I agree that we need to desire a end to the schism, but I will say it will never end unless Republicans denounce the violence and the lies, especially of the last couple of months. Continued equivocation on the legality of the election is a rotting cancer to the core of our democracy. Anything less is making it acceptable to attack the foundations of our nation.

I don't either, I think it's counterproductive right now.


I'm in the middle on this. I don't want petty revenge, but I do think justice is important. If there are no consequences, then escalation continues and is emboldened.

I also think the better country is sometimes only possible after having resolved conflicts, and ignoring them doesn't fix the schism.

Right now I think the practical reason is simply that the Senate is divided so very little is getting done that doesn't involve compromise. But other than that I see no special onus on the Democrats to do so. They should push through whatever they can that fits with their agenda.

Not that simple. The Dems are always reaching across the aisle, and when they have power all we hear from the GOP is we need to come together and compromise. When the GOP has power they never compromise and strong arm their way to get what they want. Why should the dems assume the GOP won't continue to act the same way when they get power back?

Sounds like they may wait to send the articles to the Senate which would be smart so that the emotion dies down and it can be a meticulous rebuke to those who partook in the insurrection. Those that were simply idiots (stealing the podium) can get less punitive measures (yet still some) while those running around with weapons and zip ties can get the heavy hand of justice smacking them on their candy ass. While Trump can be repudiated and the GOP can split off from the TOP.

Our world moves too fast for that to work. By then the GOP will have forgot about the transgressions and moved on to complaining about the deficit and trying to block legislation on gun control, climate change, etc.

Once again the Dems would just be letting the GOP off the hook.

And at this point, that's impeachment. Can't be a slap on the wrist. It just emboldens the Trumpist faction and they'll try it again.

Will it be better for the country to not hold the President accountable for impeachable actions if that is what we determine them to be? Will there be less of a schism if this does not happen?

The answers to those questions for me is no. The best way to start the bi-partisanship is for both parties saying we are not condoning this behavior from anyone occupying the Office of the President no matter what party they belong to. Anybody who chooses to behave in this manner will be held accountable in the strongest way possible.

funny how the Arizona GOP rants consistently about snowflakes, cancel culture and 1st amendment, but they act like a bunch of spurned teenagers if one of their own dares speak/act against them.

Arizona's Maricopa County GOP censures ex-Sen. Jeff Flake, plans vote to also censure Cindy McCain

This sounds like a really dumb idea after you're just just lost 2 Senate seats and the state went blue for President...

If the Republican really want unity with the Democrats, ALL (R and D) members should swear on the Bible and make sure its televised:

1) The election was 100% legal and certified. Donald Trump lost the election to Joe Biden. No more Stop the Steal talk.

2) Stop all lawsuits trying to overturn the election

3) ALL members will not use "stop the steal" or calling the other side traitors in all campaign tweets/emails/fund-raising etc. No matter how right they feel they are about it. That includes both the DNC and RNC too.

4) All members will agree that COVID-19 is real and a continued threat, and will then wear masks, follow all directions from the Biden COVID-19 team, and actively encourage all their constituents to do so.

5) Any responsible now or later as investigations continue for incited for sedition/voted against Biden's certification must apologize on camera for their actions and promise not to do so ever again under threat of expulsion. They will be censured if they do this, removed from any committee leadership roles. Members will cooperate completely with any investigations and not lie or deceive or face lying to congress charges and expulsion. Members who won't agree will be removed from Congress. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley should resign for their roles. All must stop all talk of Q conspiracies and agree that Q beliefs are a threat to our democracy or be expelled.

And yet they say impeachment will further divide the country.

When you elect Kelly ward as your "leader" intelligence is not one of your best attributes.

That's kind of brilliant.

Impeach him. Then hold the articles. Let Biden and the Congress jump right into slow and stop the spread of the virus, rebuild the economy, etc.

Then, when Trump does something really stupid (which will happen) and/or some really damning shit comes out (which will happen), send it to the Senate immediately.

Force them to vote at that point.

Dems just spent 4 years watching McConnell and the GOP destroy norms and taunt Dems with their majority. So now their party is eating itself from within and they want Dems to send them a lifeline and Dems should do so trusting the GOP to do the right thing?

They don't want impeachment squashed because it's the wrong thing to do. They want it squashed because it drives the fork further into their party. Is there anything anyone has seen from this GOP leadership that would give you reason to trust any promises they make?

As for stimulus in a theoretical exchange? Not enough. Throw in anti-corruption and voting rights and we can get to the table. Otherwise let's get every GOP congressman on record for whether they support what happened on 6 January or not.

Just quoting this one rather than all 4/5 of the other posts - I said just beforehand (and part quoted by ISiddiqui) that Trump definitely needs to brought to account, probably Don Jr, Guiliani and Cruz, and possibly Hawley.

That doesn’t mean the Dems can’t also begin to try and reduce the divide.

Agreed, but the argument the GOP is putting out there is that you can't bring the country together if you hold Trump accountable.

The answer to that argument a simple, no.

I don't think Trump should be let off the hook under any circumstances, it just sets too dangerous of a precedent.

If it doesn't happen this week it will never happen. There's zero chance Dems will push an impeachment trial in late-February.

Because not following through with reconstruction really brought the country together!

A couple things I wanted to add:

1) Add Brooks (Trump Rally and other comments) and Gohmert (architect of the very late lawsuit and appeal to the Supreme Court) with Cruz and Hawley.

2) A ban on all social media for Biden's 100 first days for all members and RNC/DNC. . If you want to talk about things happening, have a press conference, go on the Sunday talk shows or put out a statement. All members must talk to and answer questions from the press, and stop referring to them as the eneny of the people. Biden and the White House press go back to pre-Trump handling of social media-no attacks on members of Congress, and only use it for things like religious observances, condolescences to those who have died, national ermergencies like weather, announcements of the president schedule and state visits, etc. You know the normal things a White House press staff are suppose to use social media for.

I don't think there's any putting the genie back in the bottle on 2), though I do agree on using more appropriate language vis a vis the press. Rest of the list is a good idea.

These numbers are something. I finally got a good explanation on the number discrepancy for Perdus/Loeffler from Monica Kaufman-Pearson. For those who don't know, she was an Atlanta news anchor from the number one television station in Georgia. She was the first black anchor in the deep south, and worked for over three decades. She said it was that Perdue had strong support from farmers. both black and white, because he actually worked pretty hard for them. Add to that, the Perdue name is pretty strong in South Georgia, and his cousin was a pretty popular Governor. It also didn't help Kelly that she was unlikable.
Her opinion is that if Perdue hadn't ran from debating Ossoff, and he has ran a positive campaign on what he had accomplished instead of the constant (and at times racist) attack ads, he would have won. She is probably right.

Updated Georgia Senate run-off vote totals (99% in):

Warnock ✔️: 2,282,336 (51.0%)
Loeffler: 2,193,103 (49.0%)
--
Ossoff ✔️: 2,263,187 (50.6%)
Perdue: 2,212,194 (49.4%)

— NBC Politics (@NBCPolitics) January 11, 2021

The terrifying pattern that keeps repeating behind the late collapse of Trumpism suggests that if Trump, or someone associated with Trump, had just put the slightest effort towards addressing something/anything directly, in regards to even just one of the hundreds of documented fuck-ups over the entirety of the last four years, this all likely would have gone entirely the opposite way.

If he had done literally nothing in response to COVID other than say "listen to the scientists," I think he gets reelected.

He only lost because he went out of his way to make things worse.

And he ran like a pussy when Ossoff called him out on his secret stock sales that he had nothing to do with that took place right after a classified briefing.

I've not been monitoring TV news but have not read about Biden's Pandemic team holding daily press meetings to discuss what they will do tactically.

What I want to hear is understanding of problems, their root cause and then say similar to ... "we have a distribution/delivery/manpower problem(s). The vaccines are at the States but the "last mile" ain't working so this is what I plan to do X, Y, Z. And I ask the Military, CDC, FDA, Pharma etc. to be ready on Day 1".

The key here is have a tactical plan and let people know they have a tactical plan. The lack of specificity is a worrisome.

Just my 2 cents.

I agree with this.

That's tough to do when you're not actually the President yet. We know that the admin isn't being cooperative regarding the transition, so he may be better off waiting to get all the info first before offering detailed solutions.

Sure Biden has limitations but nothing stopping him from speaking with Newsome and discussing what need to be done on Day 1. Nothing to stop him from speaking to Moderna/Pfizer etc to understand what they can or cannot commit to etc

And then share it with us in a semi weekly press conference

This was announced on Friday.

We are working with a company that is negotiating to provide vaccines in Vermont. Part of their contract with the state is that no one is more than a 30 minute drive from a vaccine site.

I'm now eligible for a vaccine in NY, but there isn't any available.

Thanks. I knew about first paragraph but did not catch the second one.

Looking forward to reading the details.

exactly...
there's really nothing the trump morons could have or even WOULD have told them. They probably don't understand anything they are told. I mean if they wanted to talk to fauci, just go talk to him.

Honestly I don't know why people don't just ignore trump and friends and do the job to save lives. Everyone knows they are full of shit.


but yeah...maybe they HAVE been takling to these people and the news is just going that extra step telling us that trump is refusing to let bidfen talk to anyone

how fast can i drive? :D

You mean there is a better way to do this than Eventbrite?

Florida counties use Eventbrite to schedule vaccine appointments | Healthcare IT News

So what exactly is wrong with Kamala's cover pic on Vogue? Is it because she is wearing Converse and/or that was not the picture she wanted on the cover?

I think the pics look great and don't understand the controversy.

They are saying they white washed her

Ah that would be bad.

A couple articles I read alluded to too casual, disrespectful, bad pic looking forced etc. White wash was not the centerpiece of the controversy from what I've read.

Apparently they told her that they were going to use the suit picture (and that is the digital cover). So then using the casual cover is poor form. I wonder if they told her the casuals were just test shots and then they went ahead and used it.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

I'm so excited to get back to controversies like this...

dola- I haven't read many things about the inauguration, but doesn't it make sense to do it from a private, secure location?

I get the optics wouldn't be great, but better than the POTUS getting assassinated.

lol

Fox fear-mongering on a new migrant caravan coming to get us.

Maybe they can welcome Trump to the border when he pays a visit there this week.

FWIW I certainly don't expect smooth sailing from Day 1, there will be inevitable issues, confusion to work out. But there should be plan and then verifiable progress communicated every week vs the information wasteland we have now.

I do believe the States should be the "last mile" but it's obvious many States have failed in distribution so let's have the Federal Government get it done.

Biden dresses down his Covid team over plans to speed vaccinations - POLITICO

I doubt very much that the federal government has the authority to just take over and do that, just like they can't enforce various other measures on a nationwide basis. Promises like this one sound good and are understandable, but it's not up to just Biden to make it happen. The President is not a King.

I say just give the Vaccine to Walgreens and CVS. They'll have it distributed in no time.

The federal government can absolutely fund, staff, and administer vaccine sites.

Why? The asshole in office now is for all purposes or at least he is operating like so.

If Trump could send hospital ships to NYC, I have to believe Biden can mobilize MASH (? field hospitals or whatever they call them now) units to hot spots. Get every trained medic not deployed to key spots and start giving out shots.

This is under the assumption what I've read is accurate. 20+M vials have been deployed to the States, they have only inoculated approx 6+M. So it's not a supply issue (at least not right now) but a distribution, "last mile" issue.