Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The Biden Presidency - 2020 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=97045)

Edward64 03-06-2021 05:14 PM

Biden doing okay in wheeling and dealing within Dems. I don't agree that everything in the bill is necessary for the "stimulus" but this is political sausage making 101 so he had to agree to some pork here and there.

I am cautiously optimistic that some GOP moderates can see real evidence Biden is willing to deal (e.g. give out pork for votes) and start playing the game pre-Obama/Trump again.

RainMaker 03-06-2021 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 3329274)
Sinema wants to be the Manchin of the West. Who knows it may play in Arizona? Anyways with 50-50 and Manchin and Sinema wanting press, it didn't end up as bad as I feared.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk


Manchin has the excuse of being in a real red state. When was the last time a Republican won a state wide race in Arizona?

ISiddiqui 03-06-2021 06:48 PM

2 years ago. Governor Ducey's re-election.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

RainMaker 03-06-2021 07:09 PM

Damn how did he win by so much?

BYU 14 03-06-2021 07:41 PM

Because he is a republican version of Sinema. The 30% swath of independent voters here generally lean slightly right and he ran a very moderate campaign, which the lunatics like Kelly Ward and others don't seem to grasp.

JPhillips 03-06-2021 08:27 PM

The GOP is back with more bad faith bullshit. The complaint about the stimulus checks going to people in jail falls apart when you learn that the checks are following the same rules as the previous COVID checks, which these same GOPers voted for.

NobodyHere 03-06-2021 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3329301)
The GOP is back with more bad faith bullshit. The complaint about the stimulus checks going to people in jail falls apart when you learn that the checks are following the same rules as the previous COVID checks, which these same GOPers voted for.


That doesn't make any sense. If you vote for one flawed policy then you shouldn't learn from your mistakes?

RainMaker 03-07-2021 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3329332)
That doesn't make any sense. If you vote for one flawed policy then you shouldn't learn from your mistakes?


That's not what this is about.

Edward64 03-07-2021 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3329332)
That doesn't make any sense. If you vote for one flawed policy then you shouldn't learn from your mistakes?


I don't disagree with your sentiments but I'm assuming the $ is relatively very, very, very small. I'll assume this is some minor pork to get additional votes (played by both parties). So in the big scheme of things, not a big deal.

JPhillips 03-07-2021 07:35 AM

Yes, I'm sure the GOP has a principled objection.

Just like how all of them voted for the CARES act and none of them voted for this bill. They just found their principles.

Edward64 03-07-2021 07:49 AM

Yeah baby, found some pork I really like. Not sure if it made it in the final bill though.

As someone thinking about doing semi-early retirement, healthcare insurance until Medicare has been a concern so have been looking into Obamacare stuff. I am not thinking that I would spend more than $85K a year in retirement but was concerned if capital gains, or dependents working (and myriad of other possible factors) and how that would impact calculation for subsidies.

With this proposal, it takes all that uncertainty away.

Edward64 03-07-2021 08:02 AM

Good news for the economy (so far) with more jobs.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/05/econo...ort/index.html
Quote:

The US economy added 379,000 jobs last month, far more than economists had expected, signaling the labor market recovery is finally gaining steam.

The January numbers were also revised sharply higher to 166,000 added jobs versus 49,000 initially reported.

The leisure and hospitality industry added the most jobs in February with 355,000 new positions as some restrictions to stop the spread of Covid-19 were rolled back. The sector is still recovering from a rough winter, adding back positions that were lost rather than creating new jobs.

The unemployment rate — which only counts people who are actively seeking jobs and not those who have dropped out of the workforce entirely — inched down to 6.2% from 6.3% in January. It was forecast to stay flat.

GrantDawg 03-07-2021 04:44 PM

That is nice about the ACA. We are dancing with that line right now. Removing the cap is super helpful, especially since I don't know how long my son will be in our insurance.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Edward64 03-07-2021 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3329397)
That is nice about the ACA. We are dancing with that line right now. Removing the cap is super helpful, especially since I don't know how long my son will be in our insurance.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


Supposed to cost $34B over 2 years. That's significant enough where honestly, I feel the money is better spent somewhere else e.g. help subsidize vaccines for rest of world (but be sure we get credit & good press for it).

But if I'm a pawn in a bigger 3D chess move to beef up Obamacare & ensure it survives/expands, I'll happily take the pork for the larger good.

ISiddiqui 03-07-2021 06:50 PM

Generally speaking when everyone has stake in a program they'll fight for it more. Social Security is a 3rd rail of US politics because it isn't just for the poor, but it benefits everyone.

And having subsidies to limit your out of pocket expense to a certain percentage of income helps middle class families quite a bit.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

JPhillips 03-09-2021 08:21 AM

Amazing how one woman of color can make the US conservative movement into monarchists.

larrymcg421 03-09-2021 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3329508)
Amazing how one woman of color can make the US conservative movement into monarchists.


What crazier? Conservative embrace of Russia or conservative embrace of monarchy?

albionmoonlight 03-09-2021 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3329508)
Amazing how one woman of color can make the US conservative movement into monarchists.


It's so weird.

3 days ago, the British Monarchy was not a red/blue thing in America. If anything, being pro-monarch was probably a slight liberal thing.

But someone accuses them of being racist, and the right wing MOBILIZES to identify with them. Like some Avengers Assemble kind of shit.

Conservative relatives I have on Facebook who probably couldn't pick any of the Royals out of a lineup were suddenly all about how Harry and Megan were spoiled brats who were bringing about the end of Western Civilization. And fuck that Oprah for being all rich and spoiled, too.

It was WEIRD.

Brian Swartz 03-09-2021 12:47 PM

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

bhlloy 03-09-2021 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3329540)
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.


Let's face it, in 2021 this is what politics now is. Not just in the US either, although we do seem to have gone off the deep end more than most.

lungs 03-09-2021 03:04 PM

Has the Biden dog bite scandal gained wall to wall coverage on Newsmax yet?

albionmoonlight 03-09-2021 03:09 PM

COVID Bill is at, like, 70% popularity. That's low-key amazing in this polarized time.

Will be interesting to see if the GOP continues to try to demonize it a'la Obamacare or if they decide to just change the subject.

It feels like the best play here may be to just not talk about it.

NobodyHere 03-09-2021 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3329553)
COVID Bill is at, like, 70% popularity. That's low-key amazing in this polarized time.

Will be interesting to see if the GOP continues to try to demonize it a'la Obamacare or if they decide to just change the subject.

It feels like the best play here may be to just not talk about it.


Especially when the country doesn't give a shit about fiscal responsibility.

ISiddiqui 03-09-2021 04:10 PM

Latest Pew poll was showing that 55% thought the Republicans were not making a good faith effort to work with the administration (42% said they are), while 57% said the Administration was making a good faith effort to work with Republicans (only 40% said they were not).

GOP has made a bad political calculation going all super anti-Covid bill.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

Atocep 03-09-2021 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 3329558)
Latest Pew poll was showing that 55% thought the Republicans were not making a good faith effort to work with the administration (42% said they are), while 57% said the Administration was making a good faith effort to work with Republicans (only 40% said they were not).

GOP has made a bad political calculation going all super anti-Covid bill.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk



It's going to be interesting to see how this plays out in '22 if it continues. McConnell's strategy has been to prevent a dem from achieving what they ran on. For Obama it was change, so they tried to block all legislation. For Biden it was working with the GOP and that's obviously what they've been attacking. So far the public isn't buying it though.

GrantDawg 03-09-2021 04:58 PM

The GOP will fund every piece of spending that could be unpopular and highlight it like it was a crime. The deal is popular now, but the long term bet by the GOP is they can rebrand it as a huge Democrat spending spree. After the stimulus checks are gone, don't underestimate how affective that might be.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

Brian Swartz 03-09-2021 07:14 PM

I agree with GrantDawg. They know that being for something like this can't help them with their base in the long run. If public opinion turns later it's a plus for them. If it doesn't they are screwed anyway. It's cynical, but it's not necessarily - though it may end up being - bad politics. I don't think we know yet how this era will be viewed a year, two years, five years after whatever passes for 'normal' arrives.

PilotMan 03-09-2021 07:17 PM

I mean, they did blame Obama (nonstop) for TARP and the bailout that Bush2 approved before he left.

albionmoonlight 03-09-2021 07:33 PM

It’s cynical, but it’s also why the GOP has opposed COVID mitigation measures over the last year. The “we’re all in this together” mentality would destroy their brand if enough people realized it worked.

NobodyHere 03-09-2021 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3329579)
It’s cynical, but it’s also why the GOP has opposed COVID mitigation measures over the last year. The “we’re all in this together” mentality would destroy their brand if enough people realized it worked.


I'm not sure that it is so simple.

I live in Ohio and Republican governor DeWine has supported a lot of mitigation measures.

albionmoonlight 03-09-2021 07:41 PM

Good point. Not all Republicans.

I’m hopeful that the good ones can somehow still have a say in the party.

JPhillips 03-09-2021 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3329580)
I'm not sure that it is so simple.

I live in Ohio and Republican governor DeWine has supported a lot of mitigation measures.


But the rest of the party tried to impeach him.

NobodyHere 03-09-2021 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3329586)
But the rest of the party tried to impeach him.


A couple lawmakers is hardly "the rest of the party"

SackAttack 03-09-2021 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3329508)
Amazing how one woman of color can make the US conservative movement into monarchists.


I mean, that's what the conservative movement has basically always BEEN. Not necessarily "give us a king" explicitly, but statist, in the sense of "do what we have to to ensure that our vision and our rule are what prevail."

The secessionist movement in the 19th century wasn't about freedom, no matter how the revisionists try to paint it. It was about the preservation of slavery as an institution. After the Civil War, after Reconstruction, the conservative voices in the South were explicit about pursuing the supremacy of the white race over the freed blacks, and policy pursuits in Southern states for the last 150 years have been about finding ways to do that.

They may not be about having a particular person as figurehead (Trump notwithstanding) but it isn't China or North Korea's form of government the American conservative movement hates. It's who's leading those governments.

Neither one is all that different from what you see in the American South when you come right down to it.

Thomkal 03-10-2021 01:49 PM

COVID-19 Relief Bill passes Congress-1 Dem voted no today, no Rep voted yes. President Biden set to sign on Friday, which is when I get my first vaccine shot

JPhillips 03-10-2021 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3329587)
A couple lawmakers is hardly "the rest of the party"


I grew up in Ohio and the number of rank and file GOPers supporting impeachment was/is pretty high. It was far more than two.

Lathum 03-10-2021 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3329659)
COVID-19 Relief Bill passes Congress-1 Dem voted no today, no Rep voted yes. President Biden set to sign on Friday, which is when I get my first vaccine shot


wHy WoNt ThE DeMs WoRk WiTh ThE RiGhT!?!?!?!

Brian Swartz 03-10-2021 03:35 PM

One could say almost equally, 'Why are the Dems just marching in lockstep?' with only one vote against?

JPhillips 03-10-2021 03:44 PM

If the GOP would have passed something similar last Fall they'd still be running things.

Thomkal 03-10-2021 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3329680)
If the GOP would have passed something similar last Fall they'd still be running things.


Yeah if Trump had shown any real competence with handling the pandemic, and gotten the Republicans behind him on it, he likely would have won re-election.

BYU 14 03-10-2021 04:41 PM

don't know where else to put this, but out running errands today a trunk passed me going the other way with a "Fuck Biden" flag on it.

1-People are so childish

2-Guess this is the Trump merchandise money train until he announces a 2024 run

Thomkal 03-10-2021 07:18 PM

Merrick Garland is your new Attorney General. Maybe a bit surprising is that Mitch McConnell voted to confirm. His way of apologizing for locking him out of the Supreme Court?

Edward64 03-10-2021 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3329684)
Yeah if Trump had shown any real competence with handling the pandemic, and gotten the Republicans behind him on it, he likely would have won re-election.


I'd change it to "shown, consistently, as if he cared, believe this was serious, was trying with actions and words".

There were times when he showed he "cared" and said it was "serious" and "tried" but they were overwhelmed by his inconsistency where he contradicted himself on those points.

(And if he had won, it would not have been pretty in this forum).

NobodyHere 03-10-2021 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3329705)
Merrick Garland is your new Attorney General. Maybe a bit surprising is that Mitch McConnell voted to confirm. His way of apologizing for locking him out of the Supreme Court?


I think Merrick Garland was probably the most conservative person that could've been nominated by Biden. He's not exactly a liberal firebrand.

kingfc22 03-10-2021 07:55 PM

So the GOP votes against giving $1400 to Americans who need it and then go on to propose removing the Estate Tax which only applies to those with wealth in excess of $11m.

The party of the working class!

NobodyHere 03-10-2021 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingfc22 (Post 3329710)
So the GOP votes against giving $1400 to Americans who need it and then go on to propose removing the Estate Tax which only applies to those with wealth in excess of $11m.

The party of the working class!


Which idiot proposed removing the Estate Tax?

Brian Swartz 03-10-2021 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64
I'd change it to "shown, consistently, as if he cared, believe this was serious, was trying with actions and words".


I don't think he would have won anyway if he did that. It's unknowable of course, but it underestimates the amount of people who supported him because he took the approach he did IMO. Most of those who voted Biden because of the pandemic issue weren't going to vote Trump anyway.

Edward64 03-10-2021 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3329716)
I don't think he would have won anyway if he did that. It's unknowable of course, but it underestimates the amount of people who supported him because he took the approach he did IMO. Most of those who voted Biden because of the pandemic issue weren't going to vote Trump anyway.


I'm thinking he had a hardcore 38-42% and he exceeded that with 47% so let's say he exceeded expectations by +5%. I'm thinking he would have gotten more of those "hidden" voters with some more middle ground.

But you are right, won't ever know for sure.

Thomkal 03-10-2021 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3329709)
I think Merrick Garland was probably the most conservative person that could've been nominated by Biden. He's not exactly a liberal firebrand.


Which was one reason Obama nominated him to the Supreme Court

Thomkal 03-10-2021 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3329707)
I'd change it to "shown, consistently, as if he cared, believe this was serious, was trying with actions and words".

There were times when he showed he "cared" and said it was "serious" and "tried" but they were overwhelmed by his inconsistency where he contradicted himself on those points.

(And if he had won, it would not have been pretty in this forum).


You might have been one of the few still posting in the Trump thread. :)

Edward64 03-10-2021 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3329721)
You might have been one of the few still posting in the Trump thread. :)


Not me. I think most here (but not all) of us can move on from Trump. It helps that (surprisingly) Trump has not been in the news that much. Thanks to Twitter I guess.

It's not all Biden now but he owns 80+%, especially domestic and covid response.

There's been not much going on foreign policy wise yet other than some "talks" in Afghanistan and "words" against China. He's had it easy so far. Wonder when & where the first foreign crisis is going to come from. Odds are NK crazy kid will throw a tantrum or Iran will somehow escalate.

kingfc22 03-10-2021 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3329713)
Which idiot proposed removing the Estate Tax?


GOP push for estate tax reform is a handout to the rich - Los Angeles Times

Edward64 03-11-2021 04:57 AM

‘We want to be oversupplied’: U.S. buying additional 100 million doses of J&J vaccine - MarketWatch
Quote:

“I’m doing this because in this wartime effort we need maximum flexibility,” Biden said of buying the additional doses. “There’s always a chance that we’ll encounter unexpected challenges or there will be a new need for a vaccination effort. A lot can happen, a lot can change, and we need to be prepared.”
:
“We want to be oversupplied and over-prepared,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said ahead of Biden’s announcement.

Absolutely the right move. +100M doses, let's swag $40 per dose = $4B.

Quote:

“With this order, the U.S. will have enough doses to vaccinate 500 million people, and there are 330 million people in the country,” said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Amherst Pierpont, in a note.

“And by the way, there are at least two more vaccine candidates in the pipeline (Oxford/AstraZeneca AZN, +1.10% and Novavax NVAX, +1.53% ) that could gain approval in the spring, and we would be committed to buy at least 100 million doses each from them upon approval,”

Addition of AZN and NVAX, using same formula $4B x 3 = $12B. Cheap insurance to significantly reduce impact of another round of this crap (if it happens).

Now if it mutates to something that our vaccines can't handle, it'll be a bad call. But it does seem pharma's can "adjust" their vaccines to accommodate (some) new variants.

Quote:

Biden also addressed what could be a surplus of doses in the U.S.

“If we have a surplus, we’re going to share it with the rest of the world,” the president said at Wednesday’s event, noting that his administration is giving $4 billion to the World Health Organization’s Covax program, which aims to ensure vaccine equity for lower-income countries.

A good thing but not sure Biden would ever give up the surplus (maybe in 2023?). Better thing to do is to give/loan/subsidize/help negotiate countries so they can buy their own as soon as possible.

albionmoonlight 03-11-2021 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3329740)
Now if it mutates to something that our vaccines can't handle, it'll be a bad call. But it does seem pharma's can "adjust" their vaccines to accommodate (some) new variants.


Like many, I've been worried about mutations, but I read something the other day that got me more hopeful on that score.

The virus has only a limited number of ways that it can mutate and still be effective as a virus.

The vast majority of mutations would make the virus less effective. So the number of mutations about which we have to worry is finite. And our scientists have a handle on what those are likely to be and are already working on those vis a vis vaccine adaptations.

miked 03-11-2021 07:51 AM

I think we need to stockpile in case one needs boosters a year or two later.

Ksyrup 03-11-2021 09:13 AM

I just assumed this was going to eventually be more like an annual flu vaccine than like a hepatitis shot or something.

albionmoonlight 03-11-2021 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 3329764)
I just assumed this was going to eventually be more like an annual flu vaccine than like a hepatitis shot or something.


Yeah. My guess is that it will just be part of the annual routine: Flu shot & COVID booster.

Edward64 03-11-2021 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3329348)
Yeah baby, found some pork I really like. Not sure if it made it in the final bill though.

As someone thinking about doing semi-early retirement, healthcare insurance until Medicare has been a concern so have been looking into Obamacare stuff. I am not thinking that I would spend more than $85K a year in retirement but was concerned if capital gains, or dependents working (and myriad of other possible factors) and how that would impact calculation for subsidies.

With this proposal, it takes all that uncertainty away.


Looks like it made it in! Looks like semi-early retirement is more of a reality now ...

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...igned-n1260719
Quote:

With surprisingly little fanfare, the legislation includes some of the biggest changes to the Affordable Care Act (often referred to as "Obamacare") since President Barack Obama signed it in 2010.

The bill boosts subsidies for customers who buy insurance through the ACA, lowering premiums across the board and outright eliminating them on benchmark plans for people making under 150 percent of the federal poverty level.

For the first time, people making over 400 percent of the federal poverty level ($51,520 for individuals) can qualify for federal help, as well, with their premiums capped at 8.5 percent of income. The new subsidies are for only two years; Democrats are likely to try to extend them.

QuikSand 03-11-2021 08:42 PM

Sadly, the way forward for minor policy changes right now is as an add-on to HUGE policy changes, where your issue gets lost in the policy shuffle.

JPhillips 03-11-2021 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand (Post 3329829)
Sadly, the way forward for minor policy changes right now is as an add-on to HUGE policy changes, where your issue gets lost in the policy shuffle.


Another outcome of the filibuster. When you may only pass two bills of substance, you want to throw everything into them.

Vegas Vic 03-11-2021 09:25 PM

I think Biden's goal of offering the vaccine to everyone who wants it by May 1 is doable, especially when factoring in the anti-vaxxers, science deniers and serial procrastinators who will forego the opportunity.

GrantDawg 03-12-2021 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas Vic (Post 3329836)
I think Biden's goal of offering the vaccine to everyone who wants it by May 1 is doable, especially when factoring in the anti-vaxxers, science deniers and serial procrastinators who will forego the opportunity.

I hope so. If I read the announcement correctly, I should be eligible in my state next week. Just looking around I am not seeing anyone that says they have open appointments. Opening up who can administer the shots probably helps, but it still really hard to get an appointment now.

albionmoonlight 03-12-2021 07:18 AM

I think that everyone will be eligible by May 1st. Even the most anti-Biden governors aren't going to pick a fight with him about wanting to give their citizens less vaccine access.

I think that it may still take a while after May 1st for everyone to get their shots. It is one thing to be eligible. It is another thing to make the appointment.

Still--late June seems like a pretty good target for everyone who wants it to have finished both shots (or 1 with J&J).

BYU 14 03-12-2021 08:25 AM

Yeah, he made a point to clarify that everyone would be eligible in terms of supply/opportunity subject to scheduling. Still a big win on that front.

NobodyHere 03-12-2021 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYU 14 (Post 3329855)
Yeah, he made a point to clarify that everyone would be eligible in terms of supply/opportunity subject to scheduling. Still a big win on that front.


I would wait until May 1st before calling it a win.

What if there's not enough vaccines for all the prioritized groups? Do the schedules then get thrown out the window?

BYU 14 03-12-2021 08:55 AM

If the drug companies meet deadlines there will be more than enough vaccine, it was always going to be the availability of sites/staffing and that falls to the states. You can't just have anyone giving the vaccinations.

My company is volunteering at sites here in Phoenix for logistics and since we are a health insurance company, offering qualified personnel to give vaccinations. In working with DHS here they are not concerned at all with the supply right now, it is getting enough boots on the ground to give them and scheduling is still hit and miss.

JPhillips 03-12-2021 09:01 AM

NY initially made a mistake in Cuomo having to control everything with the distribution. They basically ignored the public health people throughout NY and tried to create a system from scratch. Now they are letting the people with vaccine experience do much more and there's a noticeable improvement in locations and vaccine distribution.

molson 03-12-2021 09:14 AM

This projection is a little more difficult because it relies more on the states. But Biden initially projected 100 shots in his first 100 days. We'll hit that today on day 51 of his administration. (And much fewer days than that if you use the QAnon inauguration date, which I'm seeing they've switched to March 20 now)

I'm sure his team feels confident about this projection. Setting out tangible goals and beating them is a good look.

Lathum 03-12-2021 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYU 14 (Post 3329859)
If the drug companies meet deadlines there will be more than enough vaccine, it was always going to be the availability of sites/staffing and that falls to the states. You can't just have anyone giving the vaccinations.

My company is volunteering at sites here in Phoenix for logistics and since we are a health insurance company, offering qualified personnel to give vaccinations. In working with DHS here they are not concerned at all with the supply right now, it is getting enough boots on the ground to give them and scheduling is still hit and miss.


There is zero excuse to not ha e the national guard and fema involved from the very start. If the former guy had planned accordingly we could have had a much smoother roll out and seem less transition. No reason we couldn’t have has mass triage centers set up in every metro area that could have inoculated large numbers from the start.

Ghost Econ 03-12-2021 12:12 PM

I like that MAGAts are spamming "dementia joe" today. They had a President for 4 years who couldn't slobber through 10 minute speeches, but Biden gives a quality speech and someone he's a dementia patient.

Have they not met people with dementia? It's not fun.

Lathum 03-12-2021 12:39 PM

I made the mistake of listening to ten minutes of Fox News this morning. They alternated between Joe reading a prepared speech and not taking questions and the fact that 1 million shots in 100 days isn't really a big deal. Now we all full well know if he didn't meet that goal they would be killing him also. Its ridiculous.

NobodyHere 03-12-2021 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghost Econ (Post 3329880)
I like that MAGAts are spamming "dementia joe" today. They had a President for 4 years who couldn't slobber through 10 minute speeches, but Biden gives a quality speech and someone he's a dementia patient.

Have they not met people with dementia? It's not fun.


Are they done with his wild rabid dog?

ISiddiqui 03-12-2021 04:28 PM

Wow, Stimulus is already pending in our account. That was insanely quick.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

GrantDawg 03-12-2021 04:48 PM

Friend on Facebook says his hit. I wish mine had. I am itching to buy a new bed.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

JPhillips 03-12-2021 05:08 PM

Biden is so good at the relationships aspect of politics. Calling out and praising Bernie for his help with the ARP is simple, but so many politicians overlook things like that.

NobodyHere 03-12-2021 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 3329905)
Wow, Stimulus is already pending in our account. That was insanely quick.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk


My bank is saying deposits will start on the 17th.

cuervo72 03-12-2021 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3329908)
Friend on Facebook says his hit. I wish mine had. I am itching to buy a new bed.


Bed bugs, eh?

;)

GrantDawg 03-12-2021 06:16 PM

No, lol. I am actually a professional at getting rid of those.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

Edward64 03-14-2021 02:50 PM

Hmmmm, pretty good news I guess. Of the $1.9T, we already have the $1T borrowed and ready to go, so only .9T net new.

How Trump’s team amassed a $1 trillion war chest for Biden to deploy - POLITICO
Quote:

Republicans are bashing the new $1.9 trillion pandemic relief package for further ballooning the federal debt, but it’s the Trump administration that greased the path for a smooth federal spending spree.

The Treasury has a cash pile of well over $1 trillion, which will allow the government to quickly disburse money in line with the sweeping new law, including direct checks to millions of Americans that are expected to start hitting bank accounts in the coming week. That robust rainy-day fund was built last year by then-Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who preemptively cranked up the pace of government borrowing, unsure of how and when Congress might mandate further relief measures.
:
:
So, despite concerns that markets will be flooded with new U.S. government debt to pay for the rescue package, the Treasury Department might not have to change its borrowing plans much at all to fund the legislation signed into law by President Joe Biden on Thursday.

“There are enormous implications for everyone else, but the Treasury was out in front of this nine months ago,” said Lou Crandall, chief economist at research firm Wrightson ICAP.
:
:
Treasury always has to have enough cash on hand to fund immediate government spending obligations, which it keeps as deposits at the Federal Reserve. But those funds more than quadrupled in 2020. When Biden took office, Treasury’s deposits at the Fed stood at about $1.6 trillion, compared to $400 billion in 2019, and Treasury is expected to burn through about $1 trillion of that already-borrowed cash to help fund the relief package.

“That is $1 trillion of money that the Treasury does not have to borrow this year,” said Seth Carpenter, chief U.S. economist at UBS who served as a top debt-management official at Treasury under President Barack Obama.

NobodyHere 03-14-2021 03:38 PM

The bar for good news is pretty low these days.

PilotMan 03-14-2021 04:40 PM

I saw a minute of Hannity and he was railing that it had been 50 whole days since Biden had given a news conference and I laughed and laughed. It didn't matter much the past 4 years to him. Doofus talked all the time, but he didn't take hard questions, that's for sure.

Edward64 03-14-2021 08:30 PM

I know Biden will lose some support but he is right in wanting to wait for the investigation of Cuomo.

The dilemma is that Biden himself have been accused of being too touchy-feely. Nothing to the level of Cuomo (or Trump for that matter) but enough times by enough different women.

NobodyHere 03-14-2021 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3330036)
I know Biden will lose some support but he is right in wanting to wait for the investigation of Cuomo.

The dilemma is that Biden himself have been accused of being too touchy-feely. Nothing to the level of Cuomo (or Trump for that matter) but enough times by enough different women.


Democrats are hypocrites. When it's one of their own they believe in investigations.

When it's a accused conservative then the victim must get the benefit of the doubt.

Biden himself wouldn't survive the rules that he's proposing for college students.

Edward64 03-14-2021 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3330037)
Plenty of Democrats and Republicans are hypocrites. When it's one of their own they believe in investigations.

When it's a accused of the other party then the victim must get the benefit of the doubt.


FIFY

NobodyHere 03-14-2021 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3330038)
FIFY


don't deflect

Biden wants college male students to be presumed guilty no matter what yet Cuomo gets an investigation.

Edward64 03-14-2021 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3330039)
don't deflect

Biden wants college male students to be presumed guilty no matter what yet Cuomo gets an investigation.


I actually didn’t know what you were referring to with students so I did not quote that section.

JPhillips 03-14-2021 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3330037)
Democrats are hypocrites. When it's one of their own they believe in investigations.

When it's a accused conservative then the victim must get the benefit of the doubt.

Biden himself wouldn't survive the rules that he's proposing for college students.


Most of the NY elected Dems have called for his resignation.

ISiddiqui 03-14-2021 09:19 PM

Right but they don't count as Democrats (including Senators Schumer and Gillibrand, Congresspeople Nadler and Ocasio-Cortez, etc) because it messes up the Fox News narrative...

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

JPhillips 03-14-2021 09:35 PM

I think all but 4 of the NY Dem congressional delegation has called for him to resign. De Blasio is practically giddy demanding Cuomo resign. I don't know the number for state-level Dems, but there have been plenty that have called for his resignation already and there's been an impeachment inquiry opened by Dems.

Brian Swartz 03-14-2021 11:13 PM

Yeah there's a difference here, and there have been other examples in recent years as well. Republicans gloss over any failings of their own more often, or in some cases trumpet them as assets. Democrats are definitely slower to judgement when it's one of theirs, but many of them get there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere
Biden himself wouldn't survive the rules that he's proposing for college students.


This is true also, and he's not been decisive enough for my liking on this issue. Having said that, it can't be ignored the number of Democrats calling for Cuomo to go and for the voices of the accusers to be heard. You just don't see that on the other side.

larrymcg421 03-15-2021 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3330039)
don't deflect

Biden wants college male students to be presumed guilty no matter what yet Cuomo gets an investigation.


No he doesn't. He wants the standard the same as it is in a civil trial, which is preponderance of the evidence. The students would still have beyond a reasonable doubt as the standard if it went to a criminal trial.

Qwikshot 03-15-2021 09:12 AM

Just remember, Trump is a rapist who did get away with it but Biden is soft. Got it.

Qwikshot 03-15-2021 09:13 AM

More grist for the Republican mill I suppose:

Biden planning first major tax hike in almost 30 years: report

Biden planning first major tax hike in almost 30 years: report | TheHill

JPhillips 03-15-2021 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwikshot (Post 3330064)
More grist for the Republican mill I suppose:

Biden planning first major tax hike in almost 30 years: report

Biden planning first major tax hike in almost 30 years: report | TheHill


Alternate headline:

Biden to Keep Promise of Repealing Unpopular Trump Tax Cuts

larrymcg421 03-15-2021 10:01 AM

How could it be the first major tax hike in 30 years when Obama raised taxes every day he was in office?

miked 03-15-2021 10:20 AM

Also, democrats were pretty quick to throw Franken under the bus without an investigation (which probably would have cleared him). He resigned before they could even do one.

PilotMan 03-15-2021 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3330037)
Democrats are hypocrites.


Republicans are hypocrites.

Ok, your turn. We're even.

Let's see here's another.

"Evangelical" Conservative Christians are hypocrites.

There I feel better now. How about you?

miami_fan 03-15-2021 04:45 PM

Stimulus check 2021: Millions face tax refund delay as relief arrives

Just in case you are like me and was wondering why you have not received your tax refund as of yet.

Brian Swartz 03-15-2021 04:55 PM

Good info. I wasn't wondering, knew things like that we're going to happen. Weird for me as it's the first substantial refund I've had coming in many years, but fortunately I'm in an position where it's no big deal for me to wait for it.

miami_fan 03-15-2021 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3330096)
Good info. I wasn't wondering, knew things like that we're going to happen. Weird for me as it's the first substantial refund I've had coming in many years, but fortunately I'm in an position where it's no big deal for me to wait for it.


It had me questioning if I fat fingered my bank account info.:lol:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.