Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The 2024 Presidential Nomination Thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=98938)

Atocep 03-27-2024 11:20 AM

I agree mostly. I do think the state of the union ends up mostly washing out. People have short attention spans and tire of scandals unless there are significant updates. The state of the union, Gaza, and 1000 other things will either be forgotten or have far less importance to voters by election day. Republicans can't really run on the Gaza situation because they're all for Israel steamrolling through there at any cost. 7 months from now its u likely to have much, if any, impact.

Abortion and the economy will be the 2 biggest factors in this election. The economy is strong fundamentally but people are still not comfortable with the combination of inflation and shrinkflation we're seeing. Abortion, though, is still killing the GOP. They lost a state seat special election in Alabama by 25 points in a district that Trump won and went +7 to the GOP in 2022 by heavily focusing on reproductive rights.

RainMaker 03-27-2024 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3429688)
I agree mostly. I do think the state of the union ends up mostly washing out. People have short attention spans and tire of scandals unless there are significant updates. The state of the union, Gaza, and 1000 other things will either be forgotten or have far less importance to voters by election day. Republicans can't really run on the Gaza situation because they're all for Israel steamrolling through there at any cost. 7 months from now its u likely to have much, if any, impact.

Abortion and the economy will be the 2 biggest factors in this election. The economy is strong fundamentally but people are still not comfortable with the combination of inflation and shrinkflation we're seeing. Abortion, though, is still killing the GOP. They lost a state seat special election in Alabama by 25 points in a district that Trump won and went +7 to the GOP in 2022 by heavily focusing on reproductive rights.


I really don't think those issues will go away. And I really think Democrats are making a huge mistake assuming that everyone is just going to come back to the table at election time. I'm sure some will, but I think they are vastly underestimating how many people are angry with Biden and his hard right shift and continuation of unpopular policies. Repeatedly antagonizing your base seems like a bad strategy.

Maybe they have internal data telling them things are great. Maybe there is a plan to abandon Michigan because they think they can win North Carolina with these policies instead (they did think they could win Georgia in 2020 when most people didn't think they could). And maybe they think there are enough never-Trumpers to make up for all the people they are losing.

But sure seems to me like a campaign that is fucking up bad (see their immigration stunt) and will need to pull out some excuses for why they botched another election to Donald Trump of all people.

RainMaker 03-27-2024 04:40 PM

Here is how Biden is going to be haunted over the next 9 months. We're going to keep seeing stories like this pop up every week. They can't ban every social media site posting them like they want to with TikTok. This isn't a war that will end next week, it's going to go on till November and Netanyahu will do everything in his power to make Biden look bad.




GrantDawg 03-27-2024 05:19 PM

Joe Lieberman has died. He was one of the biggest names behind the "No Labels" party, who can't seem to find anyone interested in running for them.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

Ksyrup 03-27-2024 05:33 PM

Our local news said he was 94. I about choked. But no, he was about Biden's age.

GrantDawg 03-27-2024 05:43 PM

He had a fall. That is just an example of how quickly someone of Biden or Trump's age can go down from something as simple as a fall.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

molson 03-27-2024 06:12 PM

I'm pretty sure my parents bought their retirement house because the realtor told them that Joe Lieberman's wife's parents were a previous owner. She did grow up there in Gardner, MA, but, otherwise, unsubstantiated.

Edward64 03-27-2024 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 3429712)
Our local news said he was 94. I about choked. But no, he was about Biden's age.


That did surprise me so googling said 82.

RainMaker 03-27-2024 06:45 PM

He was an enormous piece of shit.

GrantDawg 03-27-2024 07:04 PM

Y'all do realize that P. Diddy having his houses raided for sex trafficking almost guarantees he is going to be Trump's running mate, right?

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

Edward64 03-27-2024 07:37 PM

Diddy do it?

RainMaker 04-01-2024 06:29 PM

Reaching the point where Trump would be a better choice in terms of foreign policy and at least slowing down genocide than Biden. Still think he'd allow a lot, but he understands the situation much better than Biden.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/01/u...&smid=tw-share

BYU 14 04-02-2024 09:58 AM

So ignore all the other damage he will do? Beyond that, Israel won't listen to him anymore than they listen to Biden. You want them to listen, cut off aid until they allow complete aid and quit killing civilians.

RainMaker 04-02-2024 10:09 AM

Israel absolutely listens when you turn off the money spigot. HW and Reagan did it and got what they wanted. Joe being a feckless pussy doesn't change that reality.

flere-imsaho 04-02-2024 05:03 PM

We already know what Trump's foreign policy would be. It would be doing what Putin wants the U.S. to do. Given that you seem totally fine with Putin being allowed to do what he wants to do, RM, I could see how you would come up with such a ridiculous statement.

RainMaker 04-02-2024 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 3429974)
We already know what Trump's foreign policy would be. It would be doing what Putin wants the U.S. to do. Given that you seem totally fine with Putin being allowed to do what he wants to do, RM, I could see how you would come up with such a ridiculous statement.


I'm not fine with what Putin is doing. I just don't think we should be sending hundreds of billions in weapons for an unwinnable war. Also think the potential blowback of sending hundreds of billions in weapons to a poor country with extremely far-right militias and little oversight is a recipe for disaster (not to mention entering a proxy war with a nuclear power). Have a feeling we'll be seeing those weapons end up in some sketchy hands down the road.

You'd think people would realize this after the other dozen or so times this strategy blew up in our face, but maybe this time is different.

Trump sucks and all but his foreign policy is much better. It'd keep us out of nevernding conflict in Ukraine and save hundreds of billions. Plus he at least seems to have a line with Israel committing genocide that Joe doesn't.

flere-imsaho 04-02-2024 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3429980)
Trump sucks and all but his foreign policy is much better.


From the first Trump Administration, a short-list:
  • Withdrew from a nuclear arms treaty with Russia
  • Alternately increased defense funding and criticized the amount spent on defense
  • Pardoned and promoted soldiers who were convicted and accused, respectively, of war crimes
  • Increased drone strikes from the Obama Administration, and reduced transparency, including the Obama-era policy of reporting civilian deaths due to drone strikes
  • Legitimized North Korea, removed sanctions placed on North Korea, and saluted North Korean generals
  • Withdrew the U.S. from an Iranian sanctions program that then allowed Iran greater freedom to develop nuclear weapons
  • Removed support from the Kurds, causing them to ally with Syria against Turkey, another stated objective of Russia in the region
  • Sold billions of weapons to Saudi Arabia, said great things about MBS, and condoned the murder of Jamal Khashoggi
  • Gave legitimacy to the practice of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank

Atocep 04-02-2024 07:23 PM

I would add legitimizing the Taliban and inviting them to talks at Camp David to that list.

RainMaker 04-02-2024 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 3429984)
From the first Trump Administration, a short-list:
  • Withdrew from a nuclear arms treaty with Russia
  • Alternately increased defense funding and criticized the amount spent on defense
  • Pardoned and promoted soldiers who were convicted and accused, respectively, of war crimes
  • Increased drone strikes from the Obama Administration, and reduced transparency, including the Obama-era policy of reporting civilian deaths due to drone strikes
  • Legitimized North Korea, removed sanctions placed on North Korea, and saluted North Korean generals
  • Withdrew the U.S. from an Iranian sanctions program that then allowed Iran greater freedom to develop nuclear weapons
  • Removed support from the Kurds, causing them to ally with Syria against Turkey, another stated objective of Russia in the region
  • Sold billions of weapons to Saudi Arabia, said great things about MBS, and condoned the murder of Jamal Khashoggi
  • Gave legitimacy to the practice of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank


Yeah, Trump was pretty bad and still much better than Biden's foreign policy. That should tell you something.

flere-imsaho 04-02-2024 07:36 PM

I mean, that's the short list.

The fact of the matter is that the first Trump Administration's foreign policy more-or-less completely consisted of delivering on the hopes & dreams of autocrats everywhere, but especially those who had bankrolled TrumpCo over the years (Russia, though much of that was money laundering) or bankrolled Jared Kushner during the administration (Saudi Arabia) or allowed Ivanka to make money (China, granting IP rights), while simultaneously alienating long-standing U.S. allies.

If that's what constitues a "much better" foreign policy, then at least be honest about it.

And let's not forget that part of the problem with Israel right now is down to the fact that Netanyahu has been supported and emboldened for years by the same evangelical right donors that are also Trump's most fervent supporters. To think that he's magically going to bring Netanyahu to heel is fantasy, magical thinking. He'll do whatever 2025's version of Sheldon Adelson wants him to do in Israel. Or be persuaded to let Israel sweep Gaza off the map so he can get in on the seaside real estatement investment opportunities that his son-in-law talked about.

flere-imsaho 04-02-2024 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3429987)
Yeah, Trump was pretty bad and still much better than Biden's foreign policy. That should tell you something.


You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.

RainMaker 04-02-2024 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3429986)
I would add legitimizing the Taliban and inviting them to talks at Camp David to that list.


As bad as the Taliban is, they're actually the more moderate group in the country. Beats supporting the absolute psycho Salafists and some of those warlords.

NobodyHere 04-02-2024 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3429990)
As bad as the Taliban is, they're actually the more moderate group in the country. Beats supporting the absolute psycho Salafists and some of those warlords.


Taliban edict to resume stoning women to death met with horror | Taliban | The Guardian

How are the other groups worse?

RainMaker 04-02-2024 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 3429989)
You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.


Worth noting that most of those things you mentioned, Biden supports. Increase defense funding, drone strikes, West Bank settlements, weapons to the Saudis, betraying the Kurds, and the embrace of war crimes. On the others, he hasn't cared enough to change them.

On top of it, Biden is spearheading a genocide in Gaza where even our own citizens are being executed by the Israeli government. Netanyahu is openly mocking him on a daily basis it seems. One of the lowest points in American foreign policy history that will have repercussions for the rest of our lives.

The Ukraine War has cost hundreds of billions and ended up with us being less safe and Ukraine still losing (still too cowardly to implement and act on any sanctions that may harm wealthy people). The Saudis embarrass him a few times a year for fun. Even Sisi in Egypt has gotten in on that.

We've had some terrible foreign policy Presidents in our country, but he has to be up there as one of the weakest. Being subservient to tiny ethnostates and authoritarian regimes to the point that he sides with them over the deaths of his own citizens.

RainMaker 04-02-2024 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3429992)


Read up on Salafi jihadism. They view the Taliban as fake Muslims who are too secular. They're the ones that just shot up that concert hall in Russia.

As wild as it is, they're far more fucked up than the Taliban and believe their cause should be global.

flere-imsaho 04-02-2024 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3429993)
Worth noting that most of those things you mentioned, Biden supports.


Really?

Here's my list, again:
  • Withdrew from a nuclear arms treaty with Russia
  • Alternately increased defense funding and criticized the amount spent on defense
  • Pardoned and promoted soldiers who were convicted and accused, respectively, of war crimes
  • Increased drone strikes from the Obama Administration, and reduced transparency, including the Obama-era policy of reporting civilian deaths due to drone strikes
  • Legitimized North Korea, removed sanctions placed on North Korea, and saluted North Korean generals
  • Withdrew the U.S. from an Iranian sanctions program that then allowed Iran greater freedom to develop nuclear weapons
  • Removed support from the Kurds, causing them to ally with Syria against Turkey, another stated objective of Russia in the region
  • Sold billions of weapons to Saudi Arabia, said great things about MBS, and condoned the murder of Jamal Khashoggi
  • Gave legitimacy to the practice of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank

Which of those does Biden support?

RainMaker 04-02-2024 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 3429988)
And let's not forget that part of the problem with Israel right now is down to the fact that Netanyahu has been supported and emboldened for years by the same evangelical right donors that are also Trump's most fervent supporters. To think that he's magically going to bring Netanyahu to heel is fantasy, magical thinking. He'll do whatever 2025's version of Sheldon Adelson wants him to do in Israel. Or be persuaded to let Israel sweep Gaza off the map so he can get in on the seaside real estatement investment opportunities that his son-in-law talked about.


So you're saying he'll just continue on doing what Biden is doing?

Also, drop the "it's evangelicals causing this" nonsense. Liberals have defended the genocide (including many on this board). Almost all Democrats in power support it. Biden has supported it for decades and is pushing for more of it.

RainMaker 04-02-2024 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 3429995)
Really?

Here's my list, again:
  • Withdrew from a nuclear arms treaty with Russia - Russia broke it and it's kind of silly to stay in a treaty if one side is not abiding by it. A lot you can criticize him for but continuing to abide by a treaty the other side isn't is really dumb. You somehow found the one Russia example where Trump was kind of tough on them.
  • Alternately increased defense funding and criticized the amount spent on defense - Biden has done this and is asking for hundreds of billions more in military aid for other countries to fight our proxy wars.
  • Pardoned and promoted soldiers who were convicted and accused, respectively, of war crimes - Biden has ignored all the war crimes being committed in Gaza with our support. He also voted for those wars in Iraq and Afghanistan where this happened and said nothing about the war crimes the United States was committing while he was VP.
  • Increased drone strikes from the Obama Administration, and reduced transparency, including the Obama-era policy of reporting civilian deaths due to drone strikes - We're bombing Yemen, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Somalia in just the past couple months. We're providing weapons and support in bombings of many others.
  • Legitimized North Korea, removed sanctions placed on North Korea, and saluted North Korean generals - Which sanctions did he remove? I know he added a bunch when he was in power and even seized assets from NK. Worth noting that under Biden, NK is now much closer to Russia and is providing them with munitions to fight Ukraine. Not sure this is one you want to use.
  • Withdrew the U.S. from an Iranian sanctions program that then allowed Iran greater freedom to develop nuclear weapons
  • Removed support from the Kurds, causing them to ally with Syria against Turkey, another stated objective of Russia in the region - Biden literally just gave Turkey billions in military equipment to kill Kurds. You can't be serious. Fucking over the Kurds is sort of our thing.
  • Sold billions of weapons to Saudi Arabia, said great things about MBS, and condoned the murder of Jamal Khashoggi - No difference from what Biden is doing.
  • Gave legitimacy to the practice of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank - No difference from what Biden is doing.
Which of those does Biden support?


Listed above. If you're looking for some big Biden foreign policy win, the withdrawal from Afghanistan was genuinely a good decision. Although it was mostly just a shift of one neverending war to prop up defense companies to another.


Also added this for your "pardon war criminals" point. :lol:


PilotMan 04-02-2024 09:20 PM

This isn't genocide. It's exactly the sort of war that hawks want because it gets results. It's total war.

RainMaker 04-02-2024 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3430000)
This isn't genocide. It's exactly the sort of war that hawks want because it gets results. It's total war.


Nazis said the same thing.

RainMaker 04-02-2024 10:19 PM

Also, what results are they getting? Starving a bunch of kids probably creates far more extremists than they can kill. Israel is sort of proof that committing genocide against a group creates extremists in that group in the aftermath.

RainMaker 04-02-2024 10:49 PM

This could be huge for the upcoming election. If it passes, it means Biden would have to win one of Georgia, Arizona, or Nevada where he is down heavily (assuming he can win Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania).

I'd be curious to see what that passing does to his odds. Seems like his best route was the MI, PA, WI path even if Michigan is a tall task now.




Edward64 04-03-2024 05:11 AM

Supposed Trump's VP list. My guess is Scott or Vance. Rubio should just say no and keep whatever pride he (and his wife) has left.

Just a moment...
Quote:

The names under consideration continue to be in flux, according to multiple people familiar with the list, who describe it as being in “pencil, not pen.” But it includes
  • Sens. Scott of South Carolina,
  • Vance of Ohio,
  • Katie Britt of Alabama and
  • Marco Rubio of Florida, as well as
  • Govs. Noem of South Dakota,
  • Sarah Huckabee Sanders of Arkansas and
  • Doug Burgum of North Dakota.
  • Donalds, the Florida representative, and
  • Gabbard, the former Hawaii representative,

among others, are also being considered or have been floated by Trump.

Ksyrup 04-03-2024 08:40 AM

I don't understand what Rubio would bring to the table, at all. It's like picking a slightly less annoying and polarizing Ted Cruz.

Ksyrup 04-03-2024 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3430006)
This could be huge for the upcoming election. If it passes, it means Biden would have to win one of Georgia, Arizona, or Nevada where he is down heavily (assuming he can win Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania).

I'd be curious to see what that passing does to his odds. Seems like his best route was the MI, PA, WI path even if Michigan is a tall task now.





This is one step in the process to ensure the deck is stacked for Trump. The other is legislatures ordering their state's slate of electors to vote for the candidate they tell them to.

larrymcg421 04-03-2024 10:07 AM

The founders intent thing is such BS. Winner take all wasn't a major thing until 1824.

PilotMan 04-03-2024 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3430002)
Nazis said the same thing.



I think you win by equating Jews and Nazis on the same side of the table. Good going.

JonInMiddleGA 04-03-2024 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 3430019)
I don't understand what Rubio would bring to the table, at all. It's like picking a slightly less annoying and polarizing Ted Cruz.


Call it a hunch but ... it might merely be intended as an F.U. to DeSantis

RainMaker 04-03-2024 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3430028)
I think you win by equating Jews and Nazis on the same side of the table. Good going.


I'm equating what Israel is doing to what the Nazis did. Genocide to continue their push for an ethnostate.

Judaism is a religion and no sovereign country owns it.

RainMaker 04-03-2024 01:20 PM

Couldn't Maine just do the same thing and even it all out?

Edward64 04-03-2024 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 3430029)
Call it a hunch but ... it might merely be intended as an F.U. to DeSantis


Hah, didn’t think of that! You may well be right.

GrantDawg 04-03-2024 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 3430029)
Call it a hunch but ... it might merely be intended as an F.U. to DeSantis

It would be a very fitting reason for Trump to pick his running mate. Just to piss a rival off.

RainMaker 04-03-2024 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3430011)
Supposed Trump's VP list. My guess is Scott or Vance. Rubio should just say no and keep whatever pride he (and his wife) has left.

Just a moment...


I think Stefanik has to be pretty high on the list. She's changed her entire political profile to lobby for the role. Plus I feel like Trump would be more comfortable with a New Yorker.

Still can't fathom Scott getting the nod. A closeted black man from South Carolina is not going to help much. I think Britt torpedoed her chance with the weird SOTU rebuttal.

If I was betting, I'd still take the field over any of the names listed. I think it'll be a woman who won't upstage Trump. Someone like Kim Reynolds.

Swaggs 04-03-2024 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3430055)
I think Stefanik has to be pretty high on the list. She's changed her entire political profile to lobby for the role. Plus I feel like Trump would be more comfortable with a New Yorker.

Still can't fathom Scott getting the nod. A closeted black man from South Carolina is not going to help much. I think Britt torpedoed her chance with the weird SOTU rebuttal.

If I was betting, I'd still take the field over any of the names listed. I think it'll be a woman who won't upstage Trump. Someone like Kim Reynolds.


Reynolds endorsed Desantis, so she seems doubtful. I think Noem fits the profile.

Atocep 04-03-2024 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swaggs (Post 3430056)
Reynolds endorsed Desantis, so she seems doubtful. I think Noem fits the profile.


Noem likes to be in the media too much. Trump doesn't want someone that's going to pull attention away from him.

Ryche 04-04-2024 09:38 AM

I'll be quite surprised if he doesn't pick a white guy ala Pence. Burgum seems like a fit, older white guy who made a lot of money.

JPhillips 04-04-2024 09:54 AM

Pence was perfect in that he didn't need a lot of attention and wasn't ever going to show enough charisma to outshine the boss. Meanwhile, he loved the job because Trump didn't care about policy and Pence could do whatever he wanted behind the scenes.

So many of the candidates for VP now are obviously trying to raise their own profile and I can't see Trump elevating them. They all want the job because they hope Trump dies soon.

albionmoonlight 04-04-2024 10:09 AM

Pence was a great pick.

The evangelicals are now 100% MAGA. But that wasn't the case in 2016. There were some folks who wondered if they would support such a . . . secular candidate. Pence was a (successful) way of courting them.

And the GOP had a lot more establishment leaders and voters in 2016. Picking a boring Midwestern governor was a sign to those folks that you could back Trump.

And, as others noted, he did not fight Trump for attention.

Really, in hindsight, one of the best picks he could have made. That he ended up helping save the Republic four years later was just a bonus for the rest of us :-)

cuervo72 04-04-2024 10:13 AM

Just pick one of his kids (or in-laws) who doesn't reside in Florida. Not sure why he'd want to risk dying and not passing the torch directly anyway.

Thomkal 04-04-2024 12:40 PM

He can always pick one of his fellow convicts like bannon or navarro and we can all learn about Vice Presidential Immunity"

GrantDawg 04-04-2024 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 3430089)
Just pick one of his kids (or in-laws) who doesn't reside in Florida. Not sure why he'd want to risk dying and not passing the torch directly anyway.

I am wondering why he hasn't. I guess it would be Don Jr. Ivanka has not exactly been as lockstep as Cocaine Cowboy has.

GrantDawg 04-04-2024 02:01 PM

BTW, No Labels has failed to find a candidate willing to run and will not be putting a Presidential candidate forward. Millions of dollars well laundered.

RainMaker 04-04-2024 02:17 PM

Don Jr is too coked up. Eric is too dumb. Ivanka already got her billions from the Saudis and has no reason jump in that mess again.

RainMaker 04-05-2024 12:18 PM

This has to be the dumbest country.



JonInMiddleGA 04-05-2024 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3430174)
This has to be the dumbest country.


Oh she's a bonafide nutjob.

She occasionally entertains/amuses me, and at least she votes right most of the time ... but that's almost a stopped clock exception (or a savant skill).

She's a nutter ... and she's a near-perfect representative for that district tbh.

(A district that plays right into my contention that no candidate ever gets elected without votes from a fair number of pretty complete idiots)

Ksyrup 04-05-2024 12:59 PM

Her and a number of other people like her being voted into office seems to me to be a sign as well - a sign that, as Slayer says, God Hates Us All.

RainMaker 04-05-2024 01:26 PM

The earthquake is at least plausible if you're going that route because we don't really know when they'll happen. But I think we've been able to track eclipses for a few hundred years I believe.

JPhillips 04-05-2024 01:58 PM

It was centered pretty close to Trump's Bedminster course, so maybe God is pissed at the grifting Bible salesman.

Thomkal 04-05-2024 02:20 PM

So the house Dems after repubs introduced a bill to rename Dulles Airport in D.C. after Trump, had a much better suggestion:rename the miami correctional facility after Trump. I love this-we can send peter navarro, steve bannon, all jan 6 participants and planners, and trump lawyers when they all lose their license. i'm sure they can have a golf course there so Trump can cheat them all and say he won every match. yes i can see it now,,,


Just a moment...

Lathum 04-08-2024 08:06 AM

This isn't news but I just listened to Trumps response to the Florida 6 week abortion ban and how anyone can take him seriously is beyond me.

albionmoonlight 04-08-2024 08:28 AM

Trump says 100 crazy things a day in public, and none of it is widely reported.

He says one moderate thing (leave abortion to the states), and WaPost and NYT can't wait to make that their A1 headline.

The media isn't pro-Trump. But it is pro-clicks. Which amounts to the same thing.

Atocep 04-08-2024 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3430298)
Trump says 100 crazy things a day in public, and none of it is widely reported.

He says one moderate thing (leave abortion to the states), and WaPost and NYT can't wait to make that their A1 headline.

The media isn't pro-Trump. But it is pro-clicks. Which amounts to the same thing.


In the NYT's case, they didn't like Hillary in 2016 so their coverage was anti-Hillary and mostly neutral for Trump. Which is pro Trump. For 2020 they realized Trump was bad for the country and pushed Biden. This election they seem to be repeating 2016.

Atocep 04-08-2024 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3430294)
This isn't news but I just listened to Trumps response to the Florida 6 week abortion ban and how anyone can take him seriously is beyond me.


For wedge issues he goes with what polling shows. He's been 100% against abortion because that's what his base wanted. Now that it's losing elections he's trying to be more moderate.

He's doing the same with Israel. He would have been pushing Israel to flatten Gaza as president and early on was saying they need to see it through and finish the job. It's not polling well on the dem side so now he's saying slightly more moderate things. He's even admitted it's because they're not winning the PR war.

You still can't take anything he says seriously because once he's in office it's going to be Stephen Miller and others deciding policy while he chases revenge on the Biden administration. He's a useful tool for the real facists.

Lathum 04-08-2024 11:51 AM

He’s not winning any dems and very few independents talking about post birth abortions. That’s something only the most brainwashed on the right believes.

Lathum 04-08-2024 12:17 PM

I just saw a car with an "I love Catturd" magnet on the trunk. I hate this version of the simulation.

NobodyHere 04-08-2024 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3430298)
Trump says 100 crazy things a day in public, and none of it is widely reported.

He says one moderate thing (leave abortion to the states), and WaPost and NYT can't wait to make that their A1 headline.

The media isn't pro-Trump. But it is pro-clicks. Which amounts to the same thing.


I agree on that abortion position though. Probably not a popular stance on this board though.

GrantDawg 04-08-2024 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3430323)
I agree on that abortion position though. Probably not a popular stance on this board though.

Which position? That it should be up to the states, or that women should be put in prison for having abortions? He has held both.

Ksyrup 04-08-2024 01:40 PM

I will be pretty disappointed with the Biden campaign if they don't post a picture of Trump staring at the eclipse (from 2017).

NobodyHere 04-08-2024 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3430325)
Which position? That it should be up to the states, or that women should be put in prison for having abortions? He has held both.


The states thing

Atocep 04-08-2024 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3430333)
The states thing


I think there's a Healthcare standard for women that isn't met when it's left to the states.

Women shouldn't be going through the horror stories we're seeing because a bunch of old guys don't understand that abortion is a legit medical procedure.

NobodyHere 04-08-2024 02:20 PM

You do know that a sizable number of women also oppose abortion right?

Lathum 04-08-2024 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3430323)
I agree on that abortion position though. Probably not a popular stance on this board though.


that post birth abortions are a thing?

RainMaker 04-08-2024 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3430339)
You do know that a sizable number of women also oppose abortion right?


And I support their decision to not get one.

Atocep 04-08-2024 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3430339)
You do know that a sizable number of women also oppose abortion right?


Those women tend to change their mind when they're put in a situation where their health is in danger or the child isn't viable.

The problem is the vast majority of people equate abortion to a form of birth control. It's a medical procedure and a lot of people have a very difficult time accepting that until they need one.

GrantDawg 04-08-2024 03:05 PM

We can see with the mess that we are having with the states that state mandates are just chaos. Even if you are for a general abortion ban, states shouldn't be putting burdens on women for general health and reproductive care. No one should have to hire a lawyer or go before a judge to get what is regular health procedures done. They definitely shouldn't have to go to another state for care nor face prosecution from their home state if they do.

Atocep 04-08-2024 05:47 PM

The abortion issue starts with the fact that we do an absolutely horrible job of teaching women's health in this country. It's better in some places than others, but there isn't a place in this country that teaches it well. Men, generally speaking, have no clue on women's health issues and a depressing number of women aren't much better.

The term abortion has a negative stigma attached to it even though it is a legitimate medical procedure that saves lives on a daily basis. There's a significant number of women in this country that have had abortions and have no idea they had one. Hospitals refer to them as D&Cs when discussing it with mothers because they don't want to even get into any religious or political debates when someone's life is in danger.

The issue with turning it over to the state is we now have various levels of standard care for women. What about exceptions for life of baby or mother? The problem is the wording. When you say there's an exception for life of baby or mother doctors now have to wait until the life is in danger before providing care that should have been given much earlier. Entopic pregnancies are just one example. We know that fetus isn't viable and will put the mother's life at risk. Doctor's in abortion banned states, right now, have to wait until that fetus puts the mother's life at risk before they can move forward with the abortion.

In Texas, since the abortion ban went into effect, infant deaths caused by severe genetic or birth defects has gone up over 20%. This puts a massive amount of undue suffering on families and a newborn child that wasn't viable from the beginning.

I work in a hospital, but I'm IT and by no means an expert on this. My wife, however, grew up in a very conservative Christian home that was and still is very anti-abortion. She was a medic for several years in the hospital I work in and saw these things first hand. She's now very passionate about reproductive rights and women's healthcare.

Lathum 04-08-2024 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3430349)
We can see with the mess that we are having with the states that state mandates are just chaos. Even if you are for a general abortion ban, states shouldn't be putting burdens on women for general health and reproductive care. No one should have to hire a lawyer or go before a judge to get what is regular health procedures done. They definitely shouldn't have to go to another state for care nor face prosecution from their home state if they do.


It's like having a no peeing section in the pool.

the reality is this effects minority and low income people on a much higher level so the GOP doesn't care.

JPhillips 04-09-2024 11:20 AM

This is a nuclear bomb of an ad.


Qwikshot 04-09-2024 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3430430)
This is a nuclear bomb of an ad.



Arizona just banned abortions; women are cattle now.

RainMaker 04-09-2024 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3430373)
The term abortion has a negative stigma attached to it even though it is a legitimate medical procedure that saves lives on a daily basis. There's a significant number of women in this country that have had abortions and have no idea they had one. Hospitals refer to them as D&Cs when discussing it with mothers because they don't want to even get into any religious or political debates when someone's life is in danger.


This is well said. I remember that one of the Duggar women had an abortion a couple years ago. The fetus was non-viable and maybe a danger to her at some point. But it was still an abortion. They of course didn't call it that. She was provided condolences (from the Governor even!) even though she broke the law in her state.

There was a great piece put together about people who work at these clinics. They came across a lot of conservative people, including those who had been protesting the clinic on a daily basis. They all had reasons why their abortion wasn't the same as other abortions. They were "too young" or "didn't want to ruin their life" or whatever reason they could use to justify why they were different.

In the end, this has never been about abortion. Most people support it when it comes down to it when it comes to their personal life. It's about controlling women. It's why things that reduce abortions like access to birth control and health care are rebuked by anti-abortion activists. Their goal isn't to reduce abortions.

RainMaker 04-09-2024 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3430430)
This is a nuclear bomb of an ad.




Since Dems have no issues to run on besides this, this is all they should be talking about. The people convincing them to run on immigration should be fired.


albionmoonlight 04-11-2024 07:47 AM

With fluoride in dental products so we still need it in drinking water

I'm going to start standing really close to particle accelerators and hope that I am jumped into another timeline. This one really is the stupidest of all possible worlds.

flere-imsaho 04-15-2024 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3429980)
Trump sucks and all but his foreign policy is much better.


Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 3429984)
From the first Trump Administration, a short-list:
  • Withdrew the U.S. from an Iranian sanctions program that then allowed Iran greater freedom to develop nuclear weapons
  • Gave legitimacy to the practice of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank


These aged well.

RainMaker 04-15-2024 07:37 AM

West Bank settlements have been going on long before Trump (I understand this is new to some of you). Nuclear deal had nothing to do with Iran's retaliation. That deal didn't cause their consulate to get bombed.

I get your foreign policy stance is blowing up in your face again like people said it would (and like it has for 70 years). But it's going to be tough to blame this one on a guy who hasn't been in power in over 3 years.

JPhillips 04-15-2024 08:20 AM

Conveniently leaving out the execution of Iran's general and the retaliation of dozens of injured U.S. servicemen.

RainMaker 04-15-2024 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3430718)
Conveniently leaving out the execution of Iran's general and the retaliation of dozens of injured U.S. servicemen.


The attack was retaliation against Israel for blowing up their consulate. It was not directed at American forces.

This is the result of Biden's foreign policy of letting Israel do whatever they want and to start a regional war. Not going to be able to orange man bad your way out of this one.

Atocep 04-15-2024 10:13 AM

Trump's lack of ground game and the RNC's lack of money to even have one is going to hurt them. Trump hasn't even had the money to have his rallies lately.

I guess the RNC also fired most of their experienced people due to failing the "loyalty test" they made them take to keep their jobs when Laura Trump took it over.

Lathum 04-15-2024 10:49 AM

Funny what happens when you get a reputation for not paying bills.

RainMaker 04-15-2024 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3430729)
Trump's lack of ground game and the RNC's lack of money to even have one is going to hurt them. Trump hasn't even had the money to have his rallies lately.

I guess the RNC also fired most of their experienced people due to failing the "loyalty test" they made them take to keep their jobs when Laura Trump took it over.


I think it'll hurt them down ballot in a big way. Already seeing some people talk about how bad the Republicans Congressional hopes are looking. Think there is a good chance the House flips again which would at least be some check on Trump.

RainMaker 04-16-2024 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 3429974)
We already know what Trump's foreign policy would be. It would be doing what Putin wants the U.S. to do. Given that you seem totally fine with Putin being allowed to do what he wants to do, RM, I could see how you would come up with such a ridiculous statement.



This sounds like doing what Putin wants us to do. Tell us again how we care about Ukraine "winning" this war.



flere-imsaho 06-22-2025 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3429980)
Trump sucks and all but his foreign policy is much better. It'd keep us out of nevernding conflict in Ukraine and save hundreds of billions. Plus he at least seems to have a line with Israel committing genocide that Joe doesn't.


This aged well.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.