Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The Trump Presidency – 2016 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=92014)

NobodyHere 09-13-2017 09:37 PM

Trump is deal making with the Democrats again

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/tru...nts/ar-AArTMkU

AENeuman 09-13-2017 10:22 PM

"2015-2016 Republican Primary Season - Trump Courts the Conservatives"

So, he got what he wanted out the conservatives (electoral win)... now courting liberals to get...re-elected? Tarred and feathered by jon?

bronconick 09-13-2017 10:22 PM

I wonder how much of this is Schumer figuring out he can schmooze him, drop some New York talk and Trump is so willing for acceptance, he's taking it.

stevew 09-13-2017 10:27 PM

How do any of these "deals" pass when Ryan, etc have to bring them to vote?

CrimsonFox 09-13-2017 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3175023)
How do any of these "deals" pass when Ryan, etc have to bring them to vote?


Give him free coke? I dunno.

SirFozzie 09-13-2017 11:35 PM

it worked for the Debt Limit, plus the Chamber of Commerce part of the Republicans are pushing hard for it.

SirFozzie 09-13-2017 11:37 PM

dola

This is starting to feel like Bannon's the star of the Monkey's Paw episode of the Twilight Zone, ever since he got with Trump.

"I want the president to be an easily led buffoon who's willing to rally the base to whatever people tell him to do, and have control of the House and Senate to make sure we feed him stuff to feed the base".

(Monkey paw curls)

Logan 09-14-2017 07:29 AM

What deal?

Easy Mac 09-14-2017 07:30 AM

He's so dumb, I literally think he would agree to anything so long as he can say he made a deal, but then he'll just say it's all a lie later and his base will eat it up. Then he just leaves it up to Congress, who can't wipe their own ass or use incognito browsers.

JPhillips 09-14-2017 12:58 PM

There has to be a non-zero percent chance that Trump actually campaigns for a few Dems in 2018, right? That would shake things up.

NobodyHere 09-14-2017 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3175114)
There has to be a non-zero percent chance that Trump actually campaigns for a few Dems in 2018, right? That would shake things up.


Republicans would probably start calling for an impeachment at that point.

panerd 09-14-2017 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy Mac (Post 3175050)
He's so dumb, I literally think he would agree to anything so long as he can say he made a deal, but then he'll just say it's all a lie later and his base will eat it up. Then he just leaves it up to Congress, who can't wipe their own ass or use incognito browsers.


:)

JPhillips 09-14-2017 02:24 PM

If you're willing to go along with every Trump flip-flop until he supports letting immigrants brought to the country as children stay in the country, it's hard to argue that race has nothing to do with it.

Radii 09-14-2017 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3175119)
Republicans would probably start calling for an impeachment at that point.


Ann Coulter on Twitter: "At this point, who DOESN'T want Trump impeached? https://t.co/g1mMhmm8ng"

:D :D

Easy Mac 09-15-2017 06:42 AM

And he's back. Totally the tweets of a person who doesn't disdain minorities.

kingfc22 09-15-2017 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy Mac (Post 3175228)
And he's back. Totally the tweets of a person who doesn't disdain minorities.


He finally found the toilet where he had left his phone previously.

Thomkal 09-15-2017 09:31 AM

Improvised "terrorist" bomb on packed London commuter train injures 22

And Trump with his always useful tweets afterwards

Thomkal 09-15-2017 02:38 PM

I guess all of us Pumpkin Spice Latte drinkers are white supremacists...

Feminist Group: Pumpkin Spice Lattes Are Funding White Supremacy | Daily Wire

Thomkal 09-16-2017 08:37 AM

U.S. Army kills contracts for hundreds of immigrant recruits. Some face deportation. - The Washington Post

CrimsonFox 09-16-2017 02:42 PM

"Laughable" turnout for the DC Pro Trump Rally. There were "hundreds". I thought you needed at least a thousand to be laughable tho.

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/09/...e-turnout.html

digamma 09-17-2017 07:22 AM

Trumpster's retweeting a bunch of memes and gifs this morning like this one.



Thomkal 09-18-2017 04:18 PM

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1BT1E1

Because we need more coal production

tarcone 09-18-2017 06:22 PM

While that tweet is pretty funny, its not real presidential.

Radii 09-18-2017 07:57 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/politi...ans/index.html

oh boy

Easy Mac 09-18-2017 08:06 PM

It's no "It was a dark and stormy night," but hot damn that opening paragraph was epicly cutting. Journalists trying to out-condescend one another in their covering of this administration has been fantastic to watch.




larrymcg421 09-18-2017 08:09 PM

Protesters call out Pelosi over Trump DACA deal | Fox News

I hate the far left more and more every damn day. God forbid she actually try to get something done to protect people from deportation.

RainMaker 09-18-2017 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radii (Post 3175701)


Figured he was going to be one of those who goes down. Had some real shady dealings going on.

Surprised no one informed Trump that a guy who is talking regularly to Russian spies probably is having his phone tapped.

Thomkal 09-18-2017 08:38 PM

Seems like there has been a lot of leaking of stuff around Mueller's investigation-which surprises me because I thought you kept everything secret/private in them until you are ready to deliver what you found. Seems odd to me, and odd too that Mueller's seeming not to care if its leaked.

corbes 09-18-2017 08:42 PM

Almost certainly the "leaking" is not coming from Mueller's team but rather from the defense attorneys involved, who are not legally prohibited from telling the press about the investigation, and who have reason to feed news to the media with a spin that makes it appear that the investigation is heavy-handed.

Note that the sourcing in the article is attributed to "lawyers" and "people close to the investigation" -- this is media code for defense attorneys.

How to Read a News Story About an Investigation: Eight Tips on Who Is Saying What - Lawfare

corbes 09-18-2017 08:44 PM

Dola: the image in Easy Mac's post is not the actual NYTimes text.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYTimes
WASHINGTON — Paul J. Manafort was in bed early one morning in July when federal agents bearing a search warrant picked the lock on his front door and raided his Virginia home. They took binders stuffed with documents and copied his computer files, looking for evidence that Mr. Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, set up secret offshore bank accounts. They even photographed the expensive suits in his closet.
The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, then followed the house search with a warning: His prosecutors told Mr. Manafort they planned to indict him, said two people close to the investigation.


Thomkal 09-18-2017 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corbes (Post 3175712)
Almost certainly the "leaking" is not coming from Mueller's team but rather from the defense attorneys involved, who are not legally prohibited from telling the press about the investigation, and who have reason to feed news to the media with a spin that makes it appear that the investigation is heavy-handed.

Note that the sourcing in the article is attributed to "lawyers" and "people close to the investigation" -- this is media code for defense attorneys.

How to Read a News Story About an Investigation: Eight Tips on Who Is Saying What - Lawfare


Thanks for that Corbes-was not aware that the defense attorneys could legally leak

PilotMan 09-19-2017 09:39 PM

You can tell that this board is burned out from Trump. I get a lot of my Trump info here. Fuck him. Trump goes to the UN is some kind of joke.

JPhillips 09-20-2017 05:30 PM

Put a few different statements together and the GOP is being pretty candid that the healthcare bill is a pile of shit, but they must pass it or their donors will sit out 2018.

RainMaker 09-20-2017 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3175873)
Put a few different statements together and the GOP is being pretty candid that the healthcare bill is a pile of shit, but they must pass it or their donors will sit out 2018.


This kind of sums it up.




I still think not passing a bill will benefit them more. If they pass this bill, they own health care. When people get booted next year and premiums skyrocket, they have to own it. They can't point at Obamacare anymore. At least now those 48 Senators can say a few RINOs ruined it for everyone.

Radii 09-20-2017 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3175874)
They can't point at Obamacare anymore.



Sure they can. Facts no longer matter.

PilotMan 09-21-2017 08:46 AM

The worst thing about the ACA was that it took all the fault for the incredible rise and surge in healthcare premiums, that were skyrocketing well before ACA, and allowed all that fault to transfer to ACA, no matter what. The blame for expensive healthcare is now suddenly a thing that didn't exist prior to ACA, and now IT deserves 100% of that blame. That's the truth and how the uninformed see it. It's far from reality and that is the biggest weapon the right has used against it.

Easy Mac 09-21-2017 09:38 AM

Truth doesn't matter anymore

RainMaker 09-21-2017 02:04 PM

Looks like the Obamacare repeal might happen. They are bribing Murkowski by allowing Alaska to keep Obamacare. Then massive handouts to some other red states. More welfare for the welfare states.

larrymcg421 09-21-2017 02:33 PM

Well, at least the Jill Stein voters accomplished....

RainMaker 09-21-2017 02:42 PM

I mean it is amazing that the way to get her to vote for their great new plan is to bribe he by allowing her to keep the old one.

Idiocracy is here.

larrymcg421 09-21-2017 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3175942)
I mean it is amazing that the way to get her to vote for their great new plan is to bribe he by allowing her to keep the old one.

Idiocracy is here.


The bribe has even more than that, including increased Medicaid matching rates and a delay on the Medicaid per capita cap that will apply to the rest of the country. And it includes Hawaii as part of the deal so they can try to spin it as not being a direct bribe to Murkowski.

RainMaker 09-21-2017 03:53 PM

All those red states that scream about socialism sure are getting a lot of handouts in this deal.

EagleFan 09-21-2017 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3175897)
The worst thing about the ACA was that it took all the fault for the incredible rise and surge in healthcare premiums, that were skyrocketing well before ACA, and allowed all that fault to transfer to ACA, no matter what. The blame for expensive healthcare is now suddenly a thing that didn't exist prior to ACA, and now IT deserves 100% of that blame. That's the truth and how the uninformed see it. It's far from reality and that is the biggest weapon the right has used against it.


The uninformed elected this clown.

JPhillips 09-21-2017 09:40 PM

Looks like we can add cabinet secretaries chartering flights at taxpayer expense to the list of new norms.

Easy Mac 09-22-2017 06:53 AM

I'm not sure how Trump's tweet about evidence of Russians buying facebook ads means that this essentially moving the goalposts?

Also, I'm trolling a MAGA bro on twitter at the moment, and its actually kind of fun. He totally believes I think the earth is flat and that he can't prove otherwise is somehow different than me linking him facts about Russian hacking and influence.

Easy Mac 09-22-2017 07:00 AM

Every tweet about someone else... is really just a tweet about himself...


larrymcg421 09-22-2017 12:40 PM

Just imagine how easy it would be for the GOP to pass Graham-Cassidy if we didn't have those horrible moderates like Manchin and Heitkamp in the Senate.

mckerney 09-22-2017 01:03 PM

McCain said he's voting no on Graham-Cassidy.

JPhillips 09-22-2017 01:08 PM

So it all comes down to whether or not they can bribe Murkowski.

Or McCain's lying.

digamma 09-22-2017 01:09 PM

Paul is a no right now as well.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.