Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   The Official MLB 2007 Thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=57945)

Chief Rum 07-08-2007 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1496580)
Round is distinctive?


Well, it's distinct in that there's no blurring what shape it is now, isn't it?

Ksyrup 07-08-2007 01:03 PM

Wily Mo Pena makes Manny look like a Gold Glove OFer.

DeToxRox 07-08-2007 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1496714)
Wily Mo Pena makes Manny look like a Gold Glove OFer.


You would've thought that a monster HR was hit by the sheer fact Willy Mo didn't move until the ball hit the base of the wall.

DeToxRox 07-08-2007 01:11 PM

Dola

Marcus Thames may have the most power of anyone in the MLB.

Between the two bombs in Washington and the HR he just mashed to CF, he is hitting some shots.

DeToxRox 07-08-2007 01:11 PM

Dola

Marcus Thames may have the most power of anyone in the MLB.

Between the two bombs in Washington and the HR he just mashed to CF, he is hitting some shots.

DeToxRox 07-08-2007 01:16 PM

WOW!

Curtis Granderson catch of the year. Jesus christ.

Ksyrup 07-08-2007 01:16 PM

Granderson just one-upped Beltran's play from last night. Wow!!!!

LoneStarGirl 07-08-2007 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1496447)
First off...amazing catch. The concentration it must take to make that play going up the hill is something I can't even fathom. Didn't Edmonds make a similar catch a few years back? I think his might have been even more impressive (and I'm a Met fan).

I have a question for the Astros fans...why all the hatred for Beltran? I haven't heard an opposing player get so mercilessly booed by a crowd since John Rocker made his first post-NY subway-related interview appearance at Shea. Yes, he spurned you guys to join a team for more money (actually, I think the Yankee offer he would've preferred might have been less than Houston's, but that's besides the point...), but he was a rent-a-player, not a guy who devoted six or so years to the organization and was the team's heart and soul. And not only did he not owe you anything for his half season with Houston, but he turned in arguably the greatest playoff performance of all-time to get you close to the World Series.

Seriously, what's up your collective asses? I can't think of other examples where a player who was on a team for a few months and then signed elsewhere and was booed like he was Hitler. From a Mets perspective, when we made a huge deal for Mike Hampton prior to the 2000 season, and he was an important piece to a World Series team...when he signed a big deal with Colorado, he didn't become Public Enemy #1.


I was waiting on Jeeber to come in here and answer this one, but since he is slow today...

The reason for the hatred for Carlos Beltran is because when the Astros and Mets were both competing for Carlos to sign with their teams, Carlos was at home in Puerto Rico. His agent, Scott Boras, allowed the Mets to come visit Carlos at his house but denied Houston representatives any access to Carlos during that time. So of course he went to the Mets instead. That is why Astro fans treat Carlos so negatively. They feel that they were treated wrongly by Carlos and his agent.

Chief Rum 07-08-2007 05:31 PM

It's amazing to me we're still in first place at the All Star break (albeit barely) when two of our five starters are Bartolo Colon and Ervin Santana.

Logan 07-08-2007 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneStarGirl (Post 1496834)
I was waiting on Jeeber to come in here and answer this one, but since he is slow today...

The reason for the hatred for Carlos Beltran is because when the Astros and Mets were both competing for Carlos to sign with their teams, Carlos was at home in Puerto Rico. His agent, Scott Boras, allowed the Mets to come visit Carlos at his house but denied Houston representatives any access to Carlos during that time. So of course he went to the Mets instead. That is why Astro fans treat Carlos so negatively. They feel that they were treated wrongly by Carlos and his agent.


So where does Carlos preferring to sign with the Yankees for less money than he got from the Mets fit into that?

dawgfan 07-08-2007 05:53 PM

Mariners are really on a roll - I'm hoping Bavasi can work out a deal for Buehrle (maybe for Balentien and Feierabend?) to give the rotation a boost.

Chief Rum 07-08-2007 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1496869)
Mariners are really on a roll - I'm hoping Bavasi can work out a deal for Buehrle (maybe for Balentien and Feierabend?) to give the rotation a boost.


Better check the sportswire, dawg. I doubt Buehrle's coming.

dawgfan 07-08-2007 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1496877)
Better check the sportswire, dawg. I doubt Buehrle's coming.

Hmm, hadn't seen that report. Still, doesn't necessarily mean he couldn't be dealt, though I agree that it's doubtful at this point. I guess that just really depends on what kind of offers Williams gets - now that he has Buehrle under contract beyond this season, he's got more leverage to extract top prospects.

dawgfan 07-08-2007 06:07 PM

Dola - I'd say at this point though that, given what's out there, about the only deal I could see that would really benefit the M's would be to try and get Lidge as an 8th inning guy to set up Putz and allow the M's to send Morrow to the minors to develop as a starter.

Chief Rum 07-08-2007 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1496882)
Hmm, hadn't seen that report. Still, doesn't necessarily mean he couldn't be dealt, though I agree that it's doubtful at this point. I guess that just really depends on what kind of offers Williams gets - now that he has Buehrle under contract beyond this season, he's got more leverage to extract top prospects.


Aren't there rules against trading a guy like thta who is about to start a longterm extension? Anyway, I just don't think the White Sox would bother to sign him to a long term contract just to extract top prospects in a trade. I think they finally realized they were being to cheap and Chicagolanders would view letting Buerhle go as extremely negative.

dawgfan 07-08-2007 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1496892)
Aren't there rules against trading a guy like thta who is about to start a longterm extension? Anyway, I just don't think the White Sox would bother to sign him to a long term contract just to extract top prospects in a trade. I think they finally realized they were being to cheap and Chicagolanders would view letting Buerhle go as extremely negative.

I'm not sure if there are any rules like that or not. Regardless, considering that Williams has always said he's not into rebuilding - he wants the team to be contenders next season - it wouldn't make much sense to deal Buehrle now that they have him locked up long-term, even if he could get a nice haul for him.

Now, whether the ChiSox can actually be contenders next season is a whole 'nother question, especially being in the same division as the young and very talented Indians and Tigers.

Schmidty 07-08-2007 06:38 PM

dawgfan - I'll be going to Mariner - Tigers game on Sunday. If you happen to get tickets or something, maybe I could say hello.

dawgfan 07-08-2007 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schmidty (Post 1496906)
dawgfan - I'll be going to Mariner - Tigers game on Sunday. If you happen to get tickets or something, maybe I could say hello.

I was considering trying to catch one of those games - it'll obviously be a huge series given the standings. I'll definitely let you know if I end up going to the Sunday game.

sterlingice 07-08-2007 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katon (Post 1495413)
Well, a drug-boosted Neifi Perez is still Neifi Perez . . .


Damned if we don't know that in KC... :(

SI

sterlingice 07-08-2007 11:00 PM

Really good deal for the Sox on Buerhle. $14M per for him is probably $2-$3M below market value. More impressive is that it's a 4 year deal rather than the 5 or 6 he would have gotten in free agency.

SI

JonInMiddleGA 07-08-2007 11:04 PM

So ... who had the Padres & Brewers for the best records in the NL at the break in the office pool?

dawgfan 07-10-2007 04:59 PM

Rumors are flying around Seattle today that the M's and Ichiro are on the verge of agreement on a contract extension. Rumored terms are $100M/5 years.

Young Drachma 07-10-2007 07:15 PM

You know, they had some guy hit off of a tee for half a million bucks or something just now. They gave him 30 seconds. He didn't get one out of the infield. But I thought it was lame that they made him hit off of a tee.

Atocep 07-10-2007 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1498707)
Rumors are flying around Seattle today that the M's and Ichiro are on the verge of agreement on a contract extension. Rumored terms are $100M/5 years.



Wow.

I understand that Ichrio has a lot of added value from attracting fans from Japan, but wow.

Logan 07-10-2007 07:36 PM

I'd be amazed if he got $20MM a year.

Ksyrup 07-10-2007 07:43 PM

Doesn't shock me. The Mariners need to keep a major draw, he's Japanese, and he's showing he hasn't lost anything. He has an outside shot at 3000 hits if he plays this well for a few more years and sticks around into his 40s. That would be incredible.

dawgfan 07-10-2007 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 1498806)
Wow.

I understand that Ichrio has a lot of added value from attracting fans from Japan, but wow.

I think a lot of people are underestimating the on-field value Ichiro generates from his defensive ability. If you look at him strictly from his offensive contributions, yeah, he's not as valuable a hitter as a guys like Bonds, A-Rod, Vlad, Pujols. But when you add in his defensive value as a premium CF, he really does rate as an elite player. His ancillary benefits as a draw of Japanese dollars is just icing on the cake.

dawgfan 07-10-2007 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1498820)
I'd be amazed if he got $20MM a year.

It's at least what he would've gotten on the open market.

Schmidty 07-10-2007 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1498835)
Insert typical Seattle optimist fanboy comment here.


Kidding aside, I actually agree with you.

sterlingice 07-10-2007 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1498838)
It's at least what he would've gotten on the open market.


I just don't think see it at all. Maybe $15-$17M but not $20M.

SI

Crapshoot 07-10-2007 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1498868)
I just don't think see it at all. Maybe $15-$17M but not $20M.

SI


Revenue had just exploded across baseball - its more than 30-40% of what it was a couple of years ago. Think about it - a league average SP is looking at $11 million per year or whereabouts right now. Ichirio, with the perceived marketing draw, was going to get 5/90 or whereabouts easily. Additionally, Seattle is owned by Nintendo - keeping him could be more than a fiscal decision.

dawgfan 07-10-2007 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1498868)
I just don't think see it at all. Maybe $15-$17M but not $20M.

SI

Soriano signed for 8 years/$136M. Soriano is younger, but Ichiro is a more productive hitter and a far superior fielder. The speculation I've read leading into and continuing through this season put Ichiro's open market value at upwards of $20M/year. One early example from ESPN here, and another from one of the local papers here.

Considering that had Ichiro reached free agency the Yankees would've been strong candidates to bid on him, I don't think $20M/year is at all a stretch.

Latest numbers I'm seeing on his rumored deal are a little lower - it might be $90M for 5 years.

Ksyrup 07-11-2007 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1498835)
I think a lot of people are underestimating the on-field value Ichiro generates from his defensive ability. If you look at him strictly from his offensive contributions, yeah, he's not as valuable a hitter as a guys like Bonds, A-Rod, Vlad, Pujols. But when you add in his defensive value as a premium CF, he really does rate as an elite player. His ancillary benefits as a draw of Japanese dollars is just icing on the cake.


The problem with this argument is that Adam Jones is geting called up, meaning one of them is going to be wasted by not playing CF. And it'll probably be Ichiro, but maybe he'll force them to move Jones to RF in order to sign.

Ksyrup 07-11-2007 10:05 PM

Is it just me, or is the Yankees' ARod extension talk an attempt to force his hand? Now he pretty much can't opt out, unless he wants to admit that he never had any intention of staying in NY.

dawgfan 07-11-2007 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1499845)
The problem with this argument is that Adam Jones is geting called up, meaning one of them is going to be wasted by not playing CF. And it'll probably be Ichiro, but maybe he'll force them to move Jones to RF in order to sign.

There's no way Ichiro is getting displaced from CF. Jones is playing multiple OF spots in Tacoma right now, and while he's getting positive reviews for his improvement on defense, there's no way he's a better fielder than Ichiro. The reports have him going to RF, Guillen to LF and Ibanez to DH. Given the way Safeco is configured, I think they'd actually be better off leaving Guillen in RF and installing Jones in LF, but whatever.

Logan 07-11-2007 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1499846)
Is it just me, or is the Yankees' ARod extension talk an attempt to force his hand? Now he pretty much can't opt out, unless he wants to admit that he never had any intention of staying in NY.


Sure he can; he'd be stupid not to opt out. Then he attempts to negotiate a 7 year, $210 million deal. The chances of him getting a similar long-term deal 3 years from now isn't nearly as high as his chance of getting another big money, 3 year deal after a potential 7 year deal, or a large extension when he's approaching those last years.

The Yankees are doing this for 2 reasons:

1. To show their fans that they tried to sign him before he ends up going to Anaheim, Chicago, etc.
2. If he signs an extension, the Yankees still get all that money from Texas over the next 3 years. If he opts out and then they sign him, it's all on them.

dawgfan 07-11-2007 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1499846)
Now he pretty much can't opt out, unless he wants to admit that he never had any intention of staying in NY.

As a Boras client, I'd be very, very surprised if he doesn't utilize his opt-out clause. From a financial standpoint, he'd be an idiot to not do so. And given how brutal the fanbase was with him last year, and the notable lack of support from his teammates and manager at many points, I can't really see an emotional reason why he'd forgo the opt-out.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 06:46 AM

But that's what I'm saying...the Yankees are putting him in a no-win situation if he decides to opt out. If he opts out, he's saying he doesn't want to play for the Yankees, which feeds into the "ARod just says what people want to hear" thing that's been a criticism of him from the start. And if he does opt out, the Yankees have gone far enough with the "we'll negotiate now" story to also leak (I don't think this has been made official, but it's clear they've put this out there) that if he does opt out, they will not be part of the bidding.

I completely understand why ARod would want to leave. But the fact is, he keeps saying he wants to stay, and now he has to put up or shut up. I think it would be fairly easy to get a very good deal from the Yankees. Keep the next 3 years at $27M per (which is only $53M paid by the Yankees) and that gives him leverage to ask for the 5 year extension at around $32M per. That's 8 years, $241M.

I just think this is setting up as another PR hit if he doesn't attempt to negotiate with them. I think they know that and are giving themselves an easy way to keep the fans on their side if he pushes the opt out clause. Personally, I hope he leaves - I want to root for him since I don't really have anything against him, and I can't do that when he's playing for the Yankees.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1499861)
There's no way Ichiro is getting displaced from CF. Jones is playing multiple OF spots in Tacoma right now, and while he's getting positive reviews for his improvement on defense, there's no way he's a better fielder than Ichiro. The reports have him going to RF, Guillen to LF and Ibanez to DH. Given the way Safeco is configured, I think they'd actually be better off leaving Guillen in RF and installing Jones in LF, but whatever.


He won't play center now, but during the course of Ichiro's extension - and probably sooner than later - he is being groomed to take over CF. Which begs the question of whether Ichiro, as a singles hitter, is worth $20M a year to play a corner OF position and not get the most out of his defensive abilities.

In any event, one plus for you has to be that this pushes Vidro to the bench. Although you have to wonder why they would have agreed to pay him so much money and then give up on him after half a season when anyone with half a brain knew what they were getting. You guys sure could use Soriano in that bullpen now that you have meaningful games to protect, huh? It's too bad the Mariners are doing so well, in a way, because it seems to suggest Bavasi's done a good job.

miami_fan 07-12-2007 07:32 AM

So what is Rickey Henderson going to do different than what Rick Down was doing?

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 07:36 AM

Talk about himself in the third person.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 07:48 AM

Hafner and Indians agree to $57M, four-year extension

Associated Press
Updated: July 11, 2007, 11:58 PM ET

CLEVELAND -- Travis Hafner and the Cleveland Indians agreed to a $57 million, four-year contract extension through the 2012 season on Wednesday.

Hafner, the Indians' designated hitter, is making $3.95 million this year, and Cleveland had a 2008 option for a minimum $4.95 million. Under the new deal, he will receive more money next year. The new agreement includes a team option for 2013.

Cleveland is expected to announce the agreement Thursday.

The 30-year-old Hafner is batting .262 with 14 homers and 57 RBIs this season after hitting .308 last year with 42 homers and 117 RBIs.






I really don't like this deal from the Indians' perspective. The guy is a DH-only and already 30. Just straight division, he would be making $14.25M a year, but it sounds like he is going to get more next year than his option calls for, but less than the full $14M, which means he'll really be making somewhere north of $15-17M a year by the end of the deal. I guess that's the going rate, but I'd be really nervous if I was them.

sterlingice 07-12-2007 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1499946)
I really don't like this deal from the Indians' perspective. The guy is a DH-only and already 30. Just straight division, he would be making $14.25M a year, but it sounds like he is going to get more next year than his option calls for, but less than the full $14M, which means he'll really be making somewhere north of $15-17M a year by the end of the deal. I guess that's the going rate, but I'd be really nervous if I was them.


I'd have thought they could have gotten a better deal with how he's hitting this year

SI

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 08:40 AM

Yeah, you don't know if this is a blip, or the beginning of a decline. He could be Pat Burrell by 2010.

MikeVic 07-12-2007 08:45 AM

I might watch Mets games to get a glimpse of Rickey now!

Logan 07-12-2007 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1499927)
But that's what I'm saying...the Yankees are putting him in a no-win situation if he decides to opt out. If he opts out, he's saying he doesn't want to play for the Yankees


No he's not. There isn't one person in the NY area who thinks ARod won't opt out. That belief was the same before the season. It's a slam dunk; he's not going to get an ounce of heat from fans for "leaving" and then coming back.

Logan 07-12-2007 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVic (Post 1499992)
I might watch Mets games to get a glimpse of Rickey now!


Talk about something that doesn't make an ounce of sense...word out of the Mets camp for the past couple years has been how great an "instructor" Rickey is -- he helped Reyes, for example, learn how to be a great base stealer. But is Rickey really going to spend hours breaking down game tape of pitchers to pick up on tendencies? Spend hours breaking down tape of Delgado's at bats from last season to see what he's doing wrong now, and how to correct it? For some reason I have my doubts.

MikeVic 07-12-2007 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1500001)
Talk about something that doesn't make an ounce of sense...word out of the Mets camp for the past couple years has been how great an "instructor" Rickey is -- he helped Reyes, for example, learn how to be a great base stealer. But is Rickey really going to spend hours breaking down game tape of pitchers to pick up on tendencies? Spend hours breaking down tape of Delgado's at bats from last season to see what he's doing wrong now, and how to correct it? For some reason I have my doubts.


He'll teach them to use their eyes better and draw walks. ;)

Yeah, I don't see Rickey doing that either. But I want him to succeed!

st.cronin 07-12-2007 08:59 AM

I've long thought that Rickey would make a great coach, maybe even a great manager.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1499994)
No he's not. There isn't one person in the NY area who thinks ARod won't opt out. That belief was the same before the season. It's a slam dunk; he's not going to get an ounce of heat from fans for "leaving" and then coming back.


But the Yankees have gone "public" (by way of leaks) that they are willing to negotiate now, and if he opts out, they will not take part in the bidding. Seems like if they truly believe he is going to opt out, why would they take the extra step of saying he will not be a Yankee in that case? If they're going to eventually sign him after he opts out anyway, why even make that statement? If this plays out like you say, then they will have shown major weakness in the negotiations and will have to give him a blank check once he opts out - and look ridiculous for drawing a line in the sand and then saying, "No, we really didn't mean it."

Something tells me they know he's leaning towards leaving, and this is their best opportunity to (a) keep him, or (b) save face by pre-emptively making a move to sign him, so that when he opts out and goes elsewhere, they can pin it on him.

Logan 07-12-2007 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1500009)
But the Yankees have gone "public" (by way of leaks) that they are willing to negotiate now, and if he opts out, they will not take part in the bidding. Seems like if they truly believe he is going to opt out, why would they take the extra step of saying he will not be a Yankee in that case? If they're going to eventually sign him after he opts out anyway, why even make that statement? If this plays out like you say, then they will have shown major weakness in the negotiations and will have to give him a blank check once he opts out - and look ridiculous for drawing a line in the sand and then saying, "No, we really didn't mean it."

Something tells me they know he's leaning towards leaving, and this is their best opportunity to (a) keep him, or (b) save face by pre-emptively making a move to sign him, so that when he opts out and goes elsewhere, they can pin it on him.


I think you're right about the Yankees' motivation with this...believe it or not, they probably won't be able to afford his huge deal (save for Texas still ponying up) with how much they're going to need to turn over the roster. Where I think you're off though is your original point about making A-Rod look bad by starting all this...because of how no one thinks maintaining the contract makes sense. IMO, it's actually the Yankees who are in a no-win situation.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 09:21 AM

I don't see why the 8 year, $241M contract I put together wouldn't make sense, and if he wants to stay with the Yankees, then he HAS to realize that keeping the Rangers on the hook for $29M over the next 3 years is in his best interests. If his plan is to opt out and he honestly thinks the Yankees would then negotiate a deal in the same range, why would they? He just fucked them out of $30M of Tim Hicks' money?

So I guess this means he either tells Boras to stuff it and signs for around $250M with the Yanks in the next few weeks, or they opt out and he almost certainly goes elsewhere. Like I said, I can't see him being able to come back to the Yankees after costing them $30M. My inclination would be to make him an offer, subtract the $29M, and tell him to take it or leave it.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 09:25 AM

As far as ARod looking bad, you don't think Yankees fans are going to go apeshit that he's talked about wanting to stay, they've finally warmed up to him, and then he leaves? Even if you understand the move financially, it's not like he's going to get THAT much more from another team than the Yankees would offer. And since I still hear stuff about how he just goes where the money is, dating back to the Seattle/Texas thing, I think he'd get even more shit for this move nationally.

That's not to say I wouldn't mind seeing him leave. In fact, I'd love for him to take out a full-page ad in the NY papers blasting the fans for not supporting him while he was struggling and then jumping on the bandwagon when he was doing well, and that he wanted to go a team where the fans would support him through thick and thin. It would be hilarious if he came out with a statement about how, at this point in his career, all he wants is a chance to win the World Series, and he doesn't think the Yankees are in a position to do that! Man that would be awesome.

dawgfan 07-12-2007 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1499930)
He won't play center now, but during the course of Ichiro's extension - and probably sooner than later - he is being groomed to take over CF. Which begs the question of whether Ichiro, as a singles hitter, is worth $20M a year to play a corner OF position and not get the most out of his defensive abilities.

We'll have to see how Ichiro ages. At some point in the future, yeah, it may be that Jones surpasses Ichiro as a fielder, but I don't think it's a bad thing to have two guys in the OF that have respectable CF range.

As for Ichiro being a "singles hitter", that's mostly true, but I think most of the country doesn't realize just how good he is at it and just how valuable his hitting in general has been - check out this detailed look at him from USS Mariner. Quick summary - Ichiro's average offensive performance over the last 4 years is better than any single season offensive performance by any other CF over that time.

Quote:

In any event, one plus for you has to be that this pushes Vidro to the bench. Although you have to wonder why they would have agreed to pay him so much money and then give up on him after half a season when anyone with half a brain knew what they were getting. You guys sure could use Soriano in that bullpen now that you have meaningful games to protect, huh? It's too bad the Mariners are doing so well, in a way, because it seems to suggest Bavasi's done a good job.
That's the conundrum for me - Bavasi makes a lot of bad decisions, so I'd love to see someone smarter take his job. With the team doing so well this year, Bavasi's hot seat is most likely cooling off. But I'll make that trade - it's been too much fun this season seeing the team climb back into playoff contention.

dawgfan 07-12-2007 11:35 AM

Dola - I guess your point is more about whether $20M per year is worth it if Ichiro gets forced to LF or RF. First, I suspect that Ichiro will remain in CF for a long time - the way he keeps himself in shape, I think he's going to age very gracefully. Second, as that article I linked to argues, his contract is not at all out of line with the current market (though that assumes he's a CF).

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 12:26 PM

"After the New York Yankees on Wednesday indicated they would break from tradition and negotiate during the season with Alex Rodriguez on a contract extension, his agent moved in quickly to define what it would take to keep the superstar third baseman playing in New York.

And that would be unprecedented millions per season.

In a telephone interview with the New York Post, Scott Boras said Rodriguez assuredly will become Major League Baseball's first $30 million-a-year player.

However, Boras said he will not take up the Yankees' offer to negotiate before the season ends.

"We are not going to be negotiating during the season," Boras said. Boras insisted he could see no way that strategy will change, saying "This is Alex's decision. This has been his policy, and I fully expect this to continue to be his policy."


Well, here we go - someone is going to have to blink, and I bet it's not going to be ARod. This HAS to mean he's leaving, because forcing the Yankees to pay $29M they wouldn't otherwise have to would hurt his team. How could he stay with them at that point? I know it's the Yankees and they have more money than they know what to do with, but saving $29M is still significant, even to the Yankees.


EDIT: I guess the only loophole here is that he has 2 weeks after the season ends to decide whether to opt out, so technically he could wait until the season ends and then negotiate a deal with the Yankees before he has to decide to opt out. We'll see if the Yankees soften there stance on negotiating after the season, though.

Logan 07-12-2007 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1500031)
As far as ARod looking bad, you don't think Yankees fans are going to go apeshit that he's talked about wanting to stay, they've finally warmed up to him, and then he leaves? Even if you understand the move financially, it's not like he's going to get THAT much more from another team than the Yankees would offer. And since I still hear stuff about how he just goes where the money is, dating back to the Seattle/Texas thing, I think he'd get even more shit for this move nationally.

That's not to say I wouldn't mind seeing him leave. In fact, I'd love for him to take out a full-page ad in the NY papers blasting the fans for not supporting him while he was struggling and then jumping on the bandwagon when he was doing well, and that he wanted to go a team where the fans would support him through thick and thin. It would be hilarious if he came out with a statement about how, at this point in his career, all he wants is a chance to win the World Series, and he doesn't think the Yankees are in a position to do that! Man that would be awesome.


Everything you've said is still true...but none of this would have been any different if the Yankees didn't come out and offer to start negotiating now. If it never happened, and he ends up opting-out and signing elsewhere, the fans will go apeshit when he returns anyway. That's my point...the Yankees' maneuver didn't change a thing.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1500201)
Everything you've said is still true...but none of this would have been any different if the Yankees didn't come out and offer to start negotiating now. If it never happened, and he ends up opting-out and signing elsewhere, the fans will go apeshit when he returns anyway. That's my point...the Yankees' maneuver didn't change a thing.


I still think it makes the Yankees look like they covered their bases and gave it their best effort if he leaves. Might not change the perception of ARod too much, but putting the ball back in his court this early is good PR for the team in case things turn out badly. That might be all they hoped to get out of this.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1498881)
Latest numbers I'm seeing on his rumored deal are a little lower - it might be $90M for 5 years.



Official word of Ichiro's new five-year contract extension to remain with the Mariners through the 2012 season is expected to come at a Friday news conference.

As of Wednesday afternoon, the deal — which is expected to exceed $100 million in total value — remained unsigned, but is expected to be finalized soon, according to sources. Ichiro's agent, Tony Attanasio, was said to be tied up all day in court watching his son try a case.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 01:48 PM

I hope they added a 6th year...

dawgfan 07-12-2007 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1500238)
I hope they added a 6th year...

I'm not sure I do. Even though I think Ichiro is the kind of athlete that will remain in outstanding condition as he ages, and even though $20M+ per year is still below market value for Ichiro (as referenced in a previous post), I'd rather limit the M's vulnerability in case something unexpectedly bad happens with Ichiro.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 02:20 PM

I'm still not sure I agree he's worth that much per year at his age. All I was suggesting is that $100M over 6 years seems more palatable to me than $100 over 5 years. The payout is still the same, so I'm not sure how they are limiting their vulnerability over 5 years as opposed to 6. If anything, they would be deferring payment by spreading it over an additional year.

dawgfan 07-12-2007 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1500253)
The payout is still the same, so I'm not sure how they are limiting their vulnerability over 5 years as opposed to 6. If anything, they would be deferring payment by spreading it over an additional year.

Well, it all depends on how they do their accounting when budgeting yearly payroll. If it's a 5 year deal and they decide to part ways with Ichiro, that theoretically clears $20M from the payroll to spend elsewhere, as opposed to a 6 year deal where they still have $16.7M tied up. Now, Ichiro could make it all a moot point by aging gracefully, and by the time this contract ends the amount of money we're talking about could be what the going rate for a Jeff Weaver is (i.e. a middling 5th starter).

As for whether Ichiro is worth that money, well, I guess it depends on how much value you put into stats like Runs Created, how much faith you have in the number crunching guys like Tom Tango have done on examining contracts and extracting the value per win above replacement player level of recent deals, and how well you expect Ichiro to age. Based off of what deals like those for Alfonso Soriano, Carlos Lee, Aramis Ramirez, Juan Pierre, etc., it can (and has been) argued that$20M per year for Ichiro is a bargain.

MikeVic 07-12-2007 02:35 PM

If Ichiro signs for $20M+, and Seatle decides to trade him down the line... I doubt the team that gets him would agree to the entire salary. So Seattle would still be on the hook for a large part of the salary. I would think that 100M/6 is better than 100M/5.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1500262)
Well, it all depends on how they do their accounting when budgeting yearly payroll. If it's a 5 year deal and they decide to part ways with Ichiro, that theoretically clears $20M from the payroll to spend elsewhere, as opposed to a 6 year deal where they still have $16.7M tied up. Now, Ichiro could make it all a moot point by aging gracefully, and by the time this contract ends the amount of money we're talking about could be what the going rate for a Jeff Weaver is (i.e. a middling 5th starter).

As for whether Ichiro is worth that money, well, I guess it depends on how much value you put into stats like Runs Created, how much faith you have in the number crunching guys like Tom Tango have done on examining contracts and extracting the value per win above replacement player level of recent deals, and how well you expect Ichiro to age. Based off of what deals like those for Alfonso Soriano, Carlos Lee, Aramis Ramirez, Juan Pierre, etc., it can (and has been) argued that$20M per year for Ichiro is a bargain.


I'd say it has more to do with his age. He'll be 34 when the extension kicks in. Maybe if he was 3 years younger, but I'm not sure I'd want to take the chance now. I also realize the reality of him being their biggest attraction, so they have to take that chance.

dawgfan 07-12-2007 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVic (Post 1500267)
If Ichiro signs for $20M+, and Seatle decides to trade him down the line... I doubt the team that gets him would agree to the entire salary. So Seattle would still be on the hook for a large part of the salary. I would think that 100M/6 is better than 100M/5.

Sure, that's more palatable to another team. But let's keep this in mind - outside of a few seasons here and there where salaries stagnate, the going rate for players keeps rising. Even assuming some decline in Ichiro's performance due to aging, there's a fair chance that salary inflation will outpace that assumed decline and Ichiro will remain paid at or below market value during the length of his contract.

st.cronin 07-12-2007 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1500274)
Sure, that's more palatable to another team. But let's keep this in mind - outside of a few seasons here and there where salaries stagnate, the going rate for players keeps rising. Even assuming some decline in Ichiro's performance due to aging, there's a fair chance that salary inflation will outpace that assumed decline and Ichiro will remain paid at or below market value during the length of his contract.


Can you give some examples of that actually happening, a player signing one of the richest contracts in baseball, and then down the road his salary is a bargain?

dawgfan 07-12-2007 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1500273)
I'd say it has more to do with his age. He'll be 34 when the extension kicks in. Maybe if he was 3 years younger, but I'm not sure I'd want to take the chance now. I also realize the reality of him being their biggest attraction, so they have to take that chance.

Understood. But he's in the upper echelon of athletes in terms of how fit he is and how he takes care of himself. One of the few criticisms of him around town is that Ichiro rarely dives in the outfield to try to make a catch, and you almost never see him fly into a wall or the stands or to the ground with great impact. And while that's true, and it may cost the M's an out here and there, I think it also speaks to Ichiro's longevity and his chances of remaining healthy and productive for a long time.

It's obviously all speculative at this point, and there aren't a lot of good reference points in baseball history for a guy like Ichiro, but I don't think he's a player that's going to fall of a cliff in terms of performance as he gets older - I think he's going to age very well.

And yes, there are obviously factors outside of his performance that play a part in the M's wanting to lock him into another extension - he's the team's biggest star, they are winning again and don't want to lose the key piece to the team, there's the long history of superstar athletes leaving Seattle and not wanting to let Ichiro be the next one, his obvious added draw from Japan and Japanese fans (and the Nintendo ownership connection) - but I really do think a strong argument can be made to justify the deal strictly on on-field performance terms.

dawgfan 07-12-2007 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin (Post 1500277)
Can you give some examples of that actually happening, a player signing one of the richest contracts in baseball, and then down the road his salary is a bargain?

Derek Jeter for one. When you consider that Scott Boras is right and that A-Rod is probably going to get around $30M per year, and when you look at recent deals for Vernon Wells (7 years/$126M), Carlos Lee (6 years/$112M) and Carlos Beltran (7 years/$119M), Jeter's average of $18M per season looks pretty good for the Yankees.

Logan 07-12-2007 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1500291)
Derek Jeter for one. When you consider that Scott Boras is right and that A-Rod is probably going to get around $30M per year, and when you look at recent deals for Vernon Wells (7 years/$126M), Carlos Lee (6 years/$112M) and Carlos Beltran (7 years/$119M), Jeter's average of $18M per season looks pretty good for the Yankees.


He'll get a new deal if A-Rod opts-out/re-signs with the Yankees.

Logan 07-12-2007 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1500001)
Talk about something that doesn't make an ounce of sense...word out of the Mets camp for the past couple years has been how great an "instructor" Rickey is -- he helped Reyes, for example, learn how to be a great base stealer. But is Rickey really going to spend hours breaking down game tape of pitchers to pick up on tendencies? Spend hours breaking down tape of Delgado's at bats from last season to see what he's doing wrong now, and how to correct it? For some reason I have my doubts.


Thankfully, it seems that someone might have jumped the gun a bit on Rickey. The hitting coach was fired, and Rickey was added to the staff. The hitting coach position has not been filled yet -- it's still under discussion. It will either be Rickey, or hopefully (Please God) current 1b coach Howard Johnson. HoJo has already served as a hitting instructor in the organization, so that would make more sense. Plus, Rickey would be a great guy to have giving tips to guys on 1st waiting to steal or get a good jump off the base.

Jas_lov 07-12-2007 04:32 PM

Every interview A-Rod has done he's said that he wants to finish his career as a Yankee. If he still feels that way then they'll probably try and get something done, but I'm not sure they can afford him especially without Texas's help for the next couple years because they'll have a ton of money tied up in old/declining players like Damon, Giambi, Pavano, Mussina, Pettitte has a $16 million player option which he'll take.

Add to this they have to sign fan favorites Jorge Posada and Mariano Rivera who are also getting up their in age, but are still very effective.

Also, Chien Ming Wang and Robinson Cano played for peanuts this year and will need new deals. Wang is their ace and is on pace for another 18+ win season so he should get big money. Cano isn't having as good a year, but I imagine the yankees will want to keep him.

So after all of this and needing a new right fielder to replace bobby abreu, will the yankees be able to afford A-Rod?

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 10:30 PM

Tigers got screwed on a no-call on an interference play, but Pudge went nuts, bumped the ump, and got tossed. I imagine he'll be suspended for 4 or 5 days.

DeToxRox 07-12-2007 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1500539)
Tigers got screwed on a no-call on an interference play, but Pudge went nuts, bumped the ump, and got tossed. I imagine he'll be suspended for 4 or 5 days.


Pudge was as fired up as I've ever seen him.

Miller continues to impress me, though he's throwing a lot of pitches considering he is more likely then most to only get around 90 pitches a start for the most part which means our pen will be in by the middle of 6th or start of 7.

DeToxRox 07-12-2007 10:47 PM

FWIW .. Gary Sheffield is on pace for a potential 30/30 season

Lathum 07-12-2007 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jas_lov (Post 1500343)
Every interview A-Rod has done he's said that he wants to finish his career as a Yankee. If he still feels that way then they'll probably try and get something done, but I'm not sure they can afford him especially without Texas's help for the next couple years because they'll have a ton of money tied up in old/declining players like Damon, Giambi, Pavano, Mussina, Pettitte has a $16 million player option which he'll take.

Add to this they have to sign fan favorites Jorge Posada and Mariano Rivera who are also getting up their in age, but are still very effective.

Also, Chien Ming Wang and Robinson Cano played for peanuts this year and will need new deals. Wang is their ace and is on pace for another 18+ win season so he should get big money. Cano isn't having as good a year, but I imagine the yankees will want to keep him.

So after all of this and needing a new right fielder to replace bobby abreu, will the yankees be able to afford A-Rod?


your kidding, right?

they could pay him 50 million if they wanted to, they have an endless supply of money.

Ksyrup 07-12-2007 10:53 PM

Some bizarre crap going on in the Tigers/Mariners game. The umps must still be on vacation.

DeToxRox 07-12-2007 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1500548)
your kidding, right?

they could pay him 50 million if they wanted to, they have an endless supply of money.


That's true to an extent. But if A-Rod opts out, the Rangers no longer pay a big portion of his salary which means the Yanks now have to finally pony up the entire amount every season and by all accounts I've read, that is something they are not thrilled about doing.

k0ruptr 07-12-2007 11:13 PM

just a bystander comment on the Ichiro thing - He seems like the type of player the should age very well, and continue his hitting and speed with no problems.

Not really sure why I see him this way, just makes sense to me for some reason.

Chief Rum 07-12-2007 11:20 PM

All right, second half is starting. Reset the table. How's this thing all playing out?

I say Tigers.

k0ruptr 07-12-2007 11:23 PM

I call Angels

dawgfan 07-12-2007 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1500567)
All right, second half is starting. Reset the table. How's this thing all playing out?

I say Tigers.

That's a good pick. I'd also say the Red Sox are right there from a talent standpoint. I don't see enough pitching with Cleveland, and the Angels are also struggling a bit with their rotation and don't have quite the lineup that the others have. I'd love to see the M's sneak past someone, but even if they do they're highly unlikely to advance.

I just don't see the best of the NL topping the best of the AL this year.

k0ruptr 07-12-2007 11:26 PM

Are the Brewers really going to win the NL Central???

k0ruptr 07-12-2007 11:34 PM

Do you guys really think that the Tigers have the Bullpen to go deep in the playoffs?

4 out of their top 5 bullpen guys (per innings pitched) have era's from the High 4's to the 5's. mostly 5+ era's

Andrew Miller being the exception.

I do really like the the Tigers road record (best in the majors), which I value a lot. but that bullpen scares me.

Chief Rum 07-12-2007 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k0ruptr (Post 1500576)
Do you guys really think that the Tigers have the Bullpen to go deep in the playoffs?

4 out of their top 5 bullpen guys (per innings pitched) have era's from the High 4's to the 5's. mostly 5+ era's

Andrew Miller being the exception.


Bingo. That's my one reservation. A good pen is critical. The Tigers just don't have it. If Miller stays in the pen and doesn't go back to the rotation, and if Zumaya comes back and gets in a groove, then they might be decent enough to be carried by a very good offense, and a rotation that is solid.

Can't fault picking the Red Sox or the Angels, IMO. Red Sox are the next best bet. They, too, could be better in the pen, and I'm not as sold on their rotation as I am on Detroit's, but they have the experience and some huge bats.

The Angels are a sleeper pick. They get a lot of flack for offense, but they're currently fifth or sixth in the AL in scoring and still have Juan Rivera coming back. And with improved defense and an excellent pen, they're tough to beat in close games. I am more concerned about the rotation right now. Lackey and Escobar form one of the best one-two combos in the league, and Weaver is a solid #3. But Colon and Santana literally don't deserve to even be called #4 and #5 right now. As an Angels fan, I am almost penciling in a loss when either go to the mound. The good news is Colon is a second half pitcher, and at some point (I hope) someone with the team will figure out we have a better pitcher than Santana in Joe Saunders sitting at AAA.

But that's a lot of ifs, so I go with the Tigers.

Ditto on the NL. Sheep for the slaughter.

ISiddiqui 07-12-2007 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1500582)
Ditto on the NL. Sheep for the slaughter.


You mean like last year? ;)

Chief Rum 07-12-2007 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k0ruptr (Post 1500572)
Are the Brewers really going to win the NL Central???


I don't think so. That's not to rip them. They'll be solid the rest of the year. But the Cubs have been at times just terrible, and played their worst ball, and yet, they're still in sight of the Brew Crew. I think the Cubbies catch them in the end, and the Brewers end up in a dog fight with the Braves and the two losers of the NL West divisional fight for the wildcard.

Speaking of wildcard, BTW, I think the most intriguing pennant race will be the AL's wildcard. Yanks, M's (assuming they don't catch the Angels), Indians (assuming they don't catch the Tigers) and Twins look set for a round robin cage battle. And with their second half success tendencies, even the A's could sneak into the conversation.

Chief Rum 07-12-2007 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 1500584)
You mean like last year? ;)


Heh, heh, yeah, I know. Sorry, a fluke's a fluke. That was the worst World Series winner in history by winning percentage. Just goes to show you how playing well at the right time can really pay dividends. I still struggle to debate if they are truly the worst WS champ ever, because I think they had more talent than the '88 Dodgers. I still have no clue how they beat not one, but two powerhouse squads that postseason.

dawgfan 07-12-2007 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 1500584)
You mean like last year? ;)

Anything is possible in a 7-game series. I have serious doubts any of the NL teams are as good as the top AL teams, but any team that makes the playoffs has a legit shot if they get hot and/or the breaks bounce their way.

dawgfan 07-12-2007 11:55 PM

Well, I guess we'll see if Putz is suffering any emotional aftereffects from the All-Star game. Dude has been unbelievably clutch all year, and he's got as tough and as important a save opportunity as he's faced all year.

ISiddiqui 07-12-2007 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1500588)
Anything is possible in a 7-game series. I have serious doubts any of the NL teams are as good as the top AL teams, but any team that makes the playoffs has a legit shot if they get hot and/or the breaks bounce their way.


Exactly the right point. Doesn't matter if you call them a 'fluke' or if you don't think they have enough talent to determine that any team in a World Series is "sheep for the slaughter" is ignoring the randomness in a 7 game series and the potential streakiness of both teams (for example, I don't think anyone thinks, say, the 2003 Florida Marlins were a better team than the 2003 New York Yankees... but in a 7 game series at the end of the 2003 season... well, they were).

Chief Rum 07-12-2007 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1500588)
Anything is possible in a 7-game series. I have serious doubts any of the NL teams are as good as the top AL teams, but any team that makes the playoffs has a legit shot if they get hot and/or the breaks bounce their way.


My bro (an NL fan) and I talk about this all the time. We generally agree (much to his dismay) that in ranking quality squads, you have to go through at least five AL teams before you can even start talking about the best NL team.

Chief Rum 07-13-2007 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 1500596)
Exactly the right point. Doesn't matter if you call them a 'fluke' or if you don't think they have enough talent to determine that any team in a World Series is "sheep for the slaughter" is ignoring the randomness in a 7 game series and the potential streakiness of both teams (for example, I don't think anyone thinks, say, the 2003 Florida Marlins were a better team than the 2003 New York Yankees... but in a 7 game series at the end of the 2003 season... well, they were).


We're talking pro athletes here. Anything can happen. No one gets to that level without being good. That doesn't mean the odds aren't heavily slanted toward the AL. I stick by my opinion on this one, and feel free to call me on it if I end up wrong. :)

Jas_lov 07-13-2007 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1500548)
your kidding, right?

they could pay him 50 million if they wanted to, they have an endless supply of money.


If they could pay him that much this wouldn't be an issue. The point was with all of these other players they need to sign they need Texas to help pay the bill for the next couple years, and those large terrible contracts for worthless players come off the books. Throw in the additional luxury tax they'll have to pay for an even bigger payroll than they have now and it'll get pretty expensive to keep A-Rod if they have to pay the entire $30 million.

dawgfan 07-13-2007 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 1500591)
Well, I guess we'll see if Putz is suffering any emotional aftereffects from the All-Star game. Dude has been unbelievably clutch all year, and he's got as tough and as important a save opportunity as he's faced all year.

...aaaand he closes another tough game. It's worth noting that, entering tonight's game, Putz's Win Probability Added (courtesy of Fangraphs.com) is tops in the game at 4.03 (next highest pitcher is Dan Haren at 3.14). If he keeps this up, Putz deserves consideration for AL Cy Young.

ISiddiqui 07-13-2007 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1500599)
We're talking pro athletes here. Anything can happen. No one gets to that level without being good. That doesn't mean the odds aren't heavily slanted toward the AL. I stick by my opinion on this one, and feel free to call me on it if I end up wrong. :)


Sorry, don't buy the "odds heavily slanted" either. There have been enough upsets in World Series history (and two huge ones and one pretty big one [people forget how good the Cards were in 2004 with 105 wins] since 2000) to make me not believe any team that makes it is sheep for the slaughter.

dawgfan 07-13-2007 12:15 AM

Oh, and before Schmidty comments, let me pre-empt by acknowledging that the umps were a major factor in the M's winning tonight. But hey, sometimes the blown calls help you, sometimes they hurt you...

Logan 07-13-2007 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jas_lov (Post 1500601)
If they could pay him that much this wouldn't be an issue. The point was with all of these other players they need to sign they need Texas to help pay the bill for the next couple years, and those large terrible contracts for worthless players come off the books. Throw in the additional luxury tax they'll have to pay for an even bigger payroll than they have now and it'll get pretty expensive to keep A-Rod if they have to pay the entire $30 million.


All true. They're going to be spending close to $300 million when you factor in the luxury tax if they have to re-sign A-Rod for the full value. "The Yankees can spend all the want" is a bit of a fallacy these days.

Ksyrup 07-13-2007 09:10 AM

The Mets cut Julio Franco.

MikeVic 07-13-2007 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 1500746)
The Mets cut Julio Franco.


Bad karma, unless Rickey replaces him!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.