Well we've got to pick someone, and with two extra votes out there, it'd be best to get a sizable majority to prevent shenanigans, no?

Well, it is two villagers with extra votes so presumably they won't tie it. I wouldn't worry about the extra votes

I am voting Danny on the basis of his lack of activity (which he warned us about, yes, but nonetheless...).

Plus, I didn't want to vote for DT, as I am not seeing the argument for it.

I took random citizens to mean it could be anyone. Sure it's not likely, but I'd rather be safe than sorry.

Out of the three besides myself with 1 vote I'd rather see mau in the running, and not just because he voted me. He's popped in and out but I don't really recall him answering the question or two I posed, just leaving other stray comments.

But as I've said I'm fine with DT as a candidate too. Granted, the random votes make it so that we probably don't want it to be too close.

Not sure if this has been addressed .. EF - if the lynch ends in a tie because of random votes do the tie rules still take effect? Or just if we end it tied knowingly?

By random votes, I mean the random additional citizen votes.

A tie is a tie...

:)

eeek, hadn't thought of that.

This was my theory. It has to be a run away vote tonight.

My fear is, if we need a runaway vote today when won't we? There seems like there is always going to be extra votes out there

sorry all, thought I said I couldnt play :( stupid IT rules!

Dangerous. Probably going to result in some runaways that mess with voting history - but we'll work with what we've got!

Well, it's not that we really need a runaway. Worst case is two additional votes on the lower vote getter, so as long as we do'nt end up exactly two votes apart ...

once we're near deadline, we can probably shift votes in such a manner as to make a tie impossible. I hate to see people make it a runaway with hours left just to avoid a chance of a tie.

I agree. It would be nice if the last three people come and vote.

With the giraffe (my son keeps callin it that) on I figure I'd get my self defense vote in now.

Jackal, re: your questions, there is not really any answer I can give you. It was just a vote that felt like a day one vote to me.

Hmm, just a hunch. But makes the vote more meaningful for Schmidty or Danny if they happen to show up.

Took a nap when I got home at 8, but here I am!

Why are there votes on me?

I'm not a wolf y'all.

Great...I don't suppose anyone is open to not voting me?

So CW led the movement toward me - after I laid out some actual reasoning for voting him on D1 -- does nobody else find that curious?

If I die at least keep that in mind when I show up a villager, alright?

Believe in our environment! Believe in our Captain! Believe in our Planet!

I don't see any reason to change my vote at this point

Though I find it amusing DT says I "led" a movement, when I was quite candid on exactly how little information I was going on. If DT *is* good, I'm more worried about the large number of people who came along so quick.

Um, danny?

Heh.

now i feel better about wanting to vote him

Didn't I vote dtearlier?

i don't think anyone remembers what you posted on D1, DT. That was a long time ago, and you haven't posted much since.

Not that I see.

Maybe I typed it real quick at work but never hit submit before getting called away. I was planning to vote dt earlier today

I don't suppose we'll see a Schmidty sighting.

DT, you going to wow anybody over to a different vote?

gotta get going and that should help prevent shenanigans. i'm going to look at Mauchow tomorrow as he pinged me, but better to play it safe.

Just in case