Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   The OFFICIAL NHL 2009-10 Offseason Thread (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=73012)

Dr. Sak 08-11-2009 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 2092739)


He can move more freely since he shaved that neck beard!

RomaGoth 08-11-2009 03:02 PM

Carolina Hurricanes sue hip-hop artist Tyrone Banks over song - ESPN

sterlingice 08-11-2009 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 2092739)


That's just a funny picture :)

SI

RomaGoth 08-11-2009 03:39 PM

A nice mug shot of Kane.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200.../patrick.kane/

samifan24 08-11-2009 04:15 PM

I understand the Leafs are really excited about the Swedish kid in goal but didn't they give Justin Pogge away awfully cheaply? Wasn't he expected to be the goalie of the future only a year ago? They're putting a lot of faith in a rookie netminder if you ask me.

Galaxy 08-11-2009 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 2092827)


Looks like it could be an interesting case:

Cabbie in Kane case had no valid license : Home: The Buffalo News

Suburban Rhythm 08-11-2009 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 2092082)
One year does not make a tank. If you want to check out a team that tanked see who had top 5 picks for at least 4 years in a row. And traded their stars for the Kris Beeches of the world.


You mean the next Ron Francis?

They didn't make all bad moves. They got a serviceable player in Kent Manderville for Billy Tibbetts.

RomaGoth 08-12-2009 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy (Post 2092926)
Looks like it could be an interesting case:

Cabbie in Kane case had no valid license : Home: The Buffalo News


Looks like this was updated to now he has a license....:popcorn:

Cabbie in Kane case had valid license, his attorney says : Home: The Buffalo News

Maple Leafs 08-12-2009 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samifan24 (Post 2092873)
I understand the Leafs are really excited about the Swedish kid in goal but didn't they give Justin Pogge away awfully cheaply? Wasn't he expected to be the goalie of the future only a year ago? They're putting a lot of faith in a rookie netminder if you ask me.

Pogge was the goalie of the future two years ago. He had an iffy year in the AHL in 2007-08, and was benched in the playoffs. Last year he was pretty bad again, was given a few chances to play in the NHL, and was just awful. There was talk about him having serious problems with his technique.

In one sense the Leafs gave up on him for not much return (max of a third round pick if he plays 30 games). On the other hand, they did get something and if they feel like he has no future in Toronto I guess it's better than nothing.

Keep in mind the Leafs have a new goalie coach who's very highly regarded. I'd assume he watched the tapes of Pogge and his impression wasn't positive.

bbor 08-12-2009 11:13 PM

I hope this goes well for him.

Fleury, 41 and sober, attempting NHL comeback - NHL News - FOX Sports on MSN

I'd love to see him as a Leaf...we all know he is Truculent enough to be a Burke player.

RomaGoth 08-13-2009 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbor (Post 2093832)
I hope this goes well for him.

Fleury, 41 and sober, attempting NHL comeback - NHL News - FOX Sports on MSN

I'd love to see him as a Leaf...we all know he is Truculent enough to be a Burke player.


My favorite part of the article...

Quote:

The players were going half-speed and shooting pucks at a female college goalie.

sterlingice 08-13-2009 09:44 AM

So what you're saying is that it is a lot like the Leafs ;)

/ducks

SI

RomaGoth 08-13-2009 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 2094118)
So what you're saying is that it is a lot like the Leafs ;)

/ducks

SI


Yeah, but only if they were also using wooden skates. :lol:

RomaGoth 08-14-2009 03:50 PM

Yahoo power rankings:

Power rankings: Chasing the summer blahs - NHL - Yahoo! Sports

RomaGoth 08-14-2009 04:39 PM

Dola

He says this about the Islanders:

Quote:

26. New York Islanders – Manny Fernandez(notes), Manny Legace(notes), Curtis Joseph(notes) and Olaf Kolzig(notes) still are available if the Isles want to add a fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh goalie.

and this about the Coyotes:

Quote:

30. Phoenix Coyotes – That the team lost Darren Pang because the television analyst didn’t know with whom to negotiate a new contract tells you all you need to know about how upside-down things are in the desert.

samifan24 08-14-2009 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 2095810)


He loses points for suggesting Carolina adopt a Whalers throwback uniform. No, that would be disgusting.

RomaGoth 08-17-2009 10:11 AM

Couple of moves by the NY Rangers

Report: Rangers add Prospal, Messier - NHL.com - 2009 NHL Offseason News

Surprised it took this long for them to bring Messier into the fold. I would imagine he is going to be groomed for the next head coaching position with the team, and then eventually as the next GM.

RomaGoth 08-18-2009 09:29 AM

Wings looking at Bertuzzi....again?

Report: Wings talking to Bertuzzi - NHL.com - 2009 NHL Offseason News

DataKing 08-18-2009 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 2097533)


Makes sense actually. Bertuzzi is the only free-agent right-winger remaining who's worth a damn that fits inside the 2m in cap space the Wings have to work with.

RomaGoth 08-18-2009 12:38 PM

Sources: Detroit Red Wings agree to contract with free-agent forward Todd Bertuzzi - ESPN

The Jackal 08-18-2009 12:40 PM

Hm. I wonder if the Flyers are still thinking about going after a 1-2 mil forward (after finding a way to dump Randy Jones or Matt Carle). Bertuzzi was probably near the top of the list for desirable candidates, in as much as he'd be a near exact replacement for Knuble.

RomaGoth 08-18-2009 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2097737)
Hm. I wonder if the Flyers are still thinking about going after a 1-2 mil forward (after finding a way to dump Randy Jones or Matt Carle). Bertuzzi was probably near the top of the list for desirable candidates, in as much as he'd be a near exact replacement for Knuble.


Sorry but have to disagree with you on this one. I would take Knuble over Bertuzzi any day. Bertuzzi is not physical since his back injury, is universally loathed, and generally brings very little to the NHL table. In fact, he put up 44 points last season with Calgary and was still a -13 on the ice. I am a lifelong Wings fan and can't stand this guy, so this news saddens me. However, I will make the best of it and hope he gets hurt and never plays again.

Dr. Sak 08-18-2009 02:16 PM

I agree...I really liked Knuble. But I have to agree with the Flyers decision to let him walk. His productivity tailed at the end of last season, he looked very slow against the Pens and was pretty much a non factor. They were willing to give him the 2.8 mil he wanted but for only one year, and Knuble said he was going to give the Flyers a "discount" to stay with them. However, I can't blame him for taking the extra year with Washington.

samifan24 08-18-2009 03:49 PM


Yup, I'm definitely still rooting against the Red Wings this year.

RomaGoth 08-19-2009 04:38 PM

Big surprise:

Grand jury dismisses felony charge against Patrick Kane, but indicts Chicago Blackhawks star on lesser charges - ESPN Chicago

RomaGoth 08-19-2009 04:54 PM

Canes make a free agent pick-up...

Stephane Yelle agrees to one-year deal with Carolina Hurricanes - ESPN

Can't hurt, that's for sure. At the very least he can offer some leadership. One of the few Avalanche players I didn't loathe.

samifan24 08-19-2009 05:02 PM

I liked Yelle when he was on the Bruins. He's a good solid player and does a great job killing penalties.

DataKing 08-19-2009 05:04 PM

Yelle's a bargain, that's for sure.

The Jackal 08-19-2009 05:05 PM

He's quite good at faceoffs, as well. Do they still have Cullen? Between Cullen, Brind'Amour, and Yelle, they'll never lose a faceoff.

Galaxy 08-19-2009 05:44 PM


I'm not surpised. Living in the Buffalo/Niagara area, the cabbie and his lawyer have sort of changed their story a little. I get the feeling some of the information is still not being released.

Wolfpack 08-19-2009 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2098785)
He's quite good at faceoffs, as well. Do they still have Cullen? Between Cullen, Brind'Amour, and Yelle, they'll never lose a faceoff.


Yes, we still have all of them. Canes fans are pretty happy with the pickup.

Outside of Staal and maybe Ward, we don't have a superstar player, but this is probably the deepest team I can recall having. It's not Detroit rolling four lines, but by our normal standards, we can put an awful lot of combinations out there now. It'll also allow what's turned into a pretty good batch of solid young players to gel this year in Albany with the expectation that the roster will probably go through some heavy turnover in the next couple of seasons as the older vets retire or others finish out their contracts, at which point the Albany kids will become the next core of the team with Staal and Ward.

I'm getting pretty excited about the upcoming season right now. :)

RomaGoth 08-21-2009 04:10 PM

Heatley speaks:

Dany Heatley discusses his request for trade from Ottawa Senators - ESPN

I actually have more respect for him now that he has come out and said a few things. Even if he hasn't said much, at least he explained his reasoning for a trade request, and more importantly, he still plans on showing up for tc instead of holding out like a lot of other athletes seem to do these days.

So, I am wondering. Is this maybe an Ottawa problem? I look at the club's short history and it is not pretty. Yashin played/plays with no heart. Daigle played with no heart. Redden seems to be washed up upon leaving the Canadian capital. The only two guys whom seem to be relatively happy there are Chris Neil and Daniel Alfredsson.

Ottawa has to be one of the biggest underachievers in the NHL in the past half-decade.

Thoughts?

Maple Leafs 08-21-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 2100132)
I actually have more respect for him now that he has come out and said a few things.

He didn't say anything. He had a gun to his head from Team Canada, so he read a statement, gave 25-minutes on non-answers, and then got out of there. He didn't shed any light on anything at all.

He did what he had to do, but you shouldn't respect him any more for it.

RomaGoth 08-21-2009 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 2100134)
He didn't say anything. He had a gun to his head from Team Canada, so he read a statement, gave 25-minutes on non-answers, and then got out of there. He didn't shed any light on anything at all.

He did what he had to do, but you shouldn't respect him any more for it.


Could be, but I am trying to see the good in him. I hate seeing guys with so much talent let it go to waste.

I am beginning to think, though, that Ottawa is the new place to go and die for NHL players.

johnnyshaka 08-21-2009 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 2100132)

So, I am wondering. Is this maybe an Ottawa problem? I look at the club's short history and it is not pretty. Yashin played/plays with no heart. Daigle played with no heart. Redden seems to be washed up upon leaving the Canadian capital. The only two guys whom seem to be relatively happy there are Chris Neil and Daniel Alfredsson.

Ottawa has to be one of the biggest underachievers in the NHL in the past half-decade.

Thoughts?


Ottawa problem? Because players like Yashin and Daigle don't live up to expectations...in Ottawa or elsewhere? Huh? And Redden was washed up before he left...oddly enough, right around the time Chara left...hmmm.

And as for being underachievers...well, they missed the playoffs for the first time this past season after 11 straight visits. I guess not winning the Cup during that time could be underachieving but, really, I think there are several other teams that would fit that label much better.

As for Heatley, well, who cares.

Suburban Rhythm 08-22-2009 12:40 PM

09-10 THN Yearbook came in the mail today-

EAST
1 Boston
2 Washington
3 Pittsburgh
4 Philadelphia
5 New Jersey
6 Carolina
7 Buffalo
8 Montreal
9 Ottawa
10 Tampa Bay
11 Toronto
12 Florida
13 NY Rangers
14 Atlanta
15 NY Islanders

WEST

1 San Jose
2 Chicago
3 Vancouver
4 Detroit
5 Calgary
6 Anaheim
7 Dallas
8 Columbus
9 St Louis
10 Nashville
11 Edmonton
12 LA
13 Minnesota
14 Colorado
15 Phoenix


And their pick to win it all--

The Flyers!?!?! WTF

The issue contains all the usual features-- line/parings prjections, rookie outlook, etc-- and a new one this season: sort of a hedge on their ranking about, projecting a best case/worst case scenario, and what would happen to reach that.

Pittsburgh for example is projected as 3rd in the East, but could be 1st if "Crosby hits 40, and Staal reaches rookie promise", but could fall to 6th if "Gas tank is empty, team D takes a step back".

Any interest in a team, post here, I'll try my best to fill all requests

JPhillips 08-22-2009 12:50 PM

Washington, please.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 12:57 PM

I don't know whether to be happy or unhappy that they picked the Flyers to win. I can't remember the last time that happened. We will be legit contenders with Pronger, but it's hard to predict how injuries or other issues will impact the playoffs at this point.

Suburban Rhythm 08-22-2009 01:01 PM

Caps

2nd in the East
1st - if goaltending and team D improve
5th- if injuries take their toll and the offense sputters

As far as the projected lineup, couple things to note:

Theodore listed as the starter ahead of Varlamov
Knuble penciled in on the 1st line with Ovy and Backstrom
Alzner listed in the top 6 ahead of Jurcina
Nylander (4th) listed ahead of Steckel (5th) at center on the depth chart (I don't get that one at all)

JPhillips 08-22-2009 01:08 PM

Most of that looks dead on except Nylander who's probably somewhere around 74th on the depth chart.

I think Varly has to start the season as the starter after his work in the playoffs. He has had problems with conditioning, so I'd expect Theodore to play more than most backups. Of course I'm not sure where Theodore will be mentally this season after the horrible death of his child last week.

samifan24 08-22-2009 01:09 PM

The Flyers?!? Really?!?

Chief Rum 08-22-2009 02:44 PM

Anaheim please?

The Jackal 08-22-2009 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samifan24 (Post 2100373)
The Flyers?!? Really?!?


Why is that so shocking? Just because Emery is an unknown quantity doesn't mean they weren't one stupid fight away from taking the Pens to game 7 and gave them the hardest time aside from the Wings.

+ Pronger, + Laperriere, + full season of Briere/Giroux + Emery/Boucher heavily outweighs - Knuble, Lupul, and Biron/Niitty.

Suburban Rhythm 08-22-2009 03:04 PM

Ducks

3rd - if Koivu and Selanne rekindle Finnish magic
9th - if goaltending falters and youngsters stall

Lineup notes-

Hiller listed as the starter
Whitney paired with Niedermayer on top pair
Sbisa on 3rd pair, and listed as top prospect
Crusher Christensen listed 4th on the LW depth chart

The Jackal 08-22-2009 03:05 PM

They even said it in THN. Will Emery lead the Flyers to the Cup? No, almost definitely not. But he won't have to, just like Osgood didn't have to do jack to get the Wings to the finals the past two years.

Suburban Rhythm 08-22-2009 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2100401)
Why is that so shocking? Just because Emery is an unknown quantity doesn't mean they weren't one stupid fight away from taking the Pens to game 7 and gave them the hardest time aside from the Wings.

+ Pronger, + Laperriere, + full season of Briere/Giroux + Emery/Boucher heavily outweighs - Knuble, Lupul, and Biron/Niitty.


It is mainly hard to believe because of Emery. Yeah, he's as, or more, talented then Biron. But nobody knows what to expect from him. It's not hard to say they downgraded in goal, which was their weakest spot to begin with.

And I love Talbot as much as any other Pens fan, but losing a fight to Carcillo didn't let in 4 straight goals.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2100407)
It is mainly hard to believe because of Emery. Yeah, he's as, or more, talented then Biron. But nobody knows what to expect from him. It's not hard to say they downgraded in goal, which was their weakest spot to begin with.

And I love Talbot as much as any other Pens fan, but losing a fight to Carcillo didn't let in 4 straight goals.


I know. I actually get irked when people point that out as the reason the Flyers lost - they clearly lost because they allowed all the goals (but you have to admit that did mark a complete change in the attitudes of the teams during that game).

And as I said in the post above yours, Emery probably won't have to lead the Flyers to the Cup. If they had Pronger last year, things would've been different. None of the Flyers D-men pushed anyone anywhere. That won't be the case anymore.

And if Emery blows up, I really don't mind Boucher. He's had playoff experience, been to the conference finals, and has been pretty good in backup duty over the past few years.

Suburban Rhythm 08-22-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2100410)
And as I said in the post above yours, Emery probably won't have to lead the Flyers to the Cup. If they had Pronger last year, things would've been different. None of the Flyers D-men pushed anyone anywhere. That won't be the case anymore.


I think you are selling Osgood a little short. Sure, he didn't have to carry that team to 1-0 wins, but he was infinitely better in the postseason than regular season last year.

To win 16, you goalie needs to steal you one or two games. Fleury did it game 4 vs Philly, and was really good games 6 and 7 vs Detroit.

Chief Rum 08-22-2009 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2100404)
Ducks

3rd - if Koivu and Selanne rekindle Finnish magic
9th - if goaltending falters and youngsters stall

Lineup notes-

Hiller listed as the starter
Whitney paired with Niedermayer on top pair
Sbisa on 3rd pair, and listed as top prospect
Crusher Christensen listed 4th on the LW depth chart


So best shot is lowest point total among division champs? I can see that, except I actually think, top to bottom, the Pacific is stronger than the Northwest, and I think the Pacific champ will end up at #2.

I think the Ducks have made a number of key relatively under the radar additions (Koivu, Lupul, Boynton, Sbisa, plus full seasons from the trade guys and from Ryan) that are going to make them a very competitive squad right from the start.

I'm actually not certain Sbisa makes the team. Ducks have a lot of candidates on D, and maybe 2-3 spots open, and that's it.

I'm not so sure Whitney pairs with Niedermayer. Those are the two best puck moving D-men. If Sbisa makes the team, he might actually pair with Niedermayer. The staff has always been big on pairing good young players with Niedermayer, so they can learn from him.

Christensen's spot sounds about right. Some of the team's additions have really pushed him back on the depth chart.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2100413)
I think you are selling Osgood a little short. Sure, he didn't have to carry that team to 1-0 wins, but he was infinitely better in the postseason than regular season last year.

To win 16, you goalie needs to steal you one or two games. Fleury did it game 4 vs Philly, and was really good games 6 and 7 vs Detroit.


Right, well, Emery is certainly an unknown quantity, but it's not like he doesn't have the potential to steal a game or two. Been to the cup finals, put up very good numbers on his KHL team, we'll see how it goes.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 03:26 PM

But the Flyers return 4 30 goal scorers, throwing in Briere and Giroux into that mix as well. Laperriere comes in as a guy who can log major minutes on the PK and give Richards and Carter a break so that they are fresher for PPs and even strength time. He and Pronger bring valuable experience, and there's nothing in the past couple of years that suggests Pronger won't still be a force for 1-2 more seasons before his legs start catching up with him.

All in all it should be a fun battle of Pennsylvania for the division title.

Pyser 08-22-2009 03:48 PM

devils please?

Pumpy Tudors 08-22-2009 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyser (Post 2100426)
devils please?

Do we really want to know? :)

Honolulu_Blue 08-22-2009 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2100405)
But he won't have to, just like Osgood didn't have to do jack to get the Wings to the finals the past two years.


Some people just never learn...

Also, don't forget to add how Osgood didn't have to do "jack" in 1998 as well.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 2100457)
Some people just never learn...

Also, don't forget to add how Osgood didn't have to do "jack" in 1998 as well.


'98 and the past two season are quite different animals. Don't even try to act like Osgood is anything close to what he used to be. The team that was in front of him the past two years was so good defensively. That's the correlation I'm trying to make - the Flyers now have Pronger and Timonen, two all-stars, a guy who should have won the Selke last year (Richards), and other good defensive forwards as well.

I'm not saying Osgood didn't turn in any good efforts the past two seasons in the playoffs, but c'mon. Most goalies would have been fine back there, and that's the case I'm making for Emery.

The Flyers have a ways to go in terms of chemistry and on-ice product this year before I can seriously compare them to the Wings' teams of the past two years, but it's a similar goalie situation, I'd say.

Suburban Rhythm 08-22-2009 08:29 PM

Devils

2nd - if Rolston hits 30 and Brodeur stays healthy
8th - if Lemaires style stiffles rising stars

Pelley centering 3rd line, replacing Madden
Letourneau-Leblond and Bergfors listed as on the 4th line (2 rookies)
Tedenby listed as #1 prospect, but shown as NHL ready 10-11 season

This one really jumps out as me. Future Watch team grade: 30th out of 30. Shocking to see from a NJ team that always seems to have guys fit in. I would expect none of these guys are huge names, but they always have guys who fit the roles needed as solid NHL players.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 08:34 PM

And Lou is considered one of the best talent evaluators/drafters in the league, surprising.

Suburban Rhythm 08-22-2009 08:40 PM

Well, when 4-5 of these guys turn into solid NHL players, he'll prove he still knows better than other teams scouts, right?

Honolulu_Blue 08-22-2009 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2100482)
'98 and the past two season are quite different animals. Don't even try to act like Osgood is anything close to what he used to be. The team that was in front of him the past two years was so good defensively.


I am not sure I am following you. Osgood isn't anything close to what he used to be? This is despite the fact that he had better save percentage and goals against in 07 and 08 than he did in '98 and the fact that the team in front of him in '98 was arguably better in comparison to the rest of the league than either of the last two seasons given the lack of parity via the cap.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2100482)
I'm not saying Osgood didn't turn in any good efforts the past two seasons in the playoffs, but c'mon. Most goalies would have been fine back there, and that's the case I'm making for Emery.


Tell that to CuJo, Hasek or Conklin.

That's the misconception that kills me. That because the Wings are so good up front and along the blueline that you can plug any old goalie in there and the Wings would just be as successful. That's really not the case at all. Osgood isn't one of the most talented goalies in the league or the best, but he fits the Wings teams very well. The same cannot be said for all equally talented goalies or more talented.

Emery could be adequate enough for the Flyers, but just saying that Osgood proves that a great team + adequate goalie is enough to win the Cup/get to the finals is sorely mistaken.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 08:53 PM

I realize that Osgood had better stats the past two seasons than he had in '98. He made the saves he should and didn't really let in any bad goals.

He seemed to up his game from the regular season when he truthfully did not play consistently well. But is that a mark of him being a clutch performer, or a reflection of how different the playoff game is from the regular season game?

I still think the Wings would have been successful the past two seasons without Osgood going the whole way. I discount Cujo and Hasek because they are at the end of their careers and got injured a lot. I know Osgood is in a similar age range, but he's been a bit more durable. I can't make an honest statement about Conklin because I didn't really get to see him play for you guys.

Are you saying that Osgood does not prove the great team + adequate goalie statement because you believe he's still more than an adequate goalie?

bronconick 08-22-2009 09:18 PM

I hate the Red Wings, but comparing Ray Emery to Chris Osgood is pretty goddamn funny. Osgood's exile involved having to play in Long Island and taking mediocre St. Louis teams to the playoffs. Dude's got 3 cup rings, 2 of which he started for, and was a goal or two away from a 4th.

Emery spent last season in Russia because everyone in North America thought he was too lazy and bat-shit insane to play hockey.

Hopefully he gets in a fight with Pronger and they both get hurt.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 09:31 PM

I'm comparing the teams in front of them much more than the goaltenders themselves, if you read my posts.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronconick (Post 2100500)
Hopefully he gets in a fight with Pronger and they both get hurt.


And that's really adding to the conversation, cool.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 09:39 PM

I really hope Emery has a decent season so some people can bite their tongues a few times. Yeah, he acted like an immature idiot when he was in Ottawa. But he was the first to admit he let things get to him and did a lot of growing up by being forced to play in Russia.

There's nothing wrong with a goaltender with a little belly fire. Remember Hextall? It's very wishful thinking for Emery to come close to Hextall, but I'm certainly ready to give him a chance. And you can't really argue that he won't be in a position to succeed with the team that he has in front of him.

bbor 08-22-2009 10:02 PM

Emory was also kicked out of the KHL too was'nt he?For fighting with the trainer.

The Jackal 08-22-2009 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbor (Post 2100511)
Emory was also kicked out of the KHL too was'nt he?For fighting with the trainer.


I'm not sure that he was kicked out - that particular team may not have wanted him back. But there are rumors that a racial slur was directed his way, not that I'm condoning his actions. I'm just going to cross my fingers and hope for Hextall v2.0. :D

samifan24 08-22-2009 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2100401)
Why is that so shocking? Just because Emery is an unknown quantity doesn't mean they weren't one stupid fight away from taking the Pens to game 7 and gave them the hardest time aside from the Wings.

+ Pronger, + Laperriere, + full season of Briere/Giroux + Emery/Boucher heavily outweighs - Knuble, Lupul, and Biron/Niitty.


It's shocking because Emery and Boucher don't exactly put fear into the eyes of their opponents. It's a less than stellar combination in goal. Yes, Pronger will be a huge help and the Flyers have plenty of good young talent up front but I'm not sold on their defense corps after Pronger and Timonen and I'm not convinced they can get past Boston and Washington and Pittsburgh to get to the Finals.

So basically it's a combination of two things: I don't believe in the Flyers goalies and defense and I don't believe Philadelphia as a team is talented enough to get past Boston and Washington and Pittsburgh. They could get past one but not more than that, in my mind. Of course once the season begins none of this matters anyway. As we all know it's how you finish the season, now how you begin it (cough Boston cough) that really matters. If Emery or Boucher get hot at the right time, who knows.

The Jackal 08-23-2009 03:35 PM

Well, I agree, I certainly didn't expect THN to pick the Flyers. But like they said in the article, it's hard to pick amongst about 8 teams that should all be in the running by the end of the year, and I guess they just went with a good team from last year that made the biggest upgrade.

I have to believe in my goalies.. and unfortunately that's gotten me nothing but headaches for most of my life.

Suburban Rhythm 08-23-2009 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samifan24 (Post 2100524)
It's shocking because Emery and Boucher don't exactly put fear into the eyes of their opponents. It's a less than stellar combination in goal. Yes, Pronger will be a huge help and the Flyers have plenty of good young talent up front but I'm not sold on their defense corps after Pronger and Timonen and I'm not convinced they can get past Boston and Washington and Pittsburgh to get to the Finals.


I actually like Parent and Coburn. As long as they are allowed to the 2nd pair (or one with Pronger, one with Timonen). I'll get blasted for this, but Timonen was supposed to be the difference maker between the 08 series and the 09 series. He was a non factor in this series, repeatedly getting abused by Crosby's line. Part of that might have been taking a wicked hit early from Kunitz in the series, but he has never been impressive to me since coming to Philly.

RomaGoth 08-24-2009 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2100413)
I think you are selling Osgood a little short. Sure, he didn't have to carry that team to 1-0 wins, but he was infinitely better in the postseason than regular season last year.


:+1:

RomaGoth 08-24-2009 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2100482)
'98 and the past two season are quite different animals. Don't even try to act like Osgood is anything close to what he used to be. The team that was in front of him the past two years was so good defensively. That's the correlation I'm trying to make - the Flyers now have Pronger and Timonen, two all-stars, a guy who should have won the Selke last year (Richards), and other good defensive forwards as well.

I'm not saying Osgood didn't turn in any good efforts the past two seasons in the playoffs, but c'mon. Most goalies would have been fine back there, and that's the case I'm making for Emery.

The Flyers have a ways to go in terms of chemistry and on-ice product this year before I can seriously compare them to the Wings' teams of the past two years, but it's a similar goalie situation, I'd say.


Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2100495)
I realize that Osgood had better stats the past two seasons than he had in '98. He made the saves he should and didn't really let in any bad goals.

He seemed to up his game from the regular season when he truthfully did not play consistently well. But is that a mark of him being a clutch performer, or a reflection of how different the playoff game is from the regular season game?

I still think the Wings would have been successful the past two seasons without Osgood going the whole way. I discount Cujo and Hasek because they are at the end of their careers and got injured a lot. I know Osgood is in a similar age range, but he's been a bit more durable. I can't make an honest statement about Conklin because I didn't really get to see him play for you guys.

Are you saying that Osgood does not prove the great team + adequate goalie statement because you believe he's still more than an adequate goalie?


Even after Osgood is in the HOF with his top-5 stats and multiple SC rings, people will STILL say he was never any good. Too bad really.

The Jackal 08-24-2009 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2100919)
I actually like Parent and Coburn. As long as they are allowed to the 2nd pair (or one with Pronger, one with Timonen). I'll get blasted for this, but Timonen was supposed to be the difference maker between the 08 series and the 09 series. He was a non factor in this series, repeatedly getting abused by Crosby's line. Part of that might have been taking a wicked hit early from Kunitz in the series, but he has never been impressive to me since coming to Philly.


Timonen isn't a shut-down defenseman. He's an all-star based on positioning, being able to log a ton of minutes, passing and skating ability - but he's undersized and though he'll block shots, he's not going to be pushing around Crosby. Hopefully that's what Pronger will do - and hopefully he will teach Coburn how to use his body.

The Jackal 08-24-2009 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 2101183)
Even after Osgood is in the HOF with his top-5 stats and multiple SC rings, people will STILL say he was never any good. Too bad really.


I never said he was never any good!

RomaGoth 08-24-2009 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2101194)
I never said he was never any good!


Not exactly in those words, true. But to say that any goalie could win with that team is like saying Ozzie is no good.

With over 400 career wins and 3 SC rings, he deserves more respect than most people give him. Not singling you out, just making an observation.

Dr. Sak 08-24-2009 11:54 AM

And again starts our monthly Osgood debate.

MikeVic 08-24-2009 11:58 AM

I don't know what it is about Osgood. He's solid and has nice stats, but I never saw him as a HOFer. Maybe the teams he was on were so good that it makes him seem better than he is? I don't know.

JPhillips 08-24-2009 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 2101232)
And again starts our monthly Osgood debate.


Osgood is fine and he's been about as good of a replacement as possible, but come on, there wouldn't be a Sunday Morning without Charles Kuralt.

Honolulu_Blue 08-24-2009 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 2063186)
Question to all the Osgood-loving Red Wing fans that defend him based on stats and cups put up while sitting behind a 6 time Norris trophy winner: what does it say when Stevie Y leaves Ozzy out of the Olympic team invites?

Answer: He's not as good as you think he is.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 2063251)
I am baffled by this post.

Most people don't think Osgood is that good. I am pretty sure that those who think he's good (like me), would have been shocked to see him invited the Olympic team tryouts. Shocked. If he had been, I would have considered it a surprising case of nepotism (especially since that's not how Yzerman rolls).

Osgood-loving fans defend him against all those Osgood-hating fans (which are the majority). He's better than most people give him credit for and has shown a tendency to step up during the playoffs. He's a good, dependable goalie and is the perfect fit for the right team. I don't think he'd make the cut as one of Canada's top 5 goalies.

Answer: Osgood is exactly as good as I think he is and his lack of an invitation to the Canadian Olympic team doesn't change that one iota, since I never considered him in that class.


Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 2063263)
I think he would actually do pretty well in that type of situation. I think a lot of his problems in the past involved a lack of focus, especially during the season. I know he has his detractors, but how can any goalie in the NHL with 400 victories not be good? He should make the HOF someday, and if not it would be a shame.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 2063264)
See, this is the kind of guy I was targeting :)

But in seriousness... really? HOF? Osgood?

If Osgood is a hall of fame goalie than we may as well burn the place down and start over.


Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 2063272)
I am always up for a good hockey argument, especially when I know I am right. ;)

Why wouldn't he be HOF eligible?

  • 389 wins (barring injury he will top 400 this season) - 10th all time
  • 3 Stanley Cup rings
  • 2.47 career GAA, only worse than Brodeur and Plante from the top 10 goalies in career wins
Here is a link to the site I used for my information:


I see no reason to continue this argument. Let's get the thread back to the Rangers and Canadiens spending like drunken sailors.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 2063298)
Yes, he's won a lot of games... behind teams that mostly prevented the opposition from taking many shots, and especially few quality shots.

Lets look at this another way: he's never won a Vezina and as far as I can tell was only a finalist once (95-96). How many of those other top 10 goalies on your list can you say that about? Only Cujo, and even he was a finalist more than once (looks like he was 2nd or 3rd at least three times).

Osgood racked up wins behind some amazing teams, and was never considered a top-flight goalie at any point in his career. Even his own fans (see H_B above) admit that he isn't really a contender for one of the top 5 positions on the Canadian Olympic team, and this is coming off a couple of his best playoff runs ever.

Sorry, but he's not a Hall of Famer.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 2063306)
The "Is Chris Osgood a Hall of Famer" debate gets raised at least once a month on Detroit sports talk radio and more than that during hockey season.

I could care less. I can't stand Hall of Fame debates, but that's just a personal thing.

That said, I have stopped doubting Chris Osgood. Despite whatever perception there is of him out there, until he starts to breakdown or really craps the bed in the playoffs, I am not worrying about Detroit's goaltending so long as he's the starter. While the opposing goalie may be better than Osgood, Detroit's goaltending is no bigger concern to me than it would be if I were a fan of any other team with any other goalie in net.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 2063307)
This is fair enough, but 'solid' should not get someone in the HoF.


Here's a summary of last month's Chris Osgood debate!

RomaGoth 08-24-2009 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 2101265)
Here's a summary of last month's Chris Osgood debate!


Nice bit of research here. ++1!!

Suburban Rhythm 08-24-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2101193)
Timonen isn't a shut-down defenseman. He's an all-star based on positioning, being able to log a ton of minutes, passing and skating ability - but he's undersized and though he'll block shots, he's not going to be pushing around Crosby. Hopefully that's what Pronger will do - and hopefully he will teach Coburn how to use his body.


Lidstrom doesn't hit either, plays a positional game, logs a ton of time and is a superb passer, but he's considered a shutdown guy.

I realize Lidstrom is the gold standard, but paying the guy you described $6.3M a year sounds like an overpayment.

Chubby 08-24-2009 08:32 PM

Sabres please?

samifan24 08-24-2009 09:29 PM

Far too much Osgood talk in this thread.

The Jackal 08-24-2009 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2101432)
I realize Lidstrom is the gold standard, but paying the guy you described $6.3M a year sounds like an overpayment.


Agreed. I'm not upset about having Timonen on my team, though. Possibly the most underrated defenseman in the league. He's not going to be the guy that pushes you around, but having watched him for a few years (including some in Nashville), he's quite good. He's certainly not Lidstrom, but with Pronger on board this is going to be a hell of a defensive corps.

Dr. Sak 08-25-2009 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2101671)
Agreed. I'm not upset about having Timonen on my team, though. Possibly the most underrated defenseman in the league. He's not going to be the guy that pushes you around, but having watched him for a few years (including some in Nashville), he's quite good. He's certainly not Lidstrom, but with Pronger on board this is going to be a hell of a defensive corps.


I wouldn't trade Timonen for anyone on the Pens defensive roster. He is underrated by all accounts and to be honest, I don't really mind too much about his 6.3 mil a year salary, same goes with Briere's salary. The Flyers were committed to not having another bad season so they made a splash with a few signings and trades. Unlike other teams in the league who are more content on hoarding draft picks and being bad for a few years.

Kimmo is point man on the power play and I think one of the reasons he (like Carter and Richards) did not shine at the end of the season was that they just played too many minutes during the course of the year.

Now with Pronger coming in that will take some of the pressure of Kimmo and I really like the Flyers defense. I think they will go with the following:

Pronger/Colburn
Kimmo/Parent
Carle/Jones

Back to Briere, yea was injured last year but he had a good season in 2007-08 (which most forget because of last year). He was their leading scorer throughout most of the playoffs that year. I'm hoping he has a bounce back year much like Gagne did last season.

MikeVic 08-25-2009 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 2101909)
Unlike other teams in the league who are more content on hoarding draft picks, being bad for a few years, and winning a Stanley Cup.


Fixed. :D

samifan24 08-25-2009 04:01 PM

So, anyone thinking about playing fantasy this season? I had a good time playing in the FOFC league last season but I don't think it was very active.

Suburban Rhythm 08-25-2009 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 2101909)
I wouldn't trade Timonen for anyone on the Pens defensive roster. He is underrated by all accounts and to be honest, I don't really mind too much about his 6.3 mil a year salary, same goes with Briere's salary. The Flyers were committed to not having another bad season so they made a splash with a few signings and trades.



I'd argue Gonchar, but won't fault someone for saying they like Timonen as much. Neither is a lock down type guy. Gonchar, IMO, clearly better offensively, whether carrying the puck, running the PP, or blasting shots from the point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 2101909)
Unlike other teams in the league who are more content on hoarding draft picks and being bad for a few years.


That is a pretty dumb argument. Didn't the Penguins pay Gonchar (and Palffy) the season after the lockout? Paying out money because you have it doesn't make you better if it's to bad players. Remember when the Isles gave Yahsin big, long term money? I don't remember them winning either.

And based on that, I'd love to hear an answer to this. For as many times I've heard the Pens tanked, I've asked for an explanation, but nobody ever has one.

For a team that tanked that season, how is it they finished 12-5-3 in their final 20 games? Or was it the first 62 they tanked, to dig a deep enough hole that playing well the final 20 wouldn't harm them?

Dr. Sak 08-25-2009 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2102183)

And based on that, I'd love to hear an answer to this. For as many times I've heard the Pens tanked, I've asked for an explanation, but nobody ever has one.
?


Arguing with Pens fans about them tanking is like arguing with Red Wings fans about Osgood. Open your eyes man, your team tanked for the better half of this decade. Four years of barely over 20 wins is bad. And look at the guys on those rosters...bad. There is no way your team should be so shitty for that long that you get all those good picks. And please don't give me the bankruptcy excuse because they could've found ways.

It wasn't just the season after the lockout, it was those seasons before. They were a joke of a team and it's surprising because everyone i talked to in this city has been a pens fan since 1984 yet they could only get 5 or 6000 a night to watch that team.

The Jackal 08-25-2009 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2101432)
Lidstrom doesn't hit either, plays a positional game, logs a ton of time and is a superb passer, but he's considered a shutdown guy.

I realize Lidstrom is the gold standard, but paying the guy you described $6.3M a year sounds like an overpayment.


Timonen is worth it. He's a #1 defenseman - just because he isn't Lidstrom doesn't mean he isn't worth it. How many people are Lidstrom, anyways?

Timonen consistently goes against the best players on the other teams, he's invaluable in the locker room, on the powerplay, and has been the only Flyers defenseman recently who knows how to pass the puck with any skill.

I have never minded his contract. Briere, I'm not sure it was justified based on what was really one season of great play in Buffalo. But the Briere/Drury/Gomez bidding frenzy pushed up his salary, and the Flyers felt they needed him to complete the team, so whatever.

Dr. Sak 08-25-2009 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2102189)
I have never minded his contract. Briere, I'm not sure it was justified based on what was really one season of great play in Buffalo. But the Briere/Drury/Gomez bidding frenzy pushed up his salary, and the Flyers felt they needed him to complete the team, so whatever.


Of the 3, I am still glad they got Briere.

samifan24 08-25-2009 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2102189)
Timonen is worth it. He's a #1 defenseman - just because he isn't Lidstrom doesn't mean he isn't worth it. How many people are Lidstrom, anyways?

Timonen consistently goes against the best players on the other teams, he's invaluable in the locker room, on the powerplay, and has been the only Flyers defenseman recently who knows how to pass the puck with any skill.


I guess it depends what you mean by "#1 defenseman." Timonen may have been the de facto #1 in Philly last year because of how important he was to the club and how many minutes he played and what he gave the team but I don't see his overall value to a club (any club) to be anywhere near that of guys I consider to be true game changing defensemen, guys like Lidstrom, Chara and Phaneuf.

Is Timonen overpaid? No, not if he fills the role that Philadelphia wants him to do. Everything changes with Pronger on the blueline now and I think his presence takes a lot of pressure off of Timonen, whom I've always considered to be an offensive defenseman. Pronger is a clear #1 defenseman. Timonen? I don't consider him a #1 but if Philly is happy with what he brings to the team at a price of $6.3 M per year who can argue with them?

Honolulu_Blue 08-25-2009 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 2102185)
Arguing with Pens fans about them tanking is like arguing with Red Wings fans about Osgood.


I am not sure what that means, since Red Wings' fans views of Osgood are incredibly varied from "he sucks, [insert name of backup here] should start" to "he's a sure bet for the Hall of Fame" to somewheres in between.

The Jackal 08-25-2009 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samifan24 (Post 2102192)
I guess it depends what you mean by "#1 defenseman." Timonen may have been the de facto #1 in Philly last year because of how important he was to the club and how many minutes he played and what he gave the team but I don't see his overall value to a club (any club) to be anywhere near that of guys I consider to be true game changing defensemen, guys like Lidstrom, Chara and Phaneuf.

Is Timonen overpaid? No, not if he fills the role that Philadelphia wants him to do. Everything changes with Pronger on the blueline now and I think his presence takes a lot of pressure off of Timonen, whom I've always considered to be an offensive defenseman. Pronger is a clear #1 defenseman. Timonen? I don't consider him a #1 but if Philly is happy with what he brings to the team at a price of $6.3 M per year who can argue with them?


So there are three #1 defensemen in the league? That's it? I'm not saying Timonen is as good as those guys, or brings the same impact, but he's a clear #1 and would be for most teams.

samifan24 08-25-2009 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2102313)
So there are three #1 defensemen in the league? That's it? I'm not saying Timonen is as good as those guys, or brings the same impact, but he's a clear #1 and would be for most teams.


I'm not saying there are only three #1 defensemen in the league. I'm saying that I don't consider Timonen to be an elite defenseman on par with stars like those I named and others.

Suburban Rhythm 08-25-2009 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 2102185)
Arguing with Pens fans about them tanking is like arguing with Red Wings fans about Osgood. Open your eyes man, your team tanked for the better half of this decade. Four years of barely over 20 wins is bad. And look at the guys on those rosters...bad. There is no way your team should be so shitty for that long that you get all those good picks. And please don't give me the bankruptcy excuse because they could've found ways.

It wasn't just the season after the lockout, it was those seasons before. They were a joke of a team and it's surprising because everyone i talked to in this city has been a pens fan since 1984 yet they could only get 5 or 6000 a night to watch that team.


Still doesn't answer the question. If they tanked, why in the world would they go 12-5-3 down the stretch? Nearly cost them Crosby 2 seasons later!!! Thank God Bettman fixed that.

You point to the team that moved Kovalev and Straka for garbage...but they got better from that point forward. Wouldn't a tanking team have gone 3-12-5?

After the lockout, they signed Gonchar (5M), Palffy (4M?), Recchi (2M), LeClair(2M), and brought back Lemieux (1M). Not positive on Palffy's salary. But adding $14M in salary is surely the sign of a team that planned on tanking. I bet they had it all in the works for Palffy to quit halfway through the season, Lemiuex's heart to fail, and LeClair to be waste, just to appear as if they were trying to win, but secretly eyeing another top 5 pick. You can slam the the front office for bringing in poor talent, but a tanking team would not have brought in those players.

And I'll never understand they could have found ways. Pay contracts they could not afford and then fold? Or hold on to the guys at the trade deadline, get nothing in return, those players sign deals with the Flyers, Rangers or Habs for double what anyone else was offering.

Don't become another angry Flyers fan. When management had blank checks to write, but couldn't bring a championship, did you have an issue with using (abusing?) that system? How is that any different than using the system in place to award bad teams higher draft picks?

Suburban Rhythm 08-25-2009 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samifan24 (Post 2102326)
I'm not saying there are only three #1 defensemen in the league. I'm saying that I don't consider Timonen to be an elite defenseman on par with stars like those I named and others.


sami

Curious for an outsiders unbiased opinion-- Gonchar vs Timonen

I have no problem saying Gonch is not in the realm of Chara, Lidstrom, Pronger, etc. But he's a #1 in Pittsburgh.

samifan24 08-25-2009 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 2102346)
sami

Curious for an outsiders unbiased opinion-- Gonchar vs Timonen

I have no problem saying Gonch is not in the realm of Chara, Lidstrom, Pronger, etc. But he's a #1 in Pittsburgh.


I'd rather have Gonchar. He's a better offensive player. Gonchar doesn't really play defense but that's not why you get him. Timonen is a poor man's Gonchar in my opinion. I'd consider Gonchar to be elite but don't consider Timonen to be in the same class. Gonchar has better numbers, too.

The Jackal 08-25-2009 09:57 PM

If you think Gonchar is more valuable than Timonen at this point in their careers, please give me whatever drugs you are on.

samifan24 08-25-2009 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal (Post 2102385)
If you think Gonchar is more valuable than Timonen at this point in their careers, please give me whatever drugs you are on.


You're honestly saying you'd rather have Timonen on the point in a playoff game than Gonchar? You clearly think Timonen is good but better than Gonchar? Look at their career numbers. It isn't even that close.

The Jackal 08-25-2009 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samifan24 (Post 2102390)
You're honestly saying you'd rather have Timonen on the point in a playoff game than Gonchar? You clearly think Timonen is good but better than Gonchar? Look at their career numbers. It isn't even that close.


100%, no question whatsoever. Gonchar has been a very productive offensive defenseman over the years, but Timonen is actually a defenseman.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.