![]() |
*PING*
|
Quote:
Great, now SnDvls is pinging my radar.... :) |
Or should that be:
nw SnDvls s pngng my rdr :D |
Quote:
Ys rlly ht vwls :) |
Wow, no action at all in here. I guess there were no mass reveals.
If path turns out good I would recommend the seer to scan either Alan, ntn or myself (I want my name cleared :) ). |
with no action it leads me to belive we are on the right trail.
|
Quote:
Or the entirely wrong track! |
Feels like Path has waved the white flag. :shurg:
|
Quote:
I'd say that if path hadn't stopped in and not said a lynch saving word and left again. |
Quote:
My thoughts exactly. |
Well to be fair, the reason I don't like using the "Active viewers" thing at the bottom besides it being a bit gamey at times is that it is not always accurate. It is easy enough to load the page at work with intention to catch up, but then get pulled away due to something else. You still show up as actively viewing for the next 15 minutes even if you haven't had a chance to read anything.
Just playing devil's advocate I guess here since my vote is on Path, and without any further explanation on his part for his claim earlier I don't plan on moving it. I do see where everyone is going with this, that he happened to appear shortly after 1pm which was the normal deadline, but then disappeared again, which gives the impression that he checked in and saw the deadline was later (as he had forgotten) and then left to do more work , ie: waving the white flag... But I just wanted to present both sides of the arguement just I guess so there is some activity here at least! |
ntn, any insight into today's events?
|
I'm not keen on looking at the "Currently Active" thing either, and try to avoid it, because it does feel a bit gamey. Then again a lot of people say "I see you're on X. What do you think about this or that". But my position would be the same even if Path hadn't stopped in again. Except I'd be feeling less happy about it.
|
Quote:
Quote:
:D |
Anyway, no sign of heinz so I'll probably have to go to bed not knowing how this turns out.
|
I'll pop in and out of here a few times to see the write up. Here's to hoping we did a good thing today.
|
Well, my thoughts are if we got the third bad guy in path, the a major reveal might be the way to go. Well except for the Ex Con
If path is good, then I am not as sure. |
I don't think it's gamey, it's just below the quick reply box so it's hard to miss it, but that is a discussion for another thread I guess.
|
dola - it's not something that can be disabled or poster controled to completely avoid...unlike someone clicking on a posters name on the front page to see if they are PMing or what they are viewing for example.
/end discussion for another thread from me |
Starting to catch up. I tried earlier but got tied up immediately.
|
Crap, it's past deadline. I guess I should just see if I'm lynched.
|
Quote:
We had a discussion on this before, and I think you're taking what I said the wrong way. I don't think of it as cheating or inappropriate... I just have seen all kinds of hell break loose in WW games because of that box is all.. Since you can show up there without it necessarily meaning that you are actively reading the thread, it can lead to alot of improper assumptions going off of it just alone. I totally look to see who is around at deadlines in that box for instance. |
Quote:
I agree it shouldn't be the end all, matter of fact truth, as it has bit me in the ass before too in the wrong way...at a deadline. :D |
Bastards. You're all bastards. :P
I guess head robber is a role, isn't it? This was one of the worst wolf games ever. I blame myself. |
Sounds like a victory?
|
Dola, I really did get called away from catching up when I was in thread before. I was going to make some kind of fake reveal but I was just trying to decide when I got pulled away and didn't close the window for awhile. That sealed my fate since it looked like I vanished without answering any questions.
|
Wow, did we really get three robbers in three lynches? Thats pretty incredibly...I love talkative guys, haha.
|
Quote:
I hated having to throw Purdue Brad under the bus day 1 but as Alan called it I got in a situation where I really couldn't vote any other way without making it look more suspicious -- I did think I was going to at least get a few days out of it though. At least I'm taking Alan out with me as a result...... :devil: :lol: |
see you all next year...
|
Quote:
LOL - nice |
We <3 you, Lathum
|
Quote:
:confused: |
Quote:
a whole year off???? you have to be kidding right? |
Quote:
|
thats a long break......
|
If it makes anyone feel better.,... the other time he used this rule set, it was a similar ass whooping, just the other way!
|
Bah - that is like six games.
Some guys will go to extraordinary lengths to hide the fact that they are playing in my next game :) |
I was really psyched at the beginning because Lathum and I have never been wolves together before.
|
Quote:
definantly not a year but I need some time away. Between my recent blow up and my horrible play this game and in an earlier game I need some time away. I may play in a small game and will play Saldana's game for sure since he is my BFF, but I just dont have the same fire I usualy have, and most of you know how I play and I need that fire. This game would have been different had I been around yesterdays deadline to either fake reveal or try and swing the vote using sal's reveal and info that he didnt spot me doing anything, but I was in class all morning. Not trying to be overly dramatic, I may be away for a month or 3, not sure. I just know I dont enjoy playing nearly as much as I used to, and that isn't fair to anyone. Thanks for running the game Heinze, wish it had gone better. |
So, is it over then? That has to be the most amazing streak of luck in a WW game ever. The PB lynch was probably the only one that I felt ok about (considering it was a day 1 and he had some odd playing that day).. The Lathum lynch was just outright luck because of Saldana's reveal.. and then today I sat here trying to convince myself to look elsewhere, and vote after vote just piled on Path and it kind of just became a done deal out of nowhere..
So if it is over then, was I right on my gut call that ntn and Barkeep were the two cops? |
From the sidelines, I was guessing that SnDvls was a cop.
|
Dola, and I was trying to figure out who the psychic would have been.. and had been leaning towards Sndvls?
|
I had a hunch that Jackal was the ex-con, but after the first two days I doubt whoever it was would have switched anyway.
|
so is the game really over then? 3 robbers and the cyborg is all (well plus the ex-con)?
|
Quote:
Yeah, it was just the three of us. |
anyone want to role reveal then?
|
I was hinting at the seer, hoping to get night killed and join the bad guys :)
|
well I was in fact one of the cops
|
Quote:
We saw your hint, but that made us figure you'd be guarded at night so we wouldn't have gone your direction. |
Quote:
You were actually the reason I didn't move off of Path despite his saying he had a role today without more information. In thinking back, there was comments that some others had doubts if you were actually saying you had a role, where it seemed certain to me. So I wanted to make sure with Path before I looked elsewhere. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.