Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Werewolf Games (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Werewolf XLV - ROME! (Game over, post 3425) (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=58090)

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 03:23 AM

I just want to say that the noisier people are, the easier it is to clutter the thread with baseless talk and redirection.

That being said, i've checked the post-count...

... and am amazed that only Alan T is dead among those with 100+ posts. Either the Tarqs are simply letting the talkative guys talk a lot, or that at least one or two of the top guys in post-count are Tarqs.

Can't decide which is which. :)

Chief Rum 04-13-2007 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441429)
Hey there Chief Rum. How's it hanging? I see you're lurking. :)


lol...hi, Neon. :)

Chief Rum 04-13-2007 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441430)
I would imagine he's reading the thread rather than lurking.

CR let's make a big effort to coordinate our efforts here. I'm pretty certain that I'm going to be able to be around close to the deadline tomorrow but family stuff might get in the way. So I'll be making an arrest order before I disappear today (Friday :) ) I'll say what that arrest order is but I would like you to state who you are arresting in case I want to change the arrest tomorrow. Does that work?


Well, actually, hoopsguy ended upa s the other consul. I was a distant third, I believe, and Coffee Warlord may have caught me. Also, the deadline is Saturday morning (I believe at 9 a.m. EST, not sure).

I'm working on a theory to determine someone to arrest, but since I didn't egt the consul position, it will only be a suggestion. But I have a good feeling about my theory. More coming soon.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 03:37 AM

Oops. I just seem to be making mistake after mistake. My apologies.

9am EST works very well for me, as it's 3PM for me. That is what I was refering to. I'm very receptive to any theories you have as I have a lot of my own and it will be interesting to see if they match up.

Okay then Hoops. I'll post the person I've put an arrest warrant on. Please post your arrest candidate today in case I want to change my arrest order tomorrow (unless you're going to be around then as well).

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 03:38 AM

Hey Peregrine. I'm no Tarq, baby. I'm just chillin' like Kim Jong Il-lin'

How exactly does this scanning this work? All the clutter in the thread is just a jumble in my mind.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441431)
I just want to say that the noisier people are, the easier it is to clutter the thread with baseless talk and redirection.


Well it's not actually solely the people with big post counts who could be accused of attempted misdirection is it? Some people have been following a very under the radar approach (posting enough not to stand out but not enough to actually contribute a great deal) and still managed to try and direct attention away from anything useful.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441436)
Well it's not actually solely the people with big post counts who could be accused of attempted misdirection is it? Some people have been following a very under the radar approach (posting enough not to stand out but not enough to actually contribute a great deal) and still managed to try and direct attention away from anything useful.


That's what I hate "analysis". :) Around 45 useless posts that end up answering nothing every hour or so.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 03:48 AM

This is the first game where I'm actually feeling very overwhelmed. I want vote counts, I want to reread the whole thread to try and clarify some things in my head, I want lists of services hired and who has tried to hired services but failed, I want to know the suing tally. But I just don't think any one person has the time to do that. Any help here would be appreciated because we seem to be fighting a losing cause at the moment and we need to start pulling together as a team.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 03:50 AM

Where are you from, Narcizo? :) You seem to be on at the same time that I am... and I'm pretty much half-way around the world from all these guys.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441437)
That's what I hate "analysis". :) Around 45 useless posts that end up answering nothing every hour or so.


How do you propose we decide who the traitors are? By seeing who hasn't professed loyalty to the Republic - as that seems to be your methodology for clearing yourself.

I'm going to come out and say that I'm very suspicious of you at the moment. If you weren't a lawyer I'd be very likely to arrest you today. As it is I don't think we can afford losing another lawyer at the moment unless there's more to go on. That being said I don't think we can afford to risk having a lawyer who is a wolf either. I would strongly urge whoever has Ardent's services to scan Neon today please.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441439)
Where are you from, Narcizo? :) You seem to be on at the same time that I am... and I'm pretty much half-way around the world from all these guys.


I live in Sweden. It's the (late) morning to me at the moment.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441441)
How do you propose we decide who the traitors are? By seeing who hasn't professed loyalty to the Republic - as that seems to be your methodology for clearing yourself.

I'm going to come out and say that I'm very suspicious of you at the moment. If you weren't a lawyer I'd be very likely to arrest you today. As it is I don't think we can afford losing another lawyer at the moment unless there's more to go on. That being said I don't think we can afford to risk having a lawyer who is a wolf either. I would strongly urge whoever has Ardent's services to scan Neon today please.


:rolleyes:

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441442)
I live in Sweden. It's the (late) morning to me at the moment.


Cool. It's 5:00 PM here in lovely Manila.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 04:02 AM

+1?

However I have to admit that the deployment of the rolley-eyes has left my "analysis" in smoking ruins, so I withdraw anything.

Not even a standard "I know I'm good so I welcome someone to clear me"?

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441445)
+1?

However I have to admit that the deployment of the rolley-eyes has left my "analysis" in smoking ruins, so I withdraw anything.

Not even a standard "I know I'm good so I welcome someone to clear me"?


Nope. Not needed.

Chief Rum 04-13-2007 04:05 AM

Okay, here is the game opening wealth list. I have included notes on who is dead and who hired Day One services:

****

The wealthiest men in Rome are:

Bulletus Spongeus-- DEAD (vouched to be good by AE & Schmidty)-- Won service of legionnaire
Dodgus Erchickus-- won service of Ardent
Imus Thecrewus-- DEAD (vouched to be good by AE)--claimed to not bid on any services

The following Senators are known to be extremely wealthy:

Coffeus Yakus Warlordus-- won service of Swaggs
Ironsus Headus-- won service of priests
Lonestarus Girlus-- not too active
Marcus Vaughnus (replaced by Passacaglia)-- not too active
Schmidtyus Schmidtyus-- DEAD (definitely good)

The following Senators are known to be moderately wealthy:

Abeus Anxietus-- won service of horse owner
Antus Meisterus
Autumnus Leavus
Barkeepus Valerius Fortynineus
Pathus Twelveus
Peregrinus Barbarus
Snus Dvlus-- DEAD (definitely good)
Westvus Fanus (replaced by Mustang)

The following (remaining) Senators are of ordinary wealth for the Senatorial class:

Alanus Teeus-- DEAD (definitely good)-- won service of horse owner
Ardentus Enthusiastus-- Won service if legionnaire
Chiefus Rumus
Daddyus Torgous
Grammus Atticus
Hoopus Guyus
Kayus Whitus
Narcizus Lispus
Neonus Chaosus
Saldanus Lathumus-- DEAD (unknown)
Swaggus Swaggus-- DEAD (definitely good)
Tyrus Ithus

From hoops, services gired below:

Services won for Day One

Day 1:
Gallus Clarus, ex-legionnaire (Ardent)
Titus Ludius, ex-legionnaire (Bullet)
Durus Pimpus, dealer in sexual slaves
Animus Sentus, person rumored to be affiliated with the Priesthood (Ironhead)
Furius Lucius, former warlord of Gaul, enslaved and now freed
Lexus Postus, owner of many horses (Alan)
Blakus Fortunatus, owner of many horses (Anxiety)
Swaggus Swaggus (Coffee)
Ardentus Enthusiastus (Dodgerchick)

*****

Some of this guesswork, but I don't think there is anything above we are assuming too much here. We know where most of the services went. We know wealth is how service hiring is determined. We're fairly certain the ex-warlord is the sword killer, seemingly confirmed now by Coffee Warlord, if we had a doubt. The only dead person we have a real doubt on for allegiance is saldana, and he was too low on the wealth totem pole at the beginning to be likely to win a service anyway.

Someone hired the warlord on Day One, someone who used that warlord to murder Swaggs. A Tarq. It had to be someone with enough wealth to outbid others. It would help us tons if we knew of anyone we can confirm as good as having bid on the warlord and failed on Day One. We can then eliminate everyone below that person as being the Day One sword killer patron (although certainly not as a Tarq).

The top tier is pretty clear. DC said she hired AE. No one has denied this. She hasn't said anything to my knowledge that hasn't checked out.

Bullet and ITC are both almost certainly good, and the only way they aren't is if ardent is bad. I think that's a stretch right now (that ardent is bad), because he would have had to be playing a brilliant game so far to get this far without more suspicion. Plus, Schmidty is guaranteed good (killed by Tarqs), and he confirmed bullet's goodness. Finally, ITC himself stated he didn't bid on any services on Day One (or Day Two or Day Three, way to go). So the sword killer patron is not in the top tier.

In the next tier, Coffee Warlod's hirng of Swaggs was confirmed by st. cronin. Schmidty, as mentioned, is confirmed good. Ironhead has a lot of evidence in his favor for being good, and everything he has said that could be has checked out. That leaves Marc Vaughan and LSG from this tier. LSG posted on Day One and not since. She may have put in an order for the killer and used it and then gone away (for whatever reason), but regardless, she is already under arrest. I think we should throw her off the rock anyway; this possibility she is the sword killer patron is only a further excuse to do it. MV hasn't posted at all, or maybe once, and now he has been replaced by Pass. Pass also stood in for him on Day One. It's possible Pass sent in a bid and kill order for MV. But if MV was a wolf, I believe, he would have been repalced sooner than four days in. My point is, I think LSG and MV are longshots to be the sword kilelr patron (but possible).

That puts us into the next group, and the group I think we need to make our primary focus as being where our sword killer patron is hiding. Anxiety claimed to hire horses and no one denied it. Did he send a message and someone confirmed? I forget. But I believe he hired the horse owner. SnDvls is confirmed good by death at the hands of the Tarqs. And WVU Fan was a consul and didn't do a thing and was replaced. I think it's unlikely he was the sword killer patron from Day One.

That leaves this group: Anthmeister, Autumn, Barkeep, Path12 and Peregrine.

Some of these guys have already been bandied about abit. Barkeep's unfortunate circumstance tonight certainly muddies his waters as well. We have a Tarq in this group, guys, at least one. I almost guarantee it. I think Alan T was extremely fortunate to nab a service in the tier lower than that. He got lucky with that. I doubt greatly the warlord fell past this group.

I have given five (plus Passacaglia if you think he could have put in a kill order for MV on Monday). I would welcome discussion of all five as potential Tarqs. Two of them should be the targets of our arrests. Two others should be the targets of our scans.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 04:07 AM

As other people have suggested I'd like everyone to nominate one person they would lynch today were this a standard game of werewolf. Some sort of explanation would be nice as well. :)

Chief Rum 04-13-2007 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441439)
Where are you from, Narcizo? :) You seem to be on at the same time that I am... and I'm pretty much half-way around the world from all these guys.


lol...what a group we late nighters (my time) are, huh? One guy in the Phillipines, one guy in Sweden, and then there's me, the night shift American deep deep in the wee morning hours.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:09 AM

I trust noone.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441449)
lol...what a group we late nighters (my time) are, huh? One guy in the Phillipines, one guy in Sweden, and then there's me, the night shift American deep deep in the wee morning hours.


We rock the thread when noone's watching. :cool:

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441448)
As other people have suggested I'd like everyone to nominate one person they would lynch today were this a standard game of werewolf. Some sort of explanation would be nice as well. :)


I'd lynch you.

But I'd go ahead and say I'd probably vote for hoopsguy or AE, going with my post-count theory.

Of course I could be wrong.

Chief Rum 04-13-2007 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441454)
I'd lynch you.

But I'd go ahead and say I'd probably vote for hoopsguy or AE, going with my post-count theory.

Of course I could be wrong.


Few people are actually on my trust list, but hoops and Narcizo are pretty close. ardent has a lot going for him, too. I don't know that arguing for lynching any of those guys works in your favor, certainly not with me.

Peregrine 04-13-2007 04:16 AM

I'm also a night shift person and am also here!

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441455)
Few people are actually on my trust list, but hoops and Narcizo are pretty close. ardent has a lot going for him, too. I don't know that arguing for lynching any of those guys works in your favor, certainly not with me.


:)

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441456)
I'm also a night shift person and am also here!


You stink. I blame you for starting all this Werewolf nonesense. :D

Chief Rum 04-13-2007 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441456)
I'm also a night shift person and am also here!


Woot! Night shift rules! :D

I am thinking of running a small WW game where the primary deadlines will be in the wee mornings--just for us night shift folks and people out of the country (and anyone from the daytime who doesn't mind being up in the middle of the night). I wonder if I could get ten people to sign up? :)

Peregrine 04-13-2007 04:26 AM

As for my suspicon, I have stated before (I think) that I did not bid for a service Day 1. I know that in itself is suspicious, but to be honest I hadn't really understood that part of the rules then and didn't bother with it. I did bid for a service (and lost) on Day 2, bid and won on day 3, bid and lost for tomorrow.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441447)
That leaves this group: Anthmeister, Autumn, Barkeep, Path12 and Peregrine.


Off the bat I'd put Antmeister, Barkeep and Peregrine among the ones I've got suspicious vibes off of. Autumn seems to be doing decent analysis and has come up with some good ideas while Path seems to be playing what I think is his usual game, he hasn't said a lot but what he has said has made sense to me. The way Antmeister has been pushing KWhit seems a bit hinky but then again I'm getting some strange vibes off of KWhit myself, I can't really put my finger on what's up with Barkeep but something isn't right while there was the whole business with Peregrine questioning the logic in arresting people on day one.

I do have a couple of concerns though and that's the fact that Alan and Ardent got services in the lower level. While you might expect to get lucky on the horses (arf!) the fact that the legionnaire also dropped gives me pause for thought. However that's no reason not to follow up on the above 5 first (6 if we include Pass, to be honest). Dunno if they've already said but I'd like to hear who the above people claim to have bid on.

Second I'd really like to follow up on Neon first. If Ardent can confirm him as good then I think that's a solid start. I don't believe Neon will be available to scan today, as no-one will have purchased his services.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441462)
Second I'd really like to follow up on Neon first. If Ardent can confirm him as good then I think that's a solid start. I don't believe Neon will be available to scan today, as no-one will have purchased his services.


:rolleyes:

Don't waste the scan on me. Seriously.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441455)
Few people are actually on my trust list, but hoops and Narcizo are pretty close. ardent has a lot going for him, too. I don't know that arguing for lynching any of those guys works in your favor, certainly not with me.


Hoops I agree with (standard disclaimer about him being a sneaky wolf). There's quite a bit bothering me about Ardent at the moment. I'm hoping Neon can be cleared today so that Ardent can cleared tomorrow.

I know I've been making some pretty sweeping generalisations about people I'm not trusting at the moment. I'm going to try and go through and form some sort of list about that.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441463)
:rolleyes:

Don't waste the scan on me. Seriously.


Ummmm.... Okay then.

Please, please, please someone scan Neon.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441465)
Ummmm.... Okay then.

Please, please, please someone scan Neon.


The Tarqs are probably loving this exchange. :cool:

Narcizo 04-13-2007 04:44 AM

Frankly this is getting bizarre. I've never heard of anyone being so opposed to being scanned.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441464)
Hoops I agree with (standard disclaimer about him being a sneaky wolf). There's quite a bit bothering me about Ardent at the moment. I'm hoping Neon can be cleared today so that Ardent can cleared tomorrow.

I know I've been making some pretty sweeping generalisations about people I'm not trusting at the moment. I'm going to try and go through and form some sort of list about that.


Hoops has always been a talkative wolf whenever I see him play.

Chief Rum 04-13-2007 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441464)
Hoops I agree with (standard disclaimer about him being a sneaky wolf). There's quite a bit bothering me about Ardent at the moment. I'm hoping Neon can be cleared today so that Ardent can cleared tomorrow.

I know I've been making some pretty sweeping generalisations about people I'm not trusting at the moment. I'm going to try and go through and form some sort of list about that.


I'm not 100% with ardent yet either, but I still lean toward him being good. I don't know that st. cronin even would have assigned any of the opening public roles to wolves anyway. So far, that has proved to be the case, with Schmidty and AlanT certainly good. We will likely discover saldana was good soon, too.

That's no guarantee on ardent (even if wolves were assigned these roles with the same odds as everyone else, the odds based on a traditional villager-to-wolf breakdown would only suggest one of the five was likely a Tarq). But it's something.

I think what concerns me the most there is that he continues to live while other lawyers dead. I suggested that as being a curious thing earlier in the game and something to watch for. Could it be he is a Tarq? Or could it be the wolves are using our own logic against us and leaving ardent alone for the very reason for us to suspect him?

Keep in mind, ardent said bullet was good without knowing Schmidty would get a confirming email. He might have played it cautiously, but I consider that a point in his favor. Ardent could have played immense havoc with things as a Tarq by saying bullet was a Tarq.

Anyway, food for thought. There are a lot of people, including ardent, I would like to see scanned.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441467)
Frankly this is getting bizarre. I've never heard of anyone being so opposed to being scanned.


A scan on me is a wasted scan. That's all I'm going to say. Jeez.

Peregrine 04-13-2007 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441462)
Off the bat I'd put Antmeister, Barkeep and Peregrine among the ones I've got suspicious vibes off of. Autumn seems to be doing decent analysis and has come up with some good ideas while Path seems to be playing what I think is his usual game, he hasn't said a lot but what he has said has made sense to me. The way Antmeister has been pushing KWhit seems a bit hinky but then again I'm getting some strange vibes off of KWhit myself, I can't really put my finger on what's up with Barkeep but something isn't right while there was the whole business with Peregrine questioning the logic in arresting people on day one.


Well I stand by what I said then, but that was Day 1, a lot has changed. At that point we didn't know that the bad guys could even kill people. I was just against the idea of an "automatic" Day 1 lynch with no information. But that's just me, even as a moderator I've always hated that Day 1 lynch. I hate to see someone removed, someone who is almost certainly (in a blind selection) innocent.

Chief Rum 04-13-2007 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441470)
A scan on me is a wasted scan. That's all I'm going to say. Jeez.


I disagree. If a scan clears you (or anyone), it's pretty darn useful, ya know. It's a bit odd you would not want to be cleared as a good guy. Sure, a scan of a Tarq would be better (if I make the assumption you are implying about yourself), but a known good guy is almost as good as a known bad guy.

All that said, I don't agree with Narcizo's lawyer scan plan for practical purposes. The fact is that continuously living lawyers are likely to be rare. We would need to bid and win the bodyguards every night to save the same two lawyers, whichw ould always leave open our consuls, the tribune and anyone else who has proven valuable to the Republic (such as the active wealthy like Dodgerchick).

So assuming we don't go to some drastic lawyer protection program, lawyers will continue to die. That means we would have to be continuously scanning new lawyers each day. This seems rather pointless to me.

I do think ardent should be scanned because of his continuing health despite being a high profile target. But I think Neon or any other new lawyer would need to survive a day or two before we start thinking about scanning him (at least for lawyer reasons alone--certainly if other suspicions come up regarding Neon or anyone, that might necessitate a scan).

Poli 04-13-2007 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441261)
I have to admit, I'm starting to get a bit suspicious why all the lawyers are getting killed, but AE continues to remain alive. Traitors protecting their own, perhaps.

That's probably exactly what they'd like for you to think as well.

Poli 04-13-2007 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441274)
It is a smidge early to go after people for still being alive (in my opinion), but I think it is critical that the person hiring Lawyer #2 (Neon) use them to scan Ardent.

QFT.

Poli 04-13-2007 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1441365)
AE validated Imus the crewus.

How does the lawyer thing work. Do they get a definate faction scan? At one point Dodgerus Erchicus stated she scanned Alanus with a lawyer, I believe AE and he said that he did not know the outcome. But now he knows the outcome of Imus. How does it work?

Got me. DC has now said she's used me as her lawyer twice now. Sadly, it's news to me.

While this game has been fun 90% of the time, part of this lawyer thing coupled with a WVUFan noshow/missed arrests make the game agitating. Now if it turns out that BK is a bad guy and that was the real reason we only had two arrests...and if turns out saldana and wvu/whoever took over for him (mustang?) are as well. At that point, I'd say bravo.

Poli 04-13-2007 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441427)

As for my lawyer role...

No pm about ITC being good or not, just the PM about the sex slaves being sent to me.

Really? Wow.

Poli 04-13-2007 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441469)
I'm not 100% with ardent yet either, but I still lean toward him being good. I don't know that st. cronin even would have assigned any of the opening public roles to wolves anyway. So far, that has proved to be the case, with Schmidty and AlanT certainly good. We will likely discover saldana was good soon, too.

That's no guarantee on ardent (even if wolves were assigned these roles with the same odds as everyone else, the odds based on a traditional villager-to-wolf breakdown would only suggest one of the five was likely a Tarq). But it's something.

I think what concerns me the most there is that he continues to live while other lawyers dead. I suggested that as being a curious thing earlier in the game and something to watch for. Could it be he is a Tarq? Or could it be the wolves are using our own logic against us and leaving ardent alone for the very reason for us to suspect him?

Keep in mind, ardent said bullet was good without knowing Schmidty would get a confirming email. He might have played it cautiously, but I consider that a point in his favor. Ardent could have played immense havoc with things as a Tarq by saying bullet was a Tarq.

Anyway, food for thought. There are a lot of people, including ardent, I would like to see scanned.

QFT.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441473)
I do think ardent should be scanned because of his continuing health despite being a high profile target. But I think Neon or any other new lawyer would need to survive a day or two before we start thinking about scanning him (at least for lawyer reasons alone--certainly if other suspicions come up regarding Neon or anyone, that might necessitate a scan).


bada-bing.

Poli 04-13-2007 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441473)
So assuming we don't go to some drastic lawyer protection program, lawyers will continue to die. That means we would have to be continuously scanning new lawyers each day. This seems rather pointless to me.

I do think ardent should be scanned because of his continuing health despite being a high profile target. But I think Neon or any other new lawyer would need to survive a day or two before we start thinking about scanning him (at least for lawyer reasons alone--certainly if other suspicions come up regarding Neon or anyone, that might necessitate a scan).

:eek: :(

Poli 04-13-2007 05:47 AM

That was intended for the lawyers dieing thing.

Chief Rum 04-13-2007 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1441484)
That was intended for the lawyers dieing thing.


Well, of course, I certainly don't want good lawyers to die. But you know there are a few people in this game who do.

Mustang 04-13-2007 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos (Post 1441470)
A scan on me is a wasted scan. That's all I'm going to say. Jeez.


We understood you the first time. Stop cluttering up the boards....


:p :D

Poli 04-13-2007 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441486)
Well, of course, I certainly don't want good lawyers to die. But you know there are a few people in this game who do.

True, and I appreciate your insight and comments through the night, CR. I know you don't fully trust me, but I do appreciate your effort to try and help us win.

Lorena 04-13-2007 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1441478)
Got me. DC has now said she's used me as her lawyer twice now. Sadly, it's news to me.


Damn straight, you're the best lawyer in town and you're mine AE... MINE! ;)

Alright, I'm not entirely sure where things stand right now but isn't it an odd coincidence that the day I send whores to Ironhead there's only 1 kill? If I remember correctly we've had 2 kills every night except that one... coincidence?

I'll be completely honest, I haven't read the entire thread just bits and pieces of it but this really stands out in my head... has he been scanned and cleared yet?

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mustang (Post 1441488)
We understood you the first time. Stop cluttering up the boards....


:p :D


Mustang, do you think Narcizo's a Tarq? He won't believe my innocence. :cool:

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 06:45 AM

Hey. It's hoops. Jump in whenever you like. :)

hoopsguy 04-13-2007 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441461)
As for my suspicon, I have stated before (I think) that I did not bid for a service Day 1. I know that in itself is suspicious, but to be honest I hadn't really understood that part of the rules then and didn't bother with it. I did bid for a service (and lost) on Day 2, bid and won on day 3, bid and lost for tomorrow.


What Day 3 service? The only one I have matched up there so far is Anxiety on Pimpus.

hoopsguy 04-13-2007 07:05 AM

Great, now that I'm caught up on the night developments I'm the only one in the thread.

I like Rum's thoughts on who got the killer on Day 1. As an add-on, I would suggest that once they bought the killer that day it would have been a priority for them on Day 3 when they once again successfully won the bid. So a look at the top of the wealth chain from that day makes sense as well.

Day 3 Wealthiest
Bulletus Spongeus (Dead, confirmed good)
Dodgus Erchickus
Imus Thecrewus (Dead, confirmed good)

The following Senators are known to be extremely wealthy (no change):
Coffeus Yakus Warlordus
Ironsus Headus
Lonestarus Girlus (in jail already)
Marcus Vaughnus (inactive)
Schmidtyus Schmidtyus (Dead, confirmed good)

I'm not convinced we drop down to the third level as Rum did on Day 1. I really think this would have been a priority service for the Tarqs so this is where I'm going to focus my conversation unless some other detail (attorney scans) emerges.

Dodgerchick
Day 1: attorney
Day 2: sex slaves
Day 3: ???

Warlord
Day 1: attorney
Day 2: jailed, no services
Day 3: ???

Ironhead
Day 1: priest
Day 2: killer
Day 3: ???

I know that I advocated earlier that I would rather make a mistake with a poor Roman than a wealthy Roman. But that was also when we were operating with less information. At this point in the game we have content to digest; we beleive we understand how many of the rules operate.

I'm certainly willing to listen to feedback from others, but right now my plan would be to arrest one of these people. With that in mind, I'll try to advertise my final selection early enough so someone with an attorney can use their "scan" on one of the people who will be spending the day in jail. That should allow us to make an informed release/kill decision - something we have not yet been able to do this game.

Passacaglia 04-13-2007 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441447)
Okay, here is the game opening wealth list. I have included notes on who is dead and who hired Day One services:

****

The wealthiest men in Rome are:

Bulletus Spongeus-- DEAD (vouched to be good by AE & Schmidty)-- Won service of legionnaire
Dodgus Erchickus-- won service of Ardent
Imus Thecrewus-- DEAD (vouched to be good by AE)--claimed to not bid on any services

The following Senators are known to be extremely wealthy:

Coffeus Yakus Warlordus-- won service of Swaggs
Ironsus Headus-- won service of priests
Lonestarus Girlus-- not too active
Marcus Vaughnus (replaced by Passacaglia)-- not too active
Schmidtyus Schmidtyus-- DEAD (definitely good)

The following Senators are known to be moderately wealthy:

Abeus Anxietus-- won service of horse owner
Antus Meisterus
Autumnus Leavus
Barkeepus Valerius Fortynineus
Pathus Twelveus
Peregrinus Barbarus
Snus Dvlus-- DEAD (definitely good)
Westvus Fanus (replaced by Mustang)

The following (remaining) Senators are of ordinary wealth for the Senatorial class:

Alanus Teeus-- DEAD (definitely good)-- won service of horse owner
Ardentus Enthusiastus-- Won service if legionnaire
Chiefus Rumus
Daddyus Torgous
Grammus Atticus
Hoopus Guyus
Kayus Whitus
Narcizus Lispus
Neonus Chaosus
Saldanus Lathumus-- DEAD (unknown)
Swaggus Swaggus-- DEAD (definitely good)
Tyrus Ithus

From hoops, services gired below:

Services won for Day One

Day 1:
Gallus Clarus, ex-legionnaire (Ardent)
Titus Ludius, ex-legionnaire (Bullet)
Durus Pimpus, dealer in sexual slaves
Animus Sentus, person rumored to be affiliated with the Priesthood (Ironhead)
Furius Lucius, former warlord of Gaul, enslaved and now freed
Lexus Postus, owner of many horses (Alan)
Blakus Fortunatus, owner of many horses (Anxiety)
Swaggus Swaggus (Coffee)
Ardentus Enthusiastus (Dodgerchick)

*****

Some of this guesswork, but I don't think there is anything above we are assuming too much here. We know where most of the services went. We know wealth is how service hiring is determined. We're fairly certain the ex-warlord is the sword killer, seemingly confirmed now by Coffee Warlord, if we had a doubt. The only dead person we have a real doubt on for allegiance is saldana, and he was too low on the wealth totem pole at the beginning to be likely to win a service anyway.

Someone hired the warlord on Day One, someone who used that warlord to murder Swaggs. A Tarq. It had to be someone with enough wealth to outbid others. It would help us tons if we knew of anyone we can confirm as good as having bid on the warlord and failed on Day One. We can then eliminate everyone below that person as being the Day One sword killer patron (although certainly not as a Tarq).

The top tier is pretty clear. DC said she hired AE. No one has denied this. She hasn't said anything to my knowledge that hasn't checked out.

Bullet and ITC are both almost certainly good, and the only way they aren't is if ardent is bad. I think that's a stretch right now (that ardent is bad), because he would have had to be playing a brilliant game so far to get this far without more suspicion. Plus, Schmidty is guaranteed good (killed by Tarqs), and he confirmed bullet's goodness. Finally, ITC himself stated he didn't bid on any services on Day One (or Day Two or Day Three, way to go). So the sword killer patron is not in the top tier.

In the next tier, Coffee Warlod's hirng of Swaggs was confirmed by st. cronin. Schmidty, as mentioned, is confirmed good. Ironhead has a lot of evidence in his favor for being good, and everything he has said that could be has checked out. That leaves Marc Vaughan and LSG from this tier. LSG posted on Day One and not since. She may have put in an order for the killer and used it and then gone away (for whatever reason), but regardless, she is already under arrest. I think we should throw her off the rock anyway; this possibility she is the sword killer patron is only a further excuse to do it. MV hasn't posted at all, or maybe once, and now he has been replaced by Pass. Pass also stood in for him on Day One. It's possible Pass sent in a bid and kill order for MV. But if MV was a wolf, I believe, he would have been repalced sooner than four days in. My point is, I think LSG and MV are longshots to be the sword kilelr patron (but possible).

That puts us into the next group, and the group I think we need to make our primary focus as being where our sword killer patron is hiding. Anxiety claimed to hire horses and no one denied it. Did he send a message and someone confirmed? I forget. But I believe he hired the horse owner. SnDvls is confirmed good by death at the hands of the Tarqs. And WVU Fan was a consul and didn't do a thing and was replaced. I think it's unlikely he was the sword killer patron from Day One.

That leaves this group: Anthmeister, Autumn, Barkeep, Path12 and Peregrine.

Some of these guys have already been bandied about abit. Barkeep's unfortunate circumstance tonight certainly muddies his waters as well. We have a Tarq in this group, guys, at least one. I almost guarantee it. I think Alan T was extremely fortunate to nab a service in the tier lower than that. He got lucky with that. I doubt greatly the warlord fell past this group.

I have given five (plus Passacaglia if you think he could have put in a kill order for MV on Monday). I would welcome discussion of all five as potential Tarqs. Two of them should be the targets of our arrests. Two others should be the targets of our scans.



Haven't read anything after this, but -- did anyone even die after Day 1? In other words, I didn't put in a kill order.

hoopsguy 04-13-2007 07:22 AM

Also, I realize I'm giving Passacaglia a walk on the Day 3 analysis. If people think that Marc Vaughn was not posting but sent in an order then please voice that opinion as well.

Peregrine 04-13-2007 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441501)
What Day 3 service? The only one I have matched up there so far is Anxiety on Pimpus.


I hired Animus Sentus on Day 3.

hoopsguy 04-13-2007 07:50 AM

Dodgerchick, why did you choose to scan Autumn with your attorney yesterday? Was he someone high on your distrust list?

Passacaglia 04-13-2007 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 1441513)
Haven't read anything after this, but -- did anyone even die after Day 1? In other words, I didn't put in a kill order.


Just had a thought on my way to work -- even if no one died after Day 1, I think someone was poisoned after Day 2, so we can't discount the fact that a kill order was made on Day 1. I didn't order one, though.

Passacaglia 04-13-2007 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441516)
Also, I realize I'm giving Passacaglia a walk on the Day 3 analysis. If people think that Marc Vaughn was not posting but sent in an order then please voice that opinion as well.


Thanks..I think. I think the most likely scenario is that MV wasn't doing anything -- otherwise why replace him? If that's too much of a meta-game thing, then I take it back.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:13 AM

I can't recall, did we get consul vote results yesterday?

Passacaglia 04-13-2007 08:13 AM

Also, as I said before, I was told that "I" didn't purchase any services while I was Marc Vaughan, so "I" wasn't doing anything on that front. As for kills, I wasn't told that I made any -- probably since it's assumed that loyal Senators don't kill people! :)

KWhit 04-13-2007 08:15 AM

Nice late night analysis, Chief Rum. I tend to agree with you that there is a Tarq from this group: Antmeister, Autumn, Barkeep, Path12 and Peregrine.

I have a pretty good vibe about Autumn. He's had some good insights and seems to be a good guy. I think he's on the up-and-up. I'm not confident enough in that to claim him to be trusted or anything like that, but I feel that it is unlikely for him to be a Tarq.

I have neutral feelings about Path, BK, and Peregrine. Could be good - could be bad.

But Antmeister? I get bad vibes from him. Primarily because of how hard he came after me after the arrest snafu the other night. It seemed that he started to casually try to cast suspicion my way, and when no one took the bait, he became more and more accusatory. I know it's human nature to get defensive when someone comes after you, and maybe that's part of what I'm feeling, but I just feel like he was trying to make me look bad for a reason - I'm very active, was a Consul at the time, have a lot of wealth, and seem to be able to get more wealth pretty much at will. He seemed to want to take advantage of the arrest issue to try to take me down and that gives me a bad feeling about him.

So for right now, I would arrest Antmeister.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:22 AM

Personally, I would arrest path12, and after kwhit's thought process of antmeister, I might arrest antmeister as well.

I sent the horses to someone suggesting I would select barkeep, but I'd relent given his response that he doesn't fake real life obstacles.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:25 AM

Ardent Enthusiast sues Anxiety for being rich.
Ardent Enthusiast sues Dodger Chick for not paying me.
Ardent Enthusiast sues Kwhit because the third time's the charm (though I don't recall suing him two times before, just once).

Barkeep49 04-13-2007 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith (Post 1441387)
For the record, I sent my day 2 horse message to BK, who was apparently prevented from sending a reply because of his RL problem. GRR.

For the record I received no day message from Tyrith or from cronin for Tyrith.

KWhit 04-13-2007 08:27 AM

Interesting...

st.cronin 04-13-2007 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 1441366)
Yeah, there was a mistake in communication, not on my part. I tried to correct it immediately, but was unable to. So I have no freaking idea what happened.



This is correct. I made a data entry error, and Pass's bid was entered in the wrong place. I didn't discover this until after pms had gone out, and at that time decided to leave it as is. Whenever I have to make a decision like this, I consider whether it is fair to all parties, and in this case I think it was.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49 (Post 1441553)
For the record I received no day message from Tyrith or from cronin for Tyrith.

This does stir the pot.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1441469)
Keep in mind, ardent said bullet was good without knowing Schmidty would get a confirming email. He might have played it cautiously, but I consider that a point in his favor. Ardent could have played immense havoc with things as a Tarq by saying bullet was a Tarq.

Anyway, food for thought. There are a lot of people, including ardent, I would like to see scanned.


To explain why I've got a bad feeling about Ardent - I keep coming back to the kill on Swaggs on day two before the real importance of lawyers was (widely?) known. At the time my thoughts were that the pimps or the priest would be providing seer-like services, certainly not the lawyers. It now turns out that lawyers are very important/crucial in the game (a seer-role who can also read allegiance when someone dies). If Ardent were bad might he not presume that the top lawyer in Rome is always going to supercede him and, potentially, expose him. Or that Ardent potentially was given more information about his role then Swaggs got. There's also his, well, post-boosting, for want of a better word. He's posted an awful lot but has he actually said anything of note? With regards to bullet I don't see it as a huge mark in his favour. He might also be aware that lawyers get info about the killed person and suspect that the replacement lawyer would also get the info. I think it would be pretty risky for him to say that bullet was a bad guy.

So basically that's why I'm not very trusting of Ardent at the moment. On the other hand I think we can remove the question of his continued survival having any meaning beyond this point. It's likely that the bad guys will let him live from now on to increase suspicion of him. So me pointing that out might cost him his life. Sorry if that's the case.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1441549)
Personally, I would arrest path12, and after kwhit's thought process of antmeister, I might arrest antmeister as well.

I sent the horses to someone suggesting I would select barkeep, but I'd relent given his response that he doesn't fake real life obstacles.


Why would you arrest path?

And I'm afraid I don't really understand what you're saying about the horses. Probably just me being stupid though.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:33 AM

Not really, Narc. I actually just assumed when bullet died that he had somehow hired me...that I was looking after his will or something. I did not, in fact, expect to have someone come in and authenticate my announcement.

Passacaglia 04-13-2007 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1441556)
This is correct. I made a data entry error, and Pass's bid was entered in the wrong place. I didn't discover this until after pms had gone out, and at that time decided to leave it as is. Whenever I have to make a decision like this, I consider whether it is fair to all parties, and in this case I think it was.


Thanks for getting my back.

Anyway, my vote for who to arrest would be Neon Chaos. I don't see why we shouldn't scan both lawyers, to make sure they're on the up-and up, especially the one that doesn't want to be scanned.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:38 AM

Narc, as for why path: Here's better than just a 38 post guy. At least, my memory tells me he is. I can't recall reading anything he's posted, honestly. I could see path setting up the game as it has gone so far...I could see a number of players doing so, honestly. But Path has been quiet and I'd like to hear more from him.

The horse guy is who I bid on, and won, yesterday...meaning I can communicate with one person today. It's not entirely useful, but I'm sure the person reading the message understands it.

KWhit 04-13-2007 08:38 AM

I am also suspicious of Ardent and Neon and would have no problems if one of them were arrested as well.

Coffee Warlord 04-13-2007 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441508)
Warlord
Day 1: attorney
Day 2: jailed, no services
Day 3: ???


Day 3 was Furius, I bid on Schmidty last night, and we all know how that went.

st.cronin 04-13-2007 08:39 AM

Note for the Consuls: You may not issue arrest warrants for a Consul or Tribune. The Consuls are Hoopus Guyus and Narcizus Lispus. The Tribune is Antus Meisterus.

Passacaglia 04-13-2007 08:40 AM

Can lawyers do their job while in jail?

st.cronin 04-13-2007 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 1441568)
Can lawyers do their job while in jail?


There is one way to find out.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441564)
I am also suspicious of Ardent and Neon and would have no problems if one of them were arrested as well.

By all means, have me arrested. I'm not scared. I'm one of the good guys.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1441569)
There is one way to find out.

Can I defend myself?

Poli 04-13-2007 08:43 AM

Can I volunteer for jail?

Poli 04-13-2007 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1441566)
Note for the Consuls: You may not issue arrest warrants for a Consul or Tribune. The Consuls are Hoopus Guyus and Narcizus Lispus. The Tribune is Antus Meisterus.

Well, there goes that.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:45 AM

I know hoops is a consul, who got the other spot?

Passacaglia 04-13-2007 08:45 AM

Dude, look at the post you just quoted.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:46 AM

Doh. :) Wasn't thinking about the consuls when I quoted, actually breezed right by it. I went to the name antmeister...and realized that we couldn't jail him.

Narc, by all means, jail me. Let's roll those dice.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 08:47 AM

:D

Poli 04-13-2007 08:47 AM

Seriously, let's have at it.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1441573)
Can I defend myself?


Same question here. I'm loyal to the Senate, but when it comes to blows, I'm looking to stay alive.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 08:48 AM

I don't want to jail you Ardent. I want the lawyers out there doing some good. If I was going to jail a lawyer it would be Neon who isn't going to provide anything today anyway.

Barkeep49 04-13-2007 08:49 AM

I'm really struggling with why Tyrith would lie about sending me a message. Really struggling.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:49 AM

Actually, Neon, I meant in court. Can I defend myself in court. Not sure if that's how it came across.

Poli 04-13-2007 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49 (Post 1441588)
I'm really struggling with why Tyrith would lie about sending me a message. Really struggling.

Miscommunication?

Passacaglia 04-13-2007 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1441585)
Seriously, let's have at it.


Watch out, Narc. When AE gets his masochism going, he'll hound you for your entire term as Consul, until you throw him in jail. ;)

Poli 04-13-2007 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcizo (Post 1441587)
I don't want to jail you Ardent. I want the lawyers out there doing some good. If I was going to jail a lawyer it would be Neon who isn't going to provide anything today anyway.

So be it. I won't be opposed to going, if that's what needs to happen.

I'm not sure how me going to jail proves that I'm guilty or innocent, but if it's what the masses want, it's what the masses get.

Passacaglia 04-13-2007 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardent enthusiast (Post 1441590)
Miscommunication?


It's possible. It wouldn't be the only time it happened that night.

Mustang 04-13-2007 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441526)
Dodgerchick, why did you choose to scan Autumn with your attorney yesterday? Was he someone high on your distrust list?


Where did I miss this information?

What was the result of the scan (post # possibly)

Poli 04-13-2007 08:52 AM

Ardentus Enthusiastus has decided to sue everyone...in hopes that me being the lawyer that I am that perhaps I can get more information from the suing of people.

Coffeeus Yakus Warlordus
Ironus Headus
Passus Caglius
Pathus Twelvus
Peregrineus Barbarus
Barkeepus Valerius Fortynineus
Autumnus Leavus
Antus Meisterus
Chiefus Rumus
Narcizus Lispus
Lonestarus Girlus
Daddyus Torgous
Grammus Atticus
Hoopus Guyus
Mustangus Sallus
Neonus Chaosus
Tyrus Ithus

KWhit 04-13-2007 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1441169)
One last note: I do not have the list of suits that will be heard on day V ready yet. I will put that up in the morning. Apologies for the inconvenience.


Did you ever post this?

Poli 04-13-2007 08:53 AM

Note: of the suits I've filed so far, I haven't had any information. Just trying this out for size.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.