may always choose not to stone by not voting. There is no punishment for discretion.

oooh fun. Day one drama

This may be moot because of no list, but

STONE NOBODY

Because it is my understanding that any liberals exposed by comments in thread will be pointed out by the moderator(much like anxiety pointed out DTs comment just as the game started).

When i say game mechanics, i mean i believe we have a role that can search for liberal tendencies, likely on top of an actual seer. So if he finds one, we find out by the note on the door. And then we should follow through. I dont think anxiety will hand us a thing, but my idea of how mechanics might work doesnt rely upon him to do so.

Anxiety is severely handicapping us in only letting us lynch people who have been revealed liberal. If you dont think he gave us some things to even the balance, im suprised.

I think this would only be relevent if we knew WHY people ended up on the subversive list. If it was cuz of secret liberal tendencies then we could make the mathematical argument they were more likely to be wolves. But if it's because of in-game mechanics (like what bullet or I said...although mine was before game-start luckily) then it could just be a case of being stupid and not reading the rules.

And voting to no lynch is like saying "hi, im gay." What a waste

Well I will be shocked if within a few days the entire roster of players is not on the list.

You just keep digging your own grave...in not so many words you just told us your a liberal(if you believe most people will be on the list, you obviously believe you will be soon). I hope you get checked out soon, because you just keep making off comments. I had the impression very few villagers(less then half) have the liberal tendency, so your beliefs just dont work with me

And if i wanted to be stubborn, i could say only a tree-hugging liberal would not want to stone a possible sinner...but thats more role-playing then fact

Not a liberal ... just more aware of some game mechanics than you.

Care to share the intimate knowledge of the game you claim to have?

Family, let us all pray. Let us pray for the wisdom to find the heathens and stone them to death. Also, let us pray that Sister Mary can find an acceptable combination of motherboard/cpu/memory/video card soon, so that she can participate at a time other than work. Preferably not more than $500 total. Amen.

:rolleyes:
Now you want me to give up my role? :rolleyes:

Your the one offering up info about you role....ill make you a deal, ill give you mine if you give me yours.

I didnt expect you to reveal..just testing you. Your dangling reasons for us not to lynch you, but giving no substance...thats fine for now, but in time i will force the issue. But do not look at me weird, your the one tossing out hints

I'm not on the block, the hints I've given out have nothing to do with trying to convince people not to lynch me.

No one is on the block, but you and i are the only ones talking/arguing. We are also the only two to call the other something(you called me a wolf, i called you a liberal). So yes, we are both on the block relative to everyone else...

May the gospels sing a song to save your liberal soul my friend

I'm not voting for either of you. Stop your bickering, you're both probably good. Leroy, come in the house and pray.

Dola, I've got very limited access at nights for the record. I'll be around my normal amount during the day.

Allegiances by roles that i see...i dont know what it grants them, but id imagine something(especially since its 2 groups of 3, not random amounts). Id imagine they will also exert more effort to save their partners, even if one is unknowingly gay. Just the way ive seen people play in most WW games when given a tea, public or private.

4. path - Sister Mary Czinski (Female)
6. st.cronin -Brother Leroy Czinski (Male)
13. DaddyTorgo - Brother Peter Czinski (Male)

8. hoopsguy- Brother Elijah Shepherd (Male)
10. Chief Rum - Sister Elizabeth Shepherd (Female)
12. ImtheCrew - Brother Roger Shepherd (Male)