Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Beijing Olympics 2008 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=66861)

DanGarion 08-14-2008 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1808810)
They seem to always be almost the smallest or the smallest person on the court is something else I noticed.


Yeah I noticed that too!

Anthony 08-14-2008 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BishopMVP (Post 1808758)
Just wait until next week when Ben Johnson represents Canada.




Too soon? :confused: Pommel horse as a whole is stupid for 95% of the guys. Then there are maybe 2 or 3 (Arshavin included) who make you stand up and say wow. Yet they get at best .5 better. Bring the balance beam back for the guys. I know the urban legend stories about why they don't do it, but it would at least provide some fantastic viral youtube videos.


what are the urban legends?

ISiddiqui 08-14-2008 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony (Post 1808872)
what are the urban legends?


Think about the moves that female gymnasts make on the beam involving straddling the bar and imagine someone with balls doing them.

MrBug708 08-14-2008 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miami_fan (Post 1808841)
And that was with Kobe shooting bricks


Kobe's biggest knock is his low shooting percentage and he goes out and shoots 50% and now he's "shooting bricks"?

You need to let the Kobe hate go :)

Anthony 08-14-2008 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 1808874)
Think about the moves that female gymnasts make on the beam involving straddling the bar and imagine someone with balls doing them.


1. i'm sure it doesn't feel all that great to be straddling a balance beam even with a vagina.

2. then the make gymnasts don't do the balance beam staddle move. besides, anyone can straddle a balance beam. that's not hard.

ISiddiqui 08-14-2008 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony (Post 1808912)
1. i'm sure it doesn't feel all that great to be straddling a balance beam even with a vagina.

2. then the make gymnasts don't do the balance beam staddle move. besides, anyone can straddle a balance beam. that's not hard.


Imagine someone slipping and falling with legs apart on the beam. For a woman, it'd hurt bad, but it'd be alright... with a guy... well, he may not be able to have children after that.

MJ4H 08-14-2008 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 1808916)
Imagine


LET'S NOT, OK?

Lathum 08-14-2008 01:00 PM

OK, so another stupid rule.

Why do they let a completly different group of swimmers qualify for a swimming relay then the ones who are going to actualy swim in the medal round?

digamma 08-14-2008 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1809033)
OK, so another stupid rule.

Why do they let a completly different group of swimmers qualify for a swimming relay then the ones who are going to actualy swim in the medal round?


Why wouldn't they? You enter the relay as a nation. If you want to try to strategize and rest your better swimmers for the final, that's your risk (and your reward).

This isn't unique to swimming. Track relays are the same.

I could see it being an issue if you were allowed more than one entry in a relay event--you would need to designate your teams. But, with only one entry, I don't see a problem.

larrymcg421 08-14-2008 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1809033)
OK, so another stupid rule.

Why do they let a completly different group of swimmers qualify for a swimming relay then the ones who are going to actualy swim in the medal round?


I'm not sure why, but the rule is the same for the track & field relays.

Lathum 08-14-2008 01:13 PM

Well I think it's stupid.

The people that qualify should have to race for the medal.

gstelmack 08-14-2008 01:13 PM

And same for gymnastics and any other team event.

larrymcg421 08-14-2008 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1809048)
Well I think it's stupid.

The people that qualify should have to race for the medal.


Nah, I prefer it this way. It allows for more people to participate. And since it's a team event, I don't see how it's much different than basketball or other team sports where you're allowed to sub people in or out. I just consider the other swimmers the bench players.

larrymcg421 08-14-2008 01:22 PM

dola

Also, this reminds me of when I gained alot of respect for Phelps. In 2004, he gave up his spot in the medley relay final to Ian Crocker. Crocker hadn't raced in the prelims and wouldn't have got a gold if Phelps hadn't done that.

sabotai 08-14-2008 01:23 PM

Do the "bench player" swimmers who swim in the qualifying round also get gold/silver/bronze medals?

EDIT: I guess larry's last post answers that.

Huckleberry 08-14-2008 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larrymcg421 (Post 1809062)
dola

Also, this reminds me of when I gained alot of respect for Phelps. In 2004, he gave up his spot in the medley relay final to Ian Crocker. Crocker hadn't raced in the prelims and wouldn't have got a gold if Phelps hadn't done that.


Hopefully Crocker will repay him by beating him in the 100m Butterfly final.

:D

clemsonfan 08-14-2008 02:20 PM

State-media story fuels questions on gymnast's age - Olympics - Yahoo! Sports

No big surprise there.

MikeVic 08-14-2008 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clemsonfan (Post 1809114)


Ok, not really paying attention what the gymnast's name was... that article confused the hell out of me.

clemsonfan 08-14-2008 02:26 PM

Her name is "He."

larrymcg421 08-14-2008 02:30 PM

We could get a Marx Bros. routine out of this.

miami_fan 08-14-2008 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBug708 (Post 1808907)
Kobe's biggest knock is his low shooting percentage and he goes out and shoots 50% and now he's "shooting bricks"?

You need to let the Kobe hate go :)


What Kobe hate? He was 4-10 while missing dunks and layups in the first half. For Kwame Brown, that is a quality first half, for Kobe, it is shooting bricks;)

I don't have any issue with Kobe at all. When I do, you will definitely know it!:)

Fidatelo 08-14-2008 02:37 PM

I think this was a routine in the latest Rush Hour movie.

MikeVic 08-14-2008 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larrymcg421 (Post 1809125)
We could get a Marx Bros. routine out of this.


That's how I felt reading it. When did the article switch to talking about a guy? Wait, that doesn't make sense grammatically. Maybe it was a typo. No, there it is again and again it doesn't make sense grammatically. Maybe it's supposed to say she? Or her?

Fidatelo 08-14-2008 02:46 PM

Yu: May I help you?
Carter: We'll be askin' the questions, old man. Who are you?
Yu: Yu.
Carter: No, not me, you.
Yu: Yes, I am Yu.
Carter: Just answer the damn questions, who are you?
Yu: I have told you.
Carter: Are you deaf?
Yu: No, Yu is blind.
Carter: I'm not blind, you blind.
Yu: That is what I just said.
Carter: You just said what?
Yu: I did not say what, I said Yu!
Carter: That's what I'm askin' you!
Yu: And Yu is answering!
Carter: Shut up! (turns to personnel) You!
Yu: Yes?
Carter: No, not you, him! (to personnel) What's yo' name?
Mi: Mi.
Carter: Yes, YOU!
Mi: I am Mi!
Yu: He is Mi, and I am Yu.
Carter: And I'm about to whoop your old ass, man, 'cause I'm sick of playin' games! (points to everyone in the room) You, me, everybody's ass around here! (points to tall student) Him--I'm-a kick his ass, I'm sick of this!

larrymcg421 08-14-2008 02:53 PM

Who? Wu?

YouTube - Deadwood Swearengen and WU

samifan24 08-14-2008 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 1809133)
Yu: May I help you?
Carter: We'll be askin' the questions, old man. Who are you?
Yu: Yu.
Carter: No, not me, you.
Yu: Yes, I am Yu.
Carter: Just answer the damn questions, who are you?
Yu: I have told you.
Carter: Are you deaf?
Yu: No, Yu is blind.
Carter: I'm not blind, you blind.
Yu: That is what I just said.
Carter: You just said what?
Yu: I did not say what, I said Yu!
Carter: That's what I'm askin' you!
Yu: And Yu is answering!
Carter: Shut up! (turns to personnel) You!
Yu: Yes?
Carter: No, not you, him! (to personnel) What's yo' name?
Mi: Mi.
Carter: Yes, YOU!
Mi: I am Mi!
Yu: He is Mi, and I am Yu.
Carter: And I'm about to whoop your old ass, man, 'cause I'm sick of playin' games! (points to everyone in the room) You, me, everybody's ass around here! (points to tall student) Him--I'm-a kick his ass, I'm sick of this!


Haha, I just watched this movie the other night. Good stuff.

saldana 08-14-2008 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabotai (Post 1809068)
Do the "bench player" swimmers who swim in the qualifying round also get gold/silver/bronze medals?

EDIT: I guess larry's last post answers that.


yes, so if 2 of 4 people race the prelim, and are then replaced, all 6 get medals, but only the 4 that raced the final get the cermony, and the world record will be listed in their names.

saldana 08-14-2008 07:10 PM

this is pretty graphic...hungarian weightlifter trying to snatch 326 pounds, his elbow looks like it fully dislocates anteriorally to the humerus

YouTube - Weightlifting accident - Beijing 2008

Lathum 08-14-2008 07:19 PM

heh

video no longer available

saldana 08-14-2008 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 1809281)
heh

video no longer available


weird...works when i click on it....just go to youtube and it was one of the "now being viewed" at the top of the page

terpkristin 08-14-2008 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana (Post 1809277)
this is pretty graphic...hungarian weightlifter trying to snatch 326 pounds, his elbow looks like it fully dislocates anteriorally to the humerus

YouTube - Weightlifting accident - Beijing 2008


They showed that on MSNBC yesterday (Wednesday) while I was at the gym (so in the 4:30-6ish p.m. ET time period). They warned that it was graphic, and then kept showing it again and again. They also showed a clip of one of the weightlifters tearing his calf muscle (I think they said it was a torn calf muscle, maybe detached? maybe torn tendon? --it was on mute and I was trying to read the subtitles). Not exactly what I wanted to be thinking of while at the gym.

I saw some previous post about something on Walsh's shoulder. This is a complete guess, since I haven't seen this brace (not even sure who Walsh is, I THINK women's beach volleyball), but I know that while in rehab for a dislocated shoulder, I've been taped up (by physical therapists) in such a way so as to help stabilize it and helps ensure it doesn't slip out (thereby helping reduce some of the stress on the muscles, especially after a therapy session). I'm guessing that said brace may serve a role similar to that.

Ok, since I just typed that out, I'm not deleting it. But I just saw it in an ad. It looks EXACTLY like the tape pattern they used to help stabilize it so it doesn't pop out (or partially pop out). So that's my "final answer."

/tk

saldana 08-14-2008 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by terpkristin (Post 1809291)
They showed that on MSNBC yesterday (Wednesday) while I was at the gym (so in the 4:30-6ish p.m. ET time period). They warned that it was graphic, and then kept showing it again and again. They also showed a clip of one of the weightlifters tearing his calf muscle (I think they said it was a torn calf muscle, maybe detached? maybe torn tendon? --it was on mute and I was trying to read the subtitles). Not exactly what I wanted to be thinking of while at the gym.

I saw some previous post about something on Walsh's shoulder. This is a complete guess, since I haven't seen this brace (not even sure who Walsh is, I THINK women's beach volleyball), but I know that while in rehab for a dislocated shoulder, I've been taped up (by physical therapists) in such a way so as to help stabilize it and helps ensure it doesn't slip out (thereby helping reduce some of the stress on the muscles, especially after a therapy session). I'm guessing that said brace may serve a role similar to that.

Ok, since I just typed that out, I'm not deleting it. But I just saw it in an ad. It looks EXACTLY like the tape pattern they used to help stabilize it so it doesn't pop out (or partially pop out). So that's my "final answer."

/tk



it isnt really a brace. everytime they talk about the tape they explain that it is supposed to be increasing blood flow and oxygenation to the shoulder...she had surgery to clean out the joint, but has never had any history of dislocations

they are on at 9pm eastern tonight, and i am sure they will mention it again, they have every other time she has been on

edit to add: they just called it kinesiology tape

Senator 08-14-2008 08:09 PM

I never realized, since I am a longtime member of the International Society of Olympic Historians, how important beach volleyball is. I need to let the members know that it has to be considered one of the premier sports of the games. They get more prime time than almost anyone.

terpkristin 08-14-2008 08:09 PM

Well, as I said, I can only really go by what I know from personal experience in this matter. Be it a brace or tape (I called it a brace because somebody else did, either way doesn't really change the point), the function is to reduce the stress on the muscles that primarily act to stabilize the shoulder by helping support them. When my PT taped me up, in typical form, I made a nuisance of myself and asked about why it worked, what it was doing, etc, and that tape "pattern" if you will is exactly what I had.

I'm not sure I buy into the "increased blood flow" stuff, but maybe by alleviating the stress, the blood flows better. I have a hard time believing that the Olympic committee would allow something like that in competition if it didn't have at least some supportive function, but that's just a guess, too.

Even without a history of dislocations, there can be instability, and often in athletes who have strong overhead motions (volleyball players, swimmers, gymnasts all fit this mold), there is at least a little instability in the shoulder joint, due to uneven muscle build-up because of which muscles are used mostly in the sport. That she's had to clean it out suggests there MAY have been some instability or something else that's caused damage, which would be reason enough to think about helping the joint out with tape.

I guess in the end, I've definitely had that tape job and I can vouch that it supports the joint itself, helps it feel like it's moving...smoother (my shoulder grinds a bit normally but with the tape job, it didn't). So I'm sticking with my answer for what it's doing. I wonder if they would try to downplay what role the tape may serve because of sponsorships on the main circuit..

/tk

larrymcg421 08-14-2008 08:10 PM

May and Walsh have some competition here. They're down 11-9 in the first set.

DaddyTorgo 08-14-2008 08:13 PM

those belgian girls are thick

larrymcg421 08-14-2008 08:19 PM

HUGE point coming up.

saldana 08-14-2008 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by terpkristin (Post 1809300)
Well, as I said, I can only really go by what I know from personal experience in this matter. Be it a brace or tape (I called it a brace because somebody else did, either way doesn't really change the point), the function is to reduce the stress on the muscles that primarily act to stabilize the shoulder by helping support them. When my PT taped me up, in typical form, I made a nuisance of myself and asked about why it worked, what it was doing, etc, and that tape "pattern" if you will is exactly what I had.

I'm not sure I buy into the "increased blood flow" stuff, but maybe by alleviating the stress, the blood flows better. I have a hard time believing that the Olympic committee would allow something like that in competition if it didn't have at least some supportive function, but that's just a guess, too.

Even without a history of dislocations, there can be instability, and often in athletes who have strong overhead motions (volleyball players, swimmers, gymnasts all fit this mold), there is at least a little instability in the shoulder joint, due to uneven muscle build-up because of which muscles are used mostly in the sport. That she's had to clean it out suggests there MAY have been some instability or something else that's caused damage, which would be reason enough to think about helping the joint out with tape.

I guess in the end, I've definitely had that tape job and I can vouch that it supports the joint itself, helps it feel like it's moving...smoother (my shoulder grinds a bit normally but with the tape job, it didn't). So I'm sticking with my answer for what it's doing. I wonder if they would try to downplay what role the tape may serve because of sponsorships on the main circuit..

/tk


i'm not trying to argue with your experiences with the tape, but the announcers also said today that they got a call from her doctor yesterday who said he has no idea what she is doing with that much tape on her shoulder.

also people are wearing it on places where there is no joint (calf muscles, across one trapezius)

i found this website about it that explains the different ways it can be used, so apparently we are both right

http://www.kinesiologytaping.co.uk/A...echniques.html

Eaglesfan27 08-14-2008 08:22 PM

Great response by Walsh and May. By far the most entertaining match I've seen them play.

sterlingice 08-14-2008 08:24 PM

Nice match

SI

DaddyTorgo 08-14-2008 08:24 PM

yeah - i'm surprised they got taken to the limit in that first game, but they showed great adjustment and heart to rally and holdoff 5 set points before winning

Groundhog 08-14-2008 08:24 PM

I thought this was a pretty great read on why olympic/world records keep getting broken:

Human Nature : Olympic Inflation

Quote:

Olympic Inflation

Can we please stop fussing over every new Olympic record?
A new record means that an athlete using today's equipment outperformed an athlete using yesterday's equipment. It's not a fair fight.
In swimming alone, today's advantages include:
1. LZR Racer suit. It reduces friction (compared with skin) and is structurally designed to compress and streamline the body for maximum speed. Estimated drag reduction: 5 percent to 10 percent. Estimated average improvement in top swimmers' best times: 2 percent. Designed by NASA scientists and computers, among others. Cost: $500.
2. Pool depth. This is the deepest pool ever used in the Olympics. Depth disperses turbulence, reducing resistance.
3. Pool width and gutters. Two extra lanes at the margins disperse waves to gutters, reducing ricochet and resistance.
4. Lane dividers. The plastic ones in Beijing deflect turbulence down instead of sideways, reducing resistance.
5. Starting blocks. Nonskid versions have replaced the old wooden ones, boosting dive propulsion.
6. Video. Recordings and analysis identify target variables such as stroke distance and turns.
7. Medical tests. Swimmers are blood-tested after each race to measure lactic-acid buildup.
8. Sports scientists. They run the monitoring and analysis. The U.S. swim team has four.
And here's a partial list of advances in other sports:
1. Lighter shoes. The latest material is carbon nanotubes.
2. Asymmetric shoes. Stronger carbon base in the right shoe tilts you to the left to increase speed as you round the track. Left shoe is designed to stabilize you.
3. Ice vest. It lowers your temperature before the race so you can delay overheating for better performance.
4. Hypoxic tents. Sleeping in low-oxygen chambers increases red blood-cell levels.
5. Aluminum javelins. They reduce vibration compared with the old carbon ones.
6. Bicycle wheels. Front wheels with fewer spokes (eight instead of 32) reduce weight and air resistance. So do composite one-piece rear wheels. All frames are carbon.

Michael Phelps' coach says the LZR suit is fair. "Everybody is in the suit so it's across the board," he argues. That may be true of today's top swimmers. But it's not true of yesterday's. So comparing today's performances to the performances of 20, eight, or even four years agowhich is what "new Olympic record" meansis generally unfair.
If you want to compare today's athletes to yesterday's, the ideal method would be an inflationary formula. We already calculate how much $1 in 1980 would be worth today, based on price increases. We ought to be able to devise a similar multiplier for each Olympic event, based on average year-to-year improvement among top athletes. Averaging would wash out idiosyncratic ups and downs. The effects of aging could be measured and factored out.
Olympic inflation indexing wouldn't devalue new records. It would isolate and elevate records that truly stand out. Scores of media reports have boasted that every team in this year's 4 x 100 men's swimming relay beat the time that won that event four years ago. But by inflationary standards, the British, who beat the 2004 winning time by three-tenths of a second in constant time, actually failed to keep pace with it. The Americans, who beat it by five seconds, produced a genuine achievement.
And now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to watch the latest high-definition broadcast from Beijing on my 46-inch flat-screen TV. It beats the crap out of the 20-inch tube I was squinting at in 2004. But that doesn't make my eyesight any better.
Published Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:41 AM by William Saletan Filed under: enhancement, doping



terpkristin 08-14-2008 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana (Post 1809311)
i'm not trying to argue with your experiences with the tape, but the announcers also said today that they got a call from her doctor yesterday who said he has no idea what she is doing with that much tape on her shoulder.

also people are wearing it on places where there is no joint (calf muscles, across one trapezius)

i found this website about it that explains the different ways it can be used, so apparently we are both right

http://www.kinesiologytaping.co.uk/A...echniques.html


I wasn't trying to be a dick in my reply to your post, either, though I guess after 11 hours at work, I don't filter nearly as well as I think I do.. Yeah, in the end, we're both right, though I'm still not sure I buy what I've heard the announcers say about blood-flow, except as secondary to muscle support/to ease the stress on the muscles (I've known PT's to use it on people for IT band stuff and around the knees, too). Oh well, if it works for her, I guess that's all that matters. :) I really hope for her sake they put down a good base layer beneath it, that tape is super-sticky and can RIP up the skin when taking it off.

And this has been one heck of a match.

/tk

saldana 08-14-2008 08:31 PM

one of my clients daughters was on the junior national swimteam, and was telling me about those suits...according to her, they are so tight that the swimmers only use a suit one time, so they have a new one for every race (phelps would have had to bring 17). they have to stretch them out so much to get them on and off that they dont have the same effect if used twice

she also said that the reason they are all armless now is that breast strokers and back strokers couldnt move their arms over their heads if there were shoulders and arms on the suits.

saldana 08-14-2008 08:34 PM

second set not really delivering after the first

miami_fan 08-14-2008 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhog (Post 1809319)
I thought this was a pretty great read on why olympic/world records keep getting broken:

Human Nature : Olympic Inflation


The constant criticism of today's records, accomplishments etc. is getting just as aggravating as the over-adulation of those same records and accomplishments.

Groundhog 08-14-2008 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miami_fan (Post 1809350)
The constant criticism of today's records, accomplishments etc. is getting just as aggravating as the over-adulation of those same records and accomplishments.


Meh, I disagree. The past week I've heard sooooo many people comment on "how can they keep breaking these records, sometimes by more than a second". Well, that's how.

miami_fan 08-14-2008 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhog (Post 1809371)
Meh, I disagree. The past week I've heard sooooo many people comment on "how can they keep breaking these records, sometimes by more than a second". Well, that's how.


But that is my point. You can ask those questions about any athlete who breaks any records in any sport. To me, it is a way to discount the talents and efforts of these athletes.

Radii 08-14-2008 09:53 PM

Just a ridiculously dominant race from Phelps, wow.

Racer 08-14-2008 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhog (Post 1809371)
Meh, I disagree. The past week I've heard sooooo many people comment on "how can they keep breaking these records, sometimes by more than a second". Well, that's how.


+1. I find it interesting how stuff like that can effect performance and even more interesting on the ways in which you could compare past times to current times.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.