![]() |
Quote:
eh - i'm still not sure how your role can be of value to us so idk how much we'll need to talk about it. i'm curious about what the PM asks you to do though, that's for sure. |
Quote:
VOTE NTNDEACON |
UNVOTE NTNDEACON
|
the preceeding vote was just a joke
|
LOLOL! Would have been so worth it ;).
|
Quote:
I'm with you. I'm trying to cut down. It gives me the shakes, which makes me eat more, which makes it harder to lose weight. |
Coffee is nasty! 1.5 Gallons of ice tea before 9AM no need for more caffeine.
|
Jack Bauer is going to kill all of you! :mad:
|
Quote:
You did a good job being nondescript .. to the point I'm not sure what you are telling me in response to me! :) I think it has to do with my screen resolution making line 11 different then what you see as line 11 perhaps. |
Has Telle been on today? I'm thinking of sending a vote in that direction and am wondering if anyone else has a gut-feel?
|
Quote:
Quick everyone, synchronize our browsers. |
Quote:
I'd be glad to see another candidate. I don't have a feel on her though, can you point at anything that made you suspicious? |
VOTE PURDUEBRAD
Just curious more than anything else. Probably will change later. |
Quote:
bugger that. let me put it in better context for you. 4th paragraph, first line. first 3 sentences (btw the answer to the 3rd sentence is "yes") |
I don't think Telle's our best option. She may indeed be a wolf, but there are higher probability options.
|
Quote:
Nothing solid. Looking at the vote history yesterday, Telle made almost every move I did...after I did. I don't believe she had explanations for the moves like I did, and I don't believe she was breaking ties to make people defend themselves, like I did. She may have been trying to join bandwagons before they got too established. Like I said, pretty weak. |
Hmmmm, I may have to vote for one of you coffee-haters now. ;) How's that for a frivoulous reason for a vote?
|
Quote:
she voted for KWhit which is the only thing I have going for a reason to vote for anyone today. I really do think there had to be some wolves amongst those voters. Other than that nope no gut-feel on her, I find her hard to read in these games generally though. |
mmm coffee break time!
|
4th paragraph in a PM?
|
Quote:
That is better, thanks. So my response is ," The red cow howls at the moonlight". Sorry, my response doesn't actually mean anything, but it felt very much like the movie "Get Smart" :) |
Quote:
When I only have 4 PMs a day to send, I have to maximize the amount of discussion. :) |
Quote:
you know Alan, he's a chatty guy. |
Quote:
Yeppers. Absolutely! |
Quote:
OMG...it does??? VOTE HOOPSGUY |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm willing to take a suggestion if you have one. Until then, we need people to vote. Everyone seems paralyzed by inaction. Vote Telle |
Quote:
Anyone have a vote count? |
Quote:
LOL I think this game may generate the most paranoia of any other Werewolf game. Everybody's going to be going around looking for code words and counting how many letters on a line now. LOL. |
Quote:
Wh y would you s ay that wo uld occur her e? |
Quote:
I don't suppose you'd entertain "Vote BrianD" as a suggesion would you? ;) You're in that "pre-DT KWhit voters" grouping. well as far as suggestions there's the 2 other people i was considering yesterday. logic in my head says to treat it like a typical double-reveal, you lynch one and then if that's the wrong one you lynch the other and you have a wolf. but alan pointed out in his PM to me that that might not necessarily be the best course of action. there's also this "i'm looking for other computer people. we can combine our efforts and make a super-power" that somebody said to me, when i've had no other computer-folks tell me that they had such ability. |
Quote:
If you are looking for one, you can start with this moderator :eek: |
Quote:
no idea really Alan. +2 -a=c |
Quote:
Oooh permission to vote for the moderator, how can I turn that up? vote hoopsguy :D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think I'm leading :banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead: Seriously, I'll look to post one in the next few minutes. |
Current vote count:
Chief Rum: Danny (652, 8:18 PM) Passacaglia: Clap (754, 8:15 AM) Claphamsa: Pass (775, 8:57 AM) nfg (781, 9:21 AM) Purdue: path (867, 1:55) Telle: BrianD (881, 2:23 PM) |
I'm being somewhat evasive as I talk about my thoughts for who to vote for because I don't want to reveal who those people are unless/until we decide to vote for them, since it could be harmful to them if they are indeed good, but does anybody have any general thoughts on the two people I am suspicious of up there above?
|
Clap is the only one that has pinged my wolfdar out of that list. Purdue I could see voting for just to get some clarity on yesterday's vote, though NTN's up and down seems more suspicious, I mean to go back and look at that voting record.
|
I do not DT, although one of those people might very well be me. There isn't anyone up there that I wouldn't consider voting for (except of course myself) at this point.
|
Quote:
The two people you are referring to is Mr.Computer Person or Mr 36 hour person? I already told you my thoughts on Mr.36 hour person. Basically my observation thus far is various people have all kinds of time restraints on their roles and the times do not seem consistant. Some have hourly constraints and others have a week (such as Kwhit) just from what I have observed so far. So I'm not sure someone feels that guilty to me for having a power that can occur every 36 hours (or whatever the case may be). Unless there is more to it that I am missing. As for Mr.Computer guy, I guess I would feel a bit more skeptical about multiple computer guys talking to you about their roles but only one of them mentioning they have some super power when used with the others. I would assume the others would have known about that as well? I think that is easily enough avoided simply by some of the others PMing you to confirm that is indeed the case though. If none of them do, I guess that isn't a horrible route in my mind.. but part of that vote would be out of lack of understanding roles/rules more than how someone has played. That type of vote doesn't always do well though. Of the two options though, I would think the latter is a strong vote choice.. but I'm not sure that I would simply base my vote entirely on either of those. |
Oh - hey...you know who you are - thanks!
|
What was Alan's reasoning for not voting for the "double reveal" person? I can see that with so many roles there may be some some perceived overlap. I suppose it comes down to just how identical the roles were.
And as for the other one, I'm not sure what to think. Seems like an odd thing to claim if it's not true. But then again it's not easy to prove the person false either.. you can't just say "show me your power" because they'll just claim that they can't do it until they find everybody. |
Quote:
I have some suspicion of BrianD, but I didn't want to give up on the fact that I really don't like how clap didn't reveal his role. I'll dig up the post of his that pinged me. |
Quote:
I paraphrased my thinking in my previous post. I think at least what I stated in that post is fairly similar reasons I presented to DT without some of the specifics included. |
Quote:
if DT sez its a good idea i will..... its not like im the seer or anythign! |
Ah, I see DT. I think either of those would be a reasonable choice. My understanding is that 36 hour dude had a suspiciously similar power to KWhit. Might be worth checking, I would expect with 24 roles there would be lots of similiarites, but not something that basically overlaps. Computer dude certainly sounds like an invented role if no one else is seeming to sync with it. Both would make good scans rather than lynches. But at this point nothing much to lynch based on either.
|
i just sent you a PM alan.
|
Quote:
Clap as far as I can tell you voted Pass, and apparently think he's a wolf, simply because he got on you this morning. Why so certain about him? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.