Front Office Football Central - The thread for images so cool that they belong in this thread

Page 16 of 421

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)

- Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)

- - The thread for images so cool that they belong in this thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=60049)

Blade6119

02-28-2008 06:01 PM

Blade6119

02-28-2008 06:04 PM

Schmidty

02-28-2008 06:06 PM

Ha. I like that one.

daedalus

02-29-2008 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119 (Post 1671723)

yeah, put that bitch on trail . . . what the . . .

Neon_Chaos

02-29-2008 03:22 AM

Noop	03-01-2008 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119 (Post 1671735)

illinifan999

03-01-2008 09:12 PM

Sublime 2

03-01-2008 09:34 PM

sterlingice

03-01-2008 09:42 PM

105 days? Isn't that a bit excessive?

SI

mckerney

03-01-2008 10:01 PM

Toddzilla

03-02-2008 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1673433)

105 days? Isn't that a bit excessive?

SI

That form, just like the other ones we've seen, the crazy essays, math tests, etc. are all fakes.

Radii

03-04-2008 03:09 AM

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/7319/40002883sm9.jpg

Pumpy Tudors

03-05-2008 09:36 AM

thesloppy

03-05-2008 02:54 PM

I read about a chinese zoo that featured the horse-riding lion, and I think it's also the same joint responsible for the monkey-handstand-on-a-tightrope-walking-goat:

LoneStarGirl

03-05-2008 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodgerchick (Post 1610654)

awww thats from my hometown.

Blade6119

03-06-2008 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1673433)

105 days? Isn't that a bit excessive?

SI

From the previous action taken section, id assume this is not a first offense. As such, im guessing the crime itself wasn't the reason for the 105 days but more likely the fact that it was a 2nd or 3rd offense.

Blade6119

03-06-2008 01:48 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 01:49 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 01:51 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 01:52 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 01:54 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 01:59 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 02:02 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 02:04 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 02:12 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 02:14 PM

Passacaglia

03-06-2008 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119 (Post 1677468)

Is that from America's Funniest Home Videos or something?

Blade6119

03-06-2008 03:21 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 03:23 PM

Blade6119

03-06-2008 03:27 PM

B & B

03-07-2008 11:32 AM

DanGarion

03-07-2008 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119 (Post 1677416)

Let me get this straight, it's perfectly fine to post pictures of guys beating up on fake guys, but it's not fine to post pictures of guys beating up on fake women? WTF? Why is this different?

Noop	03-07-2008 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dangarion (Post 1678319)

Let me get this straight, it's perfectly fine to post pictures of guys beating up on fake guys, but it's not fine to post pictures of guys beating up on fake women? WTF? Why is this different?

I don't understand it either.

Noop	03-07-2008 12:40 PM

Before he became a junkie.

Sidhe

03-07-2008 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 1678324)

Originally Posted by dangarion View Post
Let me get this straight, it's perfectly fine to post pictures of guys beating up on fake guys, but it's not fine to post pictures of guys beating up on fake women? WTF? Why is this different?

--

I don't understand it either.

Because it's OK to beat up guys, duh.

Blade6119

03-08-2008 05:15 PM