Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The Trump Presidency – 2016 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=92014)

AENeuman 07-17-2018 02:33 PM

I guess I everything is back to normal...

n’t!

bhlloy 07-17-2018 03:22 PM

The new Air Force One will be red, white and blue, although not necessarily in that order. Need to check with Putin to make sure he's happy putting the Russian flag on our airplanes first.

mckerney 07-17-2018 03:35 PM

When I saw Trump wanted it repainted I was assuming it would be gold.

stevew 07-17-2018 03:58 PM

Wouldn’t and Would both mean the same thing when you’re smart apparently

miked 07-17-2018 04:10 PM


RainMaker 07-17-2018 04:13 PM

Real wages fell again. Seems like all those companies didn't get the memo that those tax cuts were supposed to trickle down to their employees.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wa...nds-2018-07-17

RainMaker 07-17-2018 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corbes (Post 3211787)


This stuff is pretty out there.

I think it probably comes down to his businesses. Looks like they've been doing a lot of money laundering over the years for Russian oligarchs and they can kind of hold that over him. His loans have always been sketchy too. I don't think it's overt or anything, but he knows he can't really fuck with them.

There's also the part of him that admires authoritarians. And there is a sizable portion of the US who likes that style of rule despite talking pretending to be for democracy and freedom.

cartman 07-17-2018 04:20 PM

KGB vs. KFC

JPhillips 07-17-2018 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3211863)
Wouldn’t and Would both mean the same thing when you’re smart apparently


I'm shocked that this seems to be good enough for GOP electeds to move on.

edit: Should be NOT SHOCKED

Drake 07-17-2018 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3211775)
They'll turn on Rush Limbaugh tomorrow who'll spin the issues in such a fashion that the liberal media is to blame and then they'll be happy angry Republicans again.


This is literally my FB feed today...all about the DNC server and the lies of the Obama administration and this summit reaction was all manufactured media outrage.

AlexB 07-17-2018 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3211870)
I'm shocked that this seems to be good enough for GOP electeds to move on.

edit: Should be NOT SHOCKED


Sounds fair enough to me :jester:

whomario 07-17-2018 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3211863)
Wouldn’t and Would both mean the same thing when you’re smart apparently


This is going to revolutionize speech-writing, watch for people to purposefully construct sentences this way in the future. One, you can just adjust on the fly based on the feel of the room and two, retroactively claim you misspoke.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mckerney (Post 3211819)
Apparently the only other option was for Trump to declare an all out war on Russia that would have already killed is after the nukes were fired, so it's hard to argue that Trump didn't do a great job.


Any chance you have a link at hand ? Really don't want to go off into that particular wilderness right now but would still like to read an article like that.

mckerney 07-17-2018 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whomario (Post 3211879)
Any chance you have a link at hand ? Really don't want to go off into that particular wilderness right now but would still like to read an article like that.


I was referring to the comments from those supporting how he handled the meeting with Putin, like the commentator on Fox saying "Come on, snap out of it, everybody. The guy is doing what he is supposed to be doing, and that is protecting us… What was he supposed to do? Take a gun out and shoot Putin? Putin said ‘I didn’t meddle in your election.’ So the president should say, ‘Hang on, let me execute this guy.'"

stevew 07-17-2018 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whomario (Post 3211879)
This is going to revolutionize speech-writing, watch for people to purposefully construct sentences this way in the future. One, you can just adjust on the fly based on the feel of the room and two, retroactively claim you misspoke.



Any chance you have a link at hand ? Really don't want to go off into that particular wilderness right now but would still like to read an article like that.


I forget, German does not have contractions, right? Been a minute since I studied it, only thing I really remember is Sheiskopf. Which seems like it should have been Trump's nickname in college.

whomario 07-17-2018 06:40 PM

Thanks for the link :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3211891)
I forget, German does not have contractions, right?


There are a few, but not really as many as in the english language and definitely not as 'funky' as yours with the apostrophe and all ;) And none in a way where you turn a 'positive' into a 'negative' like that , more like to differentiate between persons and places/things while still keeping the preposition short and general.

Like for example: Ich gehe zu Marko (going to see Marko) // Ich gehe zum Training (Going to practice) --> Normally it would have to be "Ich gehe zu dem Training" but that would be a useless specification (essentially: Going to that practice), so it's left out.

And now you have a talking point the next time you meet a german and want to prove you actually did take german ;)

RainMaker 07-17-2018 07:47 PM

Coincidence that this allows non-profits like the NRA to easily commit treason.

Dark Money Groups Get A Little Darker, Thanks To IRS : NPR

JPhillips 07-17-2018 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3211906)
Coincidence that this allows non-profits like the NRA to easily commit treason.

Dark Money Groups Get A Little Darker, Thanks To IRS : NPR


Kavanaugh's opinion on foreign donations has already come up in a Mueller case.

And this gives corporations a way to dump millions without their shareholders or customers ever knowing. But that's freedom, right?

Edward64 07-17-2018 08:18 PM

Don't know if requesting immunity for five witnesses is unusual in a case like this but it sounds like alot.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/17/muel...fort-case.html
Quote:

Special counsel Robert Mueller is asking a judge to grant immunity from prosecution for five potential witnesses whose testimony Mueller wants to compel at the upcoming federal criminal trial of former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort, according to a court filing Tuesday.

If the five unidentified people are not granted immunity — and compelled to testify against Manafort — they would either refuse to take the witness stand or refuse to answer questions by citing their Fifth Amendment right against being forced to incriminate themselves, according to Mueller's filing in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Virginia.

Mueller has also asked Judge T.S. Ellis to seal from public view the court motions detailing the witnesses' identities.

"The five individuals identified in the motions at issue are third parties who have not been charged in this matter, and who have not been identified publicly with the case," Mueller's team argued in a filing asking for that sealing order.

JPhillips 07-17-2018 08:40 PM

Trump told Tucker Carlson that he didn't understand the mutual defense obligations of NATO.

whomario 07-17-2018 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3211915)
Kavanaugh's opinion on foreign donations has already come up in a Mueller case.

And this gives corporations a way to dump millions without their shareholders or customers ever knowing. But that's freedom, right?


And how exactly can a law like this be said to "in no way limit transparency" ? I mean, isn't it enough to say that this is to protect "personal information" and be done with this ? Since when has it become mandatory to not only tout the (real or imagined) positive changes AND then spout nonsense about the negative aspects ?
(certain political parties are doing the same song and dance in germany)

Thomkal 07-17-2018 10:13 PM

So the DNC has been trying to serve Jared Kushner with a subpoena in their lawsuit against the Trump campaign. He's ignored them or had the Secret Service block any one attempting to serve him. They've had to go to a judge and ask for the US Marshal's service to serve him.


https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000...4-ee7f62cc0000

Edward64 07-18-2018 06:17 AM

Thanks Comey but no thanks.

Don't know if Comey caused Hillary the election but he certainly adversely impacted her in the last days. It was certainly a situation where "damned if you do and damned if you don't" but I think "don't" would have been better for the country (and our allies).

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/17/polit...eet/index.html
Quote:

Former FBI Director James Comey is urging "all who believe in this country's values" to vote for Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections.

In a tweet on Tuesday evening, Comey called the Republican-held Congress "incapable of fulfilling the Founders' design."

"This Republican Congress has proven incapable of fulfilling the Founders' design that 'Ambition must ... counteract ambition.' All who believe in this country's values must vote for Democrats this fall. Policy differences don't matter right now. History has its eyes on us," he wrote.

Comey, who was fired by President Donald Trump in May 2017, also spoke out Monday against the President's comments at his joint news conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"This was the day an American president stood on foreign soil next to a murderous lying thug and refused to back his own country. Patriots need to stand up and reject the behavior of this president," Comey said on Twitter.

Comey served under both Republican and Democratic administrations, but during 2016 testimony before Congress he noted he had been registered as a Republican most of his life, adding that he was no longer registered.

Edward64 07-18-2018 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3211924)
Trump told Tucker Carlson that he didn't understand the mutual defense obligations of NATO.


It's incredible the incredible ease that he flip-flops and how he says so many things without true conviction (or he forgets about them). It's like lying to get what you want or to sound good and then forgetting what you said before.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/17/polit...fox/index.html
Quote:

"I understand, but that's the way it was set up," he continued. "Don't forget, I just got here a little more than a year and a half ago, but I took over the conversation three or four days ago and I said you have to pay."

While at the NATO summit last week, Trump signed the NATO communique, which explicitly endorsed Article 5.

"Any attack against one Ally will be regarded as an attack against us all, as set out in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty," the communique reads.
In 2017, Trump said he agreed with the commitment that members will come to one another's aid if they're attacked, which is Article 5 of the NATO charter. Article 5 has been invoked only once -- by the United States after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

"I am committing the United States to Article 5," Trump said at the time.
"And certainly we are there to protect," he then added, saying this is why the US is "paying the kind of money necessary to have that force."

"Yes, absolutely I would be committed to Article 5," he said at the time.

Butter 07-18-2018 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3211865)
Real wages fell again. Seems like all those companies didn't get the memo that those tax cuts were supposed to trickle down to their employees.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wa...nds-2018-07-17


It only took a few months for this second obvious rebuke of "trickle down" to come out.

What a shock.

Edward64 07-18-2018 07:19 AM

Never too soon to speculate for 2020 for the Dem nominee.

73% of Democrats Want ‘A Fresh Face’ As 2020 Nominee - Rasmussen Reports®
Quote:

Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden are among those touted as serious Democratic presidential contenders in 2020, but three-out-of-four Democrats think their party needs to turn to someone new.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 73% of Likely Democratic Voters believe their party should look for a fresh face to run for president in 2020. Just 16% disagree and think the party should promote a candidate who has already run in the past. Eleven percent (11%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

By comparison, with Clinton seen as a shoo-in for the 2016 nomination, just 36% of Democrats were calling for a new face in that election, but an unusually high 21% were undecided.

Among all likely voters, 65% say Democrats should find a new face for 2020, while only 19% think it should go with someone who has run for the White House before. Sixteen percent (16%) are not sure.

As for Clinton, 58% now believe she has been bad for the Democratic Party. Only 22% think she’s been good for Democrats, while 12% say she’s had no impact on the party.

Of the three listed, I don't see Hillary or Bernie. Biden is probably the best of the three since he is relatively untainted by 2016.

I would prefer someone new (Dem or Rep, anyone but Trump).

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/15/u...ates-2020.html
Quote:

Ms. Warren, 69, now leads a small advance guard of Democrats who appear to be moving deliberately toward challenging President Trump. Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., wielding a political network cultivated over decades, has been reasserting himself as a party leader, while Senators Cory Booker of New Jersey and Kamala Harris of California have emerged as fresher-faced messengers for the midterms. And Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, the runner-up in the 2016 primaries, has been acting like a candidate as he considers another race.
:
Yet absent, at least so far, is either an obvious political phenom like former President Barack Obama or an establishment-backed juggernaut in the mold of Hillary Clinton. Unlike the last few Democratic primaries, the unsettled race evokes the sprawling nomination fights of earlier decades — lacking a dominant figure and seemingly inviting new leaders to rise.

“The opportunity for somebody to emerge and catch a wave hasn’t been this high since 1976,” said Anita Dunn, a veteran Democratic strategist, referring to another unpredictable primary featuring a multitude of candidates and a party wrestling with its identity.


JPhillips 07-18-2018 08:59 AM

Quote:

Trump said the US was continuing its discussions with North Korea over the future of the regime’s nuclear weapons arsenal “and they’re going very, very well”.

The US president said there was “no rush for speed” because North Korea had not tested any ballistic missiles over the past nine months.

“We have no time limit. We have no speed limit,” Trump said at a meeting with members of Congress on Tuesday.

“We’re just going through the process, but the relationships are very good.”

At some point the sun will burn out, so eventually NK will denuclearize.

Thomkal 07-18-2018 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3211958)
Never too soon to speculate for 2020 for the Dem nominee.

73% of Democrats Want ‘A Fresh Face’ As 2020 Nominee - Rasmussen Reports®


Of the three listed, I don't see Hillary or Bernie. Biden is probably the best of the three since he is relatively untainted by 2016.

I would prefer someone new (Dem or Rep, anyone but Trump).

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/15/u...ates-2020.html



Count me in as wanting someone new for the Dems. Clinton just has too much controversy and "smell" about her. Most of the stuff about her was made up by fear-mongering Republicans, but people both Dem and Rep just outright hate her. Biden, Bernie, Warren are just too old for me. Harris and Booker are sure to have the same white supremacist factor against them as Obama, but I need to see more from them in a leadership role if they want to be a serious candidate for me.



There is a guy I've been seeing on CNN and MSNBC (and Fox apparently) recently that I'm intrigued by, but can't remember his name. Think he is from California-Eric maybe, Swarell?

NobodyHere 07-18-2018 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3211971)
Count me in as wanting someone new for the Dems. Clinton just has too much controversy and "smell" about her. Most of the stuff about her was made up by fear-mongering Republicans, but people both Dem and Rep just outright hate her. Biden, Bernie, Warren are just too old for me. Harris and Booker are sure to have the same white supremacist factor against them as Obama, but I need to see more from them in a leadership role if they want to be a serious candidate for me.


You mean against the guy that won two terms in office?

NobodyHere 07-18-2018 10:00 AM

dola,

Count me in the group that wants a fresh face from the Democrats for president. They seem to do better when there's a youthful idealistic energy from the candidate. See Obama and Bill Clinton.

JPhillips 07-18-2018 10:03 AM

We all know it's going to be Trump vs Avenatti

It's what we deserve.

lungs 07-18-2018 10:48 AM

The baby boomers have had their chance to run this country. Time for the next generation to take over.

Bee 07-18-2018 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3211971)
Count me in as wanting someone new for the Dems. Clinton just has too much controversy and "smell" about her. Most of the stuff about her was made up by fear-mongering Republicans, but people both Dem and Rep just outright hate her. Biden, Bernie, Warren are just too old for me. Harris and Booker are sure to have the same white supremacist factor against them as Obama, but I need to see more from them in a leadership role if they want to be a serious candidate for me.



There is a guy I've been seeing on CNN and MSNBC (and Fox apparently) recently that I'm intrigued by, but can't remember his name. Think he is from California-Eric maybe, Swarell?


Eric Swalwell, but he has that lip thing going on that bugs me so I can't vote for him.

Noop 07-18-2018 11:57 AM

I hope the Democrats put someone in who is more moderate and younger. I want someone who is a social liberal but fiscally conservative/moderate. I do not want to pay crazy taxes but I am okay if there is a defined plan for the money.

Edward64 07-18-2018 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lungs (Post 3211981)
The baby boomers have had their chance to run this country. Time for the next generation to take over.


Isn't Obama a Gen X? I know there are not clear lines but always thought 1964 was the last of the boomers.

Edward64 07-18-2018 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 3211991)
I hope the Democrats put someone in who is more moderate and younger. I want someone who is a social liberal but fiscally conservative/moderate. I do not want to pay crazy taxes but I am okay if there is a defined plan for the money.


I'm kinda like you but it doesn't seem "fiscally conservative" survives the first year of the Presidency.

molson 07-18-2018 12:19 PM

Sanders is 150 years old but, but still worshiped by young far-left liberals who consider him a victim of 2016, not part of the problem like Clinton. He seems to be gearing up for another run and I could see him as the early frontrunner unless someone else steps up to get the angry liberal vote. I don't know how "anybody but Trump" will play out in 2020, whether that's enough to get people to the polls in the way a boring Democrat like Clinton could not, but I think a lot of people will be looking for something "exciting" to oppose him, and that's more important the chronological age.

bhlloy 07-18-2018 12:34 PM

Or put another way, the top 5 candidates right now include 2 of the leaders of the group who want to disband ICE, Bernie Sanders and Biden, who has said he won't run and will be in his late 70s by the time the election comes around.

The Dems should be able to put forward a moderate candidate and get 50% of the country as a never Trump vote relatively easily, but good luck doing that and not getting torn to shreds by the liberal wing of the party. I can't wait.

PilotMan 07-18-2018 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lungs (Post 3211981)
The baby boomers have had their chance to run this country. Time for the next generation to take over.


+1000

lungs 07-18-2018 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3211992)
Isn't Obama a Gen X? I know there are not clear lines but always thought 1964 was the last of the boomers.


I'd have considered Obama a damn good start to passing the torch to the next generation if we didn't backslide to the current jackass in the White House.

lungs 07-18-2018 01:39 PM

Dola

I would add that I don't want to see an Obama clone next time in terms of leadership style. I personally like Obama's leadership style but think the Dems need somebody with the political capabilities of somebody like Lyndon Johnson. A ruthless politician.

JPhillips 07-18-2018 03:10 PM

Remember how the Trump folks savaged the CBO for its "partisan" deficit projections? Well the OMB is now projecting a trillion dollar deficit for 2019, and it will only be that low if GDP growth in 2018 and 2019 is greater than 5% annually.

And did I mention that this is with a booming economy and full employment? We're so fucked when the next recession hits.

JPhillips 07-18-2018 03:12 PM

dola

Holy fuck. Sanders said that Trump is considering handing over the former ambassador to Russia for questioning by Putin.

Thomkal 07-18-2018 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee (Post 3211982)
Eric Swalwell, but he has that lip thing going on that bugs me so I can't vote for him.



Thanks for giving me the right name-guess I will have to not look at his lips :)

Thomkal 07-18-2018 04:28 PM

Manafort loses motion to move trial to Roanoke:


Judge turns down Manafort's bid to move Virginia trial - POLITICO


Edit: And lost a motion to suppress evidence from his home in VA.

JPhillips 07-18-2018 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bee (Post 3211982)
Eric Swalwell, but he has that lip thing going on that bugs me so I can't vote for him.




If the Presidency doesn't work, he'd make a killer LAX coach.

Edward64 07-18-2018 06:02 PM

Biden apparently is the front runner right now.

I don't know how well Biden and Warren mesh but that may be an interesting combination for optics.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...oll/740370002/
Quote:

With more than two years to go before the next presidential election, former Vice President Joe Biden is the early favorite to represent the Democrats and try to unseat President Donald Trump in the 2020 election, according to a new poll.

Biden was the choice of 32 percent of Democrats in a Harvard CAPS/Harris June poll that was obtained by The Hill. The party's 2016 standard bearer, Hillary Clinton, came in second with 18 percent and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., was third with 16 percent.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., was fourth with 10 percent of the vote.

Biden, who would be 77 on Election Day in 2020, has been one of Trump's most vocal critics since the 2016 campaign.
:
Although Clinton has given no indication she intends to run again, both Biden and Sanders have not ruled out a run in 2020.
:
Among other Democrats included in the poll, The Hill reported that Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., got 6 percent, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg got 3 percent, Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., got 2 percent, while Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo each got 1 percent.

molson 07-18-2018 06:10 PM

Predict It has it: Harris, Biden, Sanders as the clear top three, Warren, Booker, Gillibrand, below them, and then a drop off to everyone else. No Clinton anywhere, people buy that she's disappeared and/or wouldn't be welcomed back.

PilotMan 07-18-2018 09:15 PM

I can't do Biden, I can't do Sanders. It's got to be strong, fresh blood I'm so tired of the also-rans that they feel like trotting out. It's time to move on.

JPhillips 07-18-2018 10:03 PM



1 Trump's staff's denials since then take on a whole new light.

2 Mueller's got all of this. They're all fucked.

PilotMan 07-18-2018 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3212060)

1 Trump's staff's denials since then take on a whole new light.

2 Mueller's got all of this. They're all fucked.



I still think patience is the name of the game. Speculation only sows the seeds of disappointment and folly.

bronconick 07-18-2018 11:11 PM

And the House GOP is going to let election security funding lapse.

Drake 07-18-2018 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhlloy (Post 3211998)
The Dems should be able to put forward a moderate candidate and get 50% of the country as a never Trump vote relatively easily, but good luck doing that and not getting torn to shreds by the liberal wing of the party. I can't wait.


I dislike the rabid liberal wing of the party almost as much as I dislike rabid right-wing folks. Neither one of them can seem to shut the fuck up about things they think I have to do in order to be a good American/person/citizen/human being.

I wish we could just go back to laughing at them like nutters instead of thinking we had to bring them into (or keep them inside of) the tent.

I might just feel this way because I work on a college campus and have to hear these dumbasses cry about their social/political vision every day...and the university frowns when I tell them to get the fuck off my lawn, since it's not really my lawn.

Edward64 07-19-2018 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by molson (Post 3212040)
No Clinton anywhere, people buy that she's disappeared and/or wouldn't be welcomed back.


She's probably chilling to get the lay of the land before deciding. I don't think she has given up all hope. I do agree you are right, she's done.

Edward64 07-19-2018 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drake (Post 3212066)
I might just feel this way because I work on a college campus and have to hear these dumbasses cry about their social/political vision every day...and the university frowns when I tell them to get the fuck off my lawn, since it's not really my lawn.


I know college professors heavily lean left but your statement made me wonder about college students.

There is a chart that shows the neutral trend decreasing from 51.9 in 2000 to 42.3 in 2016. But its still a fairly large %.

https://www.theatlantic.com/educatio...entury/525135/
Quote:

Just over two in five of the 137,456 first-year college students across the United States who responded last fall to the UCLA Higher Education Research Institute’s (HERI) annual freshman survey identified as non-partisan. On the other hand, 35.5 percent of students aligned themselves with liberal or far-left ideology, while 22.2 percent considered themselves conservative or far right. Millennial voting behavior in the 2016 election is consistent with this data, as 55 percent of the demographic cast its vote for Hillary Clinton, while 37 percent supported President Donald Trump.
:
Meanwhile, 41.1 percent of women identified as liberal or far left compared to just 28.9 percent of men—the largest such gender chasm since the survey was first administered in 1966.

Edward64 07-19-2018 07:59 AM

Says Rosenstein gave Trump the option of before/after the summit.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...e-russia-probe
Quote:

Trump’s Botched Putin Summit May Help Protect the Russia Probe
:
According to accounts from people familiar with the decision, Rosenstein offered Trump the choice of having the indictments come out before or after the Putin summit. Trump chose before, in the hope that it would strengthen his hand.

The most immediate effect is that it takes the air out of Republican efforts to quash the Russia probe. Trump’s performance in Helsinki, coupled with the details of the indictment, makes it almost impossible to cast the investigation as a waste of time. After the summit, senior GOP leaders came out strongly in favor of allowing Mueller to finish the job, including House Speaker Paul Ryan, who told reporters that “Russia is trying to undermine democracy itself” and said the probe should continue. Tennessee’s Lamar Alexander, the Senate’s No. 3 Republican, said Trump’s performance “makes it even more important” for the Russia probe to continue.

It also lowers the heat on Rosenstein.
:
Rosenstein and Mueller may also benefit from the delicate confirmation process Trump faces for his new Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh. GOP lawmakers are pushing to confirm Kavanaugh before the court’s next term begins in October. Any effort to undermine the Russia probe before then might complicate matters, given that such a move could result in charges of obstruction of justice that may wind up in front of the Supreme Court; that could also help Democrats drum up opposition to Kavanaugh among moderate senators.

So far the Russia mess has mainly been Trump’s problem, but it threatens to become a liability for the entire GOP heading into the midterm elections, especially in light of the details of another Russia-related investigation.

digamma 07-19-2018 09:11 AM

The Mike McFaul question from yesterday is ridiculous. The administration continues to show itself as either woefully unprepared or incredibly malicious, and maybe both.

cuervo72 07-19-2018 09:23 AM

Heck, Trump would probably ask the Russians to "question" Brennan and Clapper and Comey, too.

cuervo72 07-19-2018 09:28 AM

New York State Opens Tax Probe Into Trump Foundation

Kodos 07-19-2018 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 3212091)
Heck, Trump would probably ask the Russians to "question" Brennan and Clapper and Comey, too.



Don't forget Killary!

JPhillips 07-19-2018 12:26 PM

Mueller's list of exhibits for the Manafort trial includes communications with Tad Devine and Kilimnik. Kilimnok is a Russian already indicted and Devine was Bernie's campaign manager. Devine left the firm in 2014 when he joined Bernie's campaign and all the exhibits are from 2010-2014.

JPhillips 07-19-2018 03:41 PM

Trump has asked Bolton to invite Putin to Washington in the Fall. Maybe a guest for his big military parade?

Ryche 07-19-2018 05:47 PM

Doesn't seem like GOP incumbents would want that reminder of the past week shortly before the election.

AlexB 07-20-2018 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3212144)
Trump has asked Bolton to invite Putin to Washington in the Fall. Maybe a guest for his big military parade?


Now we know why Trump wants the parade: Putin must have demanded to inspect and assess the US weaponry and capacity...

Not even Trump could get away with taking him around military hardware in factories and on bases, so the only way is to parade them through the streets and invite Putin!

Makes perfect sense now!

Edward64 07-20-2018 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3212144)
Trump has asked Bolton to invite Putin to Washington in the Fall. Maybe a guest for his big military parade?


You may have something there. I think the parade is scheduled for Nov 11.

mckerney 07-20-2018 09:55 AM

Trump says stock market gains since election give him opportunity to wage a trade war: 'We’re playing with the bank's money'

Bank's money, people's jobs and farmer's. Oh well, at least we weren't taken advantage of by, um, I guess having more than double the stock market gains we've had since Trump too office.

I'm starting to think Trump night not know what he's talking about in trade.

QuikSand 07-20-2018 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mckerney (Post 3212190)
I'm starting to think Trump night not know what he's talking about in trade.


It's totally understandable, given that the press is so barraged by absurdities and lies in this environment, but it's a completely bizarre notion that our President still clearly doesn't even understand the basic concepts of national debt, budget deficit, trade deficit, and stock market valuation...and essentially nobody cares beyond it being "baked in" to the generic outrage.

In this thread, I think we saw the phrase "enthusiastically ignorant." That seems to be it, right? Don't know, don't wanna know.

JPhillips 07-20-2018 10:53 AM

Oh my.



NobodyHere 07-20-2018 11:00 AM

So would such a recording fall under attorney-client privilege?

JPhillips 07-20-2018 11:05 AM

I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know.

Politically, though, it's quite damning because we were told over and over that the President had no knowledge of any payment.

Kodos 07-20-2018 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3212207)
I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know.

Politically, though, it's quite damning because we were told over and over that the President had no knowledge of any payment.


Weren't those denials specific to Stormy? I think this is a different woman.

JPhillips 07-20-2018 11:29 AM

Whoops. It's hard to keep track of Trump's mistress hush money payments.

But aren't there denials regarding this woman as well?

jeff061 07-20-2018 11:39 AM

Yeah, believe this one was for significantly more money, 1mil+.

Stormy is a shitty negotiator.

Kodos 07-20-2018 11:58 AM

I think this is the playboy model whose story was bought by the National Enquirer and then buried before the election.

I do believe there were denials of this story as well. Just not the well-known Air Force One interview where he denied things.

Radii 07-20-2018 12:10 PM

I don't think cheating on your wife, or being embarrassed enough/worried enough about it to pay off the person is impeachable, so I mostly don't care about this at all. And Trump has admitted to so very much worse than this that I don't see it impacting anything in 2020, so the trashy details of this I just have no interest in. However, I'm very interested to learn if the handling of any payments/reimbursements were done in such a way that violated Campaign Finance Law, which was something that came up many times in the Stormy Daniels conversations.

JPhillips 07-20-2018 12:12 PM

Rudy says there are other recordings.

QuikSand 07-20-2018 12:25 PM

#NothingMatters

Thomkal 07-20-2018 12:26 PM

Iran has laid groundwork for cyberwar attack on the US:


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...icials-n893081

Edward64 07-20-2018 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radii (Post 3212219)
I don't think cheating on your wife, or being embarrassed enough/worried enough about it to pay off the person is impeachable, so I mostly don't care about this at all. And Trump has admitted to so very much worse than this that I don't see it impacting anything in 2020, so the trashy details of this I just have no interest in. However, I'm very interested to learn if the handling of any payments/reimbursements were done in such a way that violated Campaign Finance Law, which was something that came up many times in the Stormy Daniels conversations.


I agree with you. No one cares about him sleeping around, he's gotten that pass by mostly everyone like it or not. The time to bring up the trashy details was before the elections.

With Cohen seemingly in Mueller's sights, that would imply possible campaign finance problem. That would be sweet.

bronconick 07-20-2018 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3212204)
So would such a recording fall under attorney-client privilege?





New York only requires one side to be aware that something is being recorded


Probably because of the 150 or so years of gangsters in New York City.

Thomkal 07-20-2018 03:36 PM

More than 100 former students at Ohio State have come forward to say they were sexually abused.



https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...m_npd_nn_tw_ma


Jordan's response-a deep-state (and time traveling) choreography from the left attack on him:


Jordan suggests left-wing conspiracy on Ohio State wrestling charges - News - The Columbus Dispatch - Columbus, OH

QuikSand 07-20-2018 03:55 PM

jeepers

JPhillips 07-20-2018 04:28 PM

Burn down B1G athletics.

kingfc22 07-20-2018 05:50 PM

I see Trump is going with the tried and true Deflect option #3 out of the playbook...NFL players and the anthem.

RainMaker 07-20-2018 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radii (Post 3212219)
I don't think cheating on your wife, or being embarrassed enough/worried enough about it to pay off the person is impeachable, so I mostly don't care about this at all. And Trump has admitted to so very much worse than this that I don't see it impacting anything in 2020, so the trashy details of this I just have no interest in. However, I'm very interested to learn if the handling of any payments/reimbursements were done in such a way that violated Campaign Finance Law, which was something that came up many times in the Stormy Daniels conversations.


I don't think the personal life stuff is important. The issue would be more that the party that never shut up about "family values" supports this. Just pointing out that they never cared about that stuff and are massive hypocrites (what's new?).

My biggest takeaway is that Cohen has to be the worlds worst fucking lawyer in the world. Why the fuck would you record this stuff?


JPhillips 07-21-2018 09:20 PM

DNI Coates gives away what dignity he had left.

Quote:

“My admittedly awkward response was in no way meant to be disrespectful or criticize the actions of the President.”

bronconick 07-21-2018 11:46 PM

CNBC‏Verified account @CNBC









Trump says stock market gains since election give him opportunity to wage a trade war: 'We’re playing with the bank's money'


Now I see why he couldn't run a casino, or sell steaks in America. He's an imbecile.

Ben E Lou 07-22-2018 02:08 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I mentioned earlier in this thread about a real problem with either no theology being taught at all in churches, or a watered-down version being given out by preachers who just want to tickle ears. Here’s an horrific example.

Reference: God, Trump and the meaning of morality - The Washington Post


If you’re part of a theological tradition that wrongly interpreted Scriptures when it came to slavery, Jim Crow, interracial marriage, and the Civil Rights movement, you might want to consider the possibility that it’s also wrong about refugees, immigrants, and Trump.

bronconick 07-22-2018 02:45 PM

I assume they skip the part where the Holy Family were refugees in Egypt to avoid Herod.

JPhillips 07-22-2018 03:36 PM

Ben: I had never heard the 15,000 mile-wide heaven bit. I'm familiar with the numerology around the end times, but do you know where the precise dimensions for heaven come from?

Ben E Lou 07-22-2018 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3212340)
Ben: I had never heard the 15,000 mile-wide heaven bit. I'm familiar with the numerology around the end times, but do you know where the precise dimensions for heaven come from?

If you take Revelation 21&22 100% literally, and then somehow twist it to claim the city mentioned there is the only aspect of heaven (at least one giant leap, imho, and probably two,) you'd have a city that's 1,500 miles wide, 1,500 miles high, and 1,500 miles long. If that's what she's referring to, then she's off tenfold. *shurg*

Drake 07-22-2018 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3212342)
If you take Revelation 21&22 100% literally, and then somehow twist it to claim the city mentioned there is the only aspect of heaven (at least one giant leap, imho, and probably two,) you'd have a city that's 1,500 miles wide, 1,500 miles high, and 1,500 miles long. If that's what she's referring to, then she's off tenfold. *shurg*


Bad theology and bad math. That's a hard life, there.

JPhillips 07-22-2018 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3212342)
If you take Revelation 21&22 100% literally, and then somehow twist it to claim the city mentioned there is the only aspect of heaven (at least one giant leap, imho, and probably two,) you'd have a city that's 1,500 miles wide, 1,500 miles high, and 1,500 miles long. If that's what she's referring to, then she's off tenfold. *shurg*


Thanks. My tradition doesn't generally look at the Bible literally, and I hadn't heard that one before.

Ben E Lou 07-22-2018 06:37 PM

Meanwhile, Trump has flip-flopped in Russian interference yet again. Now he’s back to saying it didn’t happen. *shurg*

JPhillips 07-22-2018 10:29 PM

WBUR has an interesting story on the militarization of sports.

http://www.wbur.org/onlyagame/2018/0...store-francona

Groundhog 07-23-2018 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3212351)
WBUR has an interesting story on the militarization of sports.

http://www.wbur.org/onlyagame/2018/0...store-francona


Good read. I've noticed something interesting in our national basketball league - most of the big budget teams over the past 2-3 years have been making conscious efforts to copy the game-day experience of the NBA, and this has included national anthems before the game, which was basically reserved for the Finals previously. I personally think it's a bit ridiculous and so does the rest of the crowd for the most part - not a lot of singing along.

Chief Rum 07-23-2018 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhog (Post 3212360)
Good read. I've noticed something interesting in our national basketball league - most of the big budget teams over the past 2-3 years have been making conscious efforts to copy the game-day experience of the NBA, and this has included national anthems before the game, which was basically reserved for the Finals previously. I personally think it's a bit ridiculous and so does the rest of the crowd for the most part - not a lot of singing along.


Well, of course. After all, how many of them know the words to the American anthem? :D

Groundhog 07-23-2018 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 3212362)
Well, of course. After all, how many of them know the words to the American anthem? :D


"Oh say can you see, by the .... *mumble* *mumble* *mumble*

^^^ Every Aussie attempt to sing Star Spangled Banner. :D

PilotMan 07-23-2018 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhog (Post 3212365)
"Oh say can you see, by the .... *mumble* *mumble* *mumble*

^^^ Every Aussie attempt to sing Star Spangled Banner. :D



Hey, just remember, you don't need actually know the SSB to be the president.

Thomkal 07-23-2018 08:52 AM

So Trump on the warpath this morning with Iran for some reason:


Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump









To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!

QuikSand 07-23-2018 09:23 AM

He also tweeted deep criticism of the Washington Post's coverage of his Korean "diplomacy."

Then, in a 100% unrelated move, a half hour later tweeted his thoughts about antitrust actions against Amazon.

Totally normal.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.