Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The thread for images so cool that they belong in this thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=60049)

Toddzilla 06-02-2011 02:37 PM

wwtdd ftw

MJ4H 06-02-2011 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug5984 (Post 2478615)
She took some awesome pictures of herself with her iPhone, her people say they aren't her- I'm pretty certain they are. I think it's maybe 15 total. It's like a very easy scavenger hunt to find them.

oh they are clearly her

jeff061 06-02-2011 02:45 PM

I have no idea who she is or what she's done, but apparently in one of the pics she still is wearing fake tats from some movie she was in soooo....

DanGarion 06-02-2011 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 2478589)
Very cool. Ballpark on the total cost of your unit?


Well I went with a brand new drum ($90) because I didn't want to deal with the crap of finding and preparing a used drum. So that was the biggest cost.

2 grills for meat $10 each
1 grill for charcoal box $10
4x8 piece of expanded metal (which was way more than the 1 1/2' x 5' I needed) $30
Ball Valve $10
Assorted bolts, nuts, screws, etc $15

johnnyshaka 06-02-2011 04:03 PM

Thanks, DG...seems like a pretty cost effective smoker and a nice conversation piece, too!

Looking forward to seeing your rig in action!

wade moore 06-02-2011 06:36 PM

FWIW - I have an absolutely amazing electric smoker that I would highly recommend that is about $150:

Masterbuilt

DanGarion 06-02-2011 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore (Post 2478790)
FWIW - I have an absolutely amazing electric smoker that I would highly recommend that is about $150:

Masterbuilt


E-lectric! Ew! ;)

wade moore 06-02-2011 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanGarion (Post 2478803)
E-lectric! Ew! ;)


I figured you'd say that.

If you look at how it works and read up on it, there is some debate - but it's virtually exactly the same.

You are still cooking the meat with smoke, it's just being ignited by an electric element, rather than coals.

The advantage? Completely consistent temperature with no need to play with coals, etc. And the taste is if not exactly the same, within a small enough variance that most pallets won't notice.

The only thing you lose is the "experience" of slaving over coals and fighting with getting the right temps, etc.

Noop 06-02-2011 09:24 PM


Noop 06-02-2011 09:28 PM


MikeVic 06-02-2011 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ4H (Post 2478629)
oh they are clearly her


Yum. Thank you FOFC.

Matthean 06-03-2011 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug5984 (Post 2478615)
She took some awesome pictures of herself with her iPhone, her people say they aren't her- I'm pretty certain they are. I think it's maybe 15 total. It's like a very easy scavenger hunt to find them.


Her publicist had no problem pointing out where to look for them as well.

DanGarion 06-03-2011 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wade moore (Post 2478808)
I figured you'd say that.

If you look at how it works and read up on it, there is some debate - but it's virtually exactly the same.

You are still cooking the meat with smoke, it's just being ignited by an electric element, rather than coals.

The advantage? Completely consistent temperature with no need to play with coals, etc. And the taste is if not exactly the same, within a small enough variance that most pallets won't notice.

The only thing you lose is the "experience" of slaving over coals and fighting with getting the right temps, etc.


The problem with most electrics is that they are too small. Anyway, I was just joking with you, hence the smile.

wade moore 06-03-2011 11:49 AM

Gotcha. Well, the one I have I can't imagine is any smaller than yours - and I suspect holds more as it has 3 racks.

Ksyrup 06-03-2011 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug5984 (Post 2478582)
The Blake Lively pictures are so cool they belong in this thread- however, they'd prolly get me boxed for a long time.


This is truly a name I'd never even heard before this thread. If I had to guess without any context, I would have said it's the name of a male soccer player.

GrantDawg 06-03-2011 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2479351)
This is truly a name I'd never even heard before this thread. If I had to guess without any context, I would have said it's the name of a male soccer player.



Watch it. My daughter is named Blake.

Ksyrup 06-03-2011 12:09 PM

Didn't mean any offense, simply that I'd think any person named Blake was a male without other information.

This actually interests me - does anyone have an idea why Blake was such a popular female name in the late 80s/early 90s? I notice that Blake Lively was born in 1987, too. It's far more popular now as a boy's name (which makes sense, as my kids are young and I know tons of male Blakes).

NameVoyager: Baby Name Wizard Graph of Most Popular Baby Names | The Baby Name Wizard

GrantDawg 06-03-2011 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2479363)
Didn't mean any offense, simply that I'd think any person named Blake was a male without other information.

This actually interests me - does anyone have an idea why Blake was such a popular female name in the late 80s/early 90s? I notice that Blake Lively was born in 1987, too. It's far more popular now as a boy's name (which makes sense, as my kids are young and I know tons of male Blakes).

NameVoyager: Baby Name Wizard Graph of Most Popular Baby Names | The Baby Name Wizard



You really want to know? It is going to make you laugh.

Blake Lindsey (Marler, Spalding, etc.) was a charatcter on Guiding Light. We were leaning toward a boy-ish name, and almost went with Sam. But that was too common, Blake was not, and she shares my intials. The character from the soap is why it was a popular name.

JediKooter 06-03-2011 12:16 PM

Blake Edwards?

Rizon 06-03-2011 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 2479368)
You really want to know? It is going to make you laugh.

Blake Lindsey (Marler, Spalding, etc.) was a charatcter on Guiding Light. We were leaning toward a boy-ish name, and almost went with Sam. But that was too common, Blake was not, and she shares my intials. The character from the soap is why it was a popular name.


Hahahahahahaha ... I use to watch that show religiously ...

I assume you liked the name and didn't name her because you liked the character? :D

GrantDawg 06-03-2011 12:18 PM

BTW, that graph was cool. But yeah, it proves my point. It was only popular during the period the character was active on the show (played for a long while by the impressive Sherrie Stringfield).

GrantDawg 06-03-2011 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rizon (Post 2479373)
Hahahahahahaha ... I use to watch that show religiously ...

I assume you liked the name and didn't name her because you liked the character? :D



Well, it was the name we liked. It didn't hurt that she was also our favorite character. Get your mocking caps on.....her name is Lyndsey Blake.

Ksyrup 06-03-2011 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 2479368)
You really want to know? It is going to make you laugh.

Blake Lindsey (Marler, Spalding, etc.) was a charatcter on Guiding Light. We were leaning toward a boy-ish name, and almost went with Sam. But that was too common, Blake was not, and she shares my intials. The character from the soap is why it was a popular name.


Considering Teen Mom resulted in two of the biggest popularity jumps among baby names in 2010, I guess I'm not surprised by that.

Baby names Maci and Bentley increased in popularity the most because of Teen Mom + reality blurred

Ksyrup 06-03-2011 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 2479374)
BTW, that graph was cool. But yeah, it proves my point. It was only popular during the period the character was active on the show (played for a long while by the impressive Sherrie Stringfield).


Yeah, that site is a fascinating time-killer. And seeing names rise and fall like that over time, and trying to make the connection, is fun.

Noop 06-03-2011 12:39 PM


Noop 06-03-2011 12:41 PM


Noop 06-03-2011 12:41 PM


Noop 06-03-2011 12:42 PM


Noop 06-03-2011 12:43 PM


Noop 06-03-2011 12:45 PM


Noop 06-03-2011 12:46 PM


Noop 06-03-2011 12:48 PM


Noop 06-03-2011 12:50 PM


Ksyrup 06-03-2011 03:13 PM














cuervo72 06-03-2011 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2479485)


Wow, Civilization XV looks awesome.

Rizon 06-03-2011 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 2479487)
Wow, Civilization XV looks awesome.


Terrible graphic work. The sunlight and shadows aren't even rendered right. Jeeze.

Matthean 06-03-2011 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 2479399)
Religious People
Just got royally owned.


That's one of the worst attempts to "own" religious people I have seen. It's like they complain about the lack of understanding by religious people and yet themselves show near no real knowledge of what some religions teach. It's trolling on an amateurish level.

revrew 06-03-2011 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matthean (Post 2479496)
That's one of the worst attempts to "own" religious people I have seen. It's like they complain about the lack of understanding by religious people and yet themselves show near no real knowledge of what some religions teach. It's trolling on an amateurish level.


Yup. I find that post really, really offensive. But also sad. Because in accusing others of willfully ignoring reality, it ... willfully ignores reality. But this is a pictures thread, not a theology/religious debate thread. So I will simply post my protest and attempt to avoid a threadjack. Carry on with pictures that may or may not be deemed "so cool they belong in this thread."

jeff061 06-03-2011 04:23 PM

I could only make it through a cliche'd pane or two before my interest was lost and I am not remotely a religious person. Why would the targets of that comic bother reading it enough to legitimately be offended?

JediKooter 06-03-2011 04:31 PM

Good thing there weren't any midgets or cars in that pic.

rowech 06-03-2011 04:31 PM

What's funny is the fact that people who don't believe in a God believe in a religion as well.

I really hope if there is a God that people who create and post such things get them thrown back into their face on judgement day.

jeff061 06-03-2011 04:33 PM

lol. Post an "offensive" picture you deserve to be tortured for eternity!!!!!

For the love of god the commentary on that pic is more idiotic than the pic itself. I apologize for contributing but I can't help myself :(.

JediKooter 06-03-2011 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowech (Post 2479519)
What's funny is the fact that people who don't believe in a God believe in a religion as well.


Could you explain that one please?

jeff061 06-03-2011 04:37 PM

I'm sure it's the whole you have to have faith to not believe or some BS. We can just stop talking about this.

JediKooter 06-03-2011 04:41 PM

The only thing that I can think of that is remotely close to what he is referring to is deism. But, deism is actually backwards from that. So, I haven't a clue as to what religions exist that don't believe in a god or gods.

Doug5984 06-03-2011 04:44 PM

So everyone saw those Blake Lively pics right? (tries to get thread back on track)

JediKooter 06-03-2011 04:47 PM

I saw some pics of her. Don't know if they were "the" pics though. I have to say, nice body, but, her face is just meh.

johnnyshaka 06-03-2011 04:58 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Mmm...lunch. Sadly, we only have the "before" shot but I assure you they were delicious!

DaddyTorgo 06-03-2011 05:02 PM

That's a lot of beef!!

johnnyshaka 06-03-2011 05:13 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Looks like the boss did take a "during" shot.

Rizon 06-03-2011 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug5984 (Post 2479539)
So everyone saw those Blake Lively pics right? (tries to get thread back on track)


Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2479559)
That's a lot of beef!!


Hmmm

johnnyshaka 06-03-2011 05:18 PM

Are Doug and DT talking about wieners?

JediKooter 06-03-2011 05:18 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Got to admit, a bit disappointing.

DanGarion 06-03-2011 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JediKooter (Post 2479543)
I saw some pics of her. Don't know if they were "the" pics though. I have to say, nice body, but, her face is just meh.


+1 that has always been my thought of her, she's not really a pretty face...

johnnyshaka 06-03-2011 05:25 PM

1 Attachment(s)
And it looks like there was a lone survivor...I give you the "after" shot. (sorry, my BB Curve's camera obviously doesn't compare to my boss Atrix)

JediKooter 06-03-2011 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanGarion (Post 2479575)
+1 that has always been my thought of her, she's not really a pretty face...


Ok cool. It's not just me then. :)

Desnudo 06-03-2011 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 2479564)
Looks like the boss did take a "during" shot.


If that's lunch, what's for dinner?

johnnyshaka 06-03-2011 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Desnudo (Post 2479581)
If that's lunch, what's for dinner?


Not sure yet...but whatever it is I'm pretty sure it won't be nearly as delicious as what I had for lunch!

stevew 06-03-2011 05:52 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Lively looks hot in some stuff, and meh in others...

DanGarion 06-03-2011 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 2479590)
Lively looks hot in some stuff, and meh in others...


The first girl is Jessica Alba, isn't it? The other girl, meh.

Crapshoot 06-03-2011 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2477774)



K, where is this one from ? Photoshopped? That can't be real... can it?

Ksyrup 06-03-2011 08:02 PM

I have no clue. Doesn't look real. But it's cool!

Crapshoot 06-03-2011 08:05 PM

Damn. I want to go there if its real, but it definitely looks shopped.

rowech 06-03-2011 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JediKooter (Post 2479528)
Could you explain that one please?


Religion -- a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.

Everything anyone believes in is a religion. Just not a God based one. None of us will be right or wrong until we find out for sure.

JediKooter 06-03-2011 08:30 PM

No, the place is totally real.

JediKooter 06-03-2011 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowech (Post 2479653)
Religion -- a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.

Everything anyone believes in is a religion. Just not a God based one. None of us will be right or wrong until we find out for sure.


Your use of the word believe/belief is being used way too broadly and incorrectly. Also, I'm guilty of it, we sometimes substitute the word 'belief/believe' when we really should use the word 'know'.

Things that we believe in, do not default to a religion. I believe there will be traffic when I drive home from work tonight. I don't think that hardly qualifies as a religion.

Atocep 06-03-2011 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowech (Post 2479653)
Religion -- a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.

Everything anyone believes in is a religion. Just not a God based one. None of us will be right or wrong until we find out for sure.



That's only half the definition.

Quote:

religion - a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

That's from dictionary.com

Webster defines religion as: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith

Mustang 06-03-2011 08:51 PM

Well, I believe in the soul, the cock, the pussy, the small of a woman's back, the hanging curve ball, high fiber, good scotch, that the novels of Susan Sontag are self-indulgent, overrated crap. I believe Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing Astroturf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, soft, wet kisses that last three days.

rowech 06-03-2011 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 2479666)
That's only half the definition.



That's from dictionary.com

Webster defines religion as: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith


Okay...prove there's no God. Can't? Just like I can't prove there is one. Everything is a religion.

This will be my last word on the thing becaue I'm not going to get into a big pissing match about it. Not worth the time and effort, nor the destruction of the thread.

MacroGuru 06-03-2011 09:02 PM


jeff061 06-03-2011 09:09 PM

For fucks sake guys, a religion argument in this thread is 10 times worse and 20 times more stupid than any argument that has taken place to this point.

MikeVic 06-03-2011 10:08 PM

IMAGES thread, not RELIGION.







Drake 06-03-2011 10:17 PM

Is it wrong that the Dirk Nowitzki gif is cracking me up over and over again?

Ksyrup 06-03-2011 10:45 PM


Neon_Chaos 06-03-2011 11:10 PM

Awesome

britrock88 06-03-2011 11:37 PM

Note the apparent nose job between the first Lively picture and the picture with Samberg.

EDIT: late to the party... meh.

Noop 06-04-2011 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mustang (Post 2479667)
Well, I believe in the soul, the cock, the pussy, the small of a woman's back, the hanging curve ball, high fiber, good scotch, that the novels of Susan Sontag are self-indulgent, overrated crap. I believe Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing Astroturf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, soft, wet kisses that last three days.


For reels or just giggles?

dawgfan 06-04-2011 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 2479834)
For reels or just giggles?

It's a famous speech delivered by Kevin Costner's character in the movie Bull Durham.

panerd 06-04-2011 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 2479834)
For reels or just giggles?


Bull Durham

Noop 06-04-2011 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dawgfan (Post 2479844)
It's a famous speech delivered by Kevin Costner's character in the movie Bull Durham.


Quote:

Originally Posted by panerd (Post 2479845)
Bull Durham


Good to hear. I was getting ready to question why he thought that. Mustang has always been a smart guy and I was stunned to see that. Still good to hear it was for the lulz.

sabotai 06-04-2011 01:06 AM

Where's that Picard facepalm pic......

sabotai 06-04-2011 01:27 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Too much talking, not enough cool pics!

sabotai 06-04-2011 01:28 AM

1 Attachment(s)
.

sabotai 06-04-2011 01:32 AM

1 Attachment(s)
..

mckerney 06-04-2011 01:54 AM

1 Attachment(s)
.

mckerney 06-04-2011 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabotai (Post 2479859)
Too much talking, not enough cool pics!



Radii 06-04-2011 03:22 AM

The last panel turns that one from amusing concept to outstanding webcomic... "she ha the internet, she was gonna see my balls eventually!" lolz

Pumpy Tudors 06-04-2011 02:21 PM


Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 (Post 2477822)

:lol:

mckerney 06-04-2011 05:43 PM


MJ4H 06-04-2011 06:21 PM

hahahaha

KWhit 06-04-2011 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 2479852)
Good to hear. I was getting ready to question why he thought that. Mustang has always been a smart guy and I was stunned to see that. Still good to hear it was for the lulz.


Huh? Seriously?

You'd be stunned to see that a smart guy would think Oswald acted alone?

Big Oliver Stone fan?

panerd 06-04-2011 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 2480010)
Huh? Seriously?

You'd be stunned to see that a smart guy would think Oswald acted alone?

Big Oliver Stone fan?


.

MJ4H 06-04-2011 09:52 PM

lol moon landing am i rite

Noop 06-05-2011 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit (Post 2480010)
Huh? Seriously?

You'd be stunned to see that a smart guy would think Oswald acted alone?

Big Oliver Stone fan?


I have seen the movie but to think that one man was able to coordinate and execute that plan is foolish. I don't have to dig deep into the issue to come away with the belief that JFK's death was a result of a mass and coordinated effort.

If Oswald was able to pull it off by himself then why would he allow himself to get caught? Surely a man of his skill should have been able to avoid capture and leave no evidence behind. Also if he was a trained assassin then he must of have a handler therefore making a conspiracy of one into two.

I will not risk further derailing this thread with my tinfoil beliefs anymore. So in the spirit of the thread I will leave a picture.


PilotMan 06-05-2011 12:37 AM

you guys suck.



Mustang 06-05-2011 02:46 AM


RendeR 06-05-2011 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mustang (Post 2480073)




Thats fucking hilarious!

BillJasper 06-05-2011 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mustang (Post 2480073)


:lol:

mckerney 06-05-2011 12:03 PM


MJ4H 06-05-2011 05:34 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.