Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Werewolf Games (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Werewolf XLV - ROME! (Game over, post 3425) (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=58090)

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441198)
If the sex slaves can stop a Consul from arresting someone then we are really screwed. I mean, I'm pretty sure there's no way we can win anyway, but that would really clinch it.


They stop an action. I would be surprised if it couldn't stop a consul arrest.

Passacaglia 04-12-2007 09:03 PM

Dear Senators, I have more grave news. I was unable to procure the services of Macro Gothicus.

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 09:04 PM

OK, so lets try and work through how the hiring of the killer would work.

Day 1 - we see a list of services, including Furius Lucius
Day 2 - whoever won Furius deploys him. But the bad guys allow Macro Gothicus to fall to Ironhead, when there are multiple wealthier people ahead of him (Bullet and Crew were good, DC and Pass/MV were ahead of him as well, possibly others)
Day 3 - bad guys win the bid fof Furius again, based on results
Day 4 - we try to coordinate who gets Macro, bad guys release Furius again.

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 1441215)
Dear Senators, I have more grave news. I was unable to procure the services of Macro Gothicus.


The only person who could beat you for that bid would be DC. Crew was not allowed to procure services from prison and you three were at the top of the food chain.

Passacaglia 04-12-2007 09:06 PM

As I promised, I went out in search of the man I was told was named Furio, but was actually named Macro. I hired him on the spot, but upon returning to my office, he informed me that his name was actually Maximus Maximus, and that he was a bodyguard.

My intent truly was to hire Macro Gothicus, and I am sure I called him Macro Gothicus by name in my correspondence with him. It was not until the contract had been signed that he revealed his true identity. I am sorry I let down the Republic by being duped in such a manner.

Poli 04-12-2007 09:06 PM

My message has been sent.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 1441220)
As I promised, I went out in search of the man I was told was named Furio, but was actually named Macro. I hired him on the spot, but upon returning to my office, he informed me that his name was actually Maximus Maximus, and that he was a bodyguard.

My intent truly was to hire Macro Gothicus, and I am sure I called him Macro Gothicus by name in my correspondence with him. It was not until the contract had been signed that he revealed his true identity. I am sorry I let down the Republic by being duped in such a manner.


Huh?

Peregrine 04-12-2007 09:10 PM

So we'll have to hear from Barkeep to be sure, but if he was sex slaved, then who are the traitors protecting? The last list Barkeep made was LSG (already arrested), myself (loyal) and Antmeister.

Passacaglia 04-12-2007 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441219)
The only person who could beat you for that bid would be DC. Crew was not allowed to procure services from prison and you three were at the top of the food chain.


I can't guarantee that DC beat me, as I ended up with Maximus Maximus. :eek:

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 09:13 PM

Well, the answer to who got Macro will come into play tomorrow, not with the results we just saw.

Abe Sargent 04-12-2007 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441196)
So Ironhead had the sex slaves sent to him on day 3? Meaning they were back in play today, right? So someone could have sent them to BK????

Can anyone vouch for them? Who won them yesterday?


As I mentioned earlier, I won them. I did not send them to Bk, that'd be silly.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anxiety (Post 1441237)
As I mentioned earlier, I won them. I did not send them to Bk, that'd be silly.



I didn't remember who said they had them. So you had the sex slaves last night/today? Did you send them to somebody?

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 09:16 PM

Updated lawsuit results (current):

AlanT (5-0) over KWhit, Hoops, Rum, Barkeep, and ITC
KWhit (14-1) loss to Alan, wins over WVU, Saldana, Swaggs, AE, Bullet, SnDvls, Rum, DT, Hoops, Narc, Neon, Tyrith, Ardent, Anxiety
Anxiety (6-1) loss to KWhit. Wins over Neon, DT, LSG, MV, Schmidty twice
Saldana (6-1) loss to KWhit, wins over Autumn, Barkeep, Rum, CW twice, and Ant
Narcizo (3-1) loss to KWhit, wins over Peregrine, LSG, and DT
Peregrine (3-1) loss to Narcizo, wins over Path, Neon, and LSG
Path (2-1) loss to Peregrine, wins over Neon and Ant
Gramm (2-1) loss to Autumn, wins over Mustang and Pass
Hoops (3-2) losses to Alan and KWhit, wins over Autumn, BK, and DT
Autumn (3-2) loss to Saldana and Hoops, wins over WVU, Gramm, and Neon
Bullet (1-1) loss to KWhit, win over ITC
AE (2-2) loss to KWhit twice, win over Swaggs and CW
CW (2-3) loss to Ardent and Saldana twice, wins over Iron and DC
Barkeep (2-3) lost to Saldana, KWhit,and Hoops. Wins over Neon twice
Crew (1-2) losses to Bullet and AlanT, win over DC
Rum (1-3) losses to Alan, KWhit, and Saldana. wins over LSG
Neon (2-7) losses to Barkeep twice, Autumn, Path, Peregrine, win over Ant twice
DT (1-4) lost to Anxiety, KWhit, Narcizo, and Hoops. Win over WVU
Ant (1-4) lost to Neon twice, Path, and Saldana. Win over Schmidty
Iron (0-1) loss to CW
SnDvls (0-1) loss to KWhit
Tyrith (0-1) loss to KWhit
Swaggs (0-2) loss to KWhit and AE
DC (0-2) lost to ITC and CW
Pass (0-2) lost to Anxiety and Gramm
Schmidty (0-3) loss to Anxiety twice and Ant
LSG (0-4) lost to Rum, Narcizo, Peregrine, and Anxiety
WVU/Mustang (0-4) loss to Autumn, DT, KWhit, Gramm

Abe Sargent 04-12-2007 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441219)
The only person who could beat you for that bid would be DC. Crew was not allowed to procure services from prison and you three were at the top of the food chain.


That depends on if money changes before bids are done. Has stcronin posted that? He got knocked down hard today.

path12 04-12-2007 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1441129)
The following Senators have been murdered:

Saldanus Lathumus, by sword
Schmidtyus Schmidtyus, by poison


Crap. I was trying to hire him.

Lorena 04-12-2007 09:19 PM

Alright I just woke up so I'm gonna post what I got by PM. I acquired the services of Ardent for Day IV and I had him check Autumn... he's in the clear no evidence of wrongdoing.

Now I gotta get ready for work... cya'll later.

Antmeister 04-12-2007 09:19 PM

Man....something is way off. KWhit, you are totally defending BK and I am not 100% sure which person sent the vote. Anxiety clearly states that he acquired the sex slaves and didn't use them on BK. Do I trust Anxiety, KWhit, or BK? Who is BSing us?

Abe Sargent 04-12-2007 09:19 PM

As one of the new wealthiest, do you folks think I should make a play for Furius today? Or should I try to lock up one of teh better roles that aren't as contentious?

Abe Sargent 04-12-2007 09:21 PM

I want to hear from BK first. What happened buddy?

Autumn 04-12-2007 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anxiety (Post 1441240)
That depends on if money changes before bids are done. Has stcronin posted that? He got knocked down hard today.


That will be vital to know. Hopefully st.cronin will give us that info.

So far, it seems like either Barkeepus or Abeus Anxietus is a traitor. I'll be waiting to hear Barkeepus' defense.

I don't understand what you are saying Pascalligus. Do you think a mistake was made in your PMs with St.Cronin?

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anxiety (Post 1441240)
That depends on if money changes before bids are done. Has stcronin posted that? He got knocked down hard today.


Anxiety, how did you come into such great wealth? You jumped two levels, which is more rapid than when KWhit was winning 5+ suits a day.

Poli 04-12-2007 09:24 PM

Oh, shoot. BK is here. This should be good.

Abe Sargent 04-12-2007 09:24 PM

Maybe it was the people I beat?

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antmeister (Post 1441244)
Man....something is way off. KWhit, you are totally defending BK and I am not 100% sure which person sent the vote. Anxiety clearly states that he acquired the sex slaves and didn't use them on BK. Do I trust Anxiety, KWhit, or BK? Who is BSing us?



:rolleyes:


I am trying to figure out what happened. I'm not defending anybody - especially BK after he ripped me a new on last night when my conditional arrest didn't go through. If it turns out that he screwed up and didn't get an order in, then his ass is grass.

And why in the WORLD would you think I didn't make the arrest? I posted this WELL before BK started discussing who he would vote for:

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1440808)
This is for Barkeep:

I'm going to arrest LoneStarGirlus.


:D



Just having a little fun.



And then LSG is the one who was arrested! Why would you even consider that I didn't make the arrest like I said I would. It makes no sense!

Autumn 04-12-2007 09:25 PM

I'm glad to be in the clear, Dodgerus Chickus, but I don't know if it's been wise for you to use your wealth on the lawyers and sex slaves while we're getting murdered.

Abe Sargent 04-12-2007 09:25 PM

My guess is I was nearly at the top of that level, and then the combination of multiple victories today turned out really well for me.

Poli 04-12-2007 09:26 PM

Alas, it's time for me to retire to chambers. G'night.

Autumn 04-12-2007 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441248)
Anxiety, how did you come into such great wealth? You jumped two levels, which is more rapid than when KWhit was winning 5+ suits a day.


It seems bizarre to me too. It could be a quirk of the numbers.

Barkeep49 04-12-2007 09:29 PM

I apologize. I was at work at the library and the internet was basically down and I was prevented from sending in any sort of order.

Peregrine 04-12-2007 09:29 PM

I have to admit, I'm starting to get a bit suspicious why all the lawyers are getting killed, but AE continues to remain alive. Traitors protecting their own, perhaps.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49 (Post 1441260)
I apologize. I was at work at the library and the internet was basically down and I was prevented from sending in any sort of order.


That's too bad.

:rolleyes:

Mustang 04-12-2007 09:31 PM

If Barkeep is a tarq, (or anyone for that matter), what is the benefit in NOT arresting someone? The only thing I can think of is that LSG is not a Tarq, he knows that and so he would not bother with an arrest but, that seems like a horrible move. :confused:

Autumn 04-12-2007 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441252)
And why in the WORLD would you think I didn't make the arrest? I posted this WELL before BK started discussing who he would vote for:


As I said before the results of the execution, I had the impression Antus knew ITC was innocent, and is trying to set up some other loyal members to look bad. This seems more of the same. This suggests to me that Antus and perhaps Barkeepus both are traitors. I'd be glad to see evidence that proves me wrong.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441261)
I have to admit, I'm starting to get a bit suspicious why all the lawyers are getting killed, but AE continues to remain alive. Traitors protecting their own, perhaps.



I noticed the same thing. Don't know if it means anything. But it's something to keep an eye on.

Coffee Warlord 04-12-2007 09:32 PM

Well kids, I screwed up.

Yes. I had the sword last night, and used it on Saldana. It was a calculated risk that, well, failed miserably. From the beginning, I frankly thought there was a chance that the Tarqs might start with one position of power, and Tribune was the only position that none of us could challenge. Add to that the fact that Saldana was posting very sparingly, and I had a suspicion in the back of my head that he could be bad.

So...yesterday I bid on the murdered, and had him executed. I took a shot on a gut feeling, and blew it. May have screwed us royally, and if so, my apologies.

If you wanna gut me, go ahead. Still not a traitor, though I freely admit I done messed up on that one.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441266)
As I said before the results of the execution, I had the impression Antus knew ITC was innocent, and is trying to set up some other loyal members to look bad. This seems more of the same. This suggests to me that Antus and perhaps Barkeepus both are traitors. I'd be glad to see evidence that proves me wrong.



I agree about Ant. He either is not listening, not thinking, or is a Tarquin. Neither one of those is particularly helpful.

Barkeep49 04-12-2007 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441264)
That's too bad.

:rolleyes:

See the WW ethics thread. I never lie about RL availability and have a long history of stating how I'm at work on Thursday nights.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord (Post 1441269)
Well kids, I screwed up.

Yes. I had the sword last night, and used it on Saldana. It was a calculated risk that, well, failed miserably. From the beginning, I frankly thought there was a chance that the Tarqs might start with one position of power, and Tribune was the only position that none of us could challenge. Add to that the fact that Saldana was posting very sparingly, and I had a suspicion in the back of my head that he could be bad.

So...yesterday I bid on the murdered, and had him executed. I took a shot on a gut feeling, and blew it. May have screwed us royally, and if so, my apologies.

If you wanna gut me, go ahead. Still not a traitor, though I freely admit I done messed up on that one.



Do we KNOW that Saldana was loyal? Did I miss something?

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 09:33 PM

It is a smidge early to go after people for still being alive (in my opinion), but I think it is critical that the person hiring Lawyer #2 (Neon) use them to scan Ardent.

Coffee Warlord 04-12-2007 09:33 PM

I didn't see any notice that he WASN'T, so I assume the worst. Believe me, I'd be quite relieved if my gamble paid off.

Autumn 04-12-2007 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mustang (Post 1441265)
If Barkeep is a tarq, (or anyone for that matter), what is the benefit in NOT arresting someone? The only thing I can think of is that LSG is not a Tarq, he knows that and so he would not bother with an arrest but, that seems like a horrible move. :confused:


Well that seems like a great move, actually. As has been mentioned, wtih two candidates there's a chance of a split vote and no execution. So far we've shown willingness to jump on a bandwagon and kill a quiet Senator regardless of the lack of negative evidence. If Barkeepus was a traitor, and saw Kayus Whitus' arrest plan, it would be smart for him to not arrest.

Except for the fact that everybody's going to be hihgly dubious of any excuse he uses, and likely to label him a traitor.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49 (Post 1441271)
See the WW ethics thread. I never lie about RL availability and have a long history of stating how I'm at work on Thursday nights.



I'm not accusing you of lying. I'm just pissed off that you blasted me last night about this and then tonight you screw the pooch.

That's all.

:)

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord (Post 1441269)

So...yesterday I bid on the murdered, and had him executed. I took a shot on a gut feeling, and blew it. May have screwed us royally, and if so, my apologies.

If you wanna gut me, go ahead. Still not a traitor, though I freely admit I done messed up on that one.


Didn't learn your lesson from my Necromancer game, eh?

Although have we got anything that 100% validates that the "senators" are not Tarqs? I'm certainly working under that assumption. Did your PM make it absolutely clear that you murdered a Roman and not a Tarq?

Barkeep49 04-12-2007 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441278)
I'm not accusing you of lying. I'm just pissed off that you blasted me last night about this and then tonight you screw the pooch.

That's all.

:)

Fair enough.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441277)
Well that seems like a great move, actually. As has been mentioned, wtih two candidates there's a chance of a split vote and no execution. So far we've shown willingness to jump on a bandwagon and kill a quiet Senator regardless of the lack of negative evidence. If Barkeepus was a traitor, and saw Kayus Whitus' arrest plan, it would be smart for him to not arrest.

Except for the fact that everybody's going to be hihgly dubious of any excuse he uses, and likely to label him a traitor.


I don't know. Everybody gave me so much crap last night (BK included), that I don't think it makes sense for a Tarq consul to use this as a ploy. A much better strategy is just to arrest a good guy, IMO.

Now, I'm pretty ticked off about the whole thing and wouldn't mind throwing off the cliff just because, but I don't think his non-arrest makes him any more likely to be a Tarq.

Autumn 04-12-2007 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord (Post 1441269)
Well kids, I screwed up.

Yes. I had the sword last night, and used it on Saldana. It was a calculated risk that, well, failed miserably. From the beginning, I frankly thought there was a chance that the Tarqs might start with one position of power, and Tribune was the only position that none of us could challenge. Add to that the fact that Saldana was posting very sparingly, and I had a suspicion in the back of my head that he could be bad.

So...yesterday I bid on the murdered, and had him executed. I took a shot on a gut feeling, and blew it. May have screwed us royally, and if so, my apologies.

If you wanna gut me, go ahead. Still not a traitor, though I freely admit I done messed up on that one.


Wow, that was a rather bold move, and I definitely woudln't have singled Saldanus out myself. I'm tempted to give you the benefit of the doubt based on my previous trust of you. But I think it likely we'll never find out Saldana's loyalty, and now we have to worry about you.

I'd like to make a point that we now know that Balbus Senna can convert a Senator, correct? So we have to factor conversions into our trust equations. We know one night he was used by Schmidty on Hoops, mistakenly. I believe hew as also available for bidding on Day 2, and so was probably used on Day 3.

Antmeister 04-12-2007 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441252)
:rolleyes:


I am trying to figure out what happened. I'm not defending anybody - especially BK after he ripped me a new on last night when my conditional arrest didn't go through. If it turns out that he screwed up and didn't get an order in, then his ass is grass.

And why in the WORLD would you think I didn't make the arrest? I posted this WELL before BK started discussing who he would vote for:




And then LSG is the one who was arrested! Why would you even consider that I didn't make the arrest like I said I would. It makes no sense!


Ugh....my bad, I am confused by the rules. I thought this was a PM vote and that explained the conditional vote earlier. After reading the first page again, I guess that mean you did make your vote.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441287)
I'd like to make a point that we now know that Balbus Senna can convert a Senator, correct?


We do?!?!?

What did I miss?

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antmeister (Post 1441288)
Ugh....my bad, I am confused by the rules. I thought this was a PM vote and that explained the conditional vote earlier. After reading the first page again, I guess that mean you did make your vote.


It is a PM vote.

My point was why in the world would I tell everyone that I was gonna vote for LSG and then not do it. And yet LSG gets arrested anyway.

Doesn't make sense...

But it IS a PM arrest (just to be clear).

Peregrine 04-12-2007 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441274)
It is a smidge early to go after people for still being alive (in my opinion), but I think it is critical that the person hiring Lawyer #2 (Neon) use them to scan Ardent.


I'd buy this tactic even more if I didn't already suspect Neon. There seems to be no doubt that the traitors are killing off lawyers to get control of them. It's possible they have both slots now, if so, we're in trouble.

Autumn 04-12-2007 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49 (Post 1441271)
See the WW ethics thread. I never lie about RL availability and have a long history of stating how I'm at work on Thursday nights.


I've read that thread and so I'm tempted to believe you. It certainly woudl piss me off to no end for it to be a lie after you've said this. I don't know you, so I'll presume you're not lying.

I find it straining the capacity of my brain cells though to think that at this point in the game any consul would not submit a provisional order early in the day. We have had some excuse every single day for not making two arrests. It's looking like we're going to have to chalk this game up to bumbling moves and missing players.

Coffee Warlord 04-12-2007 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441282)
Didn't learn your lesson from my Necromancer game, eh?

Although have we got anything that 100% validates that the "senators" are not Tarqs? I'm certainly working under that assumption. Did your PM make it absolutely clear that you murdered a Roman and not a Tarq?


I didn't get a PM of any sort about it. So it's theoretically possible that I got a Tarq, I really don't know.

And dammit, the Necro game I second guessed myself and blew it. This time I didn't second guess myself...and possibly blew it. :)

Barkeep49 04-12-2007 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441293)
I'd buy this tactic even more if I didn't already suspect Neon. There seems to be no doubt that the traitors are killing off lawyers to get control of them. It's possible they have both slots now, if so, we're in trouble.

Can you explain why you think Neon is a bad guy? You mentioned it earlier and again now.

Autumn 04-12-2007 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441289)
We do?!?!?

What did I miss?


Ironus Headus posted that he had the services of the philosopher, and described them. It sounds like you send the philosopher to another member to "convince them of your views." Schmidtyus thought this was a means of vouching for yourself and so sent him to Hoopyus.

I'm presuming it has no effect in the hands of a loyal Senator, but in the hands of a traitor would make a conversion.

Barkeep49 04-12-2007 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441295)
I've read that thread and so I'm tempted to believe you. It certainly woudl piss me off to no end for it to be a lie after you've said this. I don't know you, so I'll presume you're not lying.

I find it straining the capacity of my brain cells though to think that at this point in the game any consul would not submit a provisional order early in the day. We have had some excuse every single day for not making two arrests. It's looking like we're going to have to chalk this game up to bumbling moves and missing players.

Are you joking? After yesterday the last thing I wanted to do was send in a provisional order early in the day. The library I work at has triple T3s, from two different providers. The fact that we were off the internet means that there is some kind of major problem. In frankly never occurred to me that I wouldn't be online tonight.

Antmeister 04-12-2007 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 1441291)
It is a PM vote.

My point was why in the world would I tell everyone that I was gonna vote for LSG and then not do it. And yet LSG gets arrested anyway.

Doesn't make sense...

But it IS a PM arrest (just to be clear).


Man, if you are a Tarquin, and let's say Barkeep voted for LSG and you simply didn't vote, yet claimed you did, it would make perfect sense. However Barkeep says that he missed his vote so that throws that theory in the toilet. That is why I was hot and bothered by the last vote. I didn't know who was telling the truth. Because you could post one thing and decide not to do anything or even vote for the same person. Vote throwing in my conspiratorial 2 cents.

KWhit 04-12-2007 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441301)
Ironus Headus posted that he had the services of the philosopher, and described them. It sounds like you send the philosopher to another member to "convince them of your views." Schmidtyus thought this was a means of vouching for yourself and so sent him to Hoopyus.

I'm presuming it has no effect in the hands of a loyal Senator, but in the hands of a traitor would make a conversion.


I read what Schmidty and Hoops said about it, but I didn't reach the same conclusions you did.

Hmmmm..... I don't know if that's what that means or not.... Other opinions?

Autumn 04-12-2007 09:55 PM

So far it seems to me we've cleared a number of people through scans, and that's about all we've accomplished. One of those is dead by poison, we've executed two people we are fairly sure were innocent, another person is dead by poison and therefore presumably was loyal. Two are dead by sword. One we presume to be loyal since no loyal Senator claimed credit, the other one is in dispute.

Meanwhile we have not managed to kill a traitor, or even identify one. I find it likely that at least one major role has been snagged by a traitor, and that the traitors have possibly risen in the wealth ratings while we stumbled around.

I also suspect we've arrested an innocent Senator yet again, and therefore have little likelihood of making a kill tomorrow.

I can only wait and see what other services people won and used. And hope that if one of the Loyal Senators purchased the sellsword's service, that they use it on one of the presumed traitors as things become clear.

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 10:00 PM

Let me try to give more detail about Senna without a direct quote.

Senna was writing a book and wanted to get my views on the Republic. I did not find him to be particularly engaging and we ended our conversation.

I'm going to be extremely concerned if there is a regular (every other day or more?) option for him to convert.

Autumn 04-12-2007 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49 (Post 1441303)
Are you joking? After yesterday the last thing I wanted to do was send in a provisional order early in the day. The library I work at has triple T3s, from two different providers. The fact that we were off the internet means that there is some kind of major problem. In frankly never occurred to me that I wouldn't be online tonight.


Joking? We've missed arrests every day for one reason or another. I would think that ultra extreme caution would be utilized. Future consuls - please send in a provisional (not a conditional) arrest order immediately!

KWhit 04-12-2007 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441312)
Let me try to give more detail about Senna without a direct quote.

Senna was writing a book and wanted to get my views on the Republic. I did not find him to be particularly engaging and we ended our conversation.


How strange. That is very vague.

Autumn 04-12-2007 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441312)
Let me try to give more detail about Senna without a direct quote.

Senna was writing a book and wanted to get my views on the Republic. I did not find him to be particularly engaging and we ended our conversation.

I'm going to be extremely concerned if there is a regular (every other day or more?) option for him to convert.


Hmm, not very clear. Ironhead, can we get a description from you again?

And can the lawyers confirm that they got no report on the loyalty of Saldanus?

Abe Sargent 04-12-2007 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peregrine (Post 1441293)
I'd buy this tactic even more if I didn't already suspect Neon. There seems to be no doubt that the traitors are killing off lawyers to get control of them. It's possible they have both slots now, if so, we're in trouble.


Totally agree about the whole suspicion on N_C thing

Mustang 04-12-2007 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441236)
Well, the answer to who got Macro will come into play tomorrow, not with the results we just saw.


If Pass bid on Macro and didn't get him, wouldn't it have to be one of these people (higher or same wealth bracket?)

Abeus Anxietus
Dodeus Erchickus
Kayus Whitus
Coffeeus Yakus Warlordus
Ironus Headus

hoopsguy 04-12-2007 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mustang (Post 1441324)
If Pass bid on Macro and didn't get him, wouldn't it have to be one of these people (higher or same wealth bracket?)

Abeus Anxietus
Dodeus Erchickus
Kayus Whitus
Coffeeus Yakus Warlordus
Ironus Headus


Depends on the timing of the suits versus services. At the time the bids were placed only Dodeus Erchickus would have been ahead. ImTheCrew was in the pokey and couldn't place a vote. And Pass had just moved up the list, which makes it unlikely to me that he elevated beyond DC when neither was heavily invested in lawsuits on Day 3.

If the suits are processed prior to purchasing services, then the list you provided would be in play.

Autumn 04-12-2007 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441326)
Depends on the timing of the suits versus services. At the time the bids were placed only Dodeus Erchickus would have been ahead. ImTheCrew was in the pokey and couldn't place a vote. And Pass had just moved up the list, which makes it unlikely to me that he elevated beyond DC when neither was heavily invested in lawsuits on Day 3.

If the suits are processed prior to purchasing services, then the list you provided would be in play.


But I don't understand Pass's explanation. Why did he receive Maximus? Did he make a mistake in his PM? Is there some hidden mechanic at play?

Abe Sargent 04-12-2007 10:15 PM

I placed a bid on the first legionnaire on teh list. Don't remember his name because I sent my bid in before stcronin chnaged the list, but I told him I wanted the top, first legionnaire, whoever it was. I failed. So someone above me got him.

Autumn 04-12-2007 10:16 PM

Not to mention it's perfectly possible he's lying to cover up a plan to use the sellsword to kill a loyal Senator today.

Mustang 04-12-2007 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy (Post 1441326)
Depends on the timing of the suits versus services. At the time the bids were placed only Dodeus Erchickus would have been ahead.


So, Dodeus Erchickus has the bid of Macro then?

Mustang 04-12-2007 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441329)
Not to mention it's perfectly possible he's lying to cover up a plan to use the sellsword to kill a loyal Senator today.


Which is what I'm wondering what is up. If he is that high on the list, there are only a few people that could have Macro which, I'm assuming is some type of killer? But, instead, he has a Legionnaire which, I'm assuming, is some type of bodyguard?

Antmeister 04-12-2007 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441329)
Not to mention it's perfectly possible he's lying to cover up a plan to use the sellsword to kill a loyal Senator today.


Yeah, I am totally lost when I read his post talking about Furio/Macro/Maximus.

Autumn 04-12-2007 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mustang (Post 1441335)
Which is what I'm wondering what is up. If he is that high on the list, there are only a few people that could have Macro which, I'm assuming is some type of killer? But, instead, he has a Legionnaire which, I'm assuming, is some type of bodyguard?


Yes, it's not clear until he writes in again. If he had been outbid, he should have received nothing. So either there was some confusion between he and St.Cronin, he's making this all up to confuse us, or there's some game mechanic coming up that we have not yet seen.

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 10:26 PM

THROW LONUS STARUS GIRIUS TO THE ROCKUS

If she sees that she is going to bungie without a cord, she may talk.

I vote to jail Coffeus Warlordus as he apparently knows Saldana is good from his post stating he made a mistake. Makes no sense that he would state that unless he knows. Without a scan he would have to be a Tarq to know that.

Mustang 04-12-2007 10:27 PM

As a RL note, I will be involved with a disaster recovery exercise with my job tomorrow. It starts at like 6 AM and runs until god knows when so, I very much doubt I will be posting until night time.

Ironhead 04-12-2007 10:30 PM

Just got back. I would like to state the obvious.

The game is turning into one big clusterfuck for the village.

That is all (time to do some analysis).

Mustang 04-12-2007 10:31 PM

Took me 24 hours and my head was spinning but, I think I'm finally into the game. :D Hard game to get thrust into the middle of...

Autumn 04-12-2007 10:35 PM

I'm done throwing innocent quiet people off the rock. We have succeeded in stealing much of Lonestarus Girlus's money, and that's good enough for me. I want to arrest someone who's actually a traitor tomorrow.

VOTE TO FREE LONESTARUS GIRLUS

I'm going to wait to see what becomes clearer before I suggest my arrests. There sure are plenty of suspects this time.

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 10:35 PM

Yeah Mustang, this game is pretty obscure. It is very difficult to determine what we can do, even at this point in the game.

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441346)
I'm done throwing innocent quiet people off the rock. We have succeeded in stealing much of Lonestarus Girlus's money, and that's good enough for me. I want to arrest someone who's actually a traitor tomorrow.

VOTE TO FREE LONESTARUS GIRLUS

I'm going to wait to see what becomes clearer before I suggest my arrests. There sure are plenty of suspects this time.


Of the people who have died, who have we confirmed as either Republican or Tarq?

Mustang 04-12-2007 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1441350)
Of the people who have died, who have we confirmed as either Republican or Tarq?


Everyone is Republican as far as I can determine. I'd hope that if they were a Tarq, they would have been revealed to be as such.

Mustang 04-12-2007 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441346)
I'm going to wait to see what becomes clearer before I suggest my arrests. There sure are plenty of suspects this time.


So, going to suggest arrests 5 days from now? :D

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mustang (Post 1441353)
Everyone is Republican as far as I can determine. I'd hope that if they were a Tarq, they would have been revealed to be as such.


We don't get a faction reveal upon death. We have to use game mechanics to figure it out. As far as I know, we do not know what Saldana's faction was.

Mustang 04-12-2007 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1441356)
We don't get a faction reveal upon death. We have to use game mechanics to figure it out. As far as I know, we do not know what Saldana's faction was.


ooof...

That I didn't know.

Autumn 04-12-2007 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1441350)
Of the people who have died, who have we confirmed as either Republican or Tarq?


Bulletus and Imust were confirmed to be loyal. The two poison deaths are presumably loyal since as far as we know only traitors can use poison. The two sword deaths are not confirmed, but Alanus Teeus had been scanned and seems 99% likely to have been loyal.

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441360)
Bulletus and Imust were confirmed to be loyal. The two poison deaths are presumably loyal since as far as we know only traitors can use poison. The two sword deaths are not confirmed, but Alanus Teeus had been scanned and seems 99% likely to have been loyal.


AE validated Imus the crewus.

How does the lawyer thing work. Do they get a definate faction scan? At one point Dodgerus Erchicus stated she scanned Alanus with a lawyer, I believe AE and he said that he did not know the outcome. But now he knows the outcome of Imus. How does it work?

Passacaglia 04-12-2007 10:48 PM

Yeah, there was a mistake in communication, not on my part. I tried to correct it immediately, but was unable to. So I have no freaking idea what happened.

Coffee Warlord 04-12-2007 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1441339)
THROW LONUS STARUS GIRIUS TO THE ROCKUS

If she sees that she is going to bungie without a cord, she may talk.

I vote to jail Coffeus Warlordus as he apparently knows Saldana is good from his post stating he made a mistake. Makes no sense that he would state that unless he knows. Without a scan he would have to be a Tarq to know that.


Read a few posts down. I was under the impression either the lawyers immediately knew someone was a Tarq when they died, or we were automatically told.

Mustang 04-12-2007 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 1441366)
Yeah, there was a mistake in communication, not on my part. I tried to correct it immediately, but was unable to. So I have no freaking idea what happened.


I think I speak for all when I say..

Maaaa-huh?

Autumn 04-12-2007 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord (Post 1441367)
Read a few posts down. I was under the impression either the lawyers immediately knew someone was a Tarq when they died, or we were automatically told.


The story we've been told was corroborated between Ardentus and Swaggus, and so I trust it.

Supposedly the lawyers receive a PM after an execution telling them whether the person was loyal or not.

As far as I know they only receive this notice for executions, but I've never inquired about that.

Autumn 04-12-2007 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 1441366)
Yeah, there was a mistake in communication, not on my part. I tried to correct it immediately, but was unable to. So I have no freaking idea what happened.


If this was just a result of a mix-up in names on PM I'm going to be tempted to fall on my own sword. And it's not even sharpened.

Peregrine 04-12-2007 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49 (Post 1441298)
Can you explain why you think Neon is a bad guy? You mentioned it earlier and again now.


Well I guess his overall inactivity for starters, with only 13 posts only LSG has fewer posts. Also, when he does post, he tends to pop in and do strange things, like popping in after extensive inactivity to vote to free ITC without any explanation.

Frankly, though, it's difficult to tell who's a traitor and who's just not very involved in the game.

Mustang 04-12-2007 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 1441374)
If this was just a result of a mix-up in names on PM I'm going to be tempted to fall on my own sword. And it's not even sharpened.


Why wouldn't Cronin just address it then instead of Pass? Not sure why Pass would have to correct it?

Autumn 04-12-2007 11:17 PM

Well, I'll wait until morning to see. St.Cronin is gone I believe, having said he'll finish lawsuits in the morning.

Tyrith 04-12-2007 11:19 PM

For the record, I sent my day 2 horse message to BK, who was apparently prevented from sending a reply because of his RL problem. GRR.

Grammaticus 04-12-2007 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith (Post 1441387)
For the record, I sent my day 2 horse message to BK, who was apparently prevented from sending a reply because of his RL problem. GRR.


Seriously, you have to be online at end of day to participate?

Tyrith 04-13-2007 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1441394)
Seriously, you have to be online at end of day to participate?


If you're intending to do stuff then, then it helps if your internet performs as expected.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 03:07 AM

Second best lawyer in town.

Thanks to the guy who sent me the ho's last night. They were scrumptious.

How dare these people acuse me of being a traitor!?

I have always been loyal to the Senate, and I have always been proud to be a part of the Republic! And that alone should be enough to plead for my innocence!

As for my lawyer role...

No pm about ITC being good or not, just the PM about the sex slaves being sent to me.

Narcizo 04-13-2007 03:09 AM

Back from a parent meeting at my son's kindergarden.

Seems to be another seriously sub-par performance by the villagers and I have to take my share of the blame. I was trying to attract a kill attempt yesterday so I put the bodyguard on myself, hoping to catch someone. I feel particularly bad because I was initially going to protect Schmidty. I'm afraid my ego could have cost us the game so I'm really sorry. I'll try to make up for it now but I feel really doubtful of our chances at the moment. The wolves seem to be playing with us at the moment.

Neon_Chaos 04-13-2007 03:10 AM

Hey there Chief Rum. How's it hanging? I see you're lurking. :)

Narcizo 04-13-2007 03:19 AM

I would imagine he's reading the thread rather than lurking.

CR let's make a big effort to coordinate our efforts here. I'm pretty certain that I'm going to be able to be around close to the deadline tomorrow but family stuff might get in the way. So I'll be making an arrest order before I disappear today (Friday :) ) I'll say what that arrest order is but I would like you to state who you are arresting in case I want to change the arrest tomorrow. Does that work?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.