Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Werewolf Games (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Werewolf XCVIII - 24 Day Game Over - Post 2899 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=73316)

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 06:11 PM

deadline is 9pm CST though right? not 9pm EST

Passacaglia 07-07-2009 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 2066690)
I was under the impression that it is not a case of him having to catch up in half an hour. I thought with no deadline, it was a rolling clock right?

At least that was my assumption. I'm trying to catch up on stuff I skimmed through earlier today and didn't feel any pressure to try to hurry at least?


I think the clock rolls, but I don't think it ever rolls past 24 hours.

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 2066691)
Oh heh.. I thought you meant a real programmer, as if you had a computer application problem. Well I'm not a programmer here either.


LOL

figured i'd clarify that a bit just in case. still didn't reveal anything, and if the programmers just PM me i wouldn't have to reveal them so they'd stay hidden.

Passacaglia 07-07-2009 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2066693)
deadline is 9pm CST though right? not 9pm EST


Oh yeah, I guess it is. Whoops.

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 06:12 PM

dinnertime in this hizzouse...back after

ntndeacon 07-07-2009 06:14 PM

I still am somewhat suspicious of Kwhit, but I guess it is time to work on saving myself a little more.
Unvote Kwhit
Vote PB

Barkeep49 07-07-2009 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2066693)
deadline is 9pm CST though right? not 9pm EST

There is no fixed deadline. Whatever time we have our first lynch will then start the clock for the next lynch.

Poli 07-07-2009 06:32 PM

Beep, beep, beep...

Passacaglia 07-07-2009 06:36 PM

Don't believe his lies (hi Poli!) -- I'm pretty confident that we won't ever have a lynch after 9 PM Central.

PurdueBrad 07-07-2009 06:44 PM

8-8, sheesh!

Chief Rum 07-07-2009 06:44 PM

Hey everyone, work is done, play to begin. :)

I only work one job today. I had a previously scheduled trip to the golf course, though, so I am about to head out. I see I have drawn questioning due to my lack of posting. My apologies for that; it is indeed due to my work schedule, which I brought up near the start of the game (understandable if people missed that, I am used to people knowing my schedule can get hectic).

I will contact DT now and let him know what's up with me, and he can decide what he wants to do with it.

What exactly is the case for PB? Isn't he on some cross-country trip right now? And is the case for ntn just the quietness factor? I'm not sure I like either of those candidates.

I am going to go with KWhit to try to introduce a third candidate, although I suspect it won't make a difference. It's a bad spot to drop a vote, but I'm afraid I don't have a choice right now. I feel better putting up someone to give us more options than to have a hand in lynching someone I admit at this point I have not been able to read up enough in thread to make a really good case for. I will be catching up tonight after golf.

VOTE KWHIT

nfg22 07-07-2009 06:47 PM

Im still undecided as well. keeping my vote on Kwhit.

Schmidty 07-07-2009 06:55 PM

I feel like somehow, the WW are manipulating this into a tie, and a no-lynch.

Alan T 07-07-2009 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schmidty (Post 2066717)
I feel like somehow, the WW are manipulating this into a tie, and a no-lynch.


I don't think a no-lynch is possible is it? as soon as one player gets the proper percentage of votes they die without time for someone to tie it correct?

Passacaglia 07-07-2009 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 2066718)
I don't think a no-lynch is possible is it? as soon as one player gets the proper percentage of votes they die without time for someone to tie it correct?


Right. And I think if the clock ticks and two people are tied with a large enough percentage, the next one to get a vote will get lynched (and, I assume, that if one gets an unvote, the other gets lynched).

Alan T 07-07-2009 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia (Post 2066719)
Right. And I think if the clock ticks and two people are tied with a large enough percentage, the next one to get a vote will get lynched (and, I assume, that if one gets an unvote, the other gets lynched).



In the second scenario you listed, I wonder if both of them die since technically they both have the required lynch percentage at that point?

Schmidty 07-07-2009 07:03 PM

Ahhh, gotcha. Thanks.

Autumn 07-07-2009 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2066662)
BUMPING THIS IMPORTANT QUESTION


Do you mean in real life or in the game? I assumed real life but now I'm wondering.

nfg22 07-07-2009 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 2066722)
Do you mean in real life or in the game? I assumed real life but now I'm wondering.


He meant in game.

Tyrith 07-07-2009 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 2066720)
In the second scenario you listed, I wonder if both of them die since technically they both have the required lynch percentage at that point?


Doubtful, they would just wait for the tie to break I'd imagine.

Autumn 07-07-2009 07:13 PM

Oh I'm caught up now, I see you meant in game. I was wondering why you kept asking, lol

It seems to me it will be hard for the wolves to hide in this game, with us having DaddyT's role. He can orchestrate everything from behind the scenes and the wolves have no excuses to hide out. It will be interesting to see if this will balance out somehow.

Autumn 07-07-2009 07:14 PM

How many non-votes do we have? I'd like to see a lynch soon, I don't think it pays for us to let it hang for too long with no deadline. But I'd like everyone to have a chance to vote first.

nfg22 07-07-2009 07:16 PM

Im out for a few hours...sorry I have had nothing to add...FWIW I have been keeping up...

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 2066713)
Hey everyone, work is done, play to begin. :)

I only work one job today. I had a previously scheduled trip to the golf course, though, so I am about to head out. I see I have drawn questioning due to my lack of posting. My apologies for that; it is indeed due to my work schedule, which I brought up near the start of the game (understandable if people missed that, I am used to people knowing my schedule can get hectic).

I will contact DT now and let him know what's up with me, and he can decide what he wants to do with it.

What exactly is the case for PB? Isn't he on some cross-country trip right now? And is the case for ntn just the quietness factor? I'm not sure I like either of those candidates.

I am going to go with KWhit to try to introduce a third candidate, although I suspect it won't make a difference. It's a bad spot to drop a vote, but I'm afraid I don't have a choice right now. I feel better putting up someone to give us more options than to have a hand in lynching someone I admit at this point I have not been able to read up enough in thread to make a really good case for. I will be catching up tonight after golf.

VOTE KWHIT


this is not a bad vote

BrianD 07-07-2009 07:22 PM

Unvote PurdueBrad
Vote KWhit

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:25 PM

BK - what's the most recent vote-situation?

Autumn 07-07-2009 07:27 PM

Hmm, I imagine I'm about to join an avalanche.

unvote purduebrad
vote kwhit

Autumn 07-07-2009 07:28 PM

That said, what is the vote count, and who are you voting DT?

I have to say, this lack of a real deadline is kind of freaking me out.

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:28 PM

do you guys thing "every 36 hours" or "once every calendar week" is more likely to be true?

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2066738)
do you guys think "every 36 hours" or "once every calendar week" is more likely to be true?


fixed

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 2066736)
Hmm, I imagine I'm about to join an avalanche.

unvote purduebrad
vote kwhit


would not be a horrible avalanche to join IMO

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autumn (Post 2066737)
That said, what is the vote count, and who are you voting DT?

I have to say, this lack of a real deadline is kind of freaking me out.


i'm debating "every 36 hours" and "once every calendar week for 15 minutes"

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:35 PM

http://imstars.aufeminin.com/stars/f...40721-4474.jpg

Autumn 07-07-2009 07:35 PM

I think it would depend on how powerful the ability is. I'm not sure I can guess otherwise. The calendar week sounds unusual, but this is kind of an unusual game so I wouldn't discount it entirely. For a more powerful action it might make sense.

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:35 PM

oops - i forgot to image-link that

Autumn 07-07-2009 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2066743)


Thanks for the morale boost.

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:36 PM

it's not uber-powerful. i'm leaning away from it being true the more i think

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:36 PM


DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:37 PM


Autumn 07-07-2009 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2066749)


Oh well if this is what you're talking about then 15 minutes is probably unrealistically long.

JAG 07-07-2009 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 2066738)
do you guys thing "every 36 hours" or "once every calendar week" is more likely to be true?


From the rules:

"Player actions are predicated by the passing of time, not days in the game. For example, a player may be able to use a power every 36 hours."

So if someone's trying to make up something, using the example given in the rules would be the safest bet in my opinion.

I do want to throw this out though, just because two people are claiming functionally similar roles doesn't necessarily mean there's something fishy. The broad classes of players (government officials, presidents and their wives, etc...) have quite a few characters in each spot. That means there could be some functional overlap.

I'm not saying it's a bad place to start, but just wanted to put that out there.

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:39 PM

After thinking about it

VOTE KWHIT

DaddyTorgo 07-07-2009 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAG (Post 2066752)
From the rules:

"Player actions are predicated by the passing of time, not days in the game. For example, a player may be able to use a power every 36 hours."

So if someone's trying to make up something, using the example given in the rules would be the safest bet in my opinion.

I do want to throw this out though, just because two people are claiming functionally similar roles doesn't necessarily mean there's something fishy. The broad classes of players (government officials, presidents and their wives, etc...) have quite a few characters in each spot. That means there could be some functional overlap.

I'm not saying it's a bad place to start, but just wanted to put that out there.


both good points

Autumn 07-07-2009 07:41 PM

I really wish my computer hadn't crapped out this morning, I'd actually have a vote count. Anyone working on one or should I do it?

Telle 07-07-2009 07:42 PM

unvote PurdueBrad
vote KWhit

ISiddiqui 07-07-2009 07:44 PM

unvote Purdue Brad
vote KWhit

Alan T 07-07-2009 07:44 PM

Well, it looks like if we really want to get a lynch at some point today, we need more numbers. I guess this should just about do it.

Sorry Kwhit, just a numbers thing, we need a lynch today. Hopefully you are bad

Vote Kwhit

JAG 07-07-2009 07:44 PM

I'll work on it in a few minutes if no one else does, just have to finish some dishes.

PurdueBrad 07-07-2009 07:44 PM

Since Jack Bauer says so and I'm in less danger

unvote ntn

vote KWhit

Telle 07-07-2009 07:45 PM

Votes as of post #598:

1 - The Jackal - claphamsa (453)
1 - BrianD - Passacaglia (330)
8 - ntndeacon - JAG (332), The Jackal (374), KWhit (390), king (425), Thomkal (441), Tyrith (514), PurdueBrad (517), Schmidty (537)
5 - PurdueBrad - EagleFan (334), ISiddiqui (471), saldana (501), path (546), ntndeacon (560)
6 - KWhit - nfg22 (482), Chief Rum (565), BrianD (579), Autumn (581), DaddyTorgo (595), Telle (598)

Alan T 07-07-2009 07:46 PM

Oh, I guess Kwhit didn't have nearly as many votes as I thought. Heh


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.