Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   My Ridiculously Inept Congresscommie (Who Now Faces Arrest!) (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=48386)

GrantDawg 03-29-2006 04:56 PM

My wife said she's just trying to drum up more votes. This will definitely help her street-cred.

Ben E Lou 03-29-2006 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
My wife said she's just trying to drum up more votes. This will definitely help her street-cred.

:D

stevew 03-29-2006 05:00 PM

At least she knows how to re-register to vote if she gets convicted of a felony.

WVUFAN 03-29-2006 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy Mac
IAll you had to say was that she was a horribly inept congresswoman, but you threw in the Communism, trying to characterize the left as Communists. It would be no different than me labeling every rightist a Nazi. Obviously you can't be suspended, because no one would have the balls to do so, but I think some sort of public caning is in order.


True communism is a left-leaning viewpoint -- which in itself isn't a bad thing, since a majority of people who say "communism is bad" is referring to what the Soviet Union had as a government, which wasn't communism, but rather socialism. Two different things, and two radically different styles of government.

Ben E Lou 03-29-2006 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew
At least she knows how to re-register to vote if she gets convicted of a felony.

:D

GrantDawg 03-29-2006 06:34 PM

Drudge is reporting that the whole incident is on video (that's probably true considering it would be hard for it not to be at the Capital) and that the police are waiting for Congress to adjourn to arrest her (that is a maybe).

wade moore 03-29-2006 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WVUFAN
True communism is a left-leaning viewpoint -- which in itself isn't a bad thing, since a majority of people who say "communism is bad" is referring to what the Soviet Union had as a government, which wasn't communism, but rather socialism. Two different things, and two radically different styles of government.


And, if I'm not mistaken, Fascism is a right-leaning viewpoint.

For whatever that is worth...

I would argue that the Soviet Union wasn't truely just Socialism either, but as I said earlier in the thread, that's a whole seperate conversation.

Axxon 03-29-2006 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
And that's what I'd expect of most. She's an embarrasment to most Dems that I know, and the fact that some here defends her just shows there are many on the left on this board that are just as sold out as the right.


You know, I don't really see anyone defending her, just someone asking for proof of the attack. That is not a defense it's simply one of the pillars of critical thinking. It's something I wish more people would do and we wouldn't need sites like snopes but since it's much easier to sling out accusations and then attack anyone who questions those, the world is in the situation it is today.

I couldn't give a rats who's right about who here. I simply couldn't. I do care that nothing I've read has at all addressed the accusations or done anything to enlighten the issue. I only care about that because there seems to be some effort to do just that and those who know even less about the issue are just chirping in their attacks and making the entire thread unreadable.

I don't actually aim that at skydog. He's correct, I am aware of his bias, never gave a squat and looked at his post like I believe he meant it. I don't think Mr Bigglesworth does. Once he questioned it, the others jumping in are just exhibiting why I will continue to believe that human beings are the worst mistake on this planet and secretly await the day that nature wipes us out.

It's one thing not to have the ability, but when you have a brain and a voice, for the sake of humanity, try using the former before engaging the latter if you're being serious at all.

Now, as for McKinney, she's not my rep so I don't care where she falls on the scale. Everything I've read about her has basically been on here and do paint her as a loon but now, considering that no one is backing up any of the allegations just saying "everybody knows she's a loon" I feel that it's probably not so and simply another attempt by the unthinking to seem smart by jumping on the pileup and saying "I'M RIGHT, SEE!!!!"

Anyway, I'm outta here and on my way home. Just wanted to finish this thread before I go and had to interject the argument for proper communication. Hate to pick on Dutch but he's acting the unthinking part here and I know it doesn't fit him normally so here goes.

The whole juvenile master debater crack doesn't hit at the person you're attacking Dutch, it belittles the entire attempt by a person to express their thoughts to others and have a dialog that has any meaning. It basically boils any critical thinking down into a disparaging "why bother with facts and logic, just be a dumbass and agree with me" and that is the sickest, worst concept in my mind. Unfortunately enough people ignore logic like yours and perservere so the species continues to let mindless drones breed like rabbits and think like amoebas and expect the ones they mock to bail their butts out for the sake of the species.

Wow, thanks, I haven't really had a good I hate humans rant in a long time and it really feels good to be able to have one again. :D

This has been fun.

GrantDawg 03-29-2006 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axxon
You know, I don't really see anyone defending her, just someone asking for proof of the attack. That is not a defense it's simply one of the pillars of critical thinking. It's something I wish more people would do and we wouldn't need sites like snopes but since it's much easier to sling out accusations and then attack anyone who questions those, the world is in the situation it is today.

I couldn't give a rats who's right about who here. I simply couldn't. I do care that nothing I've read has at all addressed the accusations or done anything to enlighten the issue. I only care about that because there seems to be some effort to do just that and those who know even less about the issue are just chirping in their attacks and making the entire thread unreadable.

I don't actually aim that at skydog. He's correct, I am aware of his bias, never gave a squat and looked at his post like I believe he meant it. I don't think Mr Bigglesworth does. Once he questioned it, the others jumping in are just exhibiting why I will continue to believe that human beings are the worst mistake on this planet and secretly await the day that nature wipes us out.

It's one thing not to have the ability, but when you have a brain and a voice, for the sake of humanity, try using the former before engaging the latter if you're being serious at all.

Now, as for McKinney, she's not my rep so I don't care where she falls on the scale. Everything I've read about her has basically been on here and do paint her as a loon but now, considering that no one is backing up any of the allegations just saying "everybody knows she's a loon" I feel that it's probably not so and simply another attempt by the unthinking to seem smart by jumping on the pileup and saying "I'M RIGHT, SEE!!!!"

Anyway, I'm outta here and on my way home. Just wanted to finish this thread before I go and had to interject the argument for proper communication. Hate to pick on Dutch but he's acting the unthinking part here and I know it doesn't fit him normally so here goes.

The whole juvenile master debater crack doesn't hit at the person you're attacking Dutch, it belittles the entire attempt by a person to express their thoughts to others and have a dialog that has any meaning. It basically boils any critical thinking down into a disparaging "why bother with facts and logic, just be a dumbass and agree with me" and that is the sickest, worst concept in my mind. Unfortunately enough people ignore logic like yours and perservere so the species continues to let mindless drones breed like rabbits and think like amoebas and expect the ones they mock to bail their butts out for the sake of the species.

Wow, thanks, I haven't really had a good I hate humans rant in a long time and it really feels good to be able to have one again. :D

This has been fun.



Ummmm...what accusations? That she's a nut? See article on her hitting the policeman today.

WVUFAN 03-29-2006 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
And, if I'm not mistaken, Fascism is a right-leaning viewpoint.


Yes it is, again using a correct definition.


Quote:

I would argue that the Soviet Union wasn't truely just Socialism either, but as I said earlier in the thread, that's a whole seperate conversation.

Not in the strictest sense, but it certainly wasn't communism. Has anyone actually read The Communist Manifesto?

GrantDawg 03-29-2006 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axxon
You know, I don't really see anyone defending her, just someone asking for proof of the attack. That is not a defense it's simply one of the pillars of critical thinking. It's something I wish more people would do and we wouldn't need sites like snopes but since it's much easier to sling out accusations and then attack anyone who questions those, the world is in the situation it is today.

I couldn't give a rats who's right about who here. I simply couldn't. I do care that nothing I've read has at all addressed the accusations or done anything to enlighten the issue. I only care about that because there seems to be some effort to do just that and those who know even less about the issue are just chirping in their attacks and making the entire thread unreadable.

I don't actually aim that at skydog. He's correct, I am aware of his bias, never gave a squat and looked at his post like I believe he meant it. I don't think Mr Bigglesworth does. Once he questioned it, the others jumping in are just exhibiting why I will continue to believe that human beings are the worst mistake on this planet and secretly await the day that nature wipes us out.

It's one thing not to have the ability, but when you have a brain and a voice, for the sake of humanity, try using the former before engaging the latter if you're being serious at all.

Now, as for McKinney, she's not my rep so I don't care where she falls on the scale. Everything I've read about her has basically been on here and do paint her as a loon but now, considering that no one is backing up any of the allegations just saying "everybody knows she's a loon" I feel that it's probably not so and simply another attempt by the unthinking to seem smart by jumping on the pileup and saying "I'M RIGHT, SEE!!!!"

Anyway, I'm outta here and on my way home. Just wanted to finish this thread before I go and had to interject the argument for proper communication. Hate to pick on Dutch but he's acting the unthinking part here and I know it doesn't fit him normally so here goes.

The whole juvenile master debater crack doesn't hit at the person you're attacking Dutch, it belittles the entire attempt by a person to express their thoughts to others and have a dialog that has any meaning. It basically boils any critical thinking down into a disparaging "why bother with facts and logic, just be a dumbass and agree with me" and that is the sickest, worst concept in my mind. Unfortunately enough people ignore logic like yours and perservere so the species continues to let mindless drones breed like rabbits and think like amoebas and expect the ones they mock to bail their butts out for the sake of the species.

Wow, thanks, I haven't really had a good I hate humans rant in a long time and it really feels good to be able to have one again. :D

This has been fun.



BTW, are you basically saying you hate all people and wish them destroyed because people wouldn't debate an asinine point in a message board thread the way you want them to? You have a lower threshold of hate than most klansmen.

st.cronin 03-29-2006 07:23 PM

lol w/ GrantDawg

lol @ anybody taking this thread seriously

ice4277 03-29-2006 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
lol w/ GrantDawg

lol @ anybody taking this thread seriously


You hear the latest about Tom Brady?

wade moore 03-29-2006 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WVUFAN
Yes it is, again using a correct definition.




Not in the strictest sense, but it certainly wasn't communism. Has anyone actually read The Communist Manifesto?


Totally agree about the communism thing. I'm guessing you didn't see or forgot because it was days ago that I said the same exact thing ;)... I am probably one of the few people in this thread that has read it ;)... when i get time, i'm starting a thread on this ;)...

WVUFAN 03-29-2006 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
Totally agree about the communism thing. I'm guessing you didn't see or forgot because it was days ago that I said the same exact thing ;)... I am probably one of the few people in this thread that has read it ;)... when i get time, i'm starting a thread on this ;)...


I completely missed it. Went back and read the post, and I completely agree with you -- it seems a great number of people misunderstand the meaning of true communism.

st.cronin 03-29-2006 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WVUFAN
I completely missed it. Went back and read the post, and I completely agree with you -- it seems a great number of people misunderstand the meaning of true communism.


Isn't it true that there is a secondary, non-technical meaning of 'communist' which would be something like 'too ideologically liberal to be trusted with authority'?

Not trying to be snooty or funny, it just seems the word is used that way. There was a time when to label somebody 'communist' meant 'anti-american,' but that usage has largely faded away.

WVUFAN 03-29-2006 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
Isn't it true that there is a secondary, non-technical meaning of 'communist' which would be something like 'too ideologically liberal to be trusted with authority'?

Not trying to be snooty or funny, it just seems the word is used that way. There was a time when to label somebody 'communist' meant 'anti-american,' but that usage has largely faded away.


Not sure if I agree with the "too liberal to be trusted ..." definition, but it certainly was used during the McCarthy era to note someone was anti-American. Oddly enough, McCarthy used fascist tactics during that time, so calling someone a communist is somewhat ironic, in a way. Fascism and the "Soviet" form of socialism bear more than a resemblance to one another.

wade moore 03-29-2006 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
Isn't it true that there is a secondary, non-technical meaning of 'communist' which would be something like 'too ideologically liberal to be trusted with authority'?

Not trying to be snooty or funny, it just seems the word is used that way. There was a time when to label somebody 'communist' meant 'anti-american,' but that usage has largely faded away.


In addition to what WVUFan said, I would actually argue that many of the people in today's American culture that throw around "communist" do mean anti-american...

st.cronin 03-29-2006 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
In addition to what WVUFan said, I would actually argue that many of the people in today's American culture that throw around "communist" do mean anti-american...


I agree there are cases where it does mean that; it just seems to me that particular meaning is fading away.

st.cronin 03-29-2006 08:24 PM

dola

probably because of the end of the cold war

Shkspr 03-29-2006 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew
Sometimes i think that people are just looking for a fight....



...including Rep. McKinney?

dacman 03-30-2006 12:51 AM

You'll never guess who's birthday is March 29. Sen. Eugene McCarthy, I kid you not.

**cue Twilight Zone music**

Ben E Lou 03-30-2006 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shkspr
...including Rep. McKinney?

Well-played, sir!

More from the AJC on this incident. This could get quite fun.

Quote:

McKinney hits Capitol officer at checkpoint

WASHINGTON — Rep. Cynthia McKinney of Georgia struck a Capitol Hill police officer Wednesday morning after the officer, not recognizing her as a member of Congress, tried to stop her from stepping around a security checkpoint, police confirmed.
The incident "has been brought to our attention and it is being investigated," said Sgt. Kimberly Schneider, a spokeswoman for Capitol Hill police.
Congressional and police authorities, who spoke on condition that they not be named, said the investigation into the incident would stretch into today and that no arrest warrant would be issued for the DeKalb County Democrat — if, indeed, one is — until it is completed.
McKinney issued a statement Wednesday night saying she regretted the confontation.
"I know that Capitol Hill Police are securing our safety, and I appreciate the work that they do. I have demonstrated my support for them in the past, and I continue to support them now," she said.
A deputy police chief and a representative of the House's sergeant-at-arms visited McKinney's congressional office Wednesday afternoon. Neither commented to reporters.
The officer involved was not identified, but police officials said he was ready to press charges against McKinney — a rare, if not unprecedented, action by a Capitol police officer against a member of Congress.
Police and congressional officials said they were not aware of any other incidents in which a member of Congress struck a Capitol Hill police officer or an officer pressed charges against a member, though conflicts between members and police at security checkpoints are not rare.
The incident occurred when McKinney was entering a House office building on Capitol Hill. She started walking around a metal detector and X-ray machine at one of the building's entrances, as members of Congress are allowed to do, when the officer tried to stop her, congressional and police officials said.
The officer either tapped McKinney on the shoulder or grabbed her arm, they said. McKinney spun around and struck the officer, though there are conflicting reports about whether she slapped him, punched him in the chest or hit him with a cellphone she had in her hand, they said.
Congressional staffers who have worked with McKinney said several factors may have contributed to the officer's failure to recognize McKinney as a member of Congress.
McKinney usually does not wear the special lapel pin given to members of Congress to make them easier to identify, and she apparently was not wearing it Wednesday morning, congressional and police officials said. Kerri Hanley, of the House sergeant-at-arms' office, said members are not required to wear the pin, though most do.
Police also keep books with pictures of each member at security checkpoints in the Capitol and in House and Senate office buildings to help them recognize lawmakers. However, even if the officer had consulted the book, he may not have recognized McKinney, who has altered her hairstyle since her official House photo was taken, congressional aides noted.
This is not the first time McKinney has had an encounter with Capitol Hill police. When she first arrived in Congress in 1993, an officer failed to recognize her because she was new and not wearing the congressional pin. After she complained, police put pictures of McKinney up at each security checkpoint to ensure it would not happen again.
McKinney also once ran into problems at the White House. USA Today reported that when McKinney, who is African-American, and a young white aide arrived at a welcoming ceremony in May 1998 for then-Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi, the guard at the gate deferred to the aide as the person of authority. Once in the executive mansion, McKinney said, another guard tried to stop her until Rep. James Moran (D-Va.) stepped in.
"I am absolutely sick and tired of having to have my appearance at the White House validated by white people," McKinney wrote in a complaint to then-President Bill Clinton. "I don't need to be stopped or questioned because I happen to look like hired help."
The White House apologized to McKinney.
Republicans were quick to comment on Wednesday's incident, circulating an e-mail noting that McKinney's confrontation with the Capitol Hill officer came on the same day that her party announced an election-year "affirmation" of its commitment to shoring up the nation's security.
"On the day when Democrats held a media stunt to unveil their security agenda, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) hit a Capitol police officer. Not exactly a show of support for law enforcement," wrote Sean Spicer, spokesman for the House Republican Conference..

The Boortz show starts in a few moments. I don't listen to him every day, but I wouldn't miss this one. Definitely a silver lining to still being stuck at home sick. Today oughta be FUNNNNN!!! Listen live at http://www.wsbradio.com if you want. With this kind of material, he should be quite entertaining.

Ben E Lou 03-30-2006 07:33 AM

The two hairstyles:


Rep. Cynthia McKinney has altered her hairstyle since her House photo was taken, aides say, perhaps causing the error.

wade moore 03-30-2006 07:54 AM

Just turned Boortz on, hoping I didn't miss him talking about this.

Ben E Lou 03-30-2006 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
Just turned Boortz on, hoping I didn't miss him talking about this.

Surprisingly, he hasn't said much yet besides a brief mention, and Royal made a joke about wanting to hit someone in traffic with his cell phone, "since that appears to be the weapon of the day." I wonder if they're waiting until 10AM when he goes national through syndication.

Ben E Lou 03-30-2006 08:08 AM

Ah. He's about to talk about. Sounds like he's gonna pick on Ol' Billy some, too. Just commented that "The apple doesn't fall far from the tree."

wade moore 03-30-2006 08:08 AM

They just made another quick reference...

You know, as a fan of talk radio, I'm really not a big fan of Boortz.

Ben E Lou 03-30-2006 08:28 AM

Ah....it makes sense. He just teased it now, and he'll begin the discussion after the next break, probably so that it bleeds over on to the national portion of the show.

Ben E Lou 03-30-2006 08:47 AM

LOL. Did Billy really threaten to STAB a fellow member on the Georgia House floor?

GrantDawg 03-30-2006 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
The two hairstyles:













Rep. Cynthia McKinney has altered her hairstyle since her House photo was taken, aides say, perhaps causing the error.


I still question how you couldn't recognize her. She is the only person I've ever seen that her jaw literally unhinges.

JonInMiddleGA 03-30-2006 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
LOL. Did Billy really threaten to STAB a fellow member on the Georgia House floor?


Accounts of that incident vary. Billy himself denied the charge, telling reporters at the time (1995 I think it was) that "I don't carry a knife, I carry a gun."

stevew 03-30-2006 09:18 AM

Man, looks like she hit the all you can eat buffet a few times since that photo was taken.

Ben E Lou 03-30-2006 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew
Man, looks like she hit the all you can eat buffet a few times since that photo was taken.

Well, that's part of the discussion on the Boortz show--that she's gained weight and changed her hairstyle. FWIW, she looks a good bit bigger in that photo than she did when I had my encounter with her. (Going to do a thread search to see when that was...)

Ben E Lou 03-30-2006 09:24 AM

Wow. December 9th.

Axxon 03-30-2006 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Ummmm...what accusations? That she's a nut? See article on her hitting the policeman today.


Well, that hadn't been posted when I was replying. I still haven't had time to read it as my only internet connection is here at work. From what I saw on television though it appears a case of elected official arrogance and being caught by surprise. Stupid? Sure but a sign of her being a nut? Not so much.

Fact is, there is nothing but anectdotal evidence, presented by people with bias on this thread. Amusing, sure but not really convincing. Not that the thread was set up for that purpose but still.


Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
BTW, are you basically saying you hate all people and wish them destroyed because people wouldn't debate an asinine point in a message board thread the way you want them to? You have a lower threshold of hate than most klansmen.


You got me. Years of trying to come to terms with how people treat each other was predicated on the fact that one day in the future, on a message board, I'd see a thread that so affected me it changed my very past.

Hmm, on second thought, no, that's not it.

My problem with people, which is illustrated in this page is how we generally treat people who make an attempt to think logically. Now, people don't have much ability to change the brains they were born with but everyone has the ability to use what they have more effectively and I believe that's a good thing.

Many don't. Those are the people that are at the root of my disdain. In Athens, when Socrates tried to get the citizenry to think more effectively they killed him. Now, we just ridicule and try to shame people into zombiehood. Why?

Well, it seems to me that there is a vested interest in keeping people stupider than you. It's a matter of control. If you can keep others at a lower footing in using their brains you can keep a level of superiority on them. Again, it's not IQ, it's using what you have. It's how the con artist scams his victims, many of which are "smart". Course they are, but they're not thinking and the con man is. It's a built in bias and to me, anyone who engages in this is knowingly exploiting his fellow man for his own gains.

I happen to despise this and despise it more because it tends to Harrison Bergeron folks in that the level tends to sink rather than rise and it seems to me to be anti progress. I tend to get upset when I see situations like this occur and it's happening on this thread. It seems pretty humiliating to the species in general when it's done so obviously and yet we see the victims revelling in bovinellike bliss while they're being taken advantage of, simply because being challenged is hard and being told you're peachy keen in your ignorance is so damned easy and fulfilling. It's irritating.

Now, to go beyond this thread, I noticed a troubling trend in politics. The republican party is actually trying to demonize the word "intellectual" and those who try and think. Their reason is simple, they are the party in power and again, as long as they are, it's easier to maintain that power if they keep those who elect them stupid and happy, even if it's akin to Nero fiddling while Rome burns.

The democrats have tried similar "Ours is not to reason why, ours is but to do or die" is one of the most heinous qoutes I've ever heard uttered for example. If the leaders want to try and pull this kind of crap, fine but when the sheeple start buying it en mass it's really frustrating. As I wrote before though, they'll mock these people that are "different" but they'll sure as heck run to them for their needs. No point here but just to explain a line I wrote earlier.

So, this is way too long but I believe that your point needed addressing and it is why my buttons were pushed. It isn't the thread subject nor is it the banter in the thread but I see the dangerous slipping into mediocrity and it's actually extremely one sided in this thread, and it's being done by those who should be well aware of what they're doing ( including the mocking of anyone challenging their attacks like I did ) and well, yeah, if this is where the species is heading and wants to head then I see no real reason for them to continue to exist.

This is extremely different from the klan though in that I wouldn't mind all life being erradicated, not pick and choose among people. My position also was derived by legitimate concern for the species. Heck, if I wanted to, I could easily use the tactics above and would be living a much more comfortable life. I feel my position is consistant. I do my best to try and combat this and win a few, lose a few. I don't plan to stop until I'm dead and buried.

But when I see the total futility of the effort it's frustrating and I certainly do hate the species. Not individuals, I've said that many times, but the entire mess of us. I really wonder what it is that makes us worthy of existence beyond the obvious one that I'm part of the species. Sometimes that isn't enough.

Lastly, don't think I sit here working myself into a lather over this. It's just a venting of feelings and that's fairly healthy considering I'm not aiming it at anyone in particular and live the exact opposite of these feelings. I think it's a healthy release thus the thanking everyone and the smileys.

Anyway, that explains that. :)

MrBigglesworth 03-30-2006 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
And that's what I'd expect of most. She's an embarrasment to most Dems that I know, and the fact that some here defends her just shows there are many on the left on this board that are just as sold out as the right.

That's a psuedo-jeffy: nobody here is defending her, per se, I've mentioned a couple times that she very well could be a communist that got plowed by James Baker. I just noted the lack of evidence to the charges, and the vapidness of the argument. Fine by me if that is your thing, but in this case the poster acts all sanctimonious and starts banning people just when a thread has a liberal title. Like someone before mentioned, if this thing was written about Bush it would have its title changed at least, and most likely be closed. Everyone knows it, I was just pointing it out.

As they say, if you call the tune...

Shepp 03-30-2006 02:48 PM

This is off topic a little bit but its something I think about every time a see anything about Cynthia Mckinney.

I work as a police officer in Dekalb County and the year that Denise Magette beat McKinney for congress (I think it was 2002), several officers from my watch had to go to the next precent over, to Denise Magette's campaign headquarters off Memorial Drive (aka. Cynthia Mckinney Pkwy...not joking), to help put down a near riot on election day.

What happened was, that on election day Denise Magette had offered 75.00 dollars cash to anyone who would stand on the side of the road, street corners, and such with campaign signs to support her. These folks started early in the morning and did this all day till about 9:00pm. At the end of the day the roughly 200 people who did this came to the campaign headquarters to get paid. The problem started when the office only had enough cash to pay, something like, the first 20 people. Needless to say the rest of the folks were not happy and that is when the police were called.

I remember standing there thinking how dirty that was and hoping that, if that was the way Denise Magette conducted business, that she not win the election.

We had just about calmed down and dispersed the crowd when we got called to leave there and go to south precinct to help them with the exact same thing going on at Cynthia Mckinney's campaign headquarters.

Both Magette and McKinney had placated the crowds by offering IOU's to the people that they couldn't pay. I couldn't help but wonder if those people (especially the folks who worked for McKinney since she lost) ever got paid. After that night I didn't really care for either one of them and wondered if that is the way American politicians operate in general.

GrantDawg 03-30-2006 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
That's a psuedo-jeffy: nobody here is defending her, per se, I've mentioned a couple times that she very well could be a communist that got plowed by James Baker. I just noted the lack of evidence to the charges, and the vapidness of the argument. Fine by me if that is your thing, but in this case the poster acts all sanctimonious and starts banning people just when a thread has a liberal title. Like someone before mentioned, if this thing was written about Bush it would have its title changed at least, and most likely be closed. Everyone knows it, I was just pointing it out.

As they say, if you call the tune...



But the reason no one tried to argue that she is a communist is because no one actually believes she is an actual commie. It is hyperbole (as I pointed out earlier). And the whole "if it were Bush it would have to be changed" has been addressed too. Prove it. More right-wing nuts have been banned in the history of the board than left-wing nuts. A thread was started just to "prove" that the thread would be locked or the person banned. Neither happened. This crying persecution complex looks no better on you than on Franklinoble.

JonInMiddleGA 03-30-2006 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shepp
... and wondered if that is the way American politicians operate in general.


I doubt it.

In most places they would have needed to pay up front ;)

MrBigglesworth 03-30-2006 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
But the reason no one tried to argue that she is a communist is because no one actually believes she is an actual commie. It is hyperbole (as I pointed out earlier). And the whole "if it were Bush it would have to be changed" has been addressed too. Prove it. More right-wing nuts have been banned in the history of the board than left-wing nuts. A thread was started just to "prove" that the thread would be locked or the person banned. Neither happened. This crying persecution complex looks no better on you than on Franklinoble.

You still aren't getting it. I know it's just name calling (or 'hyperbole' if you want to use an intelligent sounding word for it). My point is that these kind of threads are more worthless than some legitimate discussions that get pushed aside for political reasons, left or right. I'm not the great liberal defender that you would like me to be. I have said the same things regarding the capsicum incident and Bubba Wheels posts.

Blade6119 03-30-2006 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
You still aren't getting it. I know it's just name calling (or 'hyperbole' if you want to use an intelligent sounding word for it). My point is that these kind of threads are more worthless than some legitimate discussions that get pushed aside for political reasons, left or right. I'm not the great liberal defender that you would like me to be. I have said the same things regarding the capsicum incident and Bubba Wheels posts.

Didnt i(a convervative) just get blasted for saying a comment ms. clinton said was stupid, and not even her being stupid? Liberals need to get off their imaginary cross of persecution and realize its quite fair...

Blade6119 03-30-2006 03:16 PM

dola, and the discussion of worthless threads should never enter FOFC again...ive seen like 1 worthwhile thread this MONTH....

GrantDawg 03-30-2006 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
You still aren't getting it. I know it's just name calling (or 'hyperbole' if you want to use an intelligent sounding word for it). My point is that these kind of threads are more worthless than some legitimate discussions that get pushed aside for political reasons, left or right. I'm not the great liberal defender that you would like me to be. I have said the same things regarding the capsicum incident and Bubba Wheels posts.


In your opinion, these threads are worthless without some sort of discussion. In my opinion, threads like these can be fun without all the "holier-than-thou" rhetoric.

st.cronin 03-30-2006 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119
dola, and the discussion of worthless threads should never enter FOFC again...ive seen like 1 worthwhile thread this MONTH....


link please, cause I missed it

stevew 03-30-2006 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
link please, cause I missed it

Your 100 dollar bill thread.

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
It is hyperbole (as I pointed out earlier).

...or, perhaps it is a little play on her nickname. ;)

Potential good news in the AJC this morning:

Quote:


McKinney faces arrest over security incident

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 03/31/06 WASHINGTON — Capitol Hill police are expected to seek an arrest warrant next week for Rep. Cynthia McKinney of Georgia, who was involved in a physical confrontation with a Capitol police officer Wednesday, police and legal authorities said Thursday.
Officially, the investigation of the incident, in which the DeKalb County Democrat allegedly struck a police officer who tried to stop her from going around a security checkpoint, is ongoing, said Sgt. Kimberly Schneider, spokeswoman for Capitol Hill police.
However, police have notified the federal prosecutor's office in Washington that they will be seeking an arrest warrant after the investigation is complete next week, said police and legal authorities, who spoke on the condition that they not be named because the investigation was not yet complete.
McKinney ignored a reporter's questions Thursday as she walked into the Capitol, before word of the planned arrest warrant. She could not be reached for comment later Thursday.
In a statement released Wednesday, McKinney said, "I deeply regret that the incident occurred."
McKinney's office said she may hold a news conference today in Washington.
The U.S. attorney's office must approve any warrant before police can take it to a judge for final approval. The prosecutor's office also would have to notify the Justice Department because the warrant would involve a sitting member of Congress.
Charges could range from assault on a police officer, a felony carrying a possible five-year prison term, to simple assault, which is a misdemeanor, police and legal officials said.
Capitol Hill police have viewed a security camera videotape of the incident, which occurred in a House office building around 9 a.m. Wednesday. However, one official familiar with the tape said it doesn't clearly show what happened.
The tape, the official said, only shows McKinney walking around the security checkpoint, which members of Congress are allowed to do. It does not show her confrontation with the officer who, not recognizing McKinney as a member of Congress, tried to stop her and have her go through the metal detector. McKinney acknowledged that she was not wearing the special lapel pin given to the 435 House members to make them easier to identify.
Andy Maybo, head of the Capitol Hill chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, praised the officer involved in the incident, who has not been identified.
The police union, he said, was "extremely proud of our officer. He has upheld his duties and responsibilities in a professional manner," Maybo said. "He was correct in his actions and we support him 100 percent."
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), talking to reporters Thursday, called the incident "a mistake," and said she hoped the police and McKinney could settle the dispute.
Pelosi said it was understandable that an officer who didn't recognize a member of Congress would try to stop her from going around a checkpoint. But she added, "I can also understand that members who have been here a long time think they're recognizable. I wouldn't make a big deal of this."
Back home in McKinney's district, DeKalb County Commissioner Hank Johnson, who plans to challenge her in this year's election, said the incident was just further evidence that she was undeserving of her office.
"For years, it's the people of the 4th District who have suffered and been shortchanged because of our representative's behavior in Congress," Johnson said in a statement. "It's why she is ineffective in Congress."
But a number of people at South DeKalb Mall in the heart of McKinney's district Thursday remained largely supportive.
"She is a good woman," said Andrew Hicks of DeKalb County. "I will always support her, 100 percent."
Fred Maxwell, also of DeKalb, agreed.
"Had she been one of the white persons, they would not have asked for her ID," he said. "I still think the Republicans are trying to get her out of office."
Steven McGhee of Atlanta said McKinney "damaged herself" in the incident, but he's not counting her out.
"She lost her composure," he said. "But she will probably bounce back. I would vote for her, because she is a fighter."
Wednesday's incident was not the first time a Capitol Hill police officer failed to recognize McKinney as a member of Congress. Her office on Thursday posted on her Web site a clip from a documentary, "American Blackout," that features one such encounter.
The clip first shows a black police officer recognizing McKinney and welcoming her back to Congress in 2005, when she returned after a two-year hiatus because of a 2002 re-election defeat. It then shows a white officer approaching her and the filmmakers as they enter the Capitol grounds, asking McKinney and the crew to identify themselves. Told that McKinney is a member of Congress, the officers backs off and starts apologizing.
"That's just the typical kind of treatment that I receive," McKinney says on camera. "So I'm not surprised and I'm not offended."
In what she says is a quote from the late hip-hop artist Tupac Shakur, she adds, "Some things never change."

Gee, that last section is a shocker. I can't believe ol' Cynthia played the race card.

Qwikshot 03-31-2006 07:12 AM

I wanna run for Congress, anyone want to vote for me?

GrantDawg 03-31-2006 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
...or, perhaps it is a little play on her nickname. ;)

Potential good news in the AJC this morning:

Gee, that last section is a shocker. I can't believe ol' Cynthia played the race card.



Good Lord. That last story is an example of why she is such a joke. If a white but unknown congressman came through the Capital with camera crews, does she really believe he wouldn't be stopped? I can guarentee that if I came through the halls of the Capital with a camera crew I would be stopped. There is no doubt in my mind that racism still exists, and it exists in many that wear badges, but her little persecution thing because she believes she is above everybody else is ridiculous.

JonInMiddleGA 03-31-2006 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwikshot
I wanna run for Congress, anyone want to vote for me?


Are you running against Cynnnnthia?

Farrah Whitworth-Rahn 03-31-2006 08:15 AM

Anyone else a little disturbed that members of Congress don't have to go through security like everyone else. Do they think they're better than the rest of us?

Oh wait...

CamEdwards 03-31-2006 10:30 AM

Got this from a source in the Capitol police, and I see Jonah Goldberg on the Corner's hearing the same thing. Apparently the higher ups in the Capitol Police are encouraging the officer who was struck to NOT file charges, while the rank and file officers are encouraging the officer TO file charges.

Higher ups usually win in cases like this, but I'm guessing there are going to be lots of disgruntled cops on the Hill as a result.

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 11:03 AM

She had a news conference scheduled for 11am today. It hasn't happened yet.

JonInMiddleGA 03-31-2006 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamEdwards
Apparently the higher ups in the Capitol Police are encouraging the officer who was struck to NOT file charges, while the rank and file officers are encouraging the officer TO file charges.


I kinda figured that was the situation, given the mixed signals about whether there were charges & then the statement of support from the union rep, it seemed likely to me that it would go down about this way.

st.cronin 03-31-2006 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Farrah Whitworth-Rahn
Anyone else a little disturbed that members of Congress don't have to go through security like everyone else. Do they think they're better than the rest of us?

Oh wait...


I don't have any problem with that. I'm pretty sure that at some point in the process all Congressmen get some sort of security screening by, I don't know, the FBI or the Secret Service or somebody.

I could be wrong, but I've always had that impression.

stevew 03-31-2006 12:10 PM

I bet she skips out of DC before the cops can detain her. Then shows up in some big rally in GA talking about how they were trying to lynch her, or something to that effect.

cartman 03-31-2006 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
She had a news conference scheduled for 11am today. It hasn't happened yet.


This appears to be the reason why:

hxxp://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/georgia/news-article_wxia.aspx?storyid=78068

Quote:

McKinney Faces Arrest for Scuffle

Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney delayed a scheduled news conference Friday morning as U.S. Capitol police reportedly made plans to seek an arrest warrant against her for striking a police officer.

McKinney, a Democrat, represents Atlanta suburbs that make up one of Georgia's two black-majority districts. She planned to hold a news conference with her lawyer on Friday at 11 a.m., but an aide in her office said a new time and date for the news conference were being arranged.

The six-term congresswoman is said to have hit a Capitol Police officer in the chest earlier this week when he stopped her from entering the building without going through a metal detector. McKinney said she was not wearing a lapel pin identifying her as a House member, but that she did display her Congressional identification badge.

The charges, if they are filed against her, could include felony assault on a police officer or simple assault, which is a misdemeanor. Before police can make an arrest, the U.S. Attorney's office has to approve the warrant and then notify the U.S. Justice Department because the warrant involves a sitting member of Congress.

U.S. Capitol Police said there is surveillance video of the confrontation between the officer and McKinney, but they say the video will not be released. McKinney released a statement saying she deeply regrets the incident, but was rushing to a meeting when the officer failed to recognize her. "Unfortunately, the Police Officer did not recognize me as a Member of Congress and a confrontation ensued," the statement read.

McKinney said that government security officers often fail to recognize her and treat her like a criminal suspect. Her staff members are defending her by distributing a clip of her from the new film “American Blackout.” As McKinney shows the filmmaker around the capitol grounds, a security officer fails to recognize her at first and stops her.

“That’s just typical of the type of treatment I receive. It’s typical. So, I’m not surprised and I’m not offended,” McKinney said in the film. “Okay. Thank you. Some things never change."

The incident has become the topic of much-heated debate on talk radio and for Democrats and Republicans on the Hill. Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi on Thursday labeled it "a mistake, an unfortunate lack of recognition of a member of Congress." She added that the police officer was not at fault. "I would not make a big deal of this," said Pelosi, D-Calif.

Ron Bonjean, spokesman for House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., responded: "How many officers would have to be punched before it becomes a big deal?"


I got a laugh out of the above bolded and italicized part.

st.cronin 03-31-2006 12:13 PM

I guess they had a premonition.

CamEdwards 03-31-2006 04:00 PM

Gah. apparently the press conference will be at 5:30... and Danny Glover will be by her side.

Crapshoot 03-31-2006 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamEdwards
Gah. apparently the press conference will be at 5:30... and Danny Glover will be by her side.


Yeah, this is fucking absurd. I understand the frustration at some level of apparently being scrutinized more than you feel you deserve because of race (it was real fun as a brown guy with a beard travelling one month after 9/11, what with the "three" random searches. :D ), but hitting a policeman because of this ? That's horseshit. There seems to be a lot of pressure on the ffficer not to press charges.

Solecismic 03-31-2006 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamEdwards
Gah. apparently the press conference will be at 5:30... and Danny Glover will be by her side.


He was going to be there at 11, but couldn't find a cab.

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:03 PM

I heard he was stuck on a toilet.

CamEdwards 03-31-2006 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crapshoot
Yeah, this is fucking absurd. I understand the frustration at some level of apparently being scrutinized more than you feel you deserve because of race (it was real fun as a brown guy with a beard travelling one month after 9/11, what with the "three" random searches. :D ), but hitting a policeman because of this ? That's horseshit. There seems to be a lot of pressure on the ffficer not to press charges.


At this point, I say not only charge her, but charge her with the felony, just on general principle.

cartman 03-31-2006 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
I heard he was stuck on a toilet.


I thought he was getting too old for this activist shit.

:D

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:13 PM

The race card is now in FULL effect. Oh, and, based on this picture, I would not have recognized her at all. The "Cutest Little Communist In Congress" is no longer cute... (from USA Today's web site)

Quote:

Lawyer says McKinney a victim in scuffle WASHINGTON (AP) — A lawyer for Rep. Cynthia McKinney, the Georgia congresswoman who had an altercation with a Capitol Police officer, says she was "just a victim of being in Congress while black."
McKinney awaited word Friday on whether she would be charged for apparently striking the officer after she entered a House office building this week unrecognized and did not stop when asked.
Two law enforcement officials said it was unlikely a warrant would be issued this week. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
Her lawyer, James W. Myart Jr., said, "Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, like thousands of average Americans across this country, is, too, a victim of the excessive use of force by law enforcement officials because of how she looks and the color of her skin."
"Ms. McKinney is just a victim of being in Congress while black," Myart said. "Congresswoman McKinney will be exonerated."
A spokeswoman for U.S. Capitol Police did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
Members of Congress wear identifying lapel pins and routinely are waved into buildings without undergoing security checks. McKinney was not wearing her pin at the time, and the officer apparently did not recognize her, she has said.
"Congresswoman McKinney, in a hurry, was essentially chased and grabbed by the officer," Myart said. "She reacted instinctively in an effort to defend herself."
Several Capitol Police officials have said the officer involved asked McKinney three times to stop. When she did not, he placed a hand on her and she hit him, they said.
In a draft of a statement that McKinney did not release, she said the officer "bodyblocked" her during the incident, and she blamed his failure to recognize her on a recent makeover.
"It is ... a shame that while I conduct the country's business, I have to stop and call the police to tell them that I've changed my hairstyle so that I'm not harassed at work," McKinney said in the draft, which was obtained by WSB-TV of Atlanta and posted on its website.
An official close to McKinney said the statement was a "work product" never intended to be released.
A news conference scheduled for Friday morning was canceled. McKinney had issued a statement late Wednesday saying she regretted the confrontation.
"I know that Capitol Hill Police are securing our safety, and I appreciate the work that they do. I have demonstrated my support for them in the past and I continue to support them now," she said in the statement on her website.
Actor, Danny Glover was expected to appear at an early-evening news conference Friday with McKinney at Howard University.
That gave Republicans material to keep the criticism flowing.
"Rep. McKinney appearing with the star of 'Lethal Weapon'? Not exactly the message you want to be sending," said Ron Bonjean, spokesman for House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill.
In January, during President Bush's State of the Union address, Capitol Police drew criticism for first kicking anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan out of the House gallery, and then for evicting the wife of Rep. Bill Young, R-Fla.
The department is tasked with protecting the 535 members of Congress and the vast Capitol complex in an atmosphere thick with politics and privilege.
The safety of its members became a sensitive issue after a gunman in 1998 killed two officers outside the office of then-Republican Whip Tom DeLay of Texas.

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:16 PM




Audio Clip

Click Play to listen to this audio clip

Problems? Download this clip here

Honolulu_Blue 03-31-2006 04:18 PM

My god. This woman is a train wreck. Calling her a communist is an insult to all communists.

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
My god. This woman is a train wreck. Calling her a communist is an insult to all communists.

The phrase "barking lunatic" comes to mind at the moment...

Honolulu_Blue 03-31-2006 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
The phrase "barking lunatic" comes to mind at the moment...


An apt phrase indeed.

JonInMiddleGA 03-31-2006 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
The phrase "barking lunatic" comes to mind at the moment...


I think I'll just leave it to you to explain why the REAL fun hasn't even started yet.

Who do you think her daddy is going to blame?

Although his current target seems to be "the Gay leadership"
http://sovo.com/2006/3-24/news/localnews/
but my money says he goes back to his former favorite target before this one is over.

MrBigglesworth 03-31-2006 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
...or, perhaps it is a little play on her nickname. ;)

Potential good news in the AJC this morning:

Gee, that last section is a shocker. I can't believe ol' Cynthia played the race card.

Quote:

Your search - "cutest little communist in congress" - did not match any documents.
Fascinating link, SkyDog.

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA
I think I'll just leave it to you to explain why the REAL fun hasn't even started yet.

Who do you think her daddy is going to blame?

Although his current target seems to be "the Gay leadership"
http://sovo.com/2006/3-24/news/localnews/
but my money says he goes back to his former favorite target before this one is over.

Oh, it's obvious who the real culprit in this is.

Jews. J-E-W-S.

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
Fascinating link, SkyDog.

Riggggggggghhhhttt :rolleyes:

Web Images Groups News Froogle Local more »
Advanced Search
Preferences

Web Results 1 - 10 of about 146 for "cutest little communist in congress". (0.32 seconds)
Croooow Blog: Once again, the Cutest Little Communist in Congress
Once again, the Cutest Little Communist in Congress. Matthew Continetti examines the aisle-bird and the deafening silence about her from Democrats... ...
tvh.rjwest.com/archives/006490.html - 6k - Cached - Similar pages

Grouchy Old Cripple: Dive Tables No blog
Thanks Rachel for that wonderful new name for 'the cutest little communist in Congress'. And I wish I could take credit for the cutest little communist in ...
www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/000108.html - 8k - Cached - Similar pages
Grouchy Old Cripple: Goodbye Cynthia Omigawd! The
... did everything it could to prevent Ms McPiggy's re-election) has had articles about why 'the cutest little communist in Congress' lost in the primary. ...
www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/000096.html - 12k - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from www.grouchyoldcripple.com ]

Cynthia McKinney
She is considered by many to be the "cutest little communist in Congress." In 1992 McKinney was elected as the first Congresswoman from the newly-drawn ...
www.classicdykes.com/cynthia_mckinney.htm - 46k - Cached - Similar pages

Space Politics: A national debate?
In this case the debate AJC would like to see is one where everyone to the right of Cynthia McKinny (aka The Cutest Little Communist in Congress) resigns ...
www.spacepolitics.com/archives/000609.html - 14k - Cached - Similar pages

Comments on 11533 | MetaFilter
That still doesn't answer to the brashness of the "Cutest Little Communist" in Congress (moniker supplied by those on Capitol Hill that work with her ...
www.metafilter.com/mefi/11533 - 25k - Cached - Similar pages

Croooow Blog: Discussion on Once again, the Cutest Little ...
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Once again, the Cutest Little Communist in Congress' from Croooow Blog.
www.rjwest.com/scgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=6490 - 2k - Cached - Similar pages

QandO: Take Cynthia McKinney...please!
... again show the good sense they did in 2002 and keep the person Neal Boortz calls "the cutest little communist in Congress" cooling her heals in Atlanta. ...
qando.net/archives/003505.htm - 24k - Cached - Similar pages

Space Pragmatism: Oh My Goodness, NASA is going to Nuke Space!
McKinney is known around here as the "cutest little communist in congress". But she also has no power in Congress so its not that big of an issue. ...
spacepragmatism.blogspot.com/2005/05/oh-my-goodness-nasa-is-going-to-nuke.html - 27k - Cached - Similar pages

Creative Loafing Atlanta | NEWS & VIEWS | OH MY, WHAT'S A LOSER TO DO?
Boortz -- who adores war as long as someone else fights -- last week was labeling McKinney "the cutest little communist in Congress. ...
atlanta.creativeloafing.com/2004-07-29/fishwrapper.html - 40k - Cached - Similar pages



Result Page:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Next


Sign in
Web Images Groups News Froogle Local more »
Advanced Image Search
Preferences

Images Showing: Results 1 - 1 of 1 for "cutest little communist in congress". (0.13 seconds)
Tip: Try removing quotes from your search to get more results.

Cynthia McKinney Jim Stawniak
175 x 225 pixels - 10k - jpg
atlanta.creativeloafing.com

Web Images Groups News Froogle Local more »
Advanced Groups Search
Preferences

Members: Sign in
New users: Join



Groups Alerts


Create a new group


About Google Groups






Searched all groups Results 1 - 10 of 28 for "cutest little communist in congress" (0.13 seconds)
Sorted by relevance Sort by date
Left-wing COMMUNIST LIAR Cynthia McKinney
GEORGIA'S EMBARRASSMENT - CYNTHIA MCKINNEY Georgia Democrat Cynthia McKinney (known
locally as "The cutest little Communist in Congress) is implying that ...
alt.politics.democrats - Apr 16 2002, 7:11 am by Gary Lantz - 51 messages - 18 authors

Jews In USA Govt
... We didn't re-elect her because, other than the fact she is well known in Atlanta
as "the cutest little communist in Congress", she was voting her own agenda ...
alt.peace - Apr 2 2003, 3:42 pm by Jeff Laventure - 15 messages - 8 authors

700,000 March against Bush in London - Bought & Paid For by ...
... Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney That should read EX - Congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney... AKA The cutest little communist in Congress... ...
alt.rush-limbaugh - Feb 23 2003, 8:32 pm by ROBW - 74 messages - 24 authors

Finally some Good News Barr Loses primary.
... with a newbie. McKinney was referred to by a local talk show host as "the
cutest little communist in congress". -- Alex Make the ...
alt.computer.consultants - Aug 21 2002, 8:16 am by alexy - 3 messages - 3 authors

Georgia's Embarassment - Cynthia McKinney
GEORGIA'S EMBARRASMENT - CYNTHIA MCKINNEY Georgia Democrat Cynthia McKinney (known
locally as "The cutest little Communist in Congress) is implying that ...
alt.politics.bush - Apr 13 2002, 1:55 pm by The Frog - 4 messages - 4 authors

Left-wing COMMUNIST LIAR Cynthia McKinney
... carcass." GEORGIA'S EMBARRASSMENT - CYNTHIA MCKINNEY Georgia Democrat Cynthia McKinney
(known locally as "The cutest little Communist in Congress) is implying ...
alt.fan.g-gordon-liddy - Apr 12 2002, 8:36 am by George of the Jungle - 6 messages - 5 authors

STATE OF THE UNION (CLINTON BS) SPEECH
... That would be Georgia Democratic Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, "The Cutest Little
Communist in Congress." Every single year since Clinton became president ...
alt.rush-limbaugh - Jan 27 2000, 6:51 pm by [email protected] - 5 messages - 3 authors

Democrat congresswoman blames GWBush for 9-11...
... com GEORGIA'S EMBARRASMENT – CYNTHIA MCKINNEY Georgia Democrat Cynthia McKinney
(known locally as "The cutest little Communist in Congress) is implying that ...
alt.fan.howard-stern - Apr 12 2002, 1:24 pm by Ernie Logman - 37 messages - 14 authors

Reparations
... Jesse Jackson is down there pressing all the right buttons, as is Georgia Democrat
Cynthia ("The cutest little Communist in Congress") McKinney. ...
misc.survivalism - May 31 2005, 11:06 am by Halcitron - 6 messages - 6 authors

Cynthia the loon and Bush knew......What?
... didn't vote for her. I will vote against her, 'the cutest little communist
in congress', any chance I get. Here is some of what ...
atl.general - May 18 2002, 4:44 pm by Jim Patterson - 20 messages - 11 authors


New! Get the latest messages on "cutest little communist in congress" emailed to you with Google Alerts.

Result Page:
1

2

3

Next


MrBigglesworth 03-31-2006 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue
An apt phrase indeed.

Hold on a second. What comments make her a 'barking lunatic'? The worst I have seen is that she is insinuating that because she is black she gets harassed more than normal. It's my understanding that there aren't a lot of black, female members of Congress. So seeing a black female trying to skirt security might look a little suspicious at first. And let's face it, judging by her picture, she doesn't look like the typical member of Congress. I don't know if I would call her a 'ghetto slut' like Boortz and SkyDog want to do, but I can see how it may have been due to her race. We all have our prejudices. I haven't read everything in the story though, so I could be wrong.

Still though, that's not to say that she was right in striking the officer. Does a story say where she hit him? Like, was it a slap across the arm when he grabbed her, or a punch in the face?

MrBigglesworth 03-31-2006 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Riggggggggghhhhttt :rolleyes:

Yes, if you change your prior link to a text search and not an image search you get more results. I suppose it's my fault that you screwed up the link, though :rolleyes:

stevew 03-31-2006 04:40 PM

Yeah, i got nothing off of that link earlier.

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
Yes, if you change your prior link to a text search and not an image search you get more results. I suppose it's my fault that you screwed up the link, though :rolleyes:

I didn't screw up the link. The image search gets a result, too.

sovereignstar 03-31-2006 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
...or, perhaps it is a little play on her nickname. ;)


Why are you linking to a google image search?

JonInMiddleGA 03-31-2006 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Oh, it's obvious who the real culprit in this is.

Jews. J-E-W-S.


I wonder ... am I the only person who gets the disturbing visual of Billy in a cheerleader costume when that quote comes up?

{shivers}

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovereignstar
Why are you linking to a google image search?

It's a safe image, from a safe news/commentary magazine (albeit a very liberal one). What's the problem?

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA
I wonder ... am I the only person who gets the disturbing visual of Billy in a cheerleader costume when that quote comes up?

{shivers}

EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

STOP IT!!! STOP!!!



{Shudders}

sovereignstar 03-31-2006 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
It's a safe image, from a safe news/commentary magazine (albeit a very liberal one). What's the problem?


Like others have said, there is nothing there. What is the GIS bringing up for you?

MrBigglesworth 03-31-2006 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
It's a safe image, from a safe news/commentary magazine (albeit a very liberal one). What's the problem?

I must be accessing google through http://www.google.cn/, because I am getting no results from that link, or even when I type it in myself.

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovereignstar
Like others have said, there is nothing there. What is the GIS bringing up for you?

Sign in

Web Images Groups News Froogle Local more »
Advanced Image Search
Preferences

Images Showing: Results 1 - 1 of 1 for "cutest little communist in congress". (0.13 seconds)
Tip: Try removing quotes from your search to get more results.

Cynthia McKinney Jim Stawniak
175 x 225 pixels - 10k - jpg
atlanta.creativeloafing.com

sovereignstar 03-31-2006 04:48 PM


Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovereignstar

Heh. That's straight-up weird. Could it be possible that I'm getting the Creative Loafing image because I'm in metro Atlanta? No idea... Checking on other computer now...

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:51 PM

Yeah....it came up on my other machine...checking the Treo now...

cartman 03-31-2006 04:51 PM

Hmmm, I wonder if this is one of those Google "features" that is based on location?

Ben E Lou 03-31-2006 04:54 PM

Well, it comes up on my Treo, too, but I just realized that isn't a good test. I use Cingular, and their headquarters is about 8 miles from me. :p

heybrad 03-31-2006 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
So seeing a black female trying to skirt security might look a little suspicious at first.

Wouldn't seeing anybody trying to skirt security look suspicious or am I misunderstanding you that you are under the impression that white people can skirt security with no suspicion?

Solecismic 03-31-2006 05:41 PM

The Capital walls are white, so apparently we blend in better.

stevew 03-31-2006 05:43 PM

heybrad.

MrBigglesworth 03-31-2006 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heybrad
Wouldn't seeing anybody trying to skirt security look suspicious or am I misunderstanding you that you are under the impression that white people can skirt security with no suspicion?

I guess what I said can be taken that way, but what I mean is that if you see an old white man trying to get in congress and a younger looking black female that SkyDog pointed out looks like a 'ghetto slut' (not the terminology I would use), many people would naturally be more suspicious of the latter, if only because the former fits the stereotype of a congressman more than the latter. That type of stereotyping has been backed up in countless research studies. I'm not saying that the policeman did act differently for her, I'm just saying that it wouldn't be unheard of for that to be the case. Of course, it's probably impossible to prove either way unless you really knew the guy. In any case, it wouldn't of been appropriate for her to punch the guy, if it was a punch that was thrown.

GrantDawg 03-31-2006 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
I guess what I said can be taken that way, but what I mean is that if you see an old white man trying to get in congress and a younger looking black female that SkyDog pointed out looks like a 'ghetto slut' (not the terminology I would use), many people would naturally be more suspicious of the latter, if only because the former fits the stereotype of a congressman more than the latter. That type of stereotyping has been backed up in countless research studies. I'm not saying that the policeman did act differently for her, I'm just saying that it wouldn't be unheard of for that to be the case. Of course, it's probably impossible to prove either way unless you really knew the guy. In any case, it wouldn't of been appropriate for her to punch the guy, if it was a punch that was thrown.


Are you white, Mr. Bigglesworth? If you are, then lets do an experiment. Go to Washington wearing your best suit and then try to walk through the security barriers. Go ahead. As a matter of fact, just to make it interesting, make sure to carry a gun with you. And a card saying you want to kill the President.

My guess is the police stop anyone they do not recognize when they try to skirt security whether they are young or old, male or female, black, white, blue or green. I do not deny in any way racism exist, but this was not racism. This is a highly inflated ego and very small grasp on reality.

GrantDawg 03-31-2006 08:02 PM

And for the record, my google search comes up exactly like Skydog's. It must be a regional thing.

MrBigglesworth 03-31-2006 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Are you white, Mr. Bigglesworth? If you are, then lets do an experiment. Go to Washington wearing your best suit and then try to walk through the security barriers. Go ahead. As a matter of fact, just to make it interesting, make sure to carry a gun with you. And a card saying you want to kill the President.



Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
My guess is the police stop anyone they do not recognize when they try to skirt security whether they are young or old, male or female, black, white, blue or green. I do not deny in any way racism exist, but this was not racism. This is a highly inflated ego and very small grasp on reality.

You go from making a guess in your first statement to being absolutely sure what happened in your last statements. Which is it?

GrantDawg 03-31-2006 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth



You go from making a guess in your first statement to being absolutely sure what happened in your last statements. Which is it?



Strawman? I wasn't making an arguement, I was suggesting an experiment. Now you do your part and see what happens.

MrBigglesworth 03-31-2006 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Strawman? I wasn't making an arguement, I was suggesting an experiment. Now you do your part and see what happens.

You are saying that my argument is that because she is black she got stopped by security, while a white person could walk right through. That's obviously not my argument, which makes your attack a strawman.

I'm saying that because she is a black female, that security MAY have thought she was more of a threat and was handled with more caution and rougher than would be the case for an old white man. I do not know if that is the case, but it is not un-heard of. Like you admit, racism is alive everywhere.

wade moore 03-31-2006 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth
You are saying that my argument is that because she is black she got stopped by security, while a white person could walk right through. That's obviously not my argument, which makes your attack a strawman.

I'm saying that because she is a black female, that security MAY have thought she was more of a threat and was handled with more caution and rougher than would be the case for an old white man. I do not know if that is the case, but it is not un-heard of. Like you admit, racism is alive everywhere.


Regardless of all of this, it is no excuse to strike a law enforcement official. Period. End of story.

MrBigglesworth 03-31-2006 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
Regardless of all of this, it is no excuse to strike a law enforcement official. Period. End of story.

I agree, but I'm still not sure what the 'strike' was or if she even knew it was a police officer.

I was just pointing out that you can't say she is a 'barking loon' or whatever for saying her race was a factor, she may be wrong or right.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.