Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The Trump Presidency – 2016 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=92014)

BishopMVP 08-24-2018 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodos (Post 3215611)
To be honest, I don't think anyone is clamoring for Hillary to run again. Maybe not even her.

I do think a fresh face would be good. And let's have a new Speaker of the House if the democrats take control.

Ok, replace Hilllary in that list with Elizabeth Warren. :) I guess out of those, Biden at least has charisma, though I've always found his super cool guy personality kinda creepy, and (not that it matters after Trump) but the number of family scandals is a red flag to me.

Looking at the early lists of potential candidates the other one I instinctively dislike is Eric Holder.

Thomkal 08-24-2018 10:17 PM

So Andrew Miller, Roger Stone's aide who had been fighting Mueller's efforts to talk to a grand jury and might have tried to go all the way to the Supreme Court with it, and claims he knows nothing about Roger Stone's connections to Russia or Wiki Leaks, gave in today and accepted an immunity deal with Mueller. My guess is Roger Stone will be arrested in the next couple weeks.


Edit: There is some confusion over whether this has happened or not. CNN had a tweet that said he did and a link to a video. But the link is to a video they showed earlier today showing Miller's fight against Mueller, not about the immunity. And so far no one else is reporting it.

BishopMVP 08-25-2018 04:11 AM

But how will this effect him pitching down the stretch for the Indians?

Thomkal 08-25-2018 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BishopMVP (Post 3215685)
But how will this effect him pitching down the stretch for the Indians?



Well if he does have immunity, I'm sure he'll still be able to pitch :) Though now it seems CNN has fixed its link, so he's back to being an idiot.

JPhillips 08-25-2018 08:56 AM

Trump colors an American flag.


Thomkal 08-25-2018 08:42 PM

Didn't want to bring negative politics into the McCain thread, so here's what President Trump tweeted:


Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 56m56 minutes ago




My deepest sympathies and respect go out to the family of Senator John McCain. Our hearts and prayers are with you!

digamma 08-25-2018 08:48 PM

Cowboy up!

JPhillips 08-25-2018 09:04 PM

Schumer is going to push to rename the Russell building after McCain. Replacing a guy that blocked civil rights bills with McCain is a nice gesture. I can't imagine it won't go through.

Edward64 08-25-2018 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3215728)
Didn't want to bring negative politics into the McCain thread, so here's what President Trump tweeted:

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 56m56 minutes ago

My deepest sympathies and respect go out to the family of Senator John McCain. Our hearts and prayers are with you!


Nicely done.

Odds are he'll say something stupid about McCain soon.

Marc Vaughan 08-25-2018 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3215736)
Nicely done.

Odds are he'll say something stupid about McCain soon.


That was undoubtedly his staff not Trump - far too coherent imho.

Thomkal 08-25-2018 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc Vaughan (Post 3215738)
That was undoubtedly his staff not Trump - far too coherent imho.



Yep I agree, and still couldn't bring themselves to say anything about the man.

Radii 08-26-2018 04:28 AM

Alex Jones accidentally revealing himself to be a horrible fucking hypocrite and accidentally showing the world the trans porn that he watches is basically the funniest thing ever. You'll have to just google thing one :D

Thomkal 08-26-2018 07:39 PM

Republicans try to predict what will happen if the Dems flip the House in November. They expect them to launch investigations of Trump in nearly every committee. Here's what they think the Dems will do:


https://www.axios.com/2018-midterm-e...mpaign=organic

Bee 08-26-2018 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3215774)
Republicans try to predict what will happen if the Dems flip the House in November. They expect them to launch investigations of Trump in nearly every committee. Here's what they think the Dems will do:


https://www.axios.com/2018-midterm-e...mpaign=organic


That was an interesting partial list and I don't see anything on there that Republicans wouldn't have investigated in a Democrat administration. If the Dems win the house, Trump's lawyers are going to be busy.

Thomkal 08-26-2018 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee (Post 3215778)
That was an interesting partial list and I don't see anything on there that Republicans wouldn't have investigated in a Democrat administration. If the Dems win the house, Trump's lawyers are going to be busy.



Maybe he will have no free time to Tweet with all those hearings he'll have to go to. Another reason to vote for the Dems :)

Thomkal 08-26-2018 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radii (Post 3215746)
Alex Jones accidentally revealing himself to be a horrible fucking hypocrite and accidentally showing the world the trans porn that he watches is basically the funniest thing ever. You'll have to just google thing one :D



Guess that tops the story they had where John Kerry somehow was able to divert a laser and split the Hawaii hurricane in two. Even Kerry went along with it to show just how ridiculous that whole show is. This doesn't mean I have to welcome Jones to the LGBT community now? God I hope not

PilotMan 08-27-2018 07:41 AM

Yet, vets that I am associated with, don't see this sort of thing as insulting and the whole anthem protest. How exactly?

Here, you have a guy, who was literally the poster child and rep for every POW of the Vietnam war, and he is treated like absolute shit by the president, and yet, is totes ok.

I just don't understand.

Trump rejected plans for a White House statement praising McCain - The Washington Post

JPhillips 08-27-2018 08:05 AM

I'm so old remember when the GOP said Obama destroyed the economy.



Thomkal 08-27-2018 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3215802)
Yet, vets that I am associated with, don't see this sort of thing as insulting and the whole anthem protest. How exactly?

Here, you have a guy, who was literally the poster child and rep for every POW of the Vietnam war, and he is treated like absolute shit by the president, and yet, is totes ok.

I just don't understand.

Trump rejected plans for a White House statement praising McCain - The Washington Post



yeah I don't get it either. Add in another insult this morning-flags are supposed to stay at half-mast through any Congressmen's burial which is Sunday. They are back full this morning.

bronconick 08-27-2018 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3215811)
yeah I don't get it either. Add in another insult this morning-flags are supposed to stay at half-mast through any Congressmen's burial which is Sunday. They are back full this morning.


I almost expect him to put together a rally so he can have the tv on him rather than McCain during the funeral. What a petty fuck with nuclear launch codes

PilotMan 08-27-2018 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3215811)
yeah I don't get it either. Add in another insult this morning-flags are supposed to stay at half-mast through any Congressmen's burial which is Sunday. They are back full this morning.



Are you fucking kidding?

Thomkal 08-27-2018 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronconick (Post 3215812)
I almost expect him to put together a rally so he can have the tv on him rather than McCain during the funeral. What a petty fuck with nuclear launch codes



Would not shock me in the least.

SackAttack 08-27-2018 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee (Post 3215778)
That was an interesting partial list and I don't see anything on there that Republicans wouldn't have investigated in a Democrat administration. If the Dems win the house, Trump's lawyers are going to be busy.


Shit, that's exactly what Republicans said they were GOING to do when it looked like she was going to win. I forget who, might have been Gowdy, but one of 'em said publicly that they had two years' worth of investigations lined up in the event that she won the Presidency.

Not saying the Democrats WON'T do the same, but until they win the House and unleash Committeepalooza, this is essentially Republican projection.

jct32 08-27-2018 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3215811)
yeah I don't get it either. Add in another insult this morning-flags are supposed to stay at half-mast through any Congressmen's burial which is Sunday. They are back full this morning.


They are saying the flag code says the day of death and day after for half staff following a senators death that is their justification. However, I agree with the sentiment here. It’s a trash move by a very petty man. There’s no reason to not keep them at half staff until after the funeral. McCain was an American hero.

SackAttack 08-27-2018 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3215804)
I'm so old remember when the GOP said Obama destroyed the economy.




March 2009 and September 2010 are the start dates for those respective streaks. I wonder what they had in common?

JPhillips 08-27-2018 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SackAttack (Post 3215824)
Shit, that's exactly what Republicans said they were GOING to do when it looked like she was going to win. I forget who, might have been Gowdy, but one of 'em said publicly that they had two years' worth of investigations lined up in the event that she won the Presidency.

Not saying the Democrats WON'T do the same, but until they win the House and unleash Committeepalooza, this is essentially Republican projection.


It's very telling looking at what they won't investigate themselves.

RainMaker 08-27-2018 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3215802)
Yet, vets that I am associated with, don't see this sort of thing as insulting and the whole anthem protest. How exactly?

Here, you have a guy, who was literally the poster child and rep for every POW of the Vietnam war, and he is treated like absolute shit by the president, and yet, is totes ok.

I just don't understand.

Trump rejected plans for a White House statement praising McCain - The Washington Post


The anthem stuff is people angry that black people are speaking up.

McCain is an enemy of the Republicans because he didn't go full white nationalist.

I think it's pretty simple.

BYU 14 08-27-2018 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3215837)
The anthem stuff is people angry that black people are speaking up.

McCain is an enemy of the Republicans because he didn't go full white nationalist.

I think it's pretty simple.


Check, check and check

RainMaker 08-27-2018 01:18 PM

https://politics.theonion.com/white-...-wh-1828630290

Edward64 08-27-2018 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3215802)
Yet, vets that I am associated with, don't see this sort of thing as insulting and the whole anthem protest. How exactly?


I'm reading this to say the vets you are associated with don't think the anthem protests are insulting.

Not the exact words but this survey shows 65% of veterans disagree/object to the protests.

https://iava.org/anthem/

kingfc22 08-27-2018 03:08 PM

So how long until the media realizes they've been duped again on this US/Mexico "deal"? Similarly to how they ate up the peace agreement with North Korea.

Edward64 08-27-2018 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingfc22 (Post 3215863)
So how long until the media realizes they've been duped again on this US/Mexico "deal"? Similarly to how they ate up the peace agreement with North Korea.


I'm waiting for the details on what changed, the delta's from the orig NAFTA agreement.

bronconick 08-27-2018 03:18 PM

Following public and bipartisan bitching, the WH flag is back to half-mast

Brian Swartz 08-27-2018 03:28 PM

That's one of the parts I don't get. It absolutely was appropriate to lower it half-mast, but getting upset because it didn't stay there long enough? Really??

PilotMan 08-27-2018 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3215862)
I'm reading this to say the vets you are associated with don't think the anthem protests are insulting.

Not the exact words but this survey shows 65% of veterans disagree/object to the protests.

https://iava.org/anthem/



typo, should have said, as the anthem protest. Meaning, the people I know, who are vets, and/or POW's don't bat an eye at the McCain stuff, but act like the protesters are in league with Satan and are ready to destroy the Constitution.

bronconick 08-27-2018 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3215870)
That's one of the parts I don't get. It absolutely was appropriate to lower it half-mast, but getting upset because it didn't stay there long enough? Really??



For Senators that die in office, it's supposed to stay at half until the internment.

BYU 14 08-27-2018 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3215870)
That's one of the parts I don't get. It absolutely was appropriate to lower it half-mast, but getting upset because it didn't stay there long enough? Really??


Quote:

Originally Posted by bronconick (Post 3215873)
For Senators that die in office, it's supposed to stay at half until the internment.


The "minimum" requirement is 48 hours, however there has been a long standing tradition to keep at half mast until interment, not required, but accepted and followed by both Obama and Bush Jr.

I completely understand the outrage. Because, when combined with Trumps rather terse "tribute" which is not the one presented to him by staff it shows him as petty and vindictive. Which of course he is.

PilotMan 08-27-2018 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3215870)
That's one of the parts I don't get. It absolutely was appropriate to lower it half-mast, but getting upset because it didn't stay there long enough? Really??


When was the last time that a Congressman or Senator, died in office, and the President of the US, didn't say one positive thing about them? Let alone, a President who supposedly 'loves the great military and all the great and very good people in the military' yet, can't swallow his own pride for 5 minutes to honor a guy who legitimately withstood 5 years of imprisonment and lead and organized the prisoner resistance within Hanoi?


That sort of very obvious and public statement from the pos, shouldn't go unnoticed?


As I said earlier, the next time someone tells you that you have to respect the office, even if you don't respect the person in there, just remember that the guy in there right now, doesn't respect it either.

Thomkal 08-27-2018 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3215867)
I'm waiting for the details on what changed, the delta's from the orig NAFTA agreement.



Nothing has changed except the name because he can't make the trade deal without Congress approval. Just the distraction for this week:


https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/27/polit...eal/index.html

RainMaker 08-27-2018 05:01 PM

Yeah there is no deal. Congress gets 90 days notice before they vote on changes. Mexico will have a new President by the end of the year. It was just a show to shift the news cycle from the McCain stuff to this.

The changes aren't dramatic from the looks of it. Auto manufacturers will be forced to make a slightly bigger portion of the vehicle in North America. They are also forcing them to pay $16 an hour to 45% of their workforce (it was 40%).

There are some favors thrown to the oil industry and telecom companies too I guess.

If Canada does come on board and they sign this before the new Mexico President takes office, it doesn't sound like it'll change a ton. Should be slightly better for auto workers and the steel industry although at the cost of higher prices for consumers. Kind of odd to see a Republican so far to the left on foreign trade.

RainMaker 08-27-2018 05:16 PM

Besides the white nationalist stuff, this also likely plays into Trump's dislike of McCain. Remember how hated the guy is in Russia.

'The Enemy Is Dead': Russia Reacts to U.S. Senator John McCain’s Passing

Brian Swartz 08-27-2018 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan
When was the last time that a Congressman or Senator, died in office, and the President of the US, didn't say one positive thing about them?


I totally agree with this and didn't comment on that aspect of things at all. As far as the respect for the office thing goes, I couldn't disagree with you more there. Trump being a jerk shouldn't change the way we treat our institutions. If it does, then all we're doing is giving him even more power, demeaning ourselves in response to his incompetence/demagoguery/fill in the blank with your favorite description here. That's the exact opposite of what an appropriate response is IMO(appropriate being impeach him yesterday and work all that much harder to ensure this chapter isn't repeated, not 'hey let's all follow his example of incivility now').

RainMaker 08-27-2018 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3215872)
typo, should have said, as the anthem protest. Meaning, the people I know, who are vets, and/or POW's don't bat an eye at the McCain stuff, but act like the protesters are in league with Satan and are ready to destroy the Constitution.


Because none of this has anything to do with the flag, anthem, or troops.

JPhillips 08-27-2018 06:55 PM

The dignity wraith strikes again.

Quote:

Sen. James Inhofe told reporters that Sen. John McCain was “partially to blame” for the controversy over the lowering of the White House flag. Inhofe said McCain "disagreed with the president in certain areas and wasn’t too courteous about it."

Thomkal 08-27-2018 07:42 PM

I guess all those years in prison wasn't looking too good for Paul Manafort:


https://www.wsj.com/articles/manafor...d/accounts-wsj

Thomkal 08-28-2018 09:30 AM

So the FBI needed to move out of an aging Hoover building, and had announced three finalists (MD and VA) about a year ago. Then Trump took an interest, and scrapped those plans. Why? Nothing to do with saving money but probably a lot to do with Trump Hotel in DC:


Trump intervenes in FBI headquarters project - The Washington Post

Marc Vaughan 08-28-2018 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 3215506)
...with considerable baggage and a target on her back...


Whomever runs as a Democrat will be demonstrated to have 'baggage' and a 'target' on their back ... if you doubt this think about Obama who was clean but then suddenly wasn't an American at all .... cue the incredibly obviously fake 'birther' controversy and claims that he was going to take away everyones guns ...

Butter 08-28-2018 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronconick (Post 3215873)
For Senators that die in office, it's supposed to stay at half until the internment.


Shit, McCain got it in life AND death. Rough deal.

JPhillips 08-28-2018 02:08 PM

I should never overestimate the GOP. It appears that they are slowing the process of renaming the Russell building after McCain. McConnell is forming a study group.

Quote:

Georgia’s GOP Sen. David Perdue, whose own office was formerly used by Russell, said he’s unsure if residents back home would accept a name change for the building.

“This is Washington. There’s going to be 50 percent for something and 50 percent against something,” Perdue said Tuesday.

The Senate should spend time finding “the right way” to memorialize McCain’s service, Perdue said. “To knee jerk, to do anything — any suggestion — right now is premature,” he said.

albionmoonlight 08-28-2018 02:21 PM

Apparently Russell was a segregationist who helped lead a boycott of the DNC after LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act.

So we've come to the point of the GOP working to keep a building named after a racist Democrat instead of a war hero Republican.

albionmoonlight 08-28-2018 02:24 PM

Imagine for a second if George W. Bush Googled himself and didn't like the results. So he said that he Googled himself and didn't like what he saw, so he is going to explore the government taking over Google.

Think about the reaction.

Trump did that. And things are so fucked up that it doesn't even get a blip of attention.

We won't be able to go back to the way things were. Not even close.

digamma 08-28-2018 02:45 PM

To be fair, Trump didn't google himself. He saw Lou Dobbs read a story from a blog about google results.

kingfc22 08-28-2018 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digamma (Post 3215995)
To be fair, Trump didn't google himself. He saw Lou Dobbs read a story from a blog about google results.


:lol:

JPhillips 08-28-2018 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digamma (Post 3215995)
To be fair, Trump didn't google himself. He saw Lou Dobbs read a story from a blog about google results.


Lou Dobbs and Diamond & Silk are basically cabinet members.

CrimsonFox 08-28-2018 04:10 PM

Oh dear. Trump banned from the funeral yet Obama speaking at it and Biden a pallbearer. cheeto will go crazy that day.

larrymcg421 08-28-2018 04:53 PM

So Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez tweets out a nice statement about John McCain:

Quote:

John McCain’s legacy represents an unparalleled example of human decency and American service.

As an intern, I learned a lot about the power of humanity in government through his deep friendship with Sen. Kennedy.

He meant so much, to so many. My prayers are with his family.


And she gets absolutely ripped apart by so-called leftists who feel the need to educate her about everything McCain has done wrong in his career. Fuck those people. I'd rather they just fucking left the party than cater to their immature, smarmy, out of touch brand of politics. (And I'm not even really a fan of Ocasio-Cortez).

Drake 08-28-2018 06:16 PM

I try not to listen to ideological purists. Especially of the suffocatingly leftist variety. They're the democrat version of Ayn Rand apologists on the right, and should be dismissed accordingly.

Drake 08-28-2018 06:17 PM

Though we should make them wear sashes that say something like "I learned everything I know about Topic X from Political Science 101 and shitposts on Reddit."

Draft Dodger 08-28-2018 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3215993)
Imagine for a second if George W. Bush Googled himself and didn't like the results. So he said that he Googled himself and didn't like what he saw, so he is going to explore the government taking over Google.

Think about the reaction.

Trump did that. And things are so fucked up that it doesn't even get a blip of attention.

We won't be able to go back to the way things were. Not even close.


please. like GW could use a computer...
:cool:

Thomkal 08-28-2018 07:17 PM

So a banker for Manafort had his Ipad and briefcase stolen from his apartment in NYC last night after reports about Manafort trying to make a deal with Mueller came out-in an area of NYC that has not seen any robberies since Jan 2017. Guy left the door to his balcony open, so the thief got in that way. Strange this happened when it did. They haven't said what was on the IPad or in the briefcase yet.

molson 08-28-2018 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larrymcg421 (Post 3216009)
So Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez tweets out a nice statement about John McCain:

And she gets absolutely ripped apart by so-called leftists who feel the need to educate her about everything McCain has done wrong in his career. Fuck those people. I'd rather they just fucking left the party than cater to their immature, smarmy, out of touch brand of politics. (And I'm not even really a fan of Ocasio-Cortez).


I know these people really exist but I think there's always a Russian troll element as well, making that voice louder.

JPhillips 08-29-2018 08:13 AM

Paul Ryan's PAC is using information from a security clearance to smear the Dem running against David Brat in VA. It's a little unclear how they got it, they claim the post office incorrectly gave it to them. The PAC admits they shouldn't have it, but now that they do they aren't retracting or apologizing for using it. The woman in question worked for the CIA and seemingly worked at an Islamic school as part of her work. Of course, the PAC is painting her as a terrorist sympathizer for working at an Islamic school.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/28/u...super-pac.html

Warhammer 08-29-2018 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corbes (Post 3216033)
I'm increasingly worried about the effects of negative partisanship on both sides.


This is my larger concern.

I think the other issue is rather than leading, we have a bunch of people that pander to their constituents.

stevew 08-29-2018 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by molson (Post 3216028)
I know these people really exist but I think there's always a Russian troll element as well, making that voice louder.


I am somewhat refreshed knowing that at least some percentage of the online trolls are Russians. Makes me feel better about our country a tiny bit.

JPhillips 08-29-2018 09:47 AM

Off to a good start in FL governor race.



Marc Vaughan 08-29-2018 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3216048)
Off to a good start in FL governor race.


I'm missing the days when the racists at least pretended not to be ...

ISiddiqui 08-29-2018 10:07 AM

Florida's Gov race is going to be nuts. A Trumper vs. a Sandernista. Should be very interesting.

albionmoonlight 08-29-2018 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc Vaughan (Post 3216054)
I'm missing the days when the racists at least pretended not to be ...


It's an interesting question. I miss the innocent joy of when I was naive.

But I think that, since it turns out that the racism has always been there, I'd rather it be on the surface. I'd rather the battle lines be drawn more openly than pretending that we're really arguing about marginal tax rates or some other such proxy for the actual fight.

Thomkal 08-29-2018 10:38 AM

Guess that working with Mueller didn't go over so well after all:


Trump says White House Counsel Donald McGahn will leave his job in the fall - The Washington Post


Edit: And of of course McGahn didn't know Trump was going to tweet about it

panerd 08-29-2018 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3216059)
It's an interesting question. I miss the innocent joy of when I was naive.

But I think that, since it turns out that the racism has always been there, I'd rather it be on the surface. I'd rather the battle lines be drawn more openly than pretending that we're really arguing about marginal tax rates or some other such proxy for the actual fight.


Lesson 101: How slam dunk elections like 2016 are lost...

Painting over 60 million people a lot of whom do care about such "meaningless" things like higher tax rates as closet racists.

albionmoonlight 08-29-2018 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panerd (Post 3216065)
Lesson 101: How slam dunk elections like 2016 are lost...

Painting over 60 million people a lot of whom do care about such "meaningless" things like higher tax rates as closet racists.


But that's the thing. It isn't in the closet anymore. We know what policies the GOP will enact on racial issues. They are open about it. In 2016, they weren't.

So, if going forward, one either agrees with those policies or considers them not a big deal relative to tariffs or whatever, then one will continue to vote GOP. But there's more clarity on what that means.

Marc Vaughan 08-29-2018 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panerd (Post 3216065)
Lesson 101: How slam dunk elections like 2016 are lost...

Painting over 60 million people a lot of whom do care about such "meaningless" things like higher tax rates as closet racists.


I think its fair to say in Florida at least the Republican party is quite open about their racist nature .... I personally liked it better when they pretended they cared about other things like balancing budgets, remember those days when huge deficits were said to be 'bad' ... ?

Republican Nominees comments on Democratic Candidate

CU Tiger 08-29-2018 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3216067)
But that's the thing. It isn't in the closet anymore. We know what policies the GOP will enact on racial issues. They are open about it. In 2016, they weren't.

So, if going forward, one either agrees with those policies or considers them not a big deal relative to tariffs or whatever, then one will continue to vote GOP. But there's more clarity on what that means.



You lose a lot of credibility overall when you insinuate that anyone who sides conservative is a defacto racist.


Ive said it before, I'm ashamed and embarrassed that I voted for our current sitting President. Yet despite that, given the choice I had to make between Hillary or what we have, I'd hold my nose and make the same selection again today.



Has nothing to do with race.

SackAttack 08-29-2018 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 3216079)
You lose a lot of credibility overall when you insinuate that anyone who sides conservative is a defacto racist.


Ive said it before, I'm ashamed and embarrassed that I voted for our current sitting President. Yet despite that, given the choice I had to make between Hillary or what we have, I'd hold my nose and make the same selection again today.



Has nothing to do with race.


It's pretty much entirely about race.

There is no world where you can state with credibility that you observed Trump during the campaign, with his stoking of White anxieties and enthusiastic retweets of White nationalists, or as President (Charlottesville; ignoring the deaths of brown Americans in Puerto Rico but getting super anxious about Texas' own hurricane issues), walk away going "but he's better than Hillary," and have it not be about race.

His entire *campaign* was about race on one level or another. Chase those immigrants out and build a wall! They're taking our jobs! And they're murderers and rapists besides!

And how 'bout those black people? They just can't help themselves, when they live in inner cities they just go a murderin' god-fearin' white folk (and each other when they can't find any white people to murder).

And those Haitians all have AIDS and black people are automatically low intelligence if they say anything bad about me and and and and

RainMaker 08-29-2018 01:41 PM

Not all conservatives are racist but most racists are conservative.

I mean it's not just a coincidence that all these white nationalists were suddenly working for the White House.

Ben E Lou 08-29-2018 01:47 PM

Fascinating to see CU tiger and Sack talk right past each other there.

CU: “I don’t care if he’s racist; Hillary’s worse.”
Sack: “But he’s racist!”

RainMaker 08-29-2018 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panerd (Post 3216065)
Painting over 60 million people a lot of whom do care about such "meaningless" things like higher tax rates as closet racists.


How many people were getting a tax cut with Trump that wouldn't have with Hillary?

At least Hillary's plan didn't massively increase the deficit that those fiscal conservatives seem to care about when a black man is in office.

Thomkal 08-29-2018 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 3216079)
You lose a lot of credibility overall when you insinuate that anyone who sides conservative is a defacto racist.


Ive said it before, I'm ashamed and embarrassed that I voted for our current sitting President. Yet despite that, given the choice I had to make between Hillary or what we have, I'd hold my nose and make the same selection again today.



Has nothing to do with race.



I'm always curious when people say this-how much worse would it be right now if Hillary was President instead if you are ashamed and embarassed by Trump?

CU Tiger 08-29-2018 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SackAttack (Post 3216083)
It's pretty much entirely about race.

There is no world where you can state with credibility that you observed Trump during the campaign, with his stoking of White anxieties and enthusiastic retweets of White nationalists, or as President (Charlottesville; ignoring the deaths of brown Americans in Puerto Rico but getting super anxious about Texas' own hurricane issues), walk away going "but he's better than Hillary," and have it not be about race.

His entire *campaign* was about race on one level or another. Chase those immigrants out and build a wall! They're taking our jobs! And they're murderers and rapists besides!

And how 'bout those black people? They just can't help themselves, when they live in inner cities they just go a murderin' god-fearin' white folk (and each other when they can't find any white people to murder).

And those Haitians all have AIDS and black people are automatically low intelligence if they say anything bad about me and and and and





I dont know Trump. I'm pretty hesitant to ever throw out the "racist" accusation on someone without personal knowledge/ That said I think it's pretty clear if he isn't a full on racist, he definitely has some (a lot) white superiority beliefs. Which I completely oppos.


That said, despite that fact, as much as it abhors me, I'd still vote for him again over the alternative.



I dont know any other way to make that statement.

Vince, Pt. II 08-29-2018 02:00 PM

I would assume it's along the lines of "while his public persona and his speech is embarrassing, he generally has my interests in mind with actions and policies."

albionmoonlight 08-29-2018 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 3216079)
You lose a lot of credibility overall when you insinuate that anyone who sides conservative is a defacto racist.


Then I should clarify. Voting GOP does not mean that you are racist. But it does mean that you don't consider racism a deal breaker.

I'm the same way just on different issues. I'm against abortion. But the issue isn't a deal breaker for me, so I tend to vote democratic.

I imagine that very few people agree 100% with either party on every issue. But the response isn't to pretend that the party you support actually agrees with you. It's to acknowledge that you value some issues more than others and vote accordingly.

CU Tiger 08-29-2018 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3216085)
Fascinating to see CU tiger and Sack talk right past each other there.

CU: “I don’t care if he’s racist; Hillary’s worse.”
Sack: “But he’s racist!”



One major point of contention. I never said nor will I ever say, "I dont care if he's racist" I care deeply. Yet despite how much I care, Hillary's still worse.

Atocep 08-29-2018 02:02 PM

I have no problem seeing racists and those that support racists called out. If it loses elections for Dems right now so be it. That's the embarrassing state of our country right now and I'd rather those people's true feelings be out there to be called out instead of known but not spoken about.

As RainMaker stated, not all conservatives are racist but if you are a racist you're probably conservative.

albionmoonlight 08-29-2018 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 3216092)
One major point of contention. I never said nor will I ever say, "I dont care if he's racist" I care deeply. Yet despite how much I care, Hillary's still worse.


Right. Voting is about compromise and hard choices. And the point I was trying to make above (pretty hamhandedly I guess) is that I prefer a world where the parties are more open about what they believe so that we can make these choices more openly and with less obfuscation.

Ben E Lou 08-29-2018 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 3216092)
One major point of contention. I never said nor will I ever say, "I dont care if he's racist" I care deeply. Yet despite how much I care, Hillary's still worse.

Sorry about that. That's not what I meant, nor what I think you were thinking. By "I don't care" there, I simply meant...."Even if he is racist..." Better? ;)

CU Tiger 08-29-2018 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3216095)
Sorry about that. That's not what I meant, nor what I think you were thinking. By "I don't care" there, I simply meant...."Even if he is racist..." Better? ;)



No apologies necessary. But, yes. Better.


Sorry if I am a bit sensitive.


Its been an interesting couple weeks around the Tiger house. My youngest daughter just started public school (K5). Suddenly she is more aware that she is black and mommy and daddy are white. She knows her bio mom as momma d and we've always been open and honest. But suddenly we are facing mean kid syndrome.

miami_fan 08-29-2018 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3216085)
Fascinating to see CU tiger and Sack talk right past each other there.

CU: “I don’t care if he’s racist; Hillary’s worse.”
Sack: “But he’s racist!”


Fascinating indeed.

SackAttack 08-29-2018 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3216085)
Fascinating to see CU tiger and Sack talk right past each other there.

CU: “I don’t care if he’s racist; Hillary’s worse.”
Sack: “But he’s racist!”


'Cept that isn't what he said. He said "I'm ashamed and embarrassed but I supported him over Hillary and I'd do it again; and that's not about race."

My point is, Trump's politics *are* racial politics, by and large. You need exactly two data points to figure out what Trump is going to do in a given situation.

Can he shit on minorities? If so, he will.

Are there no minorities to shit on, but an opportunity to self-aggrandize? Bank on it.

And if you look at that dumpster fire and go "still better than Hillary would be," then at the end of the day, it doesn't matter what you tell yourself - it's about race.

Lathum 08-29-2018 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 3216089)
I dont know Trump. I'm pretty hesitant to ever throw out the "racist" accusation on someone without personal knowledge/ That said I think it's pretty clear if he isn't a full on racist, he definitely has some (a lot) white superiority beliefs. Which I completely oppos.


So what makes someone a full on racist?

Lathum 08-29-2018 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3216088)
I'm always curious when people say this-how much worse would it be right now if Hillary was President instead if you are ashamed and embarassed by Trump?


Curious about this as well.

How anyone with a brain ( and CUTiger does) can witness the daily tragedy that is Trump and think we are still better off blows my mind.

Brian Swartz 08-29-2018 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SackAttack
d if you look at that dumpster fire and go "still better than Hillary would be," then at the end of the day, it doesn't matter what you tell yourself - it's about race.


As someone who didn't vote for either and wouldn't, that's nonsense. The only way this would be true is if you make race the only possible issue on which to make a voting decision. The picture isn't nearly that simplistic.

RainMaker 08-29-2018 03:15 PM

I have to ask. What is it you found so bad about Hillary? What policy were you afraid of.

I mean I'm not a big fan of her but I feel like I'd vote for her over the person who thinks my daughter is an inferior race. Who feels my daughter is not a "real American" and someone who should know their role and not speak up.

There are definitely things I'd overlook in a candidate (infidelity for example) if their policies aligned with mine. But if they thought my child was subhuman, I think at worst I'd just write someone else in.

Brian Swartz 08-29-2018 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum
How anyone with a brain ( and CUTiger does) can witness the daily tragedy that is Trump and think we are still better off blows my mind.


I'd say it just underestimates the antipathy of HRC. I personally couldn't consider her because of her record and conduct on multiple levels; I have a cousin who is a liberal, and voted for her as the best option, but definitely did so holding her nose and thinks she would have been better than Trump -- but not by much. Which is pretty much where I come out on it. I'd be less embarrassed to have her as president than the Donald, but there's no question in my mind I'd still be embarrassed having her represent me.

Lathum 08-29-2018 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3216108)
I'd say it just underestimates the antipathy of HRC. I personally couldn't consider her because of her record and conduct on multiple levels; I have a cousin who is a liberal, and voted for her as the best option, but definitely did so holding her nose and thinks she would have been better than Trump -- but not by much. Which is pretty much where I come out on it. I'd be less embarrassed to have her as president than the Donald, but there's no question in my mind I'd still be embarrassed having her represent me.


I agree with this, but at least she would make an effort to act in a way that represents the importance of the office. Trump makes a mockery of it quite literally on a daily basis. Then throw in a healthy dose of racism, xenophobia, and narcissism, plus grossly violating the first amendment and I can't envision us being worse off. That doesn't even factor in policy.

larrymcg421 08-29-2018 03:51 PM

"I knew he was a racist, but there were other issues that were more important to me."

"I didn't care that he was a racist."

"I liked that he was a racist."

What's the real difference? All three put a racist in charge. If anything, the top quote bothers me the most. I have little hope in reaching racists, but if racism is no longer a disqualifying factor for a candidate, that's far more worrisome.

ISiddiqui 08-29-2018 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larrymcg421 (Post 3216114)
What's the real difference? All three put a racist in charge. If anything, the top quote bothers me the most. I have little hope in reaching racists, but if racism is no longer a disqualifying factor for a candidate, that's far more worrisome.


Indeed. I can't understand the excusing of racism. I mean in the past people would say "Well that's not racism because..." and sometimes it'd be BS and sometimes it may make some sense, but at least folks would try to say it's not racism. Now, people are like, well they may be a racist, but... which is frightening.

JPhillips 08-29-2018 04:20 PM

I recently read about a study that showed Trump voters generally don't like him in spite of him being an asshole, they like him because he's an asshole. As long as he's punching them, everything else can be excused.

BYU 14 08-29-2018 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3216108)
I'd say it just underestimates the antipathy of HRC. I personally couldn't consider her because of her record and conduct on multiple levels; I have a cousin who is a liberal, and voted for her as the best option, but definitely did so holding her nose and thinks she would have been better than Trump -- but not by much. Which is pretty much where I come out on it. I'd be less embarrassed to have her as president than the Donald, but there's no question in my mind I'd still be embarrassed having her represent me.


I think a bigger question begs, how the fuck did we wind up with these two as our choices?

I don't ever vote straight party line (November may be the first exception to this) because I look for those closer to center. I am not a fan of the "protest" vote, but I had no choice but to go third party in 2016, because at the end of the day I have to have some belief in my choice beyond the lesser of two evils.

I could have lived with voting for HRC, Trump, never! But as that night played out I kept going back to my thoughts above. How are these two our choices?

BYU 14 08-29-2018 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3216117)
I recently read about a study that showed Trump voters generally don't like him in spite of him being an asshole, they like him because he's an asshole. As long as he's punching them, everything else can be excused.


I saw this exact sentiment on a FB post defending Trump for his treatment of McCain. Basically saying "Yeah he is a loud mouthed asshole, but I am too"

So great, you are both fucking jerks, but you don't have the future of the country in your hands, SMH.

Edward64 08-29-2018 04:38 PM

I'm reading a lot of negativity from Dem supporters on HRC here and I don't get it. I voted for her then and would again any day over Trump.

That's not to say I don't agree with Trump on some issues but overall HRC would have been a much better president IMO. The ideal situation would have been HRC in the presidency and a GOP Congress.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.