|
Quote:
So, you have some inside knowledge that they are good guys? |
Quote:
not true evil wins when they overwhelm good they both win just not a major victory |
Quote:
*shrug* Others will have their own ideas about who is utr, or what it means to be utr - making lots of posts, to me, doesn't mean anything. |
Quote:
well we're already -1 evildoer. and -1 good guy too, but with their smaller original #'s and the goodguy not being a ranger I think we have the upper hand. |
Quote:
sorry that's what I ment. thanks for clarifying it. |
Quote:
Outside of a seer or witness fingering someone, what is enough to justify voting for someone on day 1 or day 2? If you want no lynch, that is fine, but I think it is smart to build a track record and start taking using the tools available to us to solve things. |
Quote:
This argument has been posed multiple times today and has no base whatsoever. Even if i was evil, and knew Chief and Lathum werent in my faction, he could still be in the other evil faction. So how could anyone, on day 2, know 2 people are good already??? |
Quote:
still trying to get a handle on such a big game. it's only my what...3rd game? 1st real big game. and i'm probably falling into the geekiness too much. |
Quote:
if you assume that evil only needs a 1:1 ratio the rules seem to state that a 2:1 good to dark ratio could win them the game too. it isn't clear, but it does infer that if it gets to a 1:1 we lose. |
Quote:
no and I stated that I just don't like them as lynch canidates for today. |
So with all the people not liking the two lynch candidates, has anyone put forth another candidate?
|
Quote:
There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that there are some villagers on my utr list, in the same way that it's possible that one of the early voters for scooby was bad. It's a starting point, that's all. |
Quote:
I stand corrected it does state a 2:1 ratio provided there are no rangers and no strong outsider. |
Quote:
Ive said Alan for two days, and i know a few people want me |
Quote:
now why would you want someone to do that? |
Quote:
Right, so we have already established that we are playing WereWolf. :) |
Quote:
you can build a track record with a vote and no lynch still. it is used in many games when a bad guy is caught to see who they voted for ect. also used to see who a dead seer voted for assuming they survive past night 1 (unlike me in the football game) |
Quote:
brian here's vote recap...little outdated, but still a starting point |
Quote:
I'm saying that if we're going to lynch a guy we should pick someone that has the chance of coming out and saying that they're important if they are. Granted that we're going to going after someone, I'd much rather someone who was about to be killed tell us that they were important than just dying with the information. |
OOC: be back bath time
|
i'm not a big fan of either CR or lathum honestly. I think it's quite likely that they're both good.
no one has put forth another viable candidate though, so i suppose i'll just hop on the bandwagon of one...and of the two I think we would learn more from putting Lathum under a microscope as CR isn't here to defend himself and convince us. However I fear it's too late for that, hmm? |
Right now I count it chief 8, lathum 7, others less.
|
Quote:
Where are you getting that from? Here is what the rules post says: Quote:
Nothing about a minor victory or any other type of victory is specified. It appears to be winner take all within the dark side. |
Quote:
please quote the post in which i attacked CR....i made two posts, one asking him to explain his logic, and one saying that he has a habit of accusations without thinking them through and then voting for him...both of these came after he voted for me first....i havent said a word about him since, so how exactly am i driving the vote against him....if you are gonna come at me, bring something more than a complete exaggeration of what was actually said.:rolleyes: |
Quote:
You left off LoneStarGirl. |
Quote:
Major victory implies that there are other victory conditions. And if you were playing on darkness and you overwhelm good wouldn't you consider it a partial victory? :) |
Okay guys, i am here, but im on page 9, so give me a minute
|
Quote:
Because she is on his team? |
Quote:
okay...fair enough. fair enough. i honestly was just going off impressions and hazy memories rather than reading a specific post. i need to get better about that. attack withdrawn |
so do we want to go with CR? or another for Lathum? the vote is pretty close
|
Quote:
Not if the rules don't specify it or the GM let me know via PM. |
Quote:
As well as CR who actually has been UTR both in number of posts as well as post content. |
Quote:
so your saying you are trying to get a good guy to reveal by voting for him.... Honestly I am a plain villegar so if I am lynched all you'll get is voting patterns which could be helpfull. |
Quote:
Well, suffice it to say that if darkness overwhelms good the remaining good players are out of the game, and it wouldn't surprise me if it's in bad's best interests to get us out of the way before they completely decimate each other. |
Quote:
I guess you didn't read my OTHER list, where I explained why she was in my cot. That's cool. |
Quote:
No, Lathum, fricking try to understand. If we ARE going to kill someone, which we are, and we aren't going to know anything about it, then wouldn't you rather someone with a good role be able to TELL US instead of just dying? We don't know role information on ANYONE so you can't say bull---- about it? We don't KNOW anyone is good, so stop trying to miscontrue my arguments you wolf. |
Quote:
Well, I don't know how you define UTR, but I say anybody getting as many votes as Chief Rum is very much on the radar. |
Okay, I dont like that lathum jumped on the chief rum bandwagon, but he has been bad in what, the last 4 games? No way he could be bad this game too. Plus, I really dont think Blade is bad for those that keep jumping on him... He's just weird :)
|
Quote:
Why? * He was the dark adept, not associated with a faction, so chances are pretty good that none of the bad guys realized what he was. * There was no night one, so there is zero chance of a seer or that sort being involved. I tell you, we did well to get the dark adept out of the game yesterday, but there is NOTHING to take out of the vote! |
Er, no night zero.
|
Almost caught up. If I vote at the last minute, don't hold it against me alright?
|
Quote:
I completely and totally agree with this. Please don't try to take too much out of yesterday's vote. |
Quote:
Because she was one of the first four votes for Scoobz? |
Quote:
During the day, it was perfect for the bad guys, because there was never any risk involved; the leading votegetter was not on their team and he won in a runaway. It turned out poorly for them, because it wasn't a player they wanted to lose, but they were not exposed in any way in the vote. Quote:
|
anyone...is there an actual case against lathum?
|
Quote:
I'm sorry, how do we know this? I see no mention of it in the rules. It just says he was on the side of darkness. Are you just assuming this? |
Quote:
Awww, are you paying close attention to me? I feel special ;) |
Quote:
About as much as there is an actual case against CR. |
Quote:
Because he wasn't revealed to be with a faction and factional affliations are revealed upon death. |
Okay, I agree that lathum and cheif aren't standing out to me. But i have always said a no-lynch is only good for the wolves. And since Cheif is leading the pack, i will help by voting him. Plus, like i said, no way lathum can be bad 4 games in a row!
vote cheif rum |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.