Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Maximum Football??? (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=45810)

kcchief19 02-28-2006 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gstelmack
After he started this whole thread, I want to know where Bubba Wheels got off to...

I still shake my head in wonder at the mind-blowing irony of the furor Bubba Wheels of all people started by pimping a game by a Canadian.

I'm surprised that Bubba doesn't use Maximum Football as a reason to rail against universal health care. "See people!!! It doesn't work!!!!!"

albionmoonlight 02-28-2006 09:51 AM

Over 1800 posts in this thread.

If I were Bubba, I'd put this on my resume.

FrogMan 02-28-2006 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
No kidding...Just 5? That's a slow week around here. ;)


and that's not counting special user groups we don't know about...

FM

cartman 02-28-2006 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchief19
I still shake my head in wonder at the mind-blowing irony of the furor Bubba Wheels of all people started by pimping a game by a Canadian.

I'm surprised that Bubba doesn't use Maximum Football as a reason to rail against universal health care. "See people!!! It doesn't work!!!!!"


My guess is that his tinfoil hat either ran out of prepaid Internet minutes, or he can't get it adjusted to the right frequency for Internet access.

KWhit 02-28-2006 10:01 AM

Hah!

albionmoonlight 02-28-2006 10:04 AM

RE: Some Game Questions..... - 2/27/2006 9:13:51 PM
Toddzilla
Matrix Recruit



Posts: 20
Joined: 2/22/2006
Status: offline
Where can you get tickets to the Beer Tent?

(in reply to bigticket
RE: Some Game Questions..... - 2/27/2006 10:40:40 PM
David Winter
Matrix Elite Guard



Posts: 569
Joined: 11/23/2004
From: Vancouver, BC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Toddzilla

Where can you get tickets to the Beer Tent?
Yes. Tickets to the beer tent are $45

Disclaimer.
Beer tent does not contain real beer or any product of any kind. Side effects of buying beer tent tickets include nausea, head aches, dry mouth, irritation of friends and loved ones, kidney failure, liver failure, possible blindness, empty wallet syndrome, and possible smashed cars. In extreme cases possible side effects include sudden cardiac death. If you've experienced sudden cardiac death, consult your doctor.

(in reply to Toddzilla)
Post #: 10
RE: Some Game Questions..... - 2/27/2006 11:52:09 PM
bigticket
Matrix Trooper



Posts: 97
Joined: 4/22/2005
Status: offline
So you can answer that question but not a game question. I understand now.

(in reply to coachbj)
Post #: 11
RE: Some Game Questions..... - 2/28/2006 1:09:06 AM

albionmoonlight 02-28-2006 10:09 AM

dola--

Glad to see that he's in a good mood. I don't think that Davvidd even gets that much of anything is wrong here--or that there are people (Matrix Games) who stand to lose more if/when this blows up than their programming hobby.

albionmoonlight 02-28-2006 10:27 AM

dola2--

I just noticed that our very own sportplanet did an interview with Daavvidd back in the day.

http://www.sportplanet.com/catchthef.../wv21201.shtml

Ksyrup 02-28-2006 10:33 AM

I've somehow managed to stay completely out of this thread and didn't even realize it. Does anyone care to summarize what the hell's been going on around here for 37 pages?! :D

Or is it worth reading?

Coffee Warlord 02-28-2006 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup
Or is it worth reading?


This thread is the greatest acheivement in the history of the FOFC.

albionmoonlight 02-28-2006 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup
I've somehow managed to stay completely out of this thread and didn't even realize it. Does anyone care to summarize what the hell's been going on around here for 37 pages?! :D


Impossible. Though I do hope we get a diagram explaining it soon.

Quote:

Or is it worth reading?

Yes.

John Galt 02-28-2006 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight
Impossible. Though I do hope we get a diagram explaining it soon.


Yes.


I agree on both counts.

Ksyrup 02-28-2006 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord
This thread is the greatest acheivement in the history of the FOFC.


And Fozzy is the greatest metal band to be fronted by a pro wrestler. You haven't exactly given a ringing endorsement, you know. :p

Radii 02-28-2006 10:53 AM

I just read all 37 pages of this thread. In one sitting. I don't know why I stayed out of it for so long, this is a thing of beauty.

DeToxRox 02-28-2006 11:00 AM

Wow. I figured I'd put my stamp on this too, for the Guiness people.

Coffee Warlord 02-28-2006 11:00 AM


RedKingGold 02-28-2006 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight
dola2--

I just noticed that our very own sportplanet did an interview with Daavvidd back in the day.

http://www.sportplanet.com/catchthef.../wv21201.shtml


Did anyone actually read this? Here's my favorite quote:

CTF: What's your favorite part(s) of the game? I guess my favourite part of the game is that simple fact it works.

Plus, I think Daivd should stick to writing train management contol software

KWhit 02-28-2006 11:16 AM

I like "Maxxermium Footsomething."

:)

Toddzilla 02-28-2006 11:18 AM

Holy crap - one of the biggest fanboys over on the MFing forums is starting to turn on them. That's not a good thing.

Butter 02-28-2006 11:25 AM

Erik tells someone over there regarding the 3d animations "if the game were focused on arcade mode, we would want more".

Well, it's not focused on sim mode either, is it? It's not a text sim, it's not got a good arcade mode... at least the beer tent is realistic.

Bee 02-28-2006 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toddzilla
Holy crap - one of the biggest fanboys over on the MFing forums is starting to turn on them. That's not a good thing.


I've kind of lost track of who's actually a fanboy and who's a troll acting like a fanboy...

twothree 02-28-2006 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog

but then today...
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=1073537
RE: Release Info - 2/28/2006 1:29:36 PM
Erik Rutins
Administrator



Posts: 6831
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: online
We are still working on the last issue on the list, no release today, sorry folks.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
Director of Product Development and Business Relations



Mustang 02-28-2006 11:43 AM

Maximum Football entry at Wikipedia has been changed a few times in the last several days. :D

Toddzilla 02-28-2006 11:43 AM


JonInMiddleGA 02-28-2006 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord


Coolness ... teleporting horsies :)

st.cronin 02-28-2006 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord
This thread is the greatest acheivement in the history of the FOFC.


Obviously that's hyperbole, but I agree it's on the 'short list.' I think the Hot Child Molester thread has to be #1.

Ksyrup 02-28-2006 11:57 AM

I've gotten through 12 pages so far. Bravo, people, brav-O.

SFL Cat 02-28-2006 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord


Don't forget about HORSEY ONLY mode!





st.cronin 02-28-2006 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup
I've gotten through 12 pages so far. Bravo, people, brav-O.


1st 12 pages < last 12 pages

FrogMan 02-28-2006 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
1st 12 pages < last 12 pages


so true, and it only keeps on getting better. Seriously Ksyrup, under what rock have you been to miss this gem of a thread for so long? :)

FM

Bee 02-28-2006 12:00 PM

Yep...I don't think he's even gotten to the limmerick off between Quiksand and John Galt. :D

rkmsuf 02-28-2006 12:01 PM

someone posted a link to this thread over there. it was immediately removed.

they need more dean houston over there

st.cronin 02-28-2006 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrogMan
so true, and it only keeps on getting better. Seriously Ksyrup, under what rock have you been to miss this gem of a thread for so long? :)

FM


He's probably been busy searching the internet for hot child molesters. Just a hunch.

FrogMan 02-28-2006 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
Yep...I don't think he's even gotten to the limmerick off between Quiksand and John Galt. :D


not even close, the limerick off was around pages 28-29... (I had to go back and check, I am not taking notes of when cool stuff happened, there's just too much of it :D)

FM

KWhit 02-28-2006 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkmsuf
someone posted a link to this thread over there.


Twice.


Quote:

Originally Posted by rkmsuf
it was immediately removed.


Twice.

gstelmack 02-28-2006 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Butter_of_69
Erik tells someone over there regarding the 3d animations "if the game were focused on arcade mode, we would want more".

Well, it's not focused on sim mode either, is it? It's not a text sim, it's not got a good arcade mode... at least the beer tent is realistic.

Now now, there is enough for them to be bashed over without having to stretch. There actually is a middle point between text sim and arcade game, and that's a good COACHING sim (which this would like to be). You call plays and watch the guys run the play in real-time. That's what FPS started out as, and there's still room in the market for something similar.

Now to get back on topic: not that Maximum Football looks like it will fit the bill...

rkmsuf 02-28-2006 12:05 PM

Quote:

Twice.

I nominate you to be next.

Toddzilla 02-28-2006 12:07 PM

This thread made me tinkle a little:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1009219
As did this one:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=926725

albionmoonlight 02-28-2006 12:07 PM

Page 12 was us slowly realizing everything implied by this screenshot. Seems like years ago.



Coffee Warlord 02-28-2006 12:07 PM


Ksyrup 02-28-2006 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrogMan
so true, and it only keeps on getting better. Seriously Ksyrup, under what rock have you been to miss this gem of a thread for so long? :)

FM


To be honest, I think the fact that I haven't been interested in playing a text sim game since...hell, probably OOTP5...is the main reason I wasn't interested in clicking this thread. I'm just not as motivated to play any of these games as I used to be. It coincided somewhat with our second kid - I used to be able to play for hours at a time and build up some continuity; that doesn't happen much these days. Civ IV is about the only game I've been willing to put aside 3+ hours to play in one sitting, and even that can't happen much.

I didn't really pay attention to the fact that this thread got so big. More than likely, I just confused the length of the thread with a werewolf thread and thought it was a normal thread about a game I wouldn't be interested in anyway.

Sorry for the non-humorous response. I haven't gotten into the swing of this thread yet.

JeeberD 02-28-2006 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit
Twice.



Twice.


I wonder how long it's going to take for the YTMND link to get deleted and the thread locked...

Ben E Lou 02-28-2006 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JeeberD
I wonder how long it's going to take for the YTMND link to get deleted and the thread locked...

Well, it brought Jenniefr Wniter out of hiding.

JPhillips 02-28-2006 12:17 PM

I think you're reading too much into the warning. Its a form letter that is identical to the warning given Druez several days ago.

FrogMan 02-28-2006 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup
To be honest, I think the fact that I haven't been interested in playing a text sim game since...hell, probably OOTP5...is the main reason I wasn't interested in clicking this thread. I'm just not as motivated to play any of these games as I used to be. It coincided somewhat with our second kid - I used to be able to play for hours at a time and build up some continuity; that doesn't happen much these days. Civ IV is about the only game I've been willing to put aside 3+ hours to play in one sitting, and even that can't happen much.

I didn't really pay attention to the fact that this thread got so big. More than likely, I just confused the length of the thread with a werewolf thread and thought it was a normal thread about a game I wouldn't be interested in anyway.

Sorry for the non-humorous response. I haven't gotten into the swing of this thread yet.


that's cool, keep reading, you'll get to the good, err, better stuff soon enough. :D In all fairness, I too didn't have any interest for that game and I kind of caught on around page 12 or so, made for a lot less of a backlog in reading ;)

FM

FrogMan 02-28-2006 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TroyF
Well, lets look at all of the problems I see here:

1) Safeties are stationary
2) #24 doesn't seem to have any desire to block downfield.
3) CB following WR across the field, away from the ball, when the RB has the ball and he has deep zone help.
4) #64 is sitting down, and I can't for the life of me see anyone who would have put him there.
5) The defensive lineman, #83?, is just standing there.
6) I don't see a beer tent.


best description of that page 12 screenshot :)

FM

cartman 02-28-2006 12:21 PM

So, the poobah of Media Relations says that any publicity is good publicity, but they are editing or deleting threads to one of the biggest discussions of their product.

Great teamwork going on over there. Obviously everyone is on the same page.

:D

JeeberD 02-28-2006 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Well, it brought Jenniefr Wniter out of hiding.


Nice edit... :D

rkmsuf 02-28-2006 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JeeberD
I wonder how long it's going to take for the YTMND link to get deleted and the thread locked...



Thanks Toddzilla for helping realize the dream of setting this game to Benny Hill music.

Toddzilla 02-28-2006 12:22 PM

Hmmmmm...from an old screenshot. That logo for Chattanooga looks.....familiar.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/up...897C9C5CC0.jpg

cartman 02-28-2006 12:23 PM

Them complaining about our thread impacting the release and/or quality of the product would be like Ross Perot complaining that his portrayal on Saturday Night Live cost him the 1992 election.

Toddzilla 02-28-2006 12:23 PM

I'm totally going to edit my YTMND and include a picture of Tubgirl.

JPhillips 02-28-2006 12:25 PM

The "artist" really needs to post in this thread.

Toddzilla 02-28-2006 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Well, it brought Jenniefr Wniter out of hiding.

What a doofus - she says it's cute, tries to spin all the goofing on the game as good pub, then lectures us on how to ignore trolls. Now THATS quality public relations.

QuikSand 02-28-2006 12:27 PM

What we are going to need, eventually, is a new reference thread just for this thread.

A sort of linked table of contents, to help people follow the numerous discussions, understand the doubled-over references, remember what names correspond to names over there, and so forth. This could be a major undertaking -- but a worthy one.

You can hardly just jump in here... heaven forbid, you might misspell Daivd or you might not recognize the critical importance of beer tents in a football sim.

Toddzilla 02-28-2006 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Well, it brought Jenniefr Wniter out of hiding.

:D :D sorry, almost missed that.

albionmoonlight 02-28-2006 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jennifer Winter
You know what they say - no publicity is bad publicity. If only the trolls understood that there bashing is not having the outcome they desire.

The only outcome that any of us have expressed desiring is having another quality football sim on the market. Our skepticism that MF will be such a sim does not diminish our obsessive desire for more and better games. I agree with Jennifer that MF will not meet that desire.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jennifer Winter
They go to other boards - bash the game, but that in turn is only going to raise the curiostiy of people who probably hadn't even known about the games existence. Each will then go to the site and judge for themselves.


Ummm. . . are you sure that that's what you want, Jennifer? Have you seen those screenshots?

Bee 02-28-2006 12:33 PM

I wonder when VicKevlar is going to lay the smackdown on Jeninnfer for calling people trolls. :D

gstelmack 02-28-2006 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
I wonder when VicKevlar is going to lay the smackdown on Jeninnfer for calling people trolls. :D

Or Daivd for bashing text sim developers...

rkmsuf 02-28-2006 12:40 PM

Wade wrote "Daivd" in his serious post.

lol

st.cronin 02-28-2006 12:40 PM

The creattive spelling alone contanes more humor than 99% of all threads.

wade moore 02-28-2006 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkmsuf
Wade wrote "Daivd" in his serious post.

lol


I thought long and hard about that one.

I just couldn't bring myself to write "David".

Bee 02-28-2006 12:45 PM

I liked your post Wade. Thought it was dead on. The first step I think they need to take is to have a demo that's not 3 months down the line. I can't imagine this game selling well without a demo at this point.

KWhit 02-28-2006 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
I thought long and hard about that one.

I just couldn't bring myself to write "David".


Great post over there. That summed up my feelings quite well.

And I loved the spelling. You had to do it. You just had to.

wade moore 02-28-2006 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
I liked your post Wade. Thought it was dead on. The first step I think they need to take is to have a demo that's not 3 months down the line. I can't imagine this game selling well without a demo at this point.


Personally I think the first step they need to make is to declare that their gold build had critical problems, so the game is no longer in Gold status. They then need to declare that the release date is officially unknown until they have a clean Gold build. They need to set the expectation that it is an UNKNOWN period of time before this happens.

They then need to put a build together until it is Gold. Once it is Gold, LOCK THE CODE. Do not release anything to the public until the game is actual available for download, and then drop the bomb.

Combined with all of that, there should be a demo, but to me those things need to come before a demo.

wade moore 02-28-2006 12:49 PM

For when the reference thread comes:

RE: You guys seen this? - 2/28/2006 6:38:30 PM
wademoore
Matrix Recruit



Posts: 2
Joined: 2/27/2006
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: KWhit

Yep. That's the thing - once the game is released, it will be viewed on its merits. I only wish there was going to be a demo so we could give it a try before buying.

I've been holding this in through all of this, but I need to get it out.

The folks here need to realize that anyone viewing this forum would LOVE to see a new, quality football game. We would love to have a sim-style game with a 3d graphics engine behind it.

In short, we would love for Maximum Football to be a success. This includes everyone on other sites that are posting about the game. I know many of you will not believe that, but it is true.

However, when we see the behavior of the developer, the behavior of this being delayed first a year, then 2, then 3, and now delay after delay in this "Gold Release". I understand there are realistic delays behind what is going on right this moment, but it has to be understood what message you are delivering when you drag it out for three years and have the behavior towards the community that has existed over the last 4 or 5 years.

That being said, I guarantee you that if the game is good, the folks that are having fun at your expense (admittedly myself included in that list) will immediately sing your praises and recommend the game elsewhere. I'm sure, again, that you do not believe this, but it's true. We have seen it happen before in our community, and it will happen again. If you release a good game even after the bad business maneuvers over the last several years, the game is all that will matter.

One of the key problems, as KWhit mentions, is that it is tough to put down $40-$50 for a game that we would have to choose sight unseen. Let ALONE a game that has had this questionable background of development. Again, even if the development has followed every standard known to mankind, the fact is, the perception that is out there is that it was a bad development process, bad testing, questionable screenshots and bad attitude. Reality or not, that is PERCEPTION. SO to want a game to succeed without a chance to try it out, is going to be a hard sell.

Anyway. I've rambled on to basically say that the folks with Matrix, Daivd and his wife, and all others involved in this project need to understand that the "fun at your expense" (you say tomato, I say tomato) is not just some random attack for no reason. It is a reaction to all of the above. To think that there is no justification to the reactions across the internet towards this game is just silly. Any business needs to understand that when there is a negative attitude, it comes with a reason. Successful businesses find a way to make it a positive, and usually that method is not lashing back.

< Message edited by wademoore -- 2/28/2006 6:40:20 PM >

(in reply to KWhit)

FrogMan 02-28-2006 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
Personally I think the first step they need to make is to declare that their gold build had critical problems, so the game is no longer in Gold status. They then need to declare that the release date is officially unknown until they have a clean Gold build. They need to set the expectation that it is an UNKNOWN period of time before this happens.

They then need to put a build together until it is Gold. Once it is Gold, LOCK THE CODE. Do not release anything to the public until the game is actual available for download, and then drop the bomb.

Combined with all of that, there should be a demo, but to me those things need to come before a demo.


bingo! I'm not a game developper, not even a programmer, but this all makes sense to me. Now, do you think they have the self-discipline/common sense to do that?

To me, they've not shown that they have it...

FM

rkmsuf 02-28-2006 12:53 PM

dervack, you sneaky bastage.

QuikSand 02-28-2006 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
I can't imagine this game selling well without a demo at this point.


Honestly, though -- if a demo was as illuminating as the screenshots have been, how many people would try the demo and then decide that they liked the game enough to buy it?

I have to think that the no-demo strategy is a wise decision, honestly. You get the already-bagged-and-tagged fanboi audience right away before there's any word of mouth, and then you're bound to get stragglers purchasing the game over time, even if there's no good buzz for the game.

Demos work both ways -- sort of like special movie screenings for critics. When you know your movie stinks, the last thing you want to do is let the critics see it and pan it before it opens. So, you don't run a preview, and let it open unadorned. Voila -- you at least get an opening weekend out of it before word mf mouth crushes the movie.

I have to think it's the same deal at work here. Sell the game based on the promised features list, not on the actual execution. And no refunds.

Butter 02-28-2006 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand
Demos work both ways -- sort of like special movie screenings for critics. When you know your movie stinks, the last thing you want to do is let the critics see it and pan it before it opens. So, you don't run a preview, and let it open unadorned. Voila -- you at least get an opening weekend out of it before word mf mouth crushes the movie.


I thought that too, also with the clinker movie premise. This time of year tends to remind one how many truly bad movies are made in the course of a year, especially when they're all released at once.

This game's problems seem to be magnified with every release of information, so I'd be surprised to see much more in the way of even screenshots before it is "released". (Quotes signifying that I think a complete project shutdown is just as likely as a release at this point)

Ksyrup 02-28-2006 01:00 PM

Oh shit! I just had a moment I wish could have been caught on tape - both for your enjoyment, and because I think it might have won me $10K. So I'm now up to page 18 and there have been quite a few laugh-out-loud moments, and for some reason - probably overload from taking this all in at one sitting - I just spontaneously burst out laughing WAY too hard at one post. Not the greatest moment in the thread by far, but I think it was cumulative.

Anyway, that's no big deal, except for the fact that I had a mouthful of pudding at the time. Anyone ever heard a true "PLUD" sound? Well, I now have. It's like no sound I've ever heard. My screen, keyboard, and notepad are covered in pudding (vanilla, adding to the joke in my mind; thank God nobody walked by a few seconds later). I couldn't do anything but laugh like an idiot for about 3 minutes straight. My stomach hurts and I've been crying. That was, without a doubt, one of the funniest moments I've ever had. I can't get the sound of "shooting pudding out of my mouth while at the exact same instance, realizing that I'm about to shoot pudding out of my mouth and trying to stop it." DAMN that was hilarious.

OK, back to the topic.

Bee 02-28-2006 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand
Honestly, though -- if a demo was as illuminating as the screenshots have been, how many people would try the demo and then decide that they liked the game enough to buy it?

I have to think that the no-demo strategy is a wise decision, honestly. You get the already-bagged-and-tagged fanboi audience right away before there's any word of mouth, and then you're bound to get stragglers purchasing the game over time, even if there's no good buzz for the game.

Demos work both ways -- sort of like special movie screenings for critics. When you know your movie stinks, the last thing you want to do is let the critics see it and pan it before it opens. So, you don't run a preview, and let it open unadorned. Voila -- you at least get an opening weekend out of it before word mf mouth crushes the movie.

I have to think it's the same deal at work here. Sell the game based on the promised features list, not on the actual execution. And no refunds.


I agree, but my angle was assuming the game is actually decent (which I know is a stretch based on what we've seen).

wade moore 02-28-2006 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand
Honestly, though -- if a demo was as illuminating as the screenshots have been, how many people would try the demo and then decide that they liked the game enough to buy it?

I have to think that the no-demo strategy is a wise decision, honestly. You get the already-bagged-and-tagged fanboi audience right away before there's any word of mouth, and then you're bound to get stragglers purchasing the game over time, even if there's no good buzz for the game.

Demos work both ways -- sort of like special movie screenings for critics. When you know your movie stinks, the last thing you want to do is let the critics see it and pan it before it opens. So, you don't run a preview, and let it open unadorned. Voila -- you at least get an opening weekend out of it before word mf mouth crushes the movie.

I have to think it's the same deal at work here. Sell the game based on the promised features list, not on the actual execution. And no refunds.


Good point.

Bee 02-28-2006 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
Personally I think the first step they need to make is to declare that their gold build had critical problems, so the game is no longer in Gold status. They then need to declare that the release date is officially unknown until they have a clean Gold build. They need to set the expectation that it is an UNKNOWN period of time before this happens.

They then need to put a build together until it is Gold. Once it is Gold, LOCK THE CODE. Do not release anything to the public until the game is actual available for download, and then drop the bomb.

Combined with all of that, there should be a demo, but to me those things need to come before a demo.


I guess I associate most of that stuff with the developer instead of the publisher, but yep at this point, all of that needs to be done as well.

wade moore 02-28-2006 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
I agree, but my angle was assuming the game is actually decent (which I know is a stretch based on what we've seen).


Yeah.. I guess we would have to say that any "smart business strategy" would start with, "make a good game."

I still see that it's POSSIBLE (although very unlikely) that this will happen. But if you don't start with that premise, then any strategy will fail, it's just a matter of squeezing a few sales in here and there, not actually being a success.

KWhit 02-28-2006 01:04 PM

Oh yeah. I think it's obvious that the no-demo is the right choice for them - if the screenshots and movies are any indication.

wade moore 02-28-2006 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
I guess I associate most of that stuff with the developer instead of the publisher, but yep at this point, all of that needs to be done as well.


Not really. At this point, the publisher is the one making the release announcments. Erik is the one saying "not today, hopefully tomorrow" etc. Winter hasn't said anything about release in awhile.

That being said, in a regular relationship I would totally put this on the publisher. They are the ones that handled distibution, etc. So, they are the ones that control release dates. They need to muzzle the Winters and make this happen.

Bee 02-28-2006 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore
Yeah.. I guess we would have to say that any "smart business strategy" would start with, "make a good game."



And that's where everything falls apart. :D

st.cronin 02-28-2006 01:09 PM

Anybody who registered on their board read the rules?

Quote:

3. No multiple message board accounts by a single person are prohibited.

I think I need a lawyer to explain that to me.

John Galt 02-28-2006 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup
Oh shit! I just had a moment I wish could have been caught on tape - both for your enjoyment, and because I think it might have won me $10K. So I'm now up to page 18 and there have been quite a few laugh-out-loud moments, and for some reason - probably overload from taking this all in at one sitting - I just spontaneously burst out laughing WAY too hard at one post. Not the greatest moment in the thread by far, but I think it was cumulative.

Anyway, that's no big deal, except for the fact that I had a mouthful of pudding at the time. Anyone ever heard a true "PLUD" sound? Well, I now have. It's like no sound I've ever heard. My screen, keyboard, and notepad are covered in pudding (vanilla, adding to the joke in my mind; thank God nobody walked by a few seconds later). I couldn't do anything but laugh like an idiot for about 3 minutes straight. My stomach hurts and I've been crying. That was, without a doubt, one of the funniest moments I've ever had. I can't get the sound of "shooting pudding out of my mouth while at the exact same instance, realizing that I'm about to shoot pudding out of my mouth and trying to stop it." DAMN that was hilarious.

OK, back to the topic.


:D You've got to tell us which post pushed you over the edge.

JeeberD 02-28-2006 01:12 PM

I think that means that a single person isn't supposed to creat multiple accounts on their boards. Kinda like SD's "No trolling with an Alt" rule, but I guess more strict.

Bee 02-28-2006 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin
Anybody who registered on their board read the rules?



I think I need a lawyer to explain that to me.


I'm not a lawyer, but I think that means you have to create multiple accounts or they will ban you.

KWhit 02-28-2006 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JeeberD
I think that means that a single person isn't supposed to creat multiple accounts on their boards. Kinda like SD's "No trolling with an Alt" rule, but I guess more strict.


I'm sure that's what it is supposed to mean, but it's not what it says.

Ksyrup 02-28-2006 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Galt
:D You've got to tell us which post pushed you over the edge.


It was the Benny Hill website music.

Butter 02-28-2006 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit
I'm sure that's what it is supposed to mean, but it's not what it says.


With the attention to detail displayed so far, I'm shocked -- SHOCKED -- this made it past Kwality Control.

JeeberD 02-28-2006 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup
Oh shit! I just had a moment I wish could have been caught on tape - both for your enjoyment, and because I think it might have won me $10K. So I'm now up to page 18 and there have been quite a few laugh-out-loud moments, and for some reason - probably overload from taking this all in at one sitting - I just spontaneously burst out laughing WAY too hard at one post. Not the greatest moment in the thread by far, but I think it was cumulative.

Anyway, that's no big deal, except for the fact that I had a mouthful of pudding at the time. Anyone ever heard a true "PLUD" sound? Well, I now have. It's like no sound I've ever heard. My screen, keyboard, and notepad are covered in pudding (vanilla, adding to the joke in my mind; thank God nobody walked by a few seconds later). I couldn't do anything but laugh like an idiot for about 3 minutes straight. My stomach hurts and I've been crying. That was, without a doubt, one of the funniest moments I've ever had. I can't get the sound of "shooting pudding out of my mouth while at the exact same instance, realizing that I'm about to shoot pudding out of my mouth and trying to stop it." DAMN that was hilarious.

OK, back to the topic.


Yeah...so apparently doing a Google Image Search on "messy pudding" isn't work safe... :eek:

Bee 02-28-2006 01:18 PM

The trolling posts have gotten a little boring to me. I'm finding the real fanbois much more entertaining with their blind faith that this game will be worth waiting 6 years for the release. :D

JeeberD 02-28-2006 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkmsuf
dervack, you sneaky bastage.


We now have proof that Erik isn't a true dark Jedi...

Anthony 02-28-2006 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee
The trolling posts have gotten a little boring to me. I'm finding the real fanbois much more entertaining with their blind faith that this game will be worth waiting 6 years for the release. :D


I know. i've now resorted to writing the most assinine posts and they still take me seriously.

i'm not actually finding much humorous anymore. i think the Iraqi Minister Of Information was the last funny thing. oh well. no joke lasts forever.

dervack 02-28-2006 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkmsuf
dervack, you sneaky bastage.

What did I do? :D

Bonegavel 02-28-2006 01:30 PM



When they said, "toss that MF'er over here" our bride apparently misunderstood.

Ben E Lou 02-28-2006 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hell Atlantic
I know. i've now resorted to writing the most assinine posts and they still take me seriously.

Works over here for jb. Try caling him on something and watch his defenders come out of the woodwork. ;)

Anthony 02-28-2006 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Works over here for jb. Try caling him on something and watch his defenders come out of the woodwork. ;)


i already have my defenders over there:


Quote:

ORIGINAL: donkeydong12

stop making fun of him


Desnudo 02-28-2006 01:37 PM

This game isn't going to be good. You could give them five more years. Maybe the dev process wasn't up to snuff, but I think you would expect that from a small dev house. Trying to combine 3D and text simming is the core problem and the additional complexity highlights a smaller developer's lack of process.

There's a reason why SI doesn't have 3D graphics in their games and a reason why EA Sport's Total Club Manager (soccer) was mediocre as both a simulation and an arcade game. Someone with far more limited resources thinking they could pull off the combo of good simulation and arcade style graphics didn't bother to scope the project. Which is why it's taken so long to this point with no tangible results and an apparently mediocre product.

dervack 02-28-2006 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JeeberD
We now have proof that Erik isn't a true dark Jedi...

Err, I might be getting the form letter of death apparently if I don't edit my sig...

KWhit 02-28-2006 01:38 PM

Yeah, I thought that was great.

QuikSand 02-28-2006 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Desnudo
This game isn't going to be good.


Alert the media!

kingfc22 02-28-2006 01:39 PM

This thread is like crack.

dervack 02-28-2006 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit
Yeah, I thought that was great.

Although he didn't address my concern, so maybe I won't address his.

John Galt 02-28-2006 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup
It was the Benny Hill website music.


Yeah, that was a good one. It feels so long ago. :D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.